 private companies have a right under the First Amendment to delete any content they disagree with, basically for any reason, and Section 230 sort of like bolsters and strengthens that right. The further question is whether that's a good idea, and maybe do we want to change the law so maybe they can't. The structure of the marketplace is not ideal right now, because we have this like handful of dominant platforms. So if you're someone who has an opinion that gets deleted from the major platforms that might seem to you like censorship and that you have no way of getting your idea out there. The solution to that is not to tell platforms that they have to operate as though they are the government subject to the First Amendment. I think that a better approach is to just have lots of different platforms with lots of different points of view. And if you find one platform more hospitable to your way of thinking, then that's the platform you go to. Other people go to a different platform, and so forth. Public knowledge, we generally support proposals around interoperability, whereby you can have different platforms that all communicate with each other, so that even if you're on this platform and your friends are in a different platform, you should still be able to communicate with each other just like you don't all need to have email with the same service, just like you don't all need to have a phone service from the same phone company. And that way, it doesn't seem like you have this big scary company who's sort of preventing you from speaking your mind, because you have like lots of different companies.