 Let's make sure we're coming around. There we are. Nice. Hi everyone. This is Joe. Welcome to my channel and welcome to another live stream. Today, today is May 2nd 2022 and we're doing a math tutoring session number 80 where there are bouts. Let's do some mathematics. Open discussion and we've done a lot of these and this is the core essence of what my work is about which is basically trying to layer everything on mathematics. I'm just popping out the chat here and make sure we're hooked up. The live stream is coming in. Let's do our free Assange, free Assange, free Assange message. Julien Assange is a publisher and journalist that has been crucified for trying to be transferring accountability of capitalist power to humanity, something that we desperately need in our societies. For more information, see wikilees.org, defend.wikilees.org or Julien Assange and Wikilees playlist on censor 2 with that little message. We know that our chats hooked up. Notifications will go out. John Sonacci, how are you doing? What's up my man? Meet. Meet. That's what it is, right? I wonder what the short version of my man would be. M-M. M-M. M-Mate. Mate. Cool. You must be British. John, you were here two days ago. Two days ago we did our surviving, the World Economics Forum. Great reset. We can build better, back better. Right. It was a good stream, good conversations. For those of you that might be new here, might want to know what this is about, the core essence of what I do is mathematics. And I believe that if everyone was literate in the language of mathematics in the world, the world would be a much better place to live for all of us. So that's when I decided to lay everything on the foundation of stuff. John, I spent a lot of time in North West Europe. I'm doing okay. Not bad. Not bad. Nice and chill. Been working in the background, doing a lot of stuff. Mathmatic Monday. M-M. Mathematics Monday. Oh my God. How are you doing? Hope you're doing well. There's one thing I wanted to do was, just because it connects up to economics, slick mick. How are you doing? Hello, hello. Cheryl, how are you? How are you doing? Miss you on the weekend. One thing that we know that's going on through economics and politics is that taxes are going up, right? And if digital currencies rolled out, then everything will be taxed. So I thought maybe today at some point we'll do a little compound interest and relate it to taxation and figure out how long it'll take for the complete amount of $100 that anyone spends to go to all of it, to go to taxes. All you got to do is do the jump, right? See how many jumps it takes. Casinos in Vegas have made trillions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars playing with a 3% advantage for them, right? Governments take a third off the top, plus in Canada we see 15% off of anything necessary really in your life and the luxury is even more. Governments of bankrupt. So it goes to show you how competent bureaucrats are in our society and what they do with our tax dollars is insane. Slick mick 99 speaking of difficult math problems. What do you get in this problem? Stupid numpy billionaire plus 44 billion plus Twitter plus desire to free speech. What do you get? You get a lot of data for his near link connection, right? You also get a different business model for Twitter where there's going to be subscription based, which is a lot of things that go on subscription based. Even life is subscription based now, right? What do you get? You get a poop show. On a more serious note, I'm stoked to learn about compound interest. Yeah, we could definitely do, we could definitely do. And I should do my little intro. I should do my little intro. Gang, if you don't know what this work is about, I am on Patreon, patreon.com forward slash chico, C-H-Y-C-H-O. For those of you that are supporting this work on Patreon, gang, thank you very much for the support. For those of you who've been on there from the get go, thank you from the bottom of my heart. For those of you that are new to Patreon supporting this work, thank you from the bottom of my heart. Just a heads up, gang. I got a little message from Patreon saying that automated message, they might require authentication and stuff like this and this, this before we can take payouts. So what's up, baby knight? Vi, how are you doing? So, which is, we could see that coming slowly. We do have a subscribe star page, links in the description of the video once it's been uploaded to our video sharing platforms and it's available on multiple places on my social network links. And I've just started mirroring everything that we're doing on Patreon, subscribe star and more so than blogspot because that's where everything is going because they're censoring on Substack. I'm going to see if I can do a migration into Substack. I've got to play around with it to see what features it has. It has a podcasting feature as well which is fantastic. So I've got to play around with it when I get a little bit of time. I did end up buying a brand new computer. We will start live string or rumble as well. So we're doing a fair bit of stuff. So if any of, if on any of these platforms we get knocked out, look for us other places. Fernando, gang, thank you very much for the support on Patreon. Big ol' Ben, big ol' Benji, how are you doing? Hey, chichou. I am studying for my Calculus II final right now, integration. And I was wondering if you could do some examples of Taylor, oh man, Taylor Paul, no, that's not forever. I would have to look it up. Last time I did Taylor series and I actually used it a little bit, if I remember correctly, if it's connected up to the same stuff, for geophysics and whatnot. But I haven't looked at the stuff for 30 years, right? I'm not sure if there's a topic right now. I would just appreciate some help. I have a question. I could look it up. I could look it up real quick. Let me finish off my intro. Anti-social behavior, how are you doing? Which billionaires are the bad ones now? I can't keep up with the times. Also, do we hate privatization or love it? Crazy questions, right? I agree with you. I'm all like, what's going on? Is it build your own Twitter this week or is it quote, free speech is a human right time? The left is so hard to keep up with, so hard, so hard. It's clown world gang. Good thing, mathematics is consistent, persistent, absolute beautiful. No dogmas. Mathematics is the core essence of what it means to build a society that we can all be proud of, right? Zahabip. Zahabip. First time chat. Finally got a live stream. Welcome, welcome. I've been following you for a few years now and just created a Twitch account to say thank you for the public service you provide with your content. I've been more aware of what is going around in the world politically because of your open discussions and just started making the cure just like you teach in your videos. Again, thank you very much for the time you spent doing it. My pleasure, my pleasure. Zahabip. Thank you very much for creating, going to the trouble of creating account, joining our Twitch and posting a message. I appreciate it really. And I do this because I need to do this. And I've been telling people a long time. It's for selfish reasons. I want a better world to live in, really. I'm tired of this clown show. I'm tired of corruption. I'm tired of good-hearted people standing by while evil is done in their name and with their money. I'm doing this because I'm selfish. I want a better world to live in. I want to go out and play. I don't want these clowns in charge. And that is why I do what I do. And I figured that out in 2015 when I got online. I figured this is what I needed to do because the same clowns are still here, right? Or those same clowns. Zahabip. No problem. Greetings for Portugal. Portugal, greetings, greetings. Slick Mac 99. I was just wondering if there is like a proof or something that results in the current compound interest formula. For sure. For sure. I don't remember it. Pretty sure. I looked at it at some point. And it's more a derivation than a proof. I guess, I don't know, also the difference between proof and derivation. Proof is you prove something. No, I'm not going to go there. But it's a derivation, really, right? You model it, exponential growth, compound interest and stuff like this. And you get your functions and then your graphs and your data, and you model according to the data, and you say, oh, this is compound interest, right? That's sort of the way I would go about it. And then there's mathematical proofs, algebraic proofs. That might be the first math question. I'm just afraid when these clowns leave, that new ones will arrive. That's why we need everyone literate baby, baby knight. That's why we need everyone literate in the language of mathematics. Because once everyone's literate in the math, a language of mathematics, you can call BS a mile away, right? You see BS coming a mile away. If everybody was literate in the language of mathematics, they would look at data presented by centralized power and go, get out of my life, right? End of story. Ronnie, Chicho, I have a big exam tomorrow morning. Going to take a break today. Awesome. Take a break. Take a break. Gang, for those of you that are supporting this work on Twitch, which is where we're live streaming, gang, thank you very much for the support. Thank you for being here. Thank you for the love. Thank you for the subs. Thank you for the comments. Thank you for the follows and mods, mods, mods. Thank you for being here and taking care of business. I do announce these live streams 30 minutes before we go live and mine if you can get, probably get our and BitCloud and we'll see what other platforms we go to depending on what's taking place. For live streams where we don't have any visuals, we do upload the audio to soundcloud.com forward slash Chicho as a podcast and those podcasts are available in your favorite podcast and platform, including Spotify, iTunes, Google Play and whatnot. We will be uploading this live stream in segments and in whole to be censored to pitch you to rumble and to Odyssey. If you are watching this content on censor to censor to is now a garbage platform. I kid you not as a creator, it is horrendous. Okay. So if you want to follow this work, bit shoot, rumble and Odyssey. These are the three platforms that I personally prefer you watch my content. Censor to is pure garbage now and it's going to become more and more garbage and they're they're they're losing their foothold on humanity. Information is filtering through on multiple other platforms. These are three of them where I'm active and more, of course. And that is what we need in our society is open discussion, open dialogue without the technocrats censoring our lives. Right. But we'll load it on there as well. And we do have a gilded page. If you want to participate in discussion outside of these live streams in a forum format, go to gilded.gg backslash, forward slash. I forgot which one that is. CHO CHO. I'm no longer really active on discord. Discord came out and said there are now technocrats and they will begin censoring channels, platforms and whatnot because they're trying to go public. And I don't think they need to do that because rumble, rumble, this platform where you share a platform is public, but they have integrity. So all the technocratic sites with technocrats that have zero integrity were divesting from them and going into more, more disruptive innovation where real human beings share information. Aside from that game, let's, let's, let's take these guys down, take these guys down, take these guys down. Let me look up Taylor series. Okay, let me look up Taylor series. Let me see if I remember Taylor series. Oh, man, I know that graph. Taylor series. Yeah, I remember this. Oh my, I wouldn't be able to do this right now, brother or sister, of course. Oh, look at this. The McLaren series for exponential functions. Awesome. The Taylor series for any polynomial, no series for this. And factorial, then also factorial, then the Taylor series of a real or complex value function. Check this out. Check this out. Let's write it down. Let's write it down. Let's write it down. Hold on. Let me check chat. Let me make sure I'm staying on top pumpkin kinnies. Hey, Chicho, my cat just ran away today. We can't find. Oh no. Poop. When we moved here, our cats escaped as well, like three or four times. So we pumpkin, we built a catio chicken wiring and I had to plug up the holes. And what I ended up doing is depending on your kitty cat, one of our kitty cat was his food, his tummy drives them. The other kitty cat doesn't. So if he knows Sal is the one food-driven. So when Sal escaped, I went out there with treats and ran around and shook the treat can, hoping that it would come close. And as soon as I heard him, I would kneel down and open up the treats and go like this. And they very hesitant when they run away. They don't want to come close. And then slowly I would leave droppings further away, get him closer to me. And then when he came close, I zapped him, right? Beyond the hand, not food-driven. I had to chase that little bugger around for a while and it ended up coming home twice. He did that. And we had to go outside and grab him. So I'm sorry to hear pumpkin, but cats have amazing radars, amazing ability to find their way home. Okay. Pumpkin, thanks for the tip. She normally goes outside our balcony, but comes home this time. She didn't. Oh no, we live in Sweden. Oh, Sweden. Okay, okay. Yeah. Just a warning. Should I even give the heads up? Just a heads up. We have three different suites in the building we live. Two of us have cats. One other person moved in recently, not recently, a few months ago. And the kitty cat from the other suite was really old and stuff. And that kitty cat was used to going in front of the back door of this third person. That sort of meowing, getting treats or cuddles and stuff like this. And the kitty cat went there. And this person didn't realize it was a kitty cat from people that live in the same building. So she took the kitty cat to the SPCA, which is the animal shelter here. And I guess because the kitty cat was old and like, I don't know, 18 years old, had cancer, it was really frail. They put the kitty cat down. So we were like, what the F? Our neighbor with the cat, she was really, really devastated. So maybe check with people in your neighborhood if they've seen the kitty cat. That's one of the things we did as well. Yeah, they got crazy, crazy. Pumpkin eyes. Thanks for the tip. Sweden, Cheryl, putting the litter box outside can help also. I can also, oh really? Didn't think about that, the litter box outside. Because they smell their own litter. They know how to come, find it. Baby knight, have a math riddle if you want until someone with questions comes in. Okay, here's a math riddle. Here's the riddle so you can solve it if you want. Rules are, you can use all math operations, but you cannot add any digits or not equal. You can use what? You can use all math operations, but you cannot add any digits or not equal signs. Ah, okay, okay. Well, that message is master. So it's not that one. I'm looking at that going, wow, 0, 0, 0 equals 6, 0, 0 equals 6 divided by 0, 0, 0 equals 6. Oh, is that what you're doing? Oh, okay, I'm going to write this riddle down. So you can add in no not equal sign. Okay, so here's the riddle. So you can add, I'm going to write this down and then 888 equals 6. So you can use any math operation, but you cannot add any digits or not equal to sign. Okay, so the riddle is this. 0, 0, 0 equals 6, 1, 1, 1 equals 6, 2, 2, 2 equals 6, 3, 3, 3 equals 6, 4, 4 equals 6, 5, 5, 5 equals 6, 5, 5, 5 equals 6, yeah. Okay, cool. 6, 6, 6 equals 6, 7, 7, 7 equals 6, 888 equals 6, 9, 9, 9 equals 6, and do we have 10, 10, 10? Yeah. So 10, 10, 10 equals 6. So one of the ones, if you, so you can add any operation in this to make this legit, right? So for example, I'll give you one here. 2 plus 2 plus 2 is equal to 6. Is this what we're talking about, baby knight? Comprehensive litter boxes. So share regarding kitty cat. Pumpkin eyes, litter box. Use caution if you're in a more rural area because it can also draw other, ah, good point, Cheryl. For example, solution to 2. Yeah. Okay. So that's, that's the thing. All I can hear is the omen music. Number of the beast. Oh my God. Omen is a scary movie. Nicholas, what's going on? What's up, Chicho? Hope you all have a great stream. Can't stick around on a date with the wife. Awesome. Salutations, wife. Hope you guys have a fantastic, fantastic evening. A fantastic date, Cheryl. Was this second talking about that with my brother? He said the same thing. Okay. So that would be one. Another one would be this. 6 plus 6 minus 6 equals 6. What else? 3 times 3 minus 3 is 6. 3 times 3 is 9 minus 6 minus 3 is 6. What else could we do? The 0, 0, 1 is crazy. 0, 0, 0 equals 6. So only operations. Doing good so far. Wow. 5. Oh, that's great. Antisocialist behavior. Check out the 5. So 5 plus, oh, brackets. I forgot about brackets. Divided by 5. That's great. So 5 divided by 5 is 1. And then 5 plus 1 is 6. Awesome. Awesome. Brackets. Brackets. We forgot about brackets. Or I did anyway. Yeah, zeros are very interesting. Zeros would be trippy. This one. What would these guys be? 1, 1, 1. We can't add any digits. We can't add any digits. Oh, we could do this. Mine is on the same principle as 5. Did someone else get it? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, on the same principle as 5. So we're building from what we know. Right? So said real and Ronnie said at the same time, you could go like this. Bracket, bracket divided by, right? So 7 divided by 7 is 1. 7 minus 1 is 6. That's good. That's good. Antisocialist behavior. Let's check this out. But we can't add digits. Is antisocialist behavior. Does that work? Baby night? Antisocialist behavior is saying this. 4 squared. That doesn't work antisocialist behavior. 4 squared is 16. 16 divided by 4 is 4. It's not adding a digit. It's squaring it. Oh, okay. But that still doesn't work. You're saying this one for 4, 4 plus? Yeah. Plus 4 squared divided by 4. 4 squared is 16. 16 divided by 4 is 4. 4 plus 4 is not 6. It's 8. Yeah. Okay. But is that true? Baby night? Antisocialist. That would be adding a digit. So, oh, so you can't do this. Okay. So we can't add a digit. So we can't add a digit. Okay. Strictor. Strictor. You can't add a digit. 9? I can't think of anything else right now. Oh, yeah. Would square root be... Okay. Here. Baby night. Here's a question then. Square root. Good thing for bringing that out. Square root of 4 times 4 times 4. No. 4 times 4 is 16. Times 4 is 64. But then the square root of 64 is 8. It's not 6. Here's a question for you. Baby night. Square root of A. You said... Here. Let's make this a number. So you said 4 to the power of 2. That was equivalent to adding a number. But square root of 4 is also 4 to the power of a half. So taking a square root, would that also be considered adding a number? Oh, very good. Iced. Yeah. So, okay. So we need to have this answered. Okay. Is the square root of 4 adding a number? Because we are adding a number. I'm just not sure what we are allowed not allowed to do. Square root of 4 is 2. So you can use it. Yeah. Oh, okay. So if that's the case, then you can go like this. Okay. So you can go square root of 4 plus the square root of 4 plus the square root of 4. Right? That's 6. 2 plus 2 plus 2. Right? 4 times 4 plus the square root of 4. So square root of 4. Yeah. Yeah. And what C-death is saying, square root of 4 times 4 plus the square root of 4. So square root of 4 times 4 plus the square root of 4. Now, square roots, you can just separate, but 64, which is going to be... Oh, minus 2. It would have to be minus. You could do it that way as well. Minus square root of 4, which is 2. It would be 6. So we could do it that way. There's two ways to do that one. What else we got? Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So the 9. Who was that? Iced. So square root of 9 times the square root of 9. And then... What? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Minus the square root of 9. Right? Yeah. That'll work. Ice. That's good. Yeah. Yeah. Perfect ice. Perfect. So on the same note, we could do this. Cube root of 8. Cube root of 8. Cube root of 8. Add them together. You get 6, because the cube root of 8... 4, 2, 2, 2. So cube root of 8 is 2. So can we do cube root of 8? We must be able to do cube root of 8, because square root, there's an imaginary 2 there as well. Right? Oh, cube root. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Anti-social behavior. That would have worked for 4 if we did cube root. Cube root of 4 would be 4. And then plus. So another way. So we found three ways to do number 4. If this was square root, it would be cube root of 4 times 4 plus the square root of 4. That's 64. Cube root of 64 is 4. Plus 2 would have been 6. So there's three ways to do number 4, which is great. Yeah. Yeah. Nice anti-social behavior. Joe, Chico, I saw a numerical puzzle yesterday that would be fun to solve. It would probably be easier if I posted it on the math channel on Discord or I could try and type it out here. Yeah, Joe. If it's easier, not on Discord though. Gilded. I'm barely going to Discord anymore. But you could do it on Discord as well. But I'm not going to go to Discord right now. I don't want to accidentally interrupt the stream. We are streamrolling it. We are. We are. We're doing well. And gang, do not forget. Free Assange. Free Assange. Free Assange. Julian Assange is a publisher and journalist that has been crucified for trying to bring transparency and accountability of capitalist power to humanity. For more information, see wikilees.org, defend.wikilees.org, or are Julian Assange and wikilees playlists on SensorTube. Cheryl, I have a non-math but learning related question that I would love to ask this group. Anyone know? For sure, ask away. Factorial. Factorial. Born apart. Factorial. I totally forgot about factorials. That's right. So let's see. We've got this one. We've got this one. We've got this one. We've got this one. We've got this one. We've got this one. We've got this one. And we've got this one. The only ones we're missing is 10 and 0. That's it. Those are the only ones we're missing. 10. Oh, antisocialist behavior. Let's check this out. But I thought we said we couldn't do square root. 8 minus the square root as well. Oh, baby knight says 8 minus the fourth root. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So square root, square root. So square root. So for number 8, we could do this as well. For number 8, we could go 8 minus the square root, square root of 8 times 8. So 8 times 8 is 64. Square root of 64 is 4. Square root of 4 is 2. 8 minus 2 would be 6. Factorials. I want to think about this zero. Let's check it out. So antisocialist behavior, 10 to the power of 0 plus 10 to the power of 0, squared, 2 squared. No, antisocialist behavior, that wouldn't work. Actually, I think I remembered this from long ago, which other god says. Also, ones are missing. Oh yeah. So ones. We've got to do ones as well. Awesome. Thank you for that. And one, six plus eight. GG, baby. Knights. Cube roots are technically aren't allowed because you aren't allowed to write digits. Oh, you're not allowed to write digits. Okay. So we can't do this one. So if you're not allowed cube roots, then we can go in with this one. You're not allowed to write digits. See, here's the thing. Square root implies there's a 2 there. So we're sort of writing a digit, but it's implied. But let's use this one. 8 minus the square root, square root of 8 times, oops, 8. So that comes out to 6. Right? 10 to the power of 0 is 1. Yeah. So 10 to the power of 0 is 1. Anything to the power of 0 is 1. 2. Yeah. So let's check it out. Antisocialist behavior. 2 squared. Oh, so we do. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, 10. Check this out. That's great. Oh, but we're not allowed to write digits. We can't write squared antisocialist behavior. We can't write squared. Yeah, we can't write squared though. That's one of the rules. Right? We can't add any digits. Here's Cheryl's question. Cheryl says, this is especially for anyone that struggled with or actively dislike writing while in middle high school. Were you able to get past it? What? Were you able to get past it? If so, how? That, oh, how were you able to get past writing if you didn't like it? So here's the question. So Cheryl asks, let's check it out. I have a non-math but learning-related question that I would love to ask this group. And here's the question to anyone. This is especially for anyone that struggled with or actively dislike writing while in middle high school. Were you able to get past it? If so, how? So if you didn't like writing in middle school or high school, how did you get past that sort of blockage? I personally didn't like it. I didn't really get past it until in my 30s, to tell you the truth. And that was just out of anger because I wanted to communicate. So I had to learn how to communicate. And I was pissed off that our indoctrination centers didn't teach me. See that? Draw square around it. Let's see. I reject baby knight reality and substitute my own antisocials behavior sets. And then baby knight never flies. Says it's much more fun this way. Joe, chichou, I'll try and type it out. Code in numeric. Okay, so this is the next puzzle. Okay, let's finish off this one and then we'll head up Joe's puzzle. It's more logic than that, but it's still fun. Actually, let me read it while we figure out what zero, one and ten are like. So Joe's puzzle is this, quote, a numeric lock has a three digit key. Now here are some clues. Six, eight, two, one number is correct and well placed. Six, one, four, one number is correct but wrongly placed. This is like mastermind. Two, zero, six, two numbers are correct but wrongly placed. Nothing is correct. Seven, eight, zero, one number is correct but wrongly placed. Seven, three, eight, nothing is correct. So eight doesn't belong in there. We'll write that out. I like that. Like mastermind. Mastermind is a great game. People were allowed to use computers to type if their handwriting was too bad or had some sort of learning difficulty. For me, when I grew up in the 80s in high school, my handwriting was horrendous and a teacher refused to mark my essays, so I had to learn how to print and at the time we didn't have computers so I couldn't type it out. You got typewriters but I wasn't a typewriter out. So I had to struggle through it. I had to learn how to print because my script writing the teacher wouldn't read and I had to learn how to script write not print when I came to Canada and I just learned English like four years ago. So four years ago, four years previous to the teacher saying okay I won't, you just get zeros on all your essays. So in four years I learned how to write English but now the teacher was saying I can't read it. You're gonna have to print it. Man, what a difficult period. I didn't like that teacher. Ronnie, great question Cheryl. But she was right. My writing was scribble, chicken scribble. I personally saw Ronnie's reply. Great question Cheryl. I personally hated any class that required writing essays, English, literature, and history. I think if you have patience and find the beauty in elegant writing, that really helps spark interest in writing. And then Ronnie continues, I found the interest in college and ended up acing these literature classes. One thing on Ronnie's note for me that when I got into writing, a friend of mine really emphasized the importance of using the correct word in the sentence. So to me it became a game, picking the right word to use in a sentence when I got into writing again. So I found meaning in words, sort of a motivation for me to write and to simplify editing. I liked editing my own work, just getting rid of stuff. Alligott, I had the same problem. First a good pen, then return to the basics of sentence structure. Alligott says, and then Ronnie, if you just don't care or lack passion, it's so tough to do anything. I'm going back to the puzzle, let people chat through this. We need to find one for ten, ones and zeros. How do we do? We're just brainstorming. My snacks. I got sugar coated dried fruit, papaya, ginger, and pineapple. These chunks are pineapple. Really nice. It's not a good snack, but well, let me rephrase, it's not a healthy snack, but a good snack. Sea death. Brilliant. Brilliant. Ten. He's saying ten. We forgot the decimal. Check that out. Ten, one point zero plus one point zero plus one point zero. Oh no, that's not six. That's three. What am I doing? I just loved it. The decimal. So decimal, how would we do this? No, let me write down ten again. We want it to be six, not three. Ten, ten, ten. This one. No, no, that one. What are we going to do that one? Oh, I don't know. Where are we? I got all excited. So Elder God says one plus one plus one is three. I'm right. One plus one plus four. No, but we can't add any more digits, right? Three factorial is six. Oh, that's right. That's right. What am I saying? So three factorial would be one plus one plus one. Close this and then factorial, right? Who came up with that one? Antisocial behavior or Elder God? And then use factorial. Oh, and this one too then. And this one too. That's right. The ten. What? So this is the same thing as one, right? Is that correct? Credit to antisocial behavior. Okay, awesome. It was a group effort. It was a group effort. So we got this one and got this one. So we need zeros. How are we going to deal with zeros? Definitely not me. Ronnie's like definitely not me. One and ten are the same, basically. How do you do zeros? Oh yeah, zeros are the same as one. What? Zeros, you would just go zero factorial plus zero factorial plus zero factorial, all of it factorial. That's it. That's the same thing. So one, ten, and zero are the same, right? That's all it would be. That's right in here. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So zero factorial plus zero factorial plus zero factorial, all of it factorial. Winner, winner, chicken dinner, Elder God says. Baby knight. Yeah, that will work. You can also do tens like square root of, let's see, squared of ten minus ten. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Square root ten minus ten is zero. Zero divided by ten is zero. Square root of zero, zero, zero factorial is one. Let me get that. Anyway, my brain hurts. Ah, this is great. This is a great problem. This is a great problem. Excellent, excellent. Love it, love it. I thought he had to go into trigonometry somehow. Oh, trig. I wonder if you could do some trig operations here. No, maybe not. Incorporate radians and degrees. Fun problem. Fun problem. Crazy that this is one thing that works. This goes with life in general. When you get stuck somewhere, sometimes a solution for a problem resolves a whole bunch of other problems. It's the same solution, but modified a little. So ten, one, and zero were all the same solution, slightly modified. So as soon as we saw one, and then we could see ten, or we saw ten, and then we saw one, and then zero, right? So if a train leaves Vancouver and you're traveling 40 kilometers per hour, I hope it's 40 kilometers per hour. Let's do Joel's problem. Check this out. This is a mastermind. So where was it? Where was it? I'm going to write it out, write it out. Here's the problem. I'm going to erase this. Thank you, baby knight, for the puzzle. Awesome. Awesome. So let's do baby knights. This would be like a mastermind problem. I should have a mastermind game here. Somewhere. I kid you not when I say I like mastermind. This is my original mastermind game from the 1980s. I'm going to do it here. So it's not too loud, right? Check it out. What are the odds of having mastermind handy when a mastermind question comes up? Awesome. I played a lot of this. Man, look at this dude. This guy knows where it's at. Look at that. He's the original G. Look at this guy. Look at that. Awesome. Awesome. Mastermind. Mastermind. So this is, let me show you inside of this. So if you don't know this game, right? It's like a board like this. And you have colored pieces here. These guys. And you pick a pattern. So you pick a pattern like this. So you go doing, doing, doing. And then let's say red, right? And then you put this blocker on, right? And then you would be sitting here and that's your pattern you pick. And I'd be sitting here and I have all these opportunities and I take these things and I go, okay, I place, sometimes you place like double colors. Sometimes you go one color, right? So I would go here. I'll do it over here. I should just do it like this. So you would keep this in there, right? And then you would, this person is blocking it. And then this person says, okay, I forget what the color code is. Like one is the right color. And then a black would be like, oh, one of them was in the right place. So this one has nothing in the right place, but has two of the right colors, right? So they would go, oh, there's two right colors here. I don't know if it's the white or not. Right? And then you do another pattern and you see how much from this you try to figure out the pattern that the person has picked, right? So this is Joe's question. I'm going to, by the way, the chat's paused. I won't, here, let me see if I can get caught up. Look at the hair being, this clue wasn't that stuff. Clue was awesome too. I'm not very good at it. God, you got it. The only thing how are you doing? Welcome, welcome to our live stream. This game is on the internet. Now, if you all would like to play, search for code breaker, code breaker. Is that what it is? Anti-social, masterminds call code breaker? A fantastic game. I loved it. Although someone's tried it. So here's Joe's puzzle. A numerical lock has a three digit key. Now, here are some clues. 682, one number is correct and one and one number is correct and well-placed. So 682, 682. Let's say, let's say 100, let's see, make it a better color. What should we call it? Right number placed. So I'm going to go 100% and then 50%. 50% means it's a right number, but not in the right location. So 682, one number is correct and well-placed. So we have one number out of this combination that is 100% in the right place. 614, one number is correct but wrongly placed. So this one is, one number is correct, but it's in the wrong place. Right? Next. 206, two numbers are correct but wrongly placed. 206, two numbers are correct but in the wrong place. 738, nothing is correct. 738, zero. Nothing is correct. Let's put blank, blank, blank, blank, blank. Nothing is correct there. 780, one number is correct but wrongly placed. 780, one number is correct but in the wrong place. Okay, I'm going to go get caught up. A little bit more complicated than Othello. Othello I loved as well. I got to get into Go. Othello I really loved. Also had Othello. Othello, so fun. Many hours spent playing that during COVID indoor recess. Mastermind, really Cheryl. So check this out. Nothing correct here. So we know 8, 7, 8, 3 are gone. They're garbage. Right? That's where I would start. Okay. So all 8's kill on. All 8's kill on. And there's no 3's anywhere else. Right? Oh, 7 kills 7 as well. Right? So kill 7 as well because nothing correct. So 7's gone as well. So we know 0 is one of the numbers. We know 0 is a number. We know 0 is a number. But it's in the wrong place. So 0 has to be here or here. Right? Okay. What else? Two numbers are correct. So we know that's a legend. That's a number. So either 2 or 6 are correct. Right? This one. Check this out. There is no 2 here. Let's check it out. Is that going to make sense? There is no 2 there. One number is correct. And only one number is correct here. So 2 numbers. Oh. Oh, so only one of these numbers is correct. So in here only one is correct. One is in the correct location. 0 is the first number because we know that 2 numbers were in the puzzle but not placed correctly in the third step. Oh, perfect. Perfect. Perfect. Anti-socialist behavior. So we know the first guy is 0. Excellent. Solution. I should make this. I'm going to pick up a darker red. I'm going to find us a darker red. New pens. New pens. Let's do this. So we know 0 went there. Those were the options. So we know 0 doesn't belong there. 0 doesn't belong there. So it's got to be here. So from that, we know it's there. Solution. 6-0-2. Oops. Well, it can't be 8 because 8 is out of God. No, wait. Yeah. So 0-4-2, 0-6-2. So either 2 is bogus. See, it can't be 6 and 4 in the solution. Right? So one number is correct but in the wrong place. No, no. One number is correct but in and in the right place. Oh, check this out. So we know, we know that 6 is not correct here because it's not correct here. So number 3 has to be 2. Agreed? Anti-socialist behavior says 0-4-2. And the 4. Let's check out the 4. 1. Is there another one? No, it can't be. Yeah, the second spot. So we know 6 is not here. So we know 6 is gone. Right? 6 is gone. 6 is gone. These guys are gone. 6 is gone. So the middle term, right? We now know that 6 cannot be correct because we know that 0 is on the far left. Yeah. It can't be 0-6-2. If it was, then there would be 2 correct but wrongly placed in the first hand. 0-4-2. My issue is, so we got those two guys. 6 is gone. 1 is correct in the right place. So it's a choice between 1 and 4. And one of these is in but it's in the wrong place and it can't be 1 because if 1 is, was in the right place, if that was a number that counted, it would have been this. We would have had 1 correct, but 1 correct number and a correct location. So it has to be 4. So that has to be 4. Okay, cool. Right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yuki. Then payuki. So we had anti-socialist behavior going 0-4-2 and then payuki going 0-4-2. Yeah, looks like it. Cool. Great game. Great game. Cheryl, a group of about seven of us would sit together and half watch, listen to the two playing and half chitchat, brain, what? Braid hair and make fun of the two people on the front of the box. But we had several Asian friends that had been adopted by Caucasian families. So we all thought she was his daughter with this guy, with her, with this. Mastermind. Mastermind. Fun game. Fun game. I'm off for a cup of tea. Oh my god, I rushed my thing. I'm off for a cup of tea. Anti-socialist behavior. If it was 1, then it would be in the correct place in the second hint. Yeah, we won. For sure we won. For sure we won. For sure we won. Yes, Joe says we won. Fun game. And this was 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. With Mastermind, I think you have 10 choices. Do you have 10 opportunities? Not this. So we got 1. So they place it there. So you have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Yeah, you get 10 opportunities. We've played this. Every now and then on the first try you get it right. I have a handful of times I've gotten correct on the first try. Sometimes that you would have to use educated guests depending on who you're playing with and what colors they chose previously and what their characters. It's like poker. Yup, innocence. Yeah, Cheryl. Innocence then again. I suppose she could be. She could be. Indeed. 2 plus 2 equals 5. It really depends. We had a whole bunch of situations where a whole bunch of zeros and ones and whatnot ended up being 6. You'd have to watch it from the beginning. Agent provocateurs. Let's write down the Taylor series gang. Let me show you what the Taylor series is. I'm not going to deal with it. I just want to write it out. Because the first question came up regarding Taylor series and it's calculus 2, so I don't know my Taylor series from Calc 2. I spent a long, long time. Here's a Taylor series. F of A. F of A plus F prime of A, which means the derivative. F prime of A over 1 factorial plus. Oh no, not plus. Times x minus A times x minus A plus. And that's the distance between the x's. Second derivative of A over 2 factorial, 2 factorial. Oh, not plus. Jesus. I want to keep on putting down plus. Times x minus A squared plus F triple over 4, 3. 3 factorial. x minus A cubed plus so on. So that means a function at a point. The Taylor series for it is the function at that point plus the derivative of that function at that point over 1 factorial times how far away you are from the x value of the next point. So for example, let me read the description for this too. Just on wiki. Don't use wikipedia unless it's just straight up math. Even the physics and biology for sure. There's tons of BS in there. Chemistry as well. But physics and mathematics, wikipedia is not bad. There's a lot of propaganda in their indoctrination censorship for anything else, especially related to society. That all looked like the theory relatively easier than this. Okay, Taylor series. In mathematics, the Taylor series of a function is an infinite sum of terms that are expressed in terms of the function's derivatives at a single point. For most common functions, the function and the sum of its Taylor series are equal near this point. Taylor series are named after Brooke Taylor, who introduced them in 1715. If zero is a point where the derivatives are considered, a Taylor series is also called a Maclaurin series, after Colin Maclaurin, who made extensive use of the special case of Taylor series in the mid-191700s. The partial sum formed by the first n plus terms of the Taylor series is a polynomial of degree n that is called the nth Taylor polynomial of the function. Taylor polynomials are approximations of a function which become generally better as n increases. Taylor's theorem gives quantitative estimates on the error introduced by the use of such approximations. If the Taylor series of a function is convergent, if the Taylor series of a function is convergent, its sum is the limit of the infinite sequence of the Taylor polynomials. That a function may differ from the sum of its Taylor series. Even if its Taylor series is convergent, a function is analytic at a point x. If it is equal to the sum of its Taylor series in some open interval or open disc in the complex plane containing x, this implies that the function is analytic at every point. So there's some terminology here that we have to know, but applications of Taylor series, I forget where we applied it. Let's look at approximations, analytic history, first example, Fourier transformations. Oh man, we used to do Fourier transformations. So I can't remember where Taylor series is used. Yep, not Taylor, so not Taylor's, but I haven't converted. So basically, check this out. So let's say we have a function, here's f of x, right? This is f of x. Let's assume this is our x-axis, this is our f of x-axis. This is point a, right? So function at point a, that would be this value here. This would be your f of a, f of a, right? Okay. Plus the derivative of this function at point a, factorial x minus a. So you're doing the x, so you're going like this here. We'll do quick as x approaches a. So x and then let's say this is a. So you're taking the two points, but they're very close together. If I'm getting this right. So if we're doing the derivative function of this, so this is x and this is f prime of x. So if we take the derivative of this, let's say this is constant slope of two or something like this, and then it gets down to, let's say this point is zero. So it would be, what would it be? Two. Let's say one. Let's say two, whatever. One, two. So and at this point, x and then a, this is two, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, let's say it's at zero at this point and then it becomes negative and then it turns around. It's still negative, but decreasing at this point, it would be going through zero again and then it would be going like this, I guess, if it's increasing. So f a of prime would be here at this point, I guess, whatever this would be. That's as much that I can make heads or tails out of this for now. Oh boy, makes my brain hurt. Me too, to a certain degree. But once you dial into this stuff, you understand how the functions work and what all this means, it's very visual and you get a feel for what it is and the most important thing about this is where is the supply? Where do we use the Taylor series? Which is an important question to ask. Where do we use this? Right now, I can't remember where we use this. I use a Fourier transformation to filter out noise in geophysics. A Fourier series. And from the sounds of a Fourier series, Fourier transformations are a version of the Taylor series. Our form of the Taylor series, and when you're collecting lots of data, you want to filter out the noise, so you run a Fourier filter through it and gets rid of the noise. Variables, yay. So that's sort of all I can say about that Taylor series. One thing should we do, gang. Should we talk about compound interest in regards to taxation? Should we take a look at that? Should we take a look at that? Is there any math questions that you guys want to take a look? You guys want to do papaya, dried papaya, sugar-coated papaya. I'll pop through those. I cut these. It's yummy. They're longer pieces. Delicious. Joe Ciccio. Here's another puzzle I saw yesterday that I still don't truly understand. If you buy a bat and a ball for $1.10 pounds, the bat costs exactly one pound more than the ball. How much does the ball cost? And then, Joe says my original answer was that $1.10 minus one equals $1, so the ball must cost, but that would mean the ball would only be 0.9 pounds, if the bat would be 0.9 pounds. So the way you would do it is this. A ball and a bat, a ball plus a bat cost $1.10. Bat minus ball equals $1. The cost of the bat minus the ball cost $1. So all you got to do is substitute. Do a little substitution. So I'm going to take this. So this is your first equation. This is your second equation. Always remember this. The number of variables you have, that's how many equations you need to be able to solve a problem. So if you have one unknown, you need one equation to solve it. If you've got two unknowns, you need two equations to solve it. Three unknowns, three equations, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. So you can just bring this over, go minus ball. Now the bat is now 1.0 plus minus the ball minus the ball. And what you can do is that's the same bat as this. So you can take this and sub it in for the bat. So sub 2 into 1, equation 2 into 1, because this is our modified equation 2. Now you got a ball plus 1.0 minus, what? I'm doing something wrong here. Bat. Oh, because I'm indignaling. This becomes a plus, right? If the ball comes over, that's a negative, that's a plus. Plus a ball is equal to 1.10. I usually use X and Y variables, but I'm using this because if this was a bat and a glove, I would put B for bat and G for glove, but they're both BBs, right? Bat, BA, BA, they're both BA. Yeah, thank you anti-socialist behavior. So this becomes 1.0 plus 2 balls is equal to 1.01 because a ball plus a ball is 2 balls, right? Grab this guy, bring it over, minus 1.0. So 2 balls is equal to 0.1 and then divide by 2, divide by 2. So ball is equal to 0.05. That's how much the ball costs. And the bat would be, therefore, the bat would be 1.1 minus 0.05, which equals 1.05. That's how much the bat would cost. You notice I didn't write down as Captain Ranger, first time chat. Hey, Chicho, been following your content from France, Salutations France, and never had a chance to come by and thank you for your outstanding work out there. You guys enjoy the math, need those quiet a lot in product design, myself cheers. You use those quite a lot in product design, myself cheers. Cheers, Ranger. Thank you very much, Captain Ranger, for popping in from France, Salutations. Bonjour. I took French in high school, but I don't remember any of it. I cheated most of it. Cheated most of the way through. And this is, by the way, this is a common problem that you encounter. One of the generic problems that they give in high school anyway, or as a puzzle, because it's instinctive. People say, oh, something costs 1.1, and one has to be a dollar more than the other. And this one costs that. How much is that? Oh, it's a dollar. No, it's not. Or a pound. It's not. Should we do a little taxation? Compound interest. Here's a compound interest formula. How much money you've got is principal 1 minus rate of interest, the compounding period, NT. Compounding period and time you're going to put in there. Notice formula comes in really, really, really handy. This applies in many, many different places. Now, depending on which one of these things you have, what bit of information you have, and what you're trying to solve for, or you can just use simple algebra, basic algebra, you need exponents, or you have to go into logs if you're looking for compounding period or time. But let's do lay down the problem a little bit initially. Okay, how are we doing for time? Not bad. Not bad. So check this out. Let's assume you make $150. So this is you. You earn $150. That's what you're earning. I'm making the simple numbers. You have to pay tax at 33%. That means a third of your income goes towards taxation. So after tax, which equals $150 times 0.33. Let's make this tighter so it all fits. Tax at 33%, which equals $150 times 0.33, which equals $100. Approximately. Okay, let me make sure it's into the right range without rounding, where we end up with rounding if I just go to two decimal places. Yeah, 100.5, but we'll just say $100. So you get $100 left over. The guy says I do this math every week. You got $100 left over. Let's write this out. $100 left over. Or sorry, this ends up costing you $50. So after tax, you got $150 minus 50. You get $100 left over. That's how much money you're making. Okay, now let's say you go out and spend your $100. Sales tax. I don't know where you guys are. In my part of the world, we've got two different types of taxes here. We've got provincial tax and federal tax. Together they add up to 15% tax in general on things that you're buying. Some things don't have PSD, some things don't have GSD, but it's safe to say most of the things you're buying, you're paying around 15% tax. What's the tax rate in your location if you're buying goods? What are you guys paying in general? Because I want to use a base number. I know in Canada it's fairly high, but I don't know. I think some other places are pretty high as well. I mean Scandinavian countries is very high. I think it's higher than Canada. Canada is one of the highest places. So I don't want to go with the extreme. I want to go with what the consensus is. Do you guys pay like 10% tax when you buy stuff? 8%, 15% like we do? What do you guys end up paying? Would it be average tax? No, I'm not going to look up average tax. That'd be crazy. Average tax, where? Oh, no replies. We're going to go with 15%. Yours is 20%? In the UK you guys pay 20% when you buy stuff? Damn, that's high. Apparently sales tax in Bhutan is 50%. So 15% is on the low end of you guys. 6.5% local sales tax here in J-Paw. You must be in the States. You guys have state and federal in the States as well when you buy products? And in Alberta they don't have any provincial answer. They pay less than we do. So let's stick with 15%. Let's assume 15% tax. 15% tax paid. Pay 15% tax on purchases. Let's put it that way. You pay 15% tax on purchases. Pay 15% tax on purchases. Should we do a table? Let's do a table. Figure out because this $100 is in circulation. This is how much productivity you put into the system. You created $150 worth of energy into the system. Now, if you have your own business or you got your corporation or you're working for and if they're profitable, then this is how much you put in. But they end up getting more out of it because they're taking $150. Let's say you spent, you get paid $50 an hour. It took you three hours to make this thing. So you got paid $150. But the company that sells this thing sells it for $200. So your $150, the system turned into $200 for a corporation. But you get taxed. You got taxed $50. You get to take home $100. I'm moving to Canada for that extra 5% and I can also fight a tyranny as well. Also, you're welcome to join us, Aldergan. Now, you only have $100. Let's make a table. $100. You go out and spend $100. You get 15% taxed. That means you got $85 is left in the economy, in the circulation because $15 of that government, they came and took $15 of that money. So not only did you pay 50% of your income tax. So out of $150 that you earned, the first purchase you make with that $100, you only got $85 of it. You got real buying power because 15% went to the government. Now someone else takes this money, $85. And when they do a next purchase, that's again 15% tax. So $85 times $0.85. That means $72.25 is back in the economy. And $12.75 went to the government more. Now take that $72.25. The next person that buys something pays 15% tax. So let's just multiply this by times, oops, reset it, $72.25, $72.25, times $0.85, which is what has remained. Now there is $61 and $0.41 left. That means the government took $0.72.25. The government took another $10.84. You continue this. At the end of the day, how many circulations is it going to take for this thing to reach zero for the government to have taken all $100 of your worth, what you generated? So out of the $150, the initial tax you pay is $50. You get $100. You take your $100. You spend it in the economy. Now there's only $85 of economy, money left in the economy, because 15% of it went to the government. That $85, by the way, if a company is making this or a person is making this as an income, remember at the end of the year, the government is going to take a chunk of this as income tax as well. This is the bare minimum that's happening, because every time there's changing of hands, that gets put into the ledger, and if a company or a person is making profit of that, the government comes and says, give them more money. So this is bare minimum, assuming nobody's making a profit. Just by spending your money in the system every time you spend it, the government gets a piece of the pie. Until you add all these up. So after three iterations, one, two, three, three times, add these guys up. Here, let's add them up. Just doing some fun mental math, just because what's happening is taxes are going to go up, interest rates about to go up, and people are about to pay a heavy price. So after three times of your original hundred dollars being used in the economy, another $38 of it, $38.59 of the hundred the government has taken. That's another 38% of the original hundred that you got back because the government took a third of it to begin with. Now, we can use a compound interest formula to figure out how much money would be left. What should we use? Let's see. We're not going to use time, and actually we're not even going to use the compound interest. We could use simple interest formula. i equals prt. Is that simple interest? i is equal to prt. Simple interest. Principal rate time. Interest that you pay. No, we don't even need to use that. We can use the compound, I guess. Sure. Let's see. The end we're just going to leave is one, and t would be the number of times that we're doing transactions. This could be first year, second year, third year. No compounding here. This formula reduces down to a is equal to p, one minus r to the power of t. So the way this works is because we're not going to compound it. There's nothing you're paying in the middle. We're going to assume. So how much money is left? Let's say we go through 10 iterations of this. Of your original $100, if you keep one minus 0.1%, which is the interest that you're going to be paying per transaction. Let's say you do it 10 times. This is once, twice, three times. Let's say you do it 10 times. Let's see how much money is left. And then what we can do is calculate how much money, when do we reach zero after how many iterations? And by the way, this occurs on every $100 someone earns. So your next $100, you get to zap $15. You don't have to get on the first spend. As your principle decreases, the interest that you're paying reduces as well. So in the end, this graph just looks like this. It peeks down. So this would be 0.85. Let's say to the power of 10. Times 100. So after 10 times of spending of your original $100 going through 10 transactions, there's only going to be $19 and 65 cents left. And keep in mind, the last five iterations or six iterations, there's less and less taxes being taken off because this principle is a lot less. That's something to keep in mind. I just thought it was worth putting this out there because this is something that we're going to have to start thinking about as interest rates kick up in the world because they're about to be, unfortunately. We see, we see, we see, we see. As my friend says, spending money to finance your destruction, spending money to finance your destruction, indeed, indeed, right? Indeed. Crazy times. And this is bare minimum, bare minimum. Okay, bare minimum. We need to, as a society, do something about this. And those in power are working towards getting a bigger chunk of this because what's going on right now is a lot of centralized institutions are getting together and saying, you know what, we need to tax society more because we need the better carbon footprint. We need to become environmentally better. We need to prepare for whatever else is coming down the pipe. We need to collaborate. And a lot of the politicians be across their power that are imposing, imposing this stuff, these taxes, this theft, this theft. A lot of those people have not been elected. They have been appointed. And a lot of those people are not the best of us, but they're the worst of us because a lot of it comes through centralization of power. And the one thing we have learned throughout history, human history is centralization of power, least to complete corruption. As the saying goes, absolute power corrupts absolutely. And when centralized institutions are given absolute power over our capital, our productivity, then that absolute power has been corrupted absolutely. I thought this was important to put out there just so we can relate the mathematics into everything else that we've been doing, right? And we will talk a lot more about this stuff in the future, but we go baby steps. What else gang? What else? What else gang? What else? What else? They're only using the environment as a smoke screen in my opinion. In my opinion, as well, Alderga. In my opinion, as well. Indeed. But this is mathematics. But this is mathematics. But this is mathematics. All we can do is look at the numbers and go, something's off, right? Something's off, especially when these tax rates are going up and up and up. It becomes dangerous a little bit. From my perspective, anyway. From my perspective. Not fired. How are you doing? Staying for a tea or two. We're almost at the end of the stream. Up time. Are we not? We did some good math. We did some good math today. Fun math today. Fun mathematics. Joe, could we do a question about transforming a physics problem into a math problem? Sure. Do you have one in mind? Physics can go down so many directions. A lot of physics problems are working with known equations, models, right? So we sort of have to take into account what is known. What we know about a certain situation, right? So like, for example, force equals f equals ma. So force is equal to mass times acceleration. One of the most simplest things. Newton's second law. So that's a formula that we know. Force of an object is equal to mass times acceleration. So if you want to find out question would be, what's the force of an object? Find force of an object with mass 15 kilograms accelerating at 50 meters per second, right? Then f equals ma would just be, oh, the force of an object is equal to mass times acceleration. And this is going to be, what is it, 75? And the units, this is mass is going to be, the units is kilograms times meters per second. That's what we got. The kilograms is the mass and meters per second is the, meters per second squared is the acceleration. And this unit is called Newton's. The force of that object is 75 Newton's, right? So as for the derivation of this formula, oh my, I can't remember the derivation of the formula. I'm pretty sure I've looked at it, but I can't remember it. So here's the problem. A ball is shot into the air. It's kinematics. A ball is shot into the air from the edge of a building 50 feet above the ground. Its initial velocity is 20 feet per second. The equation is, oh, when they give the equations the easiest stuff. And the question asks how long until the ball hits the ground? Let's do this. Physics question, when you're given the equation, should be the easiest physics questions that you ever do. So here's the formula that they've given you. The equation is this, and that's going to be distance, I believe, right? So the distance, D, is it D? D is equal to negative 16T squared plus 20T plus 50. Is it D? D. It's initial velocity is 20 feet per second. So something's wrong. We need that. So ball is shot into the air from the edge of a building 50 feet above the ground. So here's a building into the air. I'm assuming it's being shot like this. Pull the ground to a velocity of 20 feet per second. The equation is that, and the equation asks how long until the ball hits the ground? To answer the question, you simply need to solve the quadratic equation. But how do we actually derive the formula from the word problem? The formula from the word problem is driven, like the quadratic formula, this thing that you're talking about. This is the quadratic formula of the simplest, the basic quadratic formula of this from mathematics. Now these quadratic formulas, that model projectiles, a lot of it occurs through observation. Right? So what they do, if you've ever sat in a lab, in a physics lab, what they'll do is they'll do projectiles. And they have some kind of, sometimes flash, some kind of light system that flashes. And in the background, they'll have some kind of sheet where it embeds the projectile. So once you do that, then what you can do, if you model this stuff, you can throw this on a Cartesian coordinate system. So you say, oh, okay, I want to make this simple. I'm going to put my x and y axes here. So I'm going to make the peak of the thing, my origin for the Cartesian coordinate system. And then you can take points from here, x and y, take points from here, x and y, x and y, and do some algebra to come up with equations for these functions. Because from the motion, you would say, oh, this is obviously parabola. Right? If this is a parabola, then general formula for a parabola is a x minus p squared plus q. That's the vertex form of parabola. And if the origin is zero, zero, so bad. Also, hi, sorry, hi, hi, Judah, how are you doing? Then p and q would be zero. So f of x would equal a x, right? A x squared. And then what you can do, you have to calculate your a value. Well, if you want to calculate your a value, all you got to do is take one of these points, plug them in, get your a value, and then your function for this thing would be, oops, whatever the a value is, the number x. So you get that back, and that's your formula, and all that jazz. A lot of it is through modeling. A lot of it is through modeling. There are some that are derived, right, 100% from other formulas that we have that we bring in together and say, oh, this is this, this is this, this is this. So here's a new formula. Here's a new formula. Gang, do not forget. What is this called? This is called projectiles, right? First time chat. Smuggy nine. I think we don't need formula for such questions. Formulas come in handy. And these formulas, if they give them to you in the question and physics, really easiest questions you can do. Easiest questions you do. Okay. And gang, do not forget, do not forget. Thank you, Allah, God. Free Assange, free Assange, free Assange. Julian Assange is a publisher and journalist that has been crucified for trying to bring transparency and accountability of capitalist power to humanity. For more information, you see wikileast.org, defend.wikileast.org, or our Julian Assange and Wikileast playlist on censored. I think most smuggy, I think most mathematical questions can be solved without any derivative. Possibly, yeah, a lot. Joe was given $100 by his parents as his pocket money. Joe meets a very great girl, Karen. Karen smiles at Joe. How much money does Joe have now? Zero. Funny, smudgy. Hilarious, Judah. Did they use this for calculation, for like military stuff? Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Mathematics is used everywhere. Everywhere, everywhere. Allah, God says zero as well. Now, you can do the calculus and figure out what Joe got out of that deal, right? Actually, we do have a Joe in chat right now. Joe, what did you get out of that deal, man? Well, I don't know. It depends what Joe got, right? Bad Lieutenant, Lieutenant TV. Hey, how's it going, Chicho? It's non-elder, just under rebranding. Awesome. Bad Lieutenant, bad Lieutenant TV. Funny, funny. Rebranding, rebranding is always good, almost always good. Judah, the correct answer is half of everything you... Funny. We're getting parties. What were you doing, Chicho? A long time. Hope you're doing well. Doing well. We're getting parties. Thank you very much. Hope you're doing well. Also, Joe's smiling as well. Hilarious. That's it. We're going to call the stream. We've gone down the dark path. We've gone down the dark path. Gang, fun, fun math stream. Fun math stream. Yeah, we did good. We did good. I think so. We had a lot of fun. We came, we saw, we partied, right? We came, we saw, we partied. Fun stuff, fun stuff. Da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da. Mechanical engineering is good news, by the way. I graduated my college degree in mechanical engineering. Awesome, awesome. That's great news, man. Mechanical engineering is a great degree to have, by the way. Great degree to have. Joe, Chicho, do you know anything about floating point numbers and computer science? No. No, no. I came across some, but during two classes I took in programming, but no, I don't know anything about it. Judah, I do need help with math when I take my GED. Stay tuned, okay? Not fast. Stay tuned. And Judah, you're welcome to come by during our mass streams. If you need some help, put on the phones. Next time, maybe a mystic mass stream. Possibly, possibly gotta look into those solids, right? And there's so much mathematics and, you know, a lot of religions and spirituality all over the place. Jay Powell, fun getting back to some math today. Thanks, Chicho. My pleasure, Jay. My pleasure. Intelligent blueberry. We got a Barney's. Yeah, it was a good one. We got Barney's. Is this Intelligent Blueberry? Is this you again? Man, the name branding confuses the crap out of me. Chicho, when is the next comic book stream? Ah, working on it. Working on it. I'm going to say sooner rather than later. Okay. Within the month. Within the month. We're going to sit down and do some readings, I think. Okay. I got a stack of, they're over there. Been going through reading a lot of comic books and taking segments, marking off segments that I want to read to you guys. Smudgy. A vehicle with minus 15 kilometers per liter contains 20 liters. The vehicle gets some defects as a result of which five liter fuel gets wasted per hour when the engine is on. With what minimum speed the vehicle has to move to travel 20 kilometers per hour with the existing amount of fuel. If it travels with a vehicle, oh man, I would have to look that up. You'd have to do it another time. We're coming out. Intelligent Blueberry, weekend of Barney's. Awesome. Awesome. You've been going by weekend of Barney's for a long time and Smudgy, sorry, we're going to have to do that problem at another date. At another mass stream. Okay. Gang, thank you for being here. That makes my heart hurt. Bad Lieutenant. That makes my heart hurt. Joe Chichou, have you got much experience in programming? No, not much, not much. When I was taking programming was Pascal and Fortran that were, that were prevalent and both those languages were horrendous. My God, I hated it. So I didn't take any more. Okay, Smudgy. Smudgy, all the guys says that's my kind of mathematics. Thank you for being here. If you want to know what this work is about, I am on Patreon. Patreon.com forward slash Chichou, C-H-Y-C-H-O. Yeah, we could solve it in Gildit. So Smudgy, you're welcome to join our Gildit server and we've got a forum there for mathematics and we could definitely go in there. You know, you can post a question and see if people can solve it, right? Finished by Boandoneer. Enjoy the sun. Awesome, awesome. Gang, for those of you who are supported this work on Patreon, thank you very much for the support. It is in large part because of the support we're getting on Patreon, as well as Twitch that we're able to do what it is that we are doing. So thank you very much for the support on both these platforms. Thank you for being here, gang. Thank you for the discussion and sharing information and mods. Thank you for taking care of business. I do announce these live streams 30 minutes before we go live on Mindzika Gap, Partigator and BitClub and we'll see where else we end up going. For live streams where we don't have any visuals, we do upload the audio to SunCloud.com forward slash Chichou, C-H-Y-C-H-O is a podcast and those podcasts should be available in your favorite platform, including Spotify, iTunes and Google Play. Thanks for the stream, Chichou. We'll watch it later as a relaxation program. Awesome, Plutonic Plurus. Thank you for being here and gang, we will be uploading this live stream in its entirety plus whatever segments we can take out to SensorTube, to Pichupe, to Rumble and to Odyssey. And again, gang, if you're watching this stuff only on SensorTube, you're not getting the full content of what we're producing and you should definitely be joining us on Pichupe, Rumble or Odyssey. Okay, that's where we're fully active, not on censored platforms. Aside from that gang, most likely live streams next weekend. We'll see what we end up doing. I actually want to do a couple of whispering live streams, but more on that later. Gang, I hope you have a fantastic week and we'll talk on Gilded online on some of these forums and most likely, most definitely, next weekend. Bye, everyone.