 Well, out of the three sticking points that I had talked about before the conference, two has been solved. So we now have a decision on safeguards and a decision on MRV on national reference level. So pretty good decisions I think, obviously not perfect, but I think pretty good decisions that move us forward to implementation of red at the national level, which is really what this is all about. I mean, politically red was accepted in Cancun. We're now trying to move it forward to implement it. And so with safeguards, information system, and with reference levels, we're moving that forward. The final piece, which is still being negotiated in these last few hours, the final pieces of the final agreement on that is on red plus finance for what's called a third phase when results-based actions are going to be paid for. Well, when emissions have actually been reduced because of interventions in a red plus strategy of a country. So we're trying to figure out who will pay for that, how do we pay it for, what are the modalities, what are the role of markets in paying for these reductions in the future. And we're not there. And I'm chairing that this last piece, this set of negotiations, and it's been tough. I mean, the whole week we have been meeting three, six, sometimes nine hours in a day, sometimes up to two in the morning, including last night up to midnight. And we have systematically reduced our disagreements and we're now down literally to one foot note. Can you talk about what is mentioned in that? Well, it's about what's called MRV systems, measurement reporting and verification systems, whether they have to be national or sub-national. And how do you refer to that in an agreement like what we're doing in Durban? Some countries, very few, want to have what's called sub-national systems. While most of us, actually including me, think that MRV systems have to be national. So there's this debate and we need to put a foot note, very carefully written foot note to try to reconcile the two positions. I actually disagree. I didn't chair that, but I negotiated for the Philippines for the safeguards negotiation. And I think it's not true that the safeguards were the lieuten. Certainly, I would have wanted stronger guidance on what's called the information system for safeguards. And we only got something moderately good. But not bad. I don't think it's bad. I don't think it's perfect. But the enemy of the good is the perfect in this negotiation. So I think it's very important to live with what you can achieve, with the most that you can achieve, and pretty confident that's what we have in the safeguards and in the reference levels decisions. Country has their own interests. So Brazil has their interests. I respect them a lot for the consistency with which they have put forth their positions. They have been very flexible, moved a lot in these negotiations. And if in fact we get this agreement, I would congratulate Brazil for their flexibility. It's true for almost all the countries here, for all the countries for that matter. In a negotiation, people have to move from the original position to something more common. And that has happened. A facilitator like me is not the one that can force that. I can only facilitate that, make that happen to various exercises. And I think we're succeeding in doing that. I feel, I can taste it almost, but it'll take a few more hours to really see that happen. For Red Plus, with the finance piece in place hopefully by the end of this COP, we would be able to move forward to implementation. And we hope that this finance decision is supposed to send a signal to markets, to investors, to governments that Red Plus is a good way forward to managing and protecting our forests while protecting climate and benefiting people.