 And to let you know, Bonnie, Ron, help with the wake of music this morning. Good morning, Dan. You're live and clear. And I think we'd be reluctant to say hello, but I guess we'll be ready when the time comes. While this work continues in the Space Lab Science Module, the entry team of flight controllers led by entry flight director Wayne Hale has been on console since about 2 o'clock this morning as they cycle themselves into the same shift they'll work tomorrow in support of all the preparations required for Atlantis' deorbit burn and return to the Kennedy Space Center. Entry flight director Wayne Hale has already had one weather briefing from the Space Flight Meteorology Group this morning. He's expecting a more detailed weather briefing from those forecasters about a half an hour from now as he continues to formulate his strategy of the entry team to present to the mission management team of top NASA managers and their meeting about two hours from now. And Space Lab Houston, for Bonnie to relate in on, we just need to know how much he intakes prior to LBMP. And it's good, Dan. A question. He just reported to me it's 250 ml grape with artificial sweetener. Copy. 250 ml. And it's 200 ml. That's permanent. Space Lab Houston, Fox for Ellen. LBMP advises just to go ahead and proceed. They did get your question and we'll have words for you momentarily. The cue card in the long books and who did the programming and the controller just to know which one is the one that we intended to really run. Let me start with a big picture question, Commander Gibson. One of this mission was to go up and get Norm Saggered and to do some long-term experiments about long-term space stays. But the other part of it was to prove it could be done technically, to prove it could be done politically that we could work with the Russians. Put those on a balance and tell me which was the most important part of this flight. I guess it's hard to say that one was more important than the other because they all had their very specific purposes. You mentioned that it was done to show that it could be done. I think we really integrated it more into a long-term picture than just to go show that it could be done. We are all interested in building International Space Station and working together and making that work. And this is one of the first steps on the way. We have divided it up to call what we call Phase 1 and then leading into Phase 2. Phase 1 is the flights to Mir. And those are doing many of the projects, many of the techniques, many of the tests that we'll be doing in Phase 2. So this is just one small part of the whole overall picture. Again, Commander Gibson. Norm Fagard has been pretty open about saying that this is likely to be his last flight. I'm wondering about you. How likely are you to fly again? And what is it that NASA could offer you after you have done what you have said is pretty much the piloting challenge of a lifetime? Well, Nancy, I guess I have to admit that's a pretty good question and I've been wondering to myself, well, gee, what am I going to do after this one? How, you know, I don't know that I need to top this one, but how am I going to get a more interesting and more challenging flight in the future after this? And the answer is, I guess I don't know. I'm not exactly sure where I move to next or what I do within NASA. I think I've learned quite a few things that would be very useful and very valuable to NASA. Maybe this is the last time I fly. I don't know. I guess I'm keeping an open mind and I'm keeping all the options open still at this point, Nancy. Let me ask Greg Harbaugh a question. You've had the chance to talk with Norm Fagard, and he has said that three months in space is doable, but that six months or a year is, in his mind, pretty difficult thing to do. I'm just wondering, would you be interested in a long-term stay and what is it that you have, what is your reaction to what Norm Fagard has had to say? Has that discouraged you in any way from wanting to make a long stay yourself? Well, Nancy, I don't know that I'm a candidate for that kind of a flight. I think having a medical doctor do that kind of long-duration activity to do the self-analysis, self-diagnosis that would be most useful from a scientific return standpoint would be probably the optimum. But nonetheless, an answer to your question, I'm not sure that I have the mindset to go stay someplace for three to six or 12 months if I wasn't going somewhere. I think maybe if we were on our way to Mars, I'd be very interested, but going up and staying on Space Station, I don't know. But I haven't been confronted with that question, and I guess I'll beg off until somebody asks me whether I really want to do it and can put me in that position. Well, let me ask Commander Deseroff the question that he spent three months aboard, Mayor. Tell me what it is about your character, your personality that makes you able to stay for long terms in space and would you be interested in six months a year or maybe even a length of time it would take to go to Mars? What would make you able to do that personally? Well, actually, the longer the flight, the more person becomes more intense in all of his aspects in the good and kind of the not-so-good to make long flights on existing and new stations and stations that are working on a more contemporary level and are more technologically advanced and are certainly interesting, and I would with great pleasure would agree to do this if I have the opportunity to fly to the new Alpha Station. I think this would be very interesting to try and how this would be. It would be even more interesting if there would be a big international team that consists not only of Americans in Russian, cosmonauts and astronauts, but also astronauts and cosmonauts from other countries. Commander Dezharov, Norm Tagart has said he got lonely up there. Did you get lonely up there? No, I wasn't lonely. Actually, there was a lot of work to do and there wasn't even time to think about missing anything. Norm was somewhat lonely, but I wouldn't say very lonely. And he was so loaded down with work the same way that we were with all sorts of technical issues. Norm wasn't loaded down so much that we were a little late in accepting a new module with new equipment. Let me not leave the pre-court out of this. Always there are detractors to the space program. It comes up every year for a vote. The space station is going to be coming up again in Congress. Undoubtedly there will be those who try to kill it. Are there people that you just have to write off who are always going to do this, after a mission that's been given this much international publicity and talked about this much in terms of success? Do you find it frustrating that you have to fight these battles over and over again? I look at it from two respects. I think it's good that there's some skeptics out there to keep us honest and make sure that we produce the maximum product for the dollar that's spent on the program. On the other hand, there is a little bit of frustration that if you work in something like this, like we do, it's our life and we believe in it completely. And it's somewhat frustrating that we can't communicate how important it is to those people who doubt it. And I guess it kind of falls back to your earlier question about what was the most important part of the flight, whether it be political or technical. I think what really goes on here is that there's a little bit of everything for everybody in what we're doing in space, whether it be research, whether it be international relationships, whether it be new technologies for everyday life on Earth, whether it be for motivating our children, whether it be for education. You can look at all different directions and what we do impacts every different area of our lives. So yes, there is some frustration, but it keeps us honest and I think it's healthy and that's our process that's made our country strong. And now I think that same process will make our entire globe strong internationally as we join together. One of the biggest results, I think, of this flight has demonstrated a willingness both sides and now internationally to carry on with this kind of project and it's really encouraging. Well, that brings to mind something that Greg Harbaugh said before he left, which is that I remember asking him about something, what he thought would come of this and Greg, you said that 20 years ago there was a lot of hope after Apollo's stories, but the danger now is sitting back and not committing ourselves the same thing that happened 20 years ago. If it were up to you, what would you do right this minute, right now, or as soon as you got back on the ground to keep this going, to keep this interest generated? What would I do personally, Nancy? What would you tell NASA to do and what would you do personally? Well, I think we've done what we can do on a personal level. We've accomplished our mission. We set out with a very challenging set of objectives and we've satisfied those and I think we did it very well. With regard to NASA, I think we need to do a good job of telling the American people what we do and why we do it to follow up on Charlie's point to let folks know why it is worthwhile depending on the tax dollar that the taxpayer spends that pays for our budget. We do it awful lot. If you look back and created some sort of an anthology of what we've done just in the shuttle program with all of the satellite deploys and retrieves and some of the amazing, fantastic things we've done with just the space shuttle, it's really quite an impressive list of accomplishments and I think the American public needs to have that kept in front of them so that they appreciate what the space program is really doing for them and I guess I would try to be aggressive at getting that word out. Okay, I think I lost the end of the answer to that question but let me go ahead and ask one more of Commander Desaroff if he can hear me which is what is the thing that he is looking forward, the real human thing that he is looking forward to doing the most when he gets back? Does he want to take a walk in the woods? Does he want to take a hot shower? What is the first real human thing after seeing his family that he wants to do when he gets home? Yeah, the very first thing I probably want to do is to stand under a hot shower for a pretty long time and I've missed that. And second thing, I'd like to meet with my family and I'd like to meet with my family and I'd like to meet with my family and I'd like to meet with my family and I'd like to meet with my family I'd like to meet with my family with my kids, my wife to talk, to socialize, take a little walk if there is such an opportunity immediately. And to tell you the truth, I miss people pretty much and kind of the everyday earth life. One last real quick question for Hoot. It's 20 years since Apollo's story. It's 20 years from now. What do you want people to say about this mission? Nancy, I hope they'll say it was a very good success. I hope they'll say that it had been an incredibly long dry spell between Apollo Soyuz and STS-71 but then look at all the other missions that we did and look at how STS-71 helped open the way between the United States and Russia and that we existed in cooperation and friendship thereafter. Atlantis, we have you on air to ground 1 through Milo. Okay, story you're loud and clear. You are loud and clear on air to ground 1. Let's go over and try UHF only. Atlantis, unbelievable picture. Over by California. Oh yeah, a beautiful pair. That story, this loop is still a little bit broken. Thank you Atlantis for bringing this picture to us.