 Teraz fod y cyfleu fallen Vivialau, ac mae gwaith i dylwn y morbylch yn cael cynnigau twfuns 불riff yn Rye monitorynau diwethaf a'r miwn ei ôl y bryd, yn feesch chi'n gallu gilio chi wedi cofianfyrdd i ddiweddar, ag unigach o gyleu unrhyw deuting iexast острaw Prophet niflo i Felir P Cer Willow wokilwaeth hynna i Agostig Fermiol, felly erailll unfairllai i Ffionnor. Mae'r hiad gan weithio'r Sydfil Mas Donaldine ddiddordeb i cymhwylltwyr ddeod、 amgylgeddú chi i Ffionnor a iiosoidion i'r及ffMiss Т-ara Phase onphilosôrol ffianigol o fus Giulio'r Cyngor Gelfleg. Fieldingsoniedad rhywbeth di-iglo-company am gymfor y centre i Gelflegs aheadw o hynny iinstidentifieddd, maehel unrhyw rhoi diwb i'r cyfwelelles ar gyfer fy mod? I have no relevant interest to declare. Thank you very much and let me welcome Gil Paterson, the committee, and invite him to declare any relevant interest. No relevant interest. Thank you very much. That takes us neatly to agenda item 2, which is for the committee to decide whether it's consideration of its work programme and the written evidence received into our inquiry into elected conveners should be taken in private at future meetings. Do members agree to take these items in private at future meetings? We do. Thank you very much. Now, we come to item 3, which is to discuss the membership of the cross-party group on video games technology. Members will see from paper number 1 that this group does not comply with section 6.4.1 of the code of conduct, as the group does not have an MSP member from the Conservative Party. At my request, the clerks contacted John Lamont MSP and his capacity as the business manager for the Conservative Party to ask whether there were any issues with the group's existence other than the volume of groups that the Conservative MSPs are ready members of. John Lamont has confirmed that the Conservative Party would be happy for the group to exist without a Conservative Party member. The group has managed to secure a member from the green independent group. Do members have any comments on the paper that is before them? I invite members to consider whether they are content to waive the requirement that a group's membership must include at least one MSP from each of the parties that a group is represented in the Parliamentary Bureau on this occasion. Are we content? Thank you very much. That ends the public part of this meeting. We now move into private session.