 Hey everybody, today we're debating whether or not we can be good without God and we are starting right now. Ladies and gentlemen, thrilled to have you here for this epic debate. This is going to be a blast, folks. We are very excited to have these two experienced debaters with us today, old foes from the past. It's almost like Magneto and Professor Xavier where they're kind of friends but they're also kind of enemies. So we're very excited to have you with us. This is going to be a lot of fun. Want to let you know if it's your first time here, consider hitting that subscribe button as we are very excited for a lot of upcoming debates. For example, May 14th, Kent Hovind will be on for an epic debate which is going to be a lot of fun on the fossil record. Also want to let you know our guests are linked in the description so that way if you're listening and you're like, hmm, I want to hear more of that, G-man. I want to hear more of the Skyler fiction. You can hear plenty more where that came from. And also want to let you know we are going to, oh, there's a terrible echo apparently. Let me hear, Mr. Pluto Dog is triggered by our audio. I don't think there's an echo but very excited to have you here, folks. So this is going to be a lot of fun. We are going to G-man start. It's going to be a flexible 10 minute opening statement and then we're going to kick it over to Skyler for a similar 10 minute statement. And then we're going to go into open conversation. So very excited, folks. Thanks for being here. And with that, G-man, when you are ready, the floor is all yours. Okay. Thank you, James, for having me on here today and I would like to thank Skyler fiction for accepting my challenge for this particular debate. I hope everyone's having a good day and all of you guys are surviving the, you know, the toilet paper apocalypse and COVID-19. If you have any alcohol or hand sanitizer, please share it with somebody. It would be something that would be beneficial to our society. So ladies and gentlemen, the name of this debate is whether or not a person can be good without God. And I think it's a really interesting question because for those of you who have been following my pre-trials, I think all of you know where this is going and what the answer is. And today I have made a decision to bring the pre-trials to a modern day debate. And all of you will understand what I mean by that very, very soon. Before we get started, we need to get an idea what this word good actually means. So since I know I got more than enough time, let me screen share something here for you guys to take a look at this. Okay, you can allow this, I don't know, can you see this, James? Okay, great. Okay, so basically to be good is to be desired or approved of having the qualities required for a particular role. To which is morally right or righteous, okay? Something that would benefit advantage to someone or something. Another way, let me give it a screen share here, yes. Can you see it? So these are the definitions, ladies and gents, for what I mean to be desirous or approved of having the qualities required for a particular role. That which is morally right or righteous to benefit or advantage to someone or something. Typically when we call somebody good, we're talking about a person who is moral, a person who we consider to be virtuous, a person who is typically blameless. And when we're talking about a person being good, we're talking about their nature and not the things that they necessarily do. You see, I don't necessarily believe that a person who doesn't know God cannot do good things, because that's not the, who's laughing? Okay, cool. I believe that people who don't know God or don't have God in their life can do good things. I just don't believe that they can be good people. You know what I mean? So to prove my point, ladies and gents, I just wanna talk about God and his character and our character a little bit. Okay, let me give a small example of what I mean about things as being evil, like stealing, lying, murder, baby rape, slander, hating without a cause, or having a good reason and basically a law breaker. If you just look at those eight things or whatever, you're coming to the conclusion that that person is not good. That's what most of us in our society would say about a person not being good. Good person, however, would be considered someone who's charitable, who gives, somebody who tells the truth. Someone who gives life and that takes it away. Defends the widows. You know what I mean? In orphans, a person giving you the right to choose is a person that I would consider good. A person that is in the committed relationship. We typically call somebody a good husband when they're not cheating on their lives. Someone who is not selfish. Someone who's into justice, a lawful justice, okay? And someone who is patient. We would say these are usually good character traits of a person. But in order for a person to be good, these are the things that they'll have to be doing all the time. You know what I mean? And what I'm going to do to try to prove my point that we cannot be good without God is that I want to use a very famous atheist argumentation in order to do this, ladies and gents. And yes, I will not. Oh, and one more little thing too. Not only would I be using a famous atheist argument from my opening statement, but I'm also going to be abandoning for the sake of this conversation of objective moral values. And I'm going to use subjectivity, ladies and gentlemen, to put my point that you all are going to see soon enough. Never did this before, and I think I'm going to get a kick out of this. Number one, Matt Dillon-Hunty argues for him being more moral or a better person than God by saying these things. I never murdered no one. I never flooded the earth. Matt Dillon-Hunty will get on here and say things like I've never done like all of the so-called atrocities that God has done in the Bible. And that's how Matt Dillon-Hunty will go about determining whether or not he's better than God or he's a moral person. By going after all of the horrible things that God has done. And ultimately saying that God has no moral standard and saying that God is this horrible person for the things that he's done. This is something that the atheist community does on a regular basis. And what I'm going to do, ladies and gentlemen, instead of using God as my moral standard, since I know, and everybody watching this already knows, that scholar fiction does not believe that God is a good person and we believe that scholar fiction is a good person, I would actually like to look at his moral character and the moral character of Joseph Stalin. Who also didn't have God. Scholar fiction, let's start up with Joseph Stalin. Joseph Stalin murdered more than 100 million people during his time in communist Russia. And if I got that number wrong, guys, don't kill me and I'll wipe that. We all know it's up there anyway between 25 and 100 million during his particular reign. And a lot of them was his own people. And a lot of these people were theists. People that disagreed with his regime. Is that something that we consider a good person to do? Was he being good without God when he was doing the things that he did? What about scholar fiction? He debated S.J. Thomason on this particular YouTube channel. For those of you who don't know the history of this, it was a gentleman by the name of Eugene Scott who coined the phrase Gish Gallup. And he got this phrase from a creationist named Dwayne Gish, who was famous for doing what we call the Gish Gallup. And that's asking a whole bunch of questions without really being interested in getting the answer. We would never consider a person who does something like that a good person. So if it's possible for us to be good without God and scholar fiction won't have to be able to show me why his moral character is so good that we can say that he's good. Because we would never say that someone who is dishonest would be a good person. I am not a good person. I have said things on here that is not true. I'm certainly not the beacon of all morality because I have said that Alex Botten and Fiona had a relationship when they never did. I misrepresented people on here. That doesn't make me a good person. So a scholar's not a good person. I'm not a good person. Stalin's not a good person. Then who is good, okay? The only person that I can say is actually good and fits the moral characteristics that everybody universally would say are typically good is God. We're told in the scriptures to love the Lord I God with all our heart so of mind and strength, to love our neighbor to love ourselves and to love our enemies. That is our standard. God himself and the fact that we are to love. You understand what I'm saying? Sometimes love is gonna end up being shown in the form of justice. Sometimes love is gonna be shown in the form of rebuke. Sometimes love is gonna be shown in the form of a lot of ways, a lot of things that some people in society might disagree with because of emotion, not because of facts, all right? And I expect my opponent's got a picture to bring up the babies and how a loving God would go about murdering babies or ordering the death of babies and flooding the earth. And again, it's gonna go back on the justice and we'll go to that a little bit later. So my conclusion at this, ladies and gents, if you can be good without God, then why isn't scholar fiction good? Why isn't Joseph Stalin good? Why is it that we're having such a hard time finding somebody out there that has these good moral traits in order to prove that we can be good without God? And finally, ladies and gentlemen, I am not arguing from an objective moral sense. I'm arguing from a subjective moral sense, all right? In the sense that I'm arguing according to my subjective, objective opinion that God is actually moral and that God is actually good. And because my subjective moral opinion is superior to that of all of you, I actually believe that what I'm saying about God is true, all right? Morality is not objective, it is subjective and it is according to my opinion, all right? So with that, I close. You bet. Thanks so much, G-Man. I am just adjusting the audio over here. Sorry, folks. I blame Converse. He like reset all the text stuff on me. So sorry, I know it's clipping. I'm trying to like not talk too loud. Very excited, folks. We are going to kick it over to our dear friend, Skyler. I wanna let you know, I've missed you guys. I honestly have been, I was away for a few days. Converse was filling in and he's terrific. Nobody does better than Converse, but I have missed you guys so much. So it's great to be back with you. And so it's great to be back with you. G-Man and Skyler, thanks both of you for being here and Skyler, the floor is all yours. Yeah, I'm super excited to be here tonight. I really didn't think this was gonna happen. A couple of weeks back, G-Man was on his channel, rambling about getting Christians to boycott me on this very channel that you guys are enjoying this wonderful debate tonight on and saying he would never debate me. So raptor Jesus, he blesses you in ways that you're surprised sometimes. So happy to be here. As far as the topic of the debate, can you be good without God? Of course you can. It just depends on how you define good, right? What you've heard from G-Man so far is basically him articulating what he views as good and what his definition of good is. And what he's doing is saying, hey, how are you going to say that what I call good isn't good, basically. All he's doing is giving his own definitions here. I don't have to accept your definition of good. Of course I don't. It's weird. I found it kind of funny, this idea that he was talking about, the qualities of somebody that is good, right? Someone who gives, they use negative examples of what wasn't good. But the things that he appealed to like most people would think this, tend to be things like, for instance, you can own people as property in the Bible. You can take women and children. Oh, that's weird. Let's see if this is, all right, let's see here. Hopefully this'll be good. So what's happening is, shit, I lost my thought. Where was that here? We're talking about the Bible. What the things that we would typically say is good, right? Like how he was saying, oh, people that are virtuous, not people who rape children or whatever and he's giving all these examples, right? So when G-Man, how would I say this? Says, you know, hey, this is how you tell something's good. Why is it when we look at the God G-Man worships? Why is he doing the things that we, most of us would call horrible, right? Why is he telling people to go and own people and take people as plunder? Why is he jealous? Why is he so angry and vicious with people? But somehow this is good because God is the good, according to Christian. The original topic of the debate was gonna be about morality, which is great. I really appreciate that G-Man is gonna take some type of subjective moral position tonight. That should be interesting. But this idea, if whatever G-Man is defining is good, and if he's gonna say God is the good, we're gonna need some form of demonstration, right? He's not gonna get to just say, hey, you can't be moral without my God. And that's gonna be the basic argument from him. Now, I don't wanna go too long with an opening statement. So I feel it'd just be much more fun to jump right into the discussion. So I'll concede the rest of my time. You got it. So thanks very much, folks, very excited. We will now jump into the open discussion. You guys, before we started, I was just like, oh, these guys are already getting started. And I was like, you guys hold on, I'm so sorry. I'm trying to get the text out, but they just, it might boil over, folks. Gentlemen, the floor is all yours. I'm telling you, it's the new gentle, kinder, scholar fiction here tonight. I'm here to help. Do you remember where do you wanna start? Okay, so I'd like to start since you believe that you can be good without God. Are you good, yes or no? Sure, under my definition of good I am. Yeah. Mm-hmm. What's your definition? I view right and wrong, good and bad is, good would be committing positive actions for myself and for others. I would say that bad would be doing negative actions towards myself and others when it can't be avoided. Interesting. So, do you always do things that are positive for yourself and others, scholar like 24 hours a day, seven days a week? Do I always know, no. But you see, in my view of a good person, I don't always have to do the right thing. I can make mistakes and I can grow and improve. It doesn't make me a bad person because it makes me not a perfect person. And there's a difference between being perfect and being good or bad. It's not black or white because sometimes you Christians would like to pay it. Well, my argument is based on subjectivity. So, it doesn't make a difference. I'm not making an objective argument. I'm making a subjective argument. Because according to my subjective morals, that I'm adopting for this particular debate. In my view, God is doing precisely what you just said. He's doing what's good for himself and that is bring glory to himself and also helping man as well. He's also administering justice against people who disobey him. So, by your definition, God would have to, then God is good. But according to your definition, you can't be good because gishgalloping is not a good thing to do to somebody. Is gishgalloping like something immoral under your system? I don't know if gishgalloping is any part of a moral system that I have. What was that relevance to why did you bring that up? You said that you define being good as doing what's best for you and what's best for other people. How was it? Well, yeah, well, kind of, yeah. That's fair, that's fair. But that's gishgalloping. I was included in the gishgallop SJ. I didn't gishgallop SJ. Would you asking her a bunch of questions and rapid succession and not giving her the opportunity to answer any of them? Oh no, I gave her the opportunity to answer them. She just, and what is this? I'm sorry, the topic of the debate is can we be good without God? Whether I'm a good person, the terrible person is kind of irrelevant to this debate, G-Men. Can we stay on topic? Okay, so there's two things wrong with what you said. The majority of the people that watch that knows that you gishgallop. That's number one, and the second thing is is that we also don't think liars are good people either. And you have just lied. So there's two things. You gishgallop, then you lie. So how is those things benefiting SJ Thompson at all? Once again, my behavior and my morality is not the topic of the debate, G-Men. We're talking about can people be good without God? So can we stay on topic? My opening statement was, and I quote, that I was going to use Matthew 11th's argumentation for why a person is good and why a person is not good. God was just considered not a good person because he did all these horrible things according to Matthew 11th's subjective moral worldview. What I'm saying, and he was saying that he was good because he didn't do those things. Since you believe that you're good, since you believe that you are good without God, then we have to use you as a moral standard. And if I can show that you are not good based on your own definition or based on any super accepted definition across the board or whatever, then you can't be good in this proof that you can't be good without God. That's why I used you. So can you explain to everybody why gishgalloping and lying is actually a good moral treat to have when you're debating somebody? Yeah, once again, that wasn't gishgalloping or lying. But so really what we're talking about here is the difference between you and I is I find it immoral to commit genocide, right? You don't because you don't find it immoral when God tells people to commit genocide. You don't find it immoral when God tells people to commit genital mutilation. You don't find it immoral when you tell people that God can own people as property, right? Yes, we disagree on what we define as good. You can say that under your subjective morality that those are good things, genocide, slavery, genital mutilation. I just happen to disagree with you, which is fine. You don't have to accept my opinion. I'm happy with that. But listen, once again, the idea of good, like my definition of good doesn't mean I have to be perfect, right? If I make mistakes, it doesn't mean I'm not a good person. Perfect, you're conflating two definitions, two words here. All right, James, you there, James? James, I need about two minutes to respond to that without being interrupted. Is it okay? Okay, you got it. All right, cool. So, Scholar, as I said earlier, gish galloping is a dishonest debating tactic and everyone knows this. Lying is too, and slander is also, you just said that God committed genocide in the Bible. There was no people groups at this particular time. Everybody spoke the same language. Everybody was one people. And last time I checked, I believe Noah and several other people were spared from the flood. There's only genocide when everybody dies. So now you're guilty of lying, gish galloping, and slander. Now you can consider yourself to be a good person while lying, gish galloping, and slandering. And, oh, I'm sorry, I still got one minute left. The reason why I'm asking you to this, Scholar, and I'm trying to point this out to you is the reason why you need Jesus, okay? Because I recognize that I'm not a good person and I could be accused of the same things that I put on the list here. It's like everybody watching this can be accused of this. It's like you're being accused of it. And that's why God sent us only to be gotten something that is worth a die for our sins so that our sins could be atoned for because none of us are good, none of us are perfect. We are all flawed, okay? And that's what I'm gonna try to help you as hard as I can try to understand. In this show alone, you already said that you didn't gish gallop. Look up the definition and meaning of the word. You did gish gallop. Number two, you lied about not gish galloping. And then number three, you slandered God by saying he committed genocide. If there were human beings that got spared for a particular reason or whatever, then they couldn't have been genocide. And if God allowed the flood to happen. And he knew that there was gonna be a ultimate good for all of humanity that was gonna come from it that you can't call it necessarily bad. So again, Scala, why are you lying, gish galloping and slandering and thinking that's actually a good characteristic to have? Listen, I get that you believe that I'm doing all those things. And I get that under your religious views that I am not a good person, under what your standard of good is, right? But that's just your opinion and I can't do anything with it, right? I can't argue that it's your opinion that you feel that you feel this way. And as far as those things, I'm not misspeaking your God. I use, I mean, taking women and children as plunder. You don't deny that God has told human beings that they could do that. And you'll claim that that's justice in some way. Somehow it's justice to take children into plunder. But those are good things under your morality because God told people to do them because God can't tell people to do immoral things, right? I would imagine. But I guess once again, it just comes back to it just depends on the, if you define good in a particular manner and that within that definition, this is what good is, human beings can be good. If they follow those whatever particular God lines that they've set up. Would you like more time to explain that or are you done? No, no, no, that was, I feel comfortable. Okay, so I need about 40 seconds if you don't mind to respond to what you just got me to say. Did you mean, you don't have to at request time. I've been interrupting you once. I'm trying to be polite. No, no, I'm just saying, I haven't interrupted you once and at one time, you can just speak your mind. Okay, so lying, gish galloping, slander, and now I'm bearing false witness is wrong. You said that it was wrong for God to say to take these women for plunder. What you don't understand about wartime, my friend, is if these women were either gonna be eliminated with the other people that was in a nation or they could have been spared and integrated into the nation that was beating them. Okay, so you gotta look at the two. You either kill them or you integrate them into your society. You know what I mean? I look at it as actually being good because I'm looking at it from their society, their societal basis, and not from mine because dishonest people do that. You never look at it from your societal perspective because we don't even know of ours. We don't even know if they looked at us, whether or not they would say our society of standards is right. You know what I mean? So again, I think a bearing false witness on God when you're saying that he was telling us to do something wrong when he did that. So I'm sorry, you get four things now. Lying, gish galloping, slander, and now bearing false witness. That is why we need Jesus as a scholar and you need him. According to my subjective opinion, by the way, this is what you need. So why did he have to kill the little ones? I'm not 100% sure what you're talking about. Could you be more specific? Yeah, the little ones in Deuteronomy here. I'll give you, let me read a scripture for you. All right, we won't go to the normal what I could do for a same, but we'll do something a little different. All right, let's go with, I don't know what do I have it here? Behold, I should have had it up here. Let's see, this is Numbers 31, seven through 18. They fought against a minion and the Lord commanded Moses and killed every man among their victims where Eva, Rikim, Zur, or Rebekah, Rebekah, the five kings minion, they also killed a couple other people with the sword. Israelites captured many midnight women and children and took all the midnight herds, flocks, and as goods and plunder. They burned all the towns where the many nights had settled, as well as their camps. They took all the plunders and spoils, including the people and animals and brought the captives and spoils as plunder and Moses. And then they had, let's see what else we have. Oh, here's the other one with the, is this a little boys one? You're on me 20 versus 10 through 14 when you march up to attack a city, make it's people and offer a peace. If they accept the open gates, all the people will be subject to forced labor. I shall work for you. If they refuse peace, engage in battle, lay siege to the city. When the Lord your God delivers them your hand, put the sword to all men in it. As for the women, the children, your livestock, and everything else in the city, you may take these plunder for yourself. So yeah, so like plunder is totally cool in those contexts, like to take women and children. I need about a minute to answer that question. You don't have to tell me how much time you need. You can just tell, you can just go with it. Well, I'm afraid what you're going to do if I don't tell you how much time I need, I might get gish gout. So I'm just trying to make sure that you're going to give me the time I need to speak. It wouldn't be really gish gouting you. I'd be interrupting you is what would be happening, right? You want to be pulled back. The help would be me like continuing the talk. All right, so okay. Okay, so according to my subjective, objective opinion, there's nothing wrong with God telling the Israelites in wartime what they can take for themselves, considering that they want it to, they could have went there and destroyed and killed them. I'm just eliminating all emotional emotions. As for the kids, I don't know everything and I don't see the beginning from the end. I'm a finite human being. God obviously looked down the corridor of time and saw that these people were going to be some really wicked, horrible people and actually took them out early. So I'm not understanding how that's bad, but I do know this, lying, gish galloping, slander, and bearing false witness are not good character traits and that's why we need Jesus Christ as our Lord and our Savior. And that's why you need him, okay? So according to my subjective opinion, scholar, which happens to be objective, okay? You can't say that God, well, actually you can say what you want, but according to me, all those things are good. According to my subjective opinion. Okay, perfect. Let me read another one. You tell me if this is good. And Moses said to them, numbers 31, 15 through 17, Moses said to them, have you kept all the women alive? Look to these women caused the children of Israel through the council bomb, the trespassing against the Lord, the insipior, and they were a plague among the congregation of the Lord. Now therefore kill every male among the little ones and kill every woman who has known a man intimately, but keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately. Now why would God tell you to kill all the non-virgins, but the virgins you can keep? So you would do that as a good thing too? I do, let's see. I can be flexible, although I do want to mention that I've been asked by people in the live chat to nudge both of you in more of the direction of the topic, G-man less about Skyler's past and then Skyler more about the, whether we can be good without God. So when you guys are able to make a quick transition back. I'll make one right now. I'll make one right now because I'm on topic. I'm actually using Skyler as our moral basis because he says we can be good without God. That's true, then I should be able to find somebody who doesn't know God and make them our standard, okay? Now since, I mean, unless Skyler's admitting that that person doesn't exist and we can't use anybody who doesn't know God as their standard because if we can't use somebody as standard, then this debate's over and I wanted my opening statement. So again, you mentioned about taking virgins for yourself. Again, you only have one option. You either kill these people or you took them integrated into your people. These people were doing a lot of heinous things in their countries. When anybody came to Israel they wouldn't have been doing those things no more. So again, I'm not really understanding why you don't understand is that you've been corrected by several people who went to seminary and had broken this down to you several times like Matt Slick and other people. So again, Liongish, Galloping, Slander, Barenfields, Witness and not accepting correction now is not in the characteristic of a good person. The person that is good is God. Because God is good, he's wholesome and he gives wisdom, he gives food, he gives water, he gives clothing, he gives us life. He is the author of life. That's why he sent the son Jesus Christ to this world to die for us. So again, Skyler, according to my subjective opinion God would be good. You know what I mean? And I'm not really understanding how you can go about proving otherwise with that without killing to emotion. Well, I'm not trying to argue opinions with you. I can't do, what's the point of that? Like if you just tell me what your opinion is, I can't do anything with it. That's not, you know, and I don't know if you think like this is something that I do somehow and there's some sort of irony, but it's probably because you're confused about the argument. One day it was, yeah, let me say a couple of things. So you went on there, I don't, like I'm still waiting for how you, you know why people can't be good without God we have a particular definition of good. I understand it doesn't follow your definition, but why is your definition better than my definition? I'm sorry, I need you to re-exact that question again because I thought this was a debate about can we be good without God? Not whether or not God is good or not. I thought this was a debate about can you be good? Can you be good without God? And you have not given me an example on how you're good without God. Well, I mean that you're begging the question you're assuming that I can't be good without God by that statement. I make the positive claim that you're not. You're a liar, Gish Gallup being slanderer, bearing false witness, person that doesn't take direction. We don't call people like that good. Nobody does this. I get that that's your opinion and your misrepresentation of me, but that's not an argument. Misrepresentation, you've been corrected about this baby- But this isn't the topic, this isn't the topic of the debate- Yes it is. You're making this about me because you think this is some weird strategy of yours that works. And like every time you do this, you're going to fail miserably. So can we stick to the topic of the debate instead of just focusing on me personally? You could have just ranted about me for two hours if that's what you wanted to do. Why being so personal? I've been very friendly to you tonight. I haven't been disrespectful. I haven't been interrupting you. So why like coming to this room so hostile and trying to personally attack me? Am I opening statement I mentioned that Matt Billahunty makes an argument that he's better than God or that he's a good person because he doesn't do the horrible things that God does. And I said in my opening statement that I would do the same thing with somebody who does not know God. If you don't want me to use you, I respect your opinion and I won't use you, okay? So I can use somebody else like Joseph Stalin. Joseph Stalin killed well over 25 million people during this particular reign and he didn't have God. Why was he incapable of being good without God? Once again, you're assuming that people can't be good without God. That's your burden of proof to show. You're the one arguing that people can't be good without God. So if you're going to make that claim, you have to demonstrate it. Hold on, hold on, I'm still talking. Basically what you're doing is you're switching the burden of proof. You're making, hey, this is the case that you prove it's not. And that's not how debates work, G-Men. You have to show the evidence. You have to make the argument. Perhaps do it in syllogism form. Give me premise one of the argument. Let's do that. And we can go through premise by premise of what your actual argument is. What's premise one? What was my opening statements, God, I'm just curious. Oh no, no, I want to go through the premises at this point. You've gone through a lot of information. You talked a lot about a lot of different things. So can we go, seriously, I want to deal with your argument. I'm here to deal with your argument. What would be premise one of your argument? Okay, so in my opening statement, I mentioned that I was going to use Matt Delahunty's argumentation for how he determines that he's a good person and God is not. And the way that Matt Delahunty goes about doing it is by pointing out all of the horrible things that he thinks that God did in the Bible. And he said, well, at least I didn't murder nobody. I didn't flood the earth. I didn't do this. I didn't do that. I didn't do this. So, and I also mentioned that I was going to use a subjective moral worldview for this argumentation and not an objective moral worldview, okay? Premise number two is going to be Scott. No, no, that wasn't a premise. That wasn't a premise. You were just reiterating what you believe you've told me. What's the actual premise? Like how would you put that premise form, your argument? According to my subjective moral standards, that is my premise. So anyway, premise number two would have been Scott. Wait a minute, I don't understand. Hold on, I'm still trying to understand. What's the premise one? Can you really be specific with it? I want to understand your argument. You never heard of Matt Delanty debate before? I don't watch him very often, no. Matt Delanty has a really good debate on YouTube called, can you be good without God? He has several of these debates. When Matt Delanty points out all of the horrible things that God has done, and he tried to say that because he didn't do those things, that he himself will be considered good because of that. So I'm using that strategy against you, and I'm saying- I don't necessarily agree with that strategy. I don't know if you're misrepresenting Matt Delanty. That's what I have a feeling you're doing. Well, let's just say that is the way he's arguing. I don't necessarily agree with that argument. So why would you use that strategy? Just to see if I disagree with another non-believer? So premise number two would have been- I don't know what premise number one is. I don't know what that's not a premise. Just telling me that Matt Delanty has an argument isn't a premise. According to my subjective moral standards, according to my subjective opinion and my subjective moral worldview, I use Matt Delanty's argument. I don't know. You didn't use Matt Delanty's argument. Well, listen to my opening statement, you will know that. I did listen, and that's not what Matt Delanty's argument is. Say you're not a gift scholar- And that's not a premise. What you're doing is- Say you're not a gift scholar, but you're doing it now. So anyway, number two, because that's not gonna save you today, a scholar, I promise you, okay? Number two, scholar fiction, I use you as an example because you don't have God. Joseph Stalin doesn't have God and atheists in general don't have God. Yet you guys claim to be good. Atheists are the ones that cost me my job. Caught my job, and I said I did things at the job that I did not do, and I lost my job. Atheists are the ones going around in the live chats of many people with different channels saying that they want to rape women. Atheists are the ones that's calling, they're trying to get S.J. Thomas in fire from her job. Atheists are the ones that are getting on here claiming that God did all these other things while they're doing the exact same things themselves. So again, my second premise is this. If I can point out all the horrible things that you are doing in your life, then I can say based on your own definition that you are not good. So, and premise number three, it's a conclusion is you can't be good without God because you're obviously not doing any of the things that you would define as being good. You're not doing this on a regular basis. You're not perfect. You're not trying to live that way. You know what I mean? Again, gish galloping, lying, slandering, airing false witness, and not taking correction or not good characteristics of a good person. Wow, that really wasn't, that premise wasn't even a premise there. That conclusion was not connected by any means. I wanted to. What you were arguing. I wanted to. Please just allow me to finish what I'm saying. I didn't interrupt you. Yeah, please, just let me. So that wasn't a premise as an argument. That was just you saying, I'm making the argument that Nat Dillon made as a, I don't know why that's not logically a premise. Then you saying that I'm just a bad guy under your standard of bad. Okay, thanks for an opinion. That's not how we build arguments. Did you even prep for this debate? Like is there, do you do any preparation or you just think, hey, what up? My strategy for the debate is just to talk shit about skyline, was that what you came up with? And this would make you look good. I'm waiting for you to finish. I'm trying to be polite. Oh, no, that was a question. But I figured you might not be able to recognize questions. So are you finished? I want to make sure I'm polite and make sure you finish your statement. I don't know, am I finished yet? I guess, I guess I could be finished for you. You're not about to take a sip of this and thank you. All right, so can you name one person that doesn't know God that's good? Yeah, I'm a good person. You said that you're a good person? Yeah, Dr. Josh Bowen's a good person. He's another person. He's better than I am. On the good scale, I would put Dr. Josh Bowen. Much higher. So since you're good, that means you're not a liar. You're not a Gish Gallup or you don't slander. You don't bear false witness and you do take correction then. Once again, under my standard of good, I don't have to live up to your standard of good. Your opinion about what's the standard of good is irrelevant to debate. I don't believe you have to be perfect, G-Man, to be good. And that's what you believe. That's just a difference. Now you would have to demonstrate that is a quality of good. You would have to actually make an argument and show that it is good, that that is an actual good or an actual bad. But you haven't done that. You just kind of assert it. No, I'm actually giving you my subjective opinion. Something that you've been doing for the last five years. Oh, no, no, I make arguments. I don't just get my subjective opinion. That's the problem is you think this is what I do. But that's not it. What I do is show contradictions within your own worldview by doing internal critiques. But it's okay. Maybe one day you'll understand what that is. So anyway, my premise, not my premise, my statement goes back to what I said originally. That it is impossible for man to be good without God. Since you have not been able to produce a good person without God, you said that yourself, you said you used yourself, which is why I used you in the beginning of this. I knew you was gonna try that. And basically a liar is not a good person. A gish galloper is not a good person. And it's a dishonest debating tactic. A slanderer, a person who does that just for the sake of belittling something that they have not studied nor have they understood is it's not a good characteristic of a person. Baring Paul's witness is not a good, it's not a good characteristic of him. You talked about God killing babies, crying out loud. You believe that there are circumstances where a woman should get, where a woman should have an abortion. I don't believe there are any, and I mean zero, I believe zero reasons for abortions. You actually have one or two conditions for abortion. One of them is if the woman was raped multiple times, or if the woman's life is on the line. And I can prove that with Antonio Fletcher's, with your discussion with you and Antonio Fletcher. I'm just to be sure that we are on the topic of can we be good without God? It's not clear to me, maybe I'm missing it. So I'll give you a chance if you wanna tie it back. But in terms of the abortion issue being relevant to the topic, I just need to... Yes, yes. The topic is can we be good without God? If a person can be good without God, then they should be able to hold the virtuous, the virtues, and they should be able to have the character that a good person has. The reason why- What character are you talking about? What character? What are these good things that you're talking about? The exact same question, and I just wanna answer it if you don't mind. Sure, no, no, but it'd be great. If you could tell us how to know what- I'm trying really hard to just answer James' question. Are you? Looking for honest conversation. Hold on, gentlemen, just one second. I, he's interrupting, but just to, mods, if you can do me a favor, I don't know who has been sorry for laughing for those of you who have randomly been timed out, but mods, apparently someone's randomly timing people out. So, mods, if you can do me a favor, the old rules of only hate speech, and if someone's harassing an individual, they're like, oh man, Nephilim free, you're a freak. Like, if they keep going at it, give them a warning and say, hey, it seems like you're kinda harassing somebody. Give them a warning before you delete them, but just wanna let you know about our fairly laissez faire style. Okay, go ahead, gentlemen. Yeah, so all I'm basically saying, James, is that if you can be good without God, then we should be able to find at least one person in life, and particularly scholars. Scholar claims he's an anosogatheus, right? I hope I didn't misrepresent you with that, but he claims to be an anosogatheus. I mean, he doesn't have God in his life. So scholar also said that he was a good person. And what I'm saying is that you can't be good if you're doing these things. The only way you can be good, scholar, if you repent of doing those things, and you actually follow the person with a good moral character, and that is our Lord and our savior, Jesus Christ. If you repent from all the horrible things that you do online and in these debates, what you're doing when you're talking to other people, and you actually believe in Jesus, then and only then can you actually practice true goodness. And because you don't do that, I can't consider you to be a good person, but you believe that Gish Gallup and lying, slander and baring false witness, and not accept in correction a good characteristic. I'm sorry, it just isn't. Sure. Once again, I can't do anything with your opinion. Like that's not an argument. Just you telling me that you think that I'm a bad person. Great. We'd really have to have a whole debate about this. I asked you a lot of questions. Hold on, I'm not done talking. I'm not done. I'm not done talking. So I've got a couple of things I'd like to say to you, man, give me a moment. Right? So here's the thing, right? Like just you telling me once again, your opinion that I'm a bad person under your moral standard, that you completely create it in your head based on biblical mythology from thousands of years ago, right? And you can say that it's okay to, you know, it's morally acceptable to kill children and child killers. It's not immoral, right? You can say that genocide is not immoral. You can say only people's property is not immoral. I agree that you have that moral standard, right? And in fact, like if that is your moral standard, I have no care in the world about your opinions on my moral standards, right? So that's all I'm gonna say with that. I will say that once again, I was hoping to have like some kind of argument put forth besides just you begging the question and assuming that people can't be good without God, you can't just assert that and then expect me to have to do something with it. It's just an empty assertion, just like most of what you've said is just empty opinions. Scholar, it's killing babies and the womb due to inconvenience. Is that acceptable? I don't find it acceptable, no. What if a woman's life is on the line? Yeah, if a woman's gonna die and the baby's gonna die, it seems like it would be reasonable to have an abortion. Oh, you believe in murdering a baby if the mother is gonna die? I don't believe it's murdering a baby. If the mother's gonna die and the baby's gonna die anyways. Okay, so. But you don't call it murdering when God tells people to kill children now, do you? What do you have a problem with killing children and babies? You just have a problem sometimes if it's not your God ordering people to do it. Kind of ironic, isn't it? Okay, so I'm gonna answer your question and then if you want, you can bar me with some questions if you like. All right, not get down to me but ask me a couple of questions if you like. So here's the thing Scholar, if a mother truly loved their children which a lot of these young girls don't, they would sacrifice their life in order to give their children a chance. What you're advocating is that the woman's gonna die then her life is certainly more important than her babies. We don't even see that in nature. Like a lion will die before a lion decides that they don't wanna give birth to their baby. And we humans are supposed to be smarter than these animals and we don't even understand that a lot of times. That's why what you just said is nonsense. But I've been hitting you with a lot of questions. Even talking about your character and everything and whatnot. Concerning this debate and the topic of the debate, why don't you ask me a few questions Scholar? So you can feel a little bit more comfortable about the slaughter that you're going through right now. Oh, I'm, I'm, I'm perfectly comfortable with this conversation. I just, like I said, I find it ironic that you're taught, you're bringing up abortion to me and murdering children but yet you think it's perfect immoral to murder children in certain situations. So I guess you're kind of here. I believe a couple of times. Except when God tells people to kill babies. And kill pregnant women in cities that they're taking over. Are you finished? Or can I respond? Okay, cool. So, so you're confusing a irresponsible brat who don't want to take care of their kid with God's administering justice. So how does that follow? Well, I mean, if you're going to claim it's justice to kill a baby for what the parents did, I'm kind of confused. I don't, that's what you're saying is justice because the babies didn't do anything that God ordered it to be killed. What did they do that was wrong? Need about 40 seconds to answer that question. Is that okay? Okay. You don't need to give me time. 40 seconds, I promise now, you're a good person, right? 40 seconds. All right, cool. So God is eternal. He sees the beginning in the end. He knew these kids were going to be some vicious murderers and that's why he ordered their death. You know what I mean? You're a finite human being and you don't know Jack except for what is revealed to you. So you can't sit there and tell somebody who is eternal, who's already seen the beginning and the end that that person is doing something wrong. Now, if you could tell me how that logically follows how you can do that, I'm dying to learn something here today. Sure. But what you gave as an example of context isn't correct in first annual. They didn't do it. God didn't kill those babies because he saw what they were going to do in the future. He did it as revenge for what the culture had done years before to the Israelites. So your context there isn't correct. So it was revenge. You would have to define its justice to kill children, descendants of people who attacked the Israelites many, many years ago. There's two things I can say about that. Joseph Stalin killed children in communist Russia and then number two, gotten in with these children were going to be when they grew up. Also, can you do me a favor in front of this entire audience and condemn abortion across the board please? Why? Why would I already told you my opinions on abortion? I told you if a woman's life's in danger that she should probably have the abortion or if the baby's already dead inside sometimes. Some of the things that you as a Christian would, I mean, the way God makes these babies, they come out completely medically unviable quite a bit at a time. It's amazing God wouldn't be a little bit more cautious and caring so that babies don't come out completely crippled or brain damaged or hurt but God just can't do that, right? It's gonna need about 40 seconds to respond to that. You can take 40, you can take 45. I appreciate that. Just to get what I'm gonna say, James, just let me just get this up before I forget what I'm gonna say. Does it, as long as it ties back to the original topic? Yes, it's on the original topic but I have 20 years, because he's the one asking me questions right now. You gotta remember that now, okay? So scholar, you can't really abort a baby but baby's already dead, okay? That's number one. Number two, sir. You can actually, just don't you know, they do abort a baby. I forgot what I was gonna say so I apologize, can answer the second part of your question. I've been interrupted by James Angus. I can't really, I can't remember what I'm gonna say if I'm gonna be interrupted by you guys. So getting back to the actual topic is- We'll kick it back. Let's get back to that topic. Can we be good without God? The answer is no, because all men are corrupt and all men are sinners and all men do horrible things to each other. That is why no one can be good without God. Is what I've been arguing from the very beginning of this and is what I'm gonna argue until the end of this debate. So scholar fiction, please explain to me how you do not do horrible things to other people. I, first of all, that is just an assertion. Saying that people can't be good without God is an assertion, it's not an argument. You're not actually arguing for what the topic of the debate is. And once again, whether a moral or not is not relevant to the topic of the debate. It's not relevant at all. I don't know why. This is why I think we have to keep going back to saying, let's go back to the topic, is because you're so off of it. So make your argument, put it out in premises, do something to convince me that there is this, there's this good that I am not doing. The standard of good that you are claiming, I wanna believe in it. Teach me why as one, show me the standard of good that exists. And then explain why the standard of good tells people to kill innocent children. Last time I checked, I thought this was a debate where we disagree with each other's premises and we disagree with each other's worldviews or whatever regarding this particular topic. It is not my job to convince you of nothing. It is your job to take this information and do your research to see whether or not you are educated, you are as educated that you claim you are on this particular topic. The fact of the matter is that you are without God. You said that you are a good person. I believe that you cannot be good without God. And yet I can prove that you have lied, that you have gish-galloped and that you have slander and that you have very false witness and you are not accepting correction. And I also object to the fact that I'm off topic because I'm very much on topic because scholar fiction is struggling to be able to show how he's good without God. And if you can't do it, then my subjective objective of being in wins on this particular matter. To be fair though, the topic is more on whether or not we can be, it's kind of like the broader question of whether or not humans can be good without God. So we've talked a lot about Skyler's, but to be strict on the title, we do have to actually talk about whether or not not just Skyler could theoretically be good or bad without God. Well, James, this is why I'm gonna disagree with you a little bit because when me and you agreed to have this debate, it was based on the title of the debate. We didn't discuss the specifics about what we was gonna talk about. What it was understood universally, what it was meant for a person to, for a person to believe that you could be good without God. I have mentioned scholar fiction who does not know God. I have mentioned that I was gonna use Matt Delhonte's argumentation that says, which Matt Delhonte constantly attacks the nature of God. It says that he is a good person because he does not do what God does. All right? I took that same argument. Hold on a minute, scholar, you're talking about hours of chain bluff, yeah? No, we don't have that much time left. I took that same argument and applied it to people like Joseph Stalin, the atheists as a whole, and also Scholar and anybody else who doesn't know God. And I talked about their works and what they actually do. And I've shown that these are not characteristics that we will call good. I'm not really understanding how this is not on topic when I have demonstrated and showed with facts, not my opinion, with facts, that calling people's jobs and getting them fired, okay? By trolling people and saying that you wanna rape their mouths, by trying to get people fired from their employment, by getting on here in Gitch Gallupy people, by slamming people. You're Gitch Gallupy right now. Things are good characteristics. So if you're doing, well, you're not listening, scholar, so if you're doing those things and you're not good, then my point is true that you cannot be good without God. So again, again, if you- No, no, no, no. Can we stop- No, no, no, no. It's a debate in modern debate history. This is, first of all, all you're doing is saying, in my opinion, you can't be good without God. That's not an argument. And these silly faces you keep making. Like, you're so, it's painful for us out there. I want people to think better of you. Like, you're a laughing stock because of this. Oh man, like, stay on topic. I don't know if this is like, this is what gets your fucking some rocks off. Like, this is what makes you feel good is to attack me personally and just talk about how I'm a bad person. But I mean, like I said, I don't know what to do with anything. All you're doing is telling me your opinion. You're not making arguments. You're begging the question and assuming that people can't be good without God. If you're basically saying, Skyler, come and argue and prove to me people can be good without God. No, I don't have to do that. You're creating a premise that you haven't justified, you haven't backed up, you haven't argued. Frankly, this is why I probably shouldn't debate you is these shitty strategies that you have in place. And somehow you'll think you went away tonight winning and kicking my ass somehow. Go ahead. But can we keep it on topic? Can you actually demonstrate your claims? Demonstrate that someone could be, without just begging the question and assuming a moral standard, you're saying there's a moral standard. I don't, I need you to demonstrate that moral standard exists. Okay, James, this is what I suggest James and then I'll answer a scholar fiction. I suggest we get the closing statements and get to the questions from the audience because I want to reveal why I'm doing what I'm doing. So you can, can I get to my closing statements on James, 10 minutes and then you can get to the question? What you think is that I argue my opinion all the time and I don't, you're confused by the argument. And what you're doing is you're thinking that by doing this the whole, I'm still talking it. I'm still talking, I'm still talking, I'm still talking. I know you asked James a question and I'm responding after, let me, I would like to respond. I think it would be fair. You've given, you've ridden Schuyler pretty hard tonight in terms of bringing up things here. I don't think any of us expected. So I do want to give Schuyler a chance to give a response here. And we can go to the- Why are you a good person? So it's not my job to prove to you that I am a good person, right? You're claiming I'm not a good person. It's just your opinion that I'm not a good person, right? And see, you keep smiling and looking moronic because you think that when I debate people that I'm arguing my opinion versus their opinion. And that's because you don't understand the moral arguments that I make. So when I talk about something like genocide in the Bible, baby killing, I'm not doing it to measure my moral system versus your moral system. What I'm doing is I'm showing you contradictions from your own position. When God says he cares about children and loves children, yet has them violently executed when he could do otherwise, right? So the silliness of like, I guess this is why I should learn not to debate you because you can't be taken seriously. But anyways, so whenever you're ready to demonstrate that people can't be good without God, which is the burden on you, I'm ready to hear your argument or you can just go back to attacking me and that maybe makes you feel better inside. Okay, so earlier in this, Matt, before we started the show, I actually did some pre-trials and you tell me now, right? A lot of people watching this know what my pre-trials are all about, right? And it has to be a very topic. And I've been talking about this for like two weeks now. It's been an extremely popular topic online now. And so the reason why I use you is because you would be the, what do you call it, the example for all of us because you claim that you could be good without God. I don't think I could be good without God. So I have to use somebody as an example for morality and unfortunately, I don't know anybody who is good without God. And that means you, you're not good without God, Matt, though hunting ain't good without God, our laws ain't good without God, the atheist community ain't good without God, the agnostic community isn't good without God, witches aren't good without God, the warlocks ain't good without God, nobody is good without God, Christians aren't good without God. So I'm just telling you that my argumentation is that liars, slingish gallipers, and I've demonstrated why you're a liar earlier in this show and anybody can go back and go look at it. I'm still talking about me not the topic. I'm talking about me not the topic. Yeah, but you're talking about me not the topic. I thought we, I thought we'd been multiple times the moderation. I'm talking, I'm talking. I'm talking, I'm talking. I think that we need to get back on. I'm talking, talking, talking, talking. Despite other, okay. Despite other nights, I think you've definitely come at Skyler tonight to where it was, we can call it even. So I think it might be best to go to the actual topic. Yeah, not act like you're a boxer and not- So here's the thing, here's the thing. He can't defend his position. So what I, this is what I recommend, James. We go to closing statements and then we go to the audience. So the audience can get their questions on because unfortunately Skyler officially can't- I think that you look like you're head-hunting Skyler tonight. No, not head-hunting, this is part of my strategy. I told you I was gonna come on here. I never argued that morality is subjective. I came on here on purpose to show scholar fiction two things. Number one, that he is not a good person without God. Number two, and there's a lot of people that's in on this that understands how ridiculously stupid his line of argumentation for morality is. And it is, you can't get on here according to my subjective objective of opinion. Okay, cool. I'm gonna use that argument today and according to my subjective, objective opinion, Skyler, God is good and you are not. It's just my opinion. Do you understand that, okay? Never use that argument again because this is how Eschig felt when you did this to her. Okay? So again, so again, Skyler, if you believe in the people of God, show it. Show it. This might be a good time. I can give Skyler a chance to respond since you did ask him a question, G-man, but I do want to, then this might be a chance where we'll give Skyler the last word since we had G-man start, since you had the first word and then we can go into Q and A. I love it. That sounds good. Yeah, I don't, G-man wasted all our times again, a debate where he thought he was true of proving some kind of point. The irony is he'll watch this later and realize how silly what he's doing is. Yeah, like I said, I don't argue my opinion when I debate people. We're not arguing of moral opinions versus moral opinions when I have these debates. You don't understand the argument. That's why you think what you're doing tonight shows me or teaches me something. You're thinking that I always just argue my opinion versus their opinion, which is not what's going on. You've wasted your time tonight. You've literally proved nothing. You just gave me your opinion. You told me that, hey, you're moral under my system. I appreciate your opinion, I guess. I'm fine, I'm fine with being a moral if it means that I'm not for owning people's property or taking women and children as plunder. If you want to believe those things are moral, hey, man, you have Adam. That's perfectly okay. It's just not cool with my book. I don't get down with slavery and child killing. But yeah, so I was given nothing but your opinion. I was given no arguments. I had fun though, it was appreciative. I hope you folks like the kinder, gentler style of fiction. But James, thank you for hosting me. This was an amazing time. You guys were incredible. Okay, so it's my turn for my closing statement now. Well, I mentioned that it was probably gonna be the last statement before we go to Q&A just because we had you start, G-Man. So I have a feeling I know what you'd say anyway. No closing statements? Like I'm gonna be able to give at least two minute closing statement, you know? We, the last, you did kind of have like several minutes there and you ended it with a question for Skyler. So I gave Skyler a chance to answer and- Okay, that's fine, that's all right, that's all right. But do want to mention folks, hold on one second, I'm behind here. But do want to say thanks so much for your questions, folks. It's certainly been a wild one. And we were excited, I forgot to mention, if you have a question, I think it's gonna be a tough one for us to get to every one of them now because if you throw it in the live chat now it's hard but we'll try our best. And Super Chat's an option in which case you can make a comment toward one of the speakers and it would push your question to the top of the list for the Q&A. And with that, thanks for your Super Chat from Fatman who says, G-Man, do you still believe liars are worse than child molesters? Babies are selfish. Yes, and yes, I believe that liars are worse than child molesters because I believe, okay, let's say you molested a child one time. Yeah, there's a lot of psychological things that could happen to that child. But lying, lying is something that can affect literally everybody. And I don't know how much time I would be allowed to be able to answer that, but let's just take, for example, let's say for example that you were supposed to get a paycheck from your boss and your boss lied to you and said he wasn't gonna pay you. You won't be able to pay your rent. The water bill people won't be able to get their money and then when people that need the money for their rent, they won't be able to go to the bank and they won't be able to give their mortgage made payment to their bank or whatever. And then the bank is gonna be vexed and they're gonna get laws made that's gonna affect everybody else because if that one person's holding a lie, lies affect everybody. As far as a baby being selfish, ladies and gentlemen, all you gotta do is ask a baby to be quiet or ask a baby to or tell a child. I know a funny scholar from your- Are you calling baby selfish? You're hilarious. You gotta give him a chance to respond. Let's let GMN carry it. So let me respond, okay? So babies will tend to do what a baby wants to do. And that in a lot of us would deem that to be very selfish. We have to teach babies not to be selfish. See, no one has to teach you to steal. No one has to teach you to kill. No one has to teach you to do those things. We naturally do those things on our own. And ever since we were little babies, we've been selfish and arrogant and we've been a lot of different things until we're taught not to do those things. So yeah, I hold to my worldview on those particular things and we'll debate anybody on that topic when it's scientific. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat from Caleb or Caleb as he likes to be called. Caleb says the debate hasn't started and Skyler has already lost. You got a critic out there. Let's see. That sounds like another person. I think I saw that. It does. Athena goddess of wisdom and warfare. Thanks for your super chat. Said I am insulted. You compared Magneto to GMN. That's right. These guys are like Magneto and Professor Xavier. They're like kind of friends, kind of enemies. Sometime. Actually, I think they're pretty much just all. They're always foes. I thought tonight might be different, but thanks for your super chat. Caleb appreciate it. Said Skyler needs a fan for that nervous sweat. Next up. I need a big, I need a burst. I need to stop wearing this sweater every time, but I need to represent Raptors Jesus. They're living down here in Florida top folks. Thanks for your super chat. Japp Jappexekin007 said, none of those define a good person, just a person that does good deeds. Was that for me or is that for? I'm not exactly sure. I would think that's for GMN because he was listening to things that he claimed to make somebody a good person. I think so. And this person was saying, yeah. Okay. So that's very vague. And at the chance of me sounding silly, I'm like going to be a little bit more specific about what he's talking about. I don't even know what the heck he's saying that none of these, none of these white. The things that you were saying were good that make people. I don't know. I need that person to be a little bit more specific. Well, that's what I'm telling you. I'm telling you, no, that's what he was saying. I try to be honest, Skyler. Honestly. I know, I know, I appreciate it, but I mean, you can answer the question now. Next up. I don't know what to say. Stupid or horror energy is after you, GMN. She says, Eugenie Scott coined Gish Gallup, not Eugenie. She's a woman. Did you miss gender Eugenie Scott? There's a possibility that I might have done that. Stupid or energy me. You got to go out to dinner one day, get some candlelight and talk about this someday. Like, I don't know. Maybe we can talk about that one day over a candlelight dinner or something like that. If you're really a woman. You know. Sounds romantic. It could be, you never know, stupid or energy could be a 400 pound man laying on his bed. You don't know. Oh God. Let's go. Let's see. Oh, don't act like you don't like it. Next up, thanks for your super chat. Jappexican007 says there is no good without God just a chemical's opinion versus another bag of chemicals opinion. I mean, it's always weird to me when I hear theists refer to human beings. It's just bags of chemicals. You never tend to, I mean, I guess you could find every once in a while an atheist that would refer to themselves as bag chemicals. That's not a typical thing non-believers say, but you know, you can always find someone who's out of the norm. Gotcha. And thanks for your super chat from our dearest friend. Stupid or energy strikes again. G-Man has hearts in his eyes. She says that gish galloping is when you bring up many different subjects in succession, not ask the same question over and over. Okay. Stupid or energy. Listen to me. Call me, just call me. If you're a woman, call me. I'm available, call me, okay? But to answer that, if you go back and actually look at the school scholar fiction and S.J. Thomason, that's exactly what he did. And it wasn't even a good gish gallop. So just, just check it out. And he didn't care about how the woman felt. You know, didn't give her an opportunity to answer. She put all this time and energy in there. Man, they didn't care about our answers and stuff like that. Anyway, stupid or energy. That's not at all what happened. Next up, thanks for your super chat. And I, I think it's funny that G-Man, your only, your only requirement for stupid or energy is that they be a woman. That's for you. That's like, you know, the bar is not that high. It sounds like, but let's see. And Flatter, thanks for your super chat says, Nathan Thompson for defaulty? What does that mean? Defaulty of the year 2020. Next up, thanks for your super chat, Martin C, who says points for, quote, subjective, objective opinion, unquote, awesome. I think that was that from you, G-Man. Yeah, I love my new subjective, objective opinions because all I gotta do is give everybody my subjective, objective opinions and I'll be right all the time. Despite giving my subjective, objective opinions. No facts. Just my subjective, objective opinions. This sounds like a wrap. Subjective, objective opinions. Subjective, objective opinions. That sounds like something awesome. You're not one stupid. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat from movie theory. Yes, this is the one. That's, I was gonna say Caleb stole movie theory. Movie theory says, Skyler already lost and doesn't even know it. I think you were like here last time and you said that exact same thing to you because you said, man, that's the worst kind of losing. Thanks for your. And I love that they donate money just to tell you that and tell me that. Like please keep donating the modern day to donate them. It's a. Tell me how terrible I am. I appreciate it. It's the same, it's the same super chat every night. But thank your stupid whore energy who says you can use a concept as a standard like human wellbeing. Why do you need a person? Dirt. Dirt. I don't want to go out to eat at dirt. I mean, if you got a good restaurant, we can go to the, we can go to that restaurant and I'll be able to find them up now. She said that you have to use a standard James. Did you read that again, at least? Yes. Well, she said you can use a concept as a standard like human wellbeing. Why do you need a person as the standard? Well, the reason why you need a person because you need some consistency using a concept, you know, if somebody uses their own subjective, objective opinion, you know what I mean? That phrase will work to me anything. But when you got a person who demonstrates their goodness or their morality, then we have something that we can follow. And again, stupid whore energy, if you're a good person, I want to know whether or not you're my standard and I should follow your example. And by the way, I will not take you to dirt, McDonald's maybe, but not dirt. So, you know that, so yeah. Next. I like how you say it's a consistency. You need a human being for consistency, but you don't believe human beings are consistent in their morality. Like you contradict your own self when you're saying that. Make sure you guys watch H.J. Thomas in the Sunday. Just make sure you watch us in the Sunday. Let's see, next one. Standalone, thanks for your super chat, said, did all the Tutsis die in the Rwandan genocide? The what? He doesn't even know this. He doesn't know this. I'm sorry, yeah. Did all the Tutsis die in the Rwandan genocide? I don't know what the Rwandan genocide is. So, that's probably for scholars, scholars incident. Gotcha. Next up, thanks for your super chat from, the layman says, Schuyler did a great job at remaining patient and kind amidst G-man's aggression, a true Christian virtue. I agree. Schuyler's fiction was very kind and very patient and he was different today. I think after putting him on trial today, which he was found guilty as charged on, I think he found out that being a good person is better to be that way when he's showing that it's to be a guilty, and I hope he knows what I was up. Schuyler, you did a good job. Me, he doesn't run or boss. Well, I mean, truthfully, what I've kind of learned some things recently, which is like you have to be understanding of people, even if they're like confused, ignorant, like really not well studied in particular positions and laugh at themselves constantly when they're on screen. Like you just have to have patience with people like that and not take it personally because I understand that like you wanna, make me look like a bad person and talk about how bad I am, but this is just like your insecurities inside, right? Like making you have to like feel, this makes you feel good when you talk bad about people. So yeah, I just came to understand, I gotta be more forgiving. I gotta understand not all people are gonna live up to the same standard that I have, right? So that's why I've been doing it. Must keep moving. I appreciate it, yeah. Must keep moving. Jen S, thanks for your super chat says, repent and trust Jesus. Jesus equals true joy. Appreciate that, Jen. P Barnes, thanks for your super chat as well said, was kind of interested after your opening G-Man as it was a little different. Just using this as a soapbox to attack Skyler is pretty sad in my subjective opinion. Well, I definitely appreciate your subjective opinion on that, sir. And as long as you understand that as your opinion, attacks scholar, no, scholar is doesn't know God and I keep constantly being told that you could be good without God. Scholar Fischer himself said that he was good and Scholar Fischer felt to show that he was good. You see, if I were to argue from an objective and this is what I wanna get to, if I were to argue from an objective world, Stan Samu says, Stan, a worldview, Scholar would be the one that's saying, objective, subjective objective and he would be constantly attacking the morality of God, which he already tried to do and he's seen that it didn't work. Hence the strategy that I use to put M1 trial for once and let him see that he is not the good person that he was and that he was guilty as charged. Gotcha. And next up, let's see. Yes, we will, as I mentioned, we will link any after show in the debate. So if you would like, I can put that in the description. There's apparently going to be an after show at Dragnox Silvus' show. That's your old buddy, right, G-Man? I'm not, okay, no, no, that's a cesspool for immorality. I'm not going there. Gotcha. I'm telling you that right now. That's a cesspool. So G-Man may or may not be there. Okay, thanks for your super chat, P-Barns. I heard those guys were stealing money from safes. That's what I heard. You can't trust people who steal money from safes. No, you definitely can't do that. I felt a lot of security vans, you know. You can't do that, no. Anybody who steals a safe should be locked up. Definitely, I believe that. Yeah, especially. Is there some sort of inside joke? This strikes me as an inside joke. Thanks for your super chat from... Scholar's Soul is Safe, I think. I think there's a rumor going around saying that Scholar's Soul is Safe. What was it me? I'm not 100% sure. I don't remember no more. Did the joke got so old that we kind of... We'll talk about your personal lives later. P-Barns, thanks for your super chat. Said, was kind of interested. Oh, we got that one, embarrassing. Thanks for your super chat. Said, Raptor Jesus. Hmm, ramen. Harley Quinn, thanks for your super chat. Said, chocolate atheist, where does God say wartime excuses the suspension of morality in the Bible? I'm not really sure he ever says that, nor did I say that or anybody else here said that. I'm confused. What is chocolate atheist? Oh, chocolate atheist. Oh, that was when I pretended to be an atheist and I fooled the whole world into believing I was an atheist. And they all remember that. It was a huge event. It was when G-Man lied to everybody. Remember how he called me a liar? And G-Man lied to everybody. When I lied to everybody and told everybody that I was an atheist, I was. Next up, next up, Dragnox Silvis. Thanks for your super chat. Who said, no, he didn't lose his job. He lied about that. Anybody can talk to the old employer and they can talk to him and he'll tell you what happened. The day all that stuff was ordered that he and his friends called on that job there. So, and also Dragnox was also laughing. He's another immoral person. Laughing at somebody being out in the cold, laughing at somebody being hungry, laughing at somebody being thirsty, laughing at somebody being homeless, laughing at somebody who makes them believe. Let's see. Thanks for your super chat. Frank McEvoy. I know I'm, I said that wrong, sorry. Let me know if I'll try better next time. Thanks for your super chat, Frank said. I may be wrong, but I think there is a difference between the God in the Old Testament and God the Father. The God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament are exactly identical. Problem is that you have people that read the Old Testament and they do not understand what they're reading. So they just make assumptions about what they're reading because they don't understand. And then when they get in front of a theologian or somebody who's learned, they don't take correction, you know what I mean? Locan16, thanks for your super chat. Said G-Man has a good brain. I appreciate that, I call home and thank you. The fan out there, nice. Fatman, thanks for your super chat, says. G-Man, what is your fetish with Matt Dilla-Huntie? It doesn't matter who you debate, you bring him up. Two minutes in and you bring him up. Is it because he's on national stage and you're not or is it because he's right? Or are you attracted to him? I added that last part. I think it has something to do with the bionic dance obsession I had. Bionic dance never really gave me an opportunity to debate her. I don't debate her on no times. No, I don't care about talking to one no more. Matt Dilla-Huntie has never given me that one-on-one opportunity to debate him. I think that's all that is. And if I do debate him, he goes into retirement on the topic of slavery. I'm sorry, but it's gonna happen. Next up, I'm sorry. Wilson, thanks for your super chat. I said, well, I guess God, Stalin and Hitler on the same page, seeing as none of them committed genocide. And neither did God either. He was in order to commit genocide, everybody has to be killed and everybody wasn't killed. Next up. Definition of genocide. Cibella Shepherd. Thanks for your super chat just to get through as many questions said. For Skyler, did you steal a safe? Man, what is it with you stealing people's safes? Oh, I haven't. I know someone who has, but I haven't. Next up. Garth Cooks. Thanks for your super chat. I said, G-man, you're talking loud, ain't sayin' nothin'. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. Thank you. Next up. Stupid whore energy strikes again. She says, G-man, are you aware that temptation and desire are synonyms? I'm aware that a lot of atheists need to go to school. That's what I'm aware of. And I think a lot of them need to go by biblical definitions and not what they think because Jesus was tempted in every way. That doesn't mean he had a desire to do those things. Again, go to school, ladies and gentlemen, it would do you a lot of good. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat from our dearest friend, Charles Insolo, appreciate it, asked Raptor Jesus has us quote under his claws, unquote, Rahman. Rahman. Next up. And Flat Earth, thanks for your super chat, said G is not, quote, good, unquote. Flat Earth said that about me? They said, yeah, because I'm about to leave. They said, yeah, they said G is not good. I don't understand. But Slam R.N., thanks for your super chat, said one person was timed out and people are freaking out. Next up. We glad we worked that out. Sillian Holland, thanks for your super chat, said can we get G-man's definition of good because it seems his definition is to be a good person you must believe in God, which is nonsense. So, so well explained definition, please. Well, I mean, I strange shared this earlier. So I guess I'll read it again. To be desire or approve of, I believe I said that earlier, having the qualities required of a particular role, that which is morally right or righteous, the benefit or advantage to someone or something. You know what I mean? And when we're talking about a person being good, we're talking about their nature. We're not necessarily talking about doing good things because a bad person can do good things from time to time. A good person by nature will always do good. And the human beings don't do that. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat from dearest friend Phillip. Good to see you again. Says, hey G-man, you've been trash talking Skylar a lot for minor things, but how come you don't trash talk your own God for torturing people in hell? Okay, the people that go to hell deserves to be there. These are the people who mock God, who say he ain't real, worship other gods and do everything that they're not supposed to be doing and actually make excuses for their wrongs, instead of taking responsibility for them. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat. Curtin C who says G-man, where is quote Gish Gallup unquote a sin in the Bible? Oh, when we ask a question, the Bible says that we're supposed to be quick to listen and slow to speak. So when a person asks you a question, they're supposed to give you an opportunity to answer. If a person is constantly asking you questions and not giving you an opportunity to answer dishonestly, that means that person is being dishonest and lying is a sin and God hates the lying time. Gish Gallup is not that. A Gish Gallup is if I bring up a bunch of different topics at once. It's not that if you don't let somebody have enough time to answer, are you asked the same question over and over. Gish Gallup would be bringing up evolution, morality, the trinity, all at one time. That's what a Gish Gallup is. You don't understand these terms. It's like you're a child using big words and it makes you feel good. So try using the words. According to my subjective, objective opinion, I disagree with you with my subjective, objective opinion disagree. You can disagree with objective facts. So you like, or you leave your argument, Scholar. Me, movie theory, thanks for your super chat. Who said pro life is the way to be pro child, pro life. Lehman, thanks for your super chat. Who said, G-man, do you believe berating Schuyler in order to win a debate is a Christian virtue? Yes, and I'm gonna tell you why. 40 seconds to answer this by the way. If I would have argued for objective moral values in this particular debate, Scholar fiction would have spent the entire debate like he does in every other debate attacking the guy with the Bible. But because I argued from his perspective and the debate topic, which I've been on purpose, was whether or not a person can be good without God, Scholar claims he's good. Scholar doesn't have a God. So I decided to take a look into his life. And we found that he was lying, dish-galloping slanderer who bears false witness and does not take correction. And we do not consider those people to be good. So yes, it was very good for me to do that because the Bible tells me to expose them for the works of darkness. Thanks for your super chat. Under his clause 667 says, what does it take to tickle G-man's G-spot? I think girls have G-spots. I don't think men do. Gotcha, thank you for that. It's right near your tape. Had made, okay, gosh, had made the cat. Thanks for your super chat. Let's see, says tell G-man to tell G-cat that he still owes me $5. Also tell him what a Gish Gallop is. Okay, I'll do that right now. Hey Mitchy, you gonna pay that five bucks back, Mitchy? No. This man is insane. He ain't gonna pay you back your $5 soon, okay? Come on with it, it's soon. Thanks for your super chat. Stupid whore energy, bringing the hammer down once again. She says, G-man, can you quote the Bible verse where it says God killed women and children and even the cows because they would eventually be very evil. You're back to the future rationalization is anachronistic. Stupid whore energy, cool. Okay, so stupid whore energy. Listen to me very carefully here in the book of Revelation, God says that he is the alpha and the omega and the Greek and that's the first Greek alphabet and the last letter in the Greek alphabet, right? Because there's a beginning and the end and he's eternal. He's already seen what's gonna happen, okay? So I don't need to show you that theology, okay? I'm assuming you know what it means to live in eternity versus living in diamond space. I'm also assuming that you know what the word alpha and what the alpha and omega is. So super whore energy, you need to call me. You need to call me. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat. P Barnes who says, I need about 10 seconds for James to read this super chat if that's okay. Next up, thanks for your super chat. Michael Dresden says, I have to wear a mask? No, my body, my choice. Thanks Michael Dresden for your other super chat who said pro-choice is murder. It's like getting a little heated. That topic is coming up a lot lately. Marty Camijo, thanks for your super chat. Murder, murder, just a scholar. You're a murderer too, scholar, because you support murder. It's only like that. I'll give Skyler a chance to respond and then we have to go to the next one. Yeah, I mean, this is just child like behavior and him lying. Thanks for your super chat. Marty Camijo who says, thank you for the laughs, G-man. I needed it. You're welcome. And I really hope you understand the stupidity of his line of argumentation that he uses when he comes in here every week, talking about some unscrupulous, my subject of opinion, my subject of opinion. Anybody can do that. And I must start doing that for no one at the baby. Because he needs a different script. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat. From Timothy Foster. Appreciate it. It said, G-man, you're just asserting that all atheists are bad by attacking an individual. You need to show how we're all bad. Why am I bad? For example, you don't know me. Okay, so give me your name. I'll put you on my docket on Wednesday. You're going to pre-trial. And I'll show you why you're a liar. I don't know what that was about. Some random stranger, you have no information on. You'll be on my docket. I'll put you on my docket, and then I'll... How would you know anything about that guy? It's just some stranger that made a comment. Like, what are you going to do? Like, this is bearing false witness. This is lying about people. I'm a horrible person, so are you. Apparently you are. Apparently you are. I'm not talking to you. You're agreeing with me. You are. You're saying you're a terrible person. You're talking to me, Skyler. I'm a big boy. I can take it, though. Don't worry me. Next up, thanks for your super chat. The yoga, she says. For anyone in the chat that doesn't believe in God, but still loves your fellow human neighbor, bless you, you're doing the right thing. Duke Davidson, thanks for your super chat. Who said, GM, genocide is a deliberate plan to destroy people of a national, ethnic, or religious group. We say the Holocaust in the, gosh. Sorry, the only reason I say, gosh, is because I'm like, man, YouTube is going to think we're talking about like the worst stuff ever. Yeah, yeah. So we say the terrible event of World War II and the assault on Native Americans with genocide despite their being survivors. Well, let me answer that. Number one, when we're talking about genocide, God would have to kill human beings, right? You actually go read the story of the flood. He wasn't killing human beings. He was killing half-breeds because enough of them was having sex with women and they was giving birth to things that were not humans no more. So again, you can go back and go read the story again and you'll see that it's not genocide. Again, I recommend you go to Bible school, seminary or get some talk with somebody who's been there before. You just misrepresent the Bible. There's multiple instances of him telling. No, I didn't. Yes, there. It isn't just the flood. Like, yes, the Nephilim were destroyed, the flood. If I take your worldview into consideration, I'll grant you that. After the Nephilim, why are you so moronic? Why do you dance and act like a buffoon? Because I know I won this debate in my opening statement, good. That's good, Jim. He's just so dumb. Thanks for your... It's like a five-year-old man child. You've got a statement, Skyler. Next up, happy dude. Thanks for your super chat, said God and exists and Jesus lives, repent and believe. Thanks for that. The undead Christian, thanks for your super chat as well who said, Skyler, if morals are only subjective, does that make everyone's morals irrelevant if it's just opinion and feeling? That's a good question. It depends on whether people find other people's opinions relevant, right? We do this every day within society. There are people whose opinions you value more over others, right? Certain opinions may not be relevant to you. Like to me, G-man's opinions aren't relevant. He's a moron. I just have to deal with moronic stuff, right? But there are other people who are smart, intelligent, understand the Bible that aren't dishonest pieces of shit, right? And those people, I can value their opinions. So yes, that's the deal. Sometimes you can value other people's opinions. Sometimes you don't. I don't respect racist people's opinions. So yeah, but that's how the world works. Next up, thanks for your super chat from club who says, obviously Skyler took his Adderall today. Let's see. Well, you're very peaceful. It makes you peaceful. Let's see. I don't really know if Skyler uses Adderall and there's nothing wrong if you do. So next up, gosh, that was awkward. I just smoke weed. Cannabis is the thing to take in. I heard that's a cool thing, though. You smoke weed. Thank you everybody for watching. Why aren't you interrupting me in the middle of what I'm saying? Are you not paying attention to what people are listening to? What are you doing? I can't believe. Come on, somewhere there, G-man. Like pay attention to what's happening. You're literally like dancing on screen, talking to you. I'm in the middle of a sentence. You're still in it. I've never wanted to be so fast in my life. That's the problem. I've never wanted to be so fast in my life. I know you feel that way, just like you feel you're a real man. Everybody watching this knows it. But you're not a real man. Everybody who argues on the internet with almost no people watching this channel. Next up, we must keep going. Must keep going. We gotta keep going. Thanks, guys. No one's gonna watch it. Hwancho Del Rancho. Thanks for your super chat says, has Skyler ever stolen a safe? I haven't. They're coming at you about the safe. Yeah. You know what I've never done too, is like, accuse, well, there's a lot of things that G-man's done that I haven't done. Thanks for your super chat. Tioga says, B-E-B, bring Erika back. I agree. No, no, what Erika? No, please, not Dr. Dino. Please don't, oh, no, I'm just kidding. Just talking about how pleasant Erika is. G-man likes her. Okay, thanks for your super chat. He loves winning. No, no, no, no. Next up, Brandra Zero. Thanks for your super chat. Who said, you stole this debate, G-man. You took everyone's time for your own personal gain. Do this on your own channel and your own time. You are a horrible person. Thank you, Jesus, for dying on a cross with me, Lord. Thank you. That is why we all need you, Lord, because all of us are horrible. Amen to that comment and amen to that comment. You ain't doing nothing but proving my point. Marty Camillo, thanks for your super chat. Said, why is G-man such a child? That's a good question. Why do you act like this G-man? That's actually since super chat here. Why G-man's a child? First of all, we need to get the definition of a child. I think I'm pretty old. I don't think I'm, I got gray hairs there and everything. I think the mentality is what they're talking about. Your mentality. My mentality, my mentality tells me that a child- Your mentality tells you something? And a child deserves a right to live even if the mother is going to die, Skylar. Unless God tells the person to kill them. They don't deserve to live, right? Like, except those- You're a horrible person, Skylar. You're a horrible person. You're the one who supports babies. I told you we're ready. Tioga, thanks for your super chat. Good old Tioga says, stupid horror energy is a chat. Very nice. They're buddies. Xavier, thanks for your super chat. All me, all me. Xavier, thanks for your super chat. Says, Hannah asks, what does ICE spell? I know what it spells. Ooh, ooh, ooh, can I answer this question? Okay. Gremlin. Thank you. Next up. Xavier, thanks for your, oh, we got that one. Spirit self, thanks for your, thanks for your super chat. Said congrats on bringing that sexy back, James. Appreciate that. That's Earl, the postman. 65 year old postman from Alabama. So, good friend of the channel. Next up, Tioga, thanks for your super chat. Who says, Applebee's G-Man? This is when you said stupid horror energy. You said that you would take her on a date at McDonald's. I'll pay for everything. I'll hold the door open for you and everything. If you're a woman, if you're a man, I ain't taking you nowhere. But if you're a woman, I will take you out to eat, find a dime, and you- All you have to be is a woman. It doesn't matter anything else. You may be a murderer in prison, but G-Man is prepared to date you if you're a woman. So, I will date you and I will wind and guide you and treat you like a woman so you can start calling yourself a whore. And it's something of that, you know? Next up, thanks for your super chat from Sphere itself. Said by the way, this was completely embarrassing for G-Man. So, the person who said that this is completely embarrassing for G-Man, my argument for that is, uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh, iKonTrollTrollTrollJustJustLikeYou, uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh. Okay, thank you very much for that. Next up, thanks for your super chat from Caleb, who said, G-Man, please livestream the date with stupid whore energy. Nice. Marty. No, Marty Camillo, thanks for your super chat. obviously G-Man didn't take his Adderall today. I think I did write my cat to work today. I'm not sure. I think I did get on my cat and we went to work and we did a little bit of like science projects and whatnot and then we came back. So I don't know. I think my cat is a pretty good horse. I don't know. Thank you for that. Next up. Appreciate your super chat. Trolls haters and naysayers says G-Man isn't it wrong to lie about having a family? Actually, no one should say that they got a family when they really don't got one. But I also believe that is equally as much as a big lie when somebody says that they don't support a borschting when they actually do. Next up. Thanks for your super chat. Let's see. Caleb, thanks for your super chat. He said obviously Skylar took his Adderall. Oh, we got that one. Sorry about that Skylar. Lord Jeffery, thanks for your super chat said, gosh, you guys, some of these super chats I should not have read. I will say that they've been some of you. They're brutal. And so I apologize to both Skylar and G-man as I honestly have been kind of behind in reading these as I basically saying them out loud as I read them. So I apologize. By the way, it is a proven my point that proven that they're not good without God because they're giving money so that you can be so that you can read their immoral statements. All they're doing is proving me right across the board. So this is awesome. This is great. That from Lord Jeffery says, good job Skylar fiction. Blessed be the com raptor chair and hat. Also G-man, look up at hominem. It's not raptor like. Okay, so. Yeah, so several of us discuss how would I prove that I'm right without throwing an ad home at a scholar? All you got to do is go watch S.J.'s debate with scholar and you'll see him get galloping. He also lied and does not take correction on a regular basis with the Bible. Everything that I said about scholar, everything can be backed up with proof and evidence. So again, the ad home is me just attacking over the sake of attacking him. No, I'm just pointing out what he's already done just in that one debate with him in that shit. Next up, thanks for your super chat. My raven 26 who says this convo was over before it started in the pretrials has G-man not said quote, no one is good including himself unquote. He refutes his own argument. Skyler wins flawless victory. Fatality. Okay, so let's talk about the fatality. Yes, it is true that on the pretrials I said that no one is good, not even me. That's why I said that you need God to be good. Scholar doesn't want me because scholar can't prove that he's good. Do you know the topic? You can't see me son. The problem is, the problem is you're asserting you can't be good without God. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat from that shit. Crazy strikes again. She says Satan colon sin. Me colon. I think I don't know if that's like an eighties Cindy Laffer song. I don't know. She's at this point that is making you sit at this point. James, some of that stuff don't make no sense. I don't even know what that was about. I'm sorry Wilson. Thanks for your super chat said there's a book by Dr. Bo Kakey about morality. G man might find enlightening. He'll probably love it. I'll read it. Send me a copy. I'll give you my action. No, I won't. Are you getting email it to me via the audio ebook or whatever or the ebook or whatever you can send it to me via email and I'll look at it and read it. You said why are there still Nephilim in numbers? Why is it so? Numbers. Yeah. Well, the Nephilim were falling angels. They wasn't destroyed. They offspring was destroyed. So the angels, some angels could have still been disobedient and could have still decided that they wanted to have a sexual relationship with people. That's actually the best question I think you got today. I'm going to answer that next time I come on to that a second time too. The angels aren't the Nephilim. That's two different things. You just confused yourself there. The angels aren't the Nephilim. Earlier you said that the Nephilim died in the flood. That's why God sent the flood. That's not what I said. You did say that. You did say that the reason that the flood happened was to kill the Nephilim, not the human beings. But that's not what you just said though. What you just said was that God killed all of the Nephilim. That's the point. He didn't do to repeat her where it says that these angels were put in prison. That's the point of the question she was asking. That's the point of the question she was asking. Because you claim that the reason the flood happened was to kill the Nephilim, but somehow the Nephilim are still alive. That was the point. You missed it. Let's keep going. Well, again, I can answer that question in about 40 seconds without being interrupted. We should kind of keep going. Next up, thanks for your super chat from Fanta Rang says, G-Man, are you a Flat Earther? Okay, no, but I do not believe we went to the moon. I believe that's a lie out of hell. I don't believe that we've been to the moon. Thank you. Next up, Phillip, thanks for your super chat said, G-Man, has anyone told you that you might be a narcissist? I don't know. I don't know. When the last time I looked in the mirror, I mean, looking at myself, now I need to shave. No, I'm not a narcissist. I'm just very confident in what I believe. I think a lot of people out there are threatened by that. Thanks. Dark's Row 317 for your super chat. Saw there was no message if you want. Tag me at Modern Day Debate. I'll read that message for you. M-O, thanks for your super chat said, G-Man is incapable of self-control. How many times have you been accidentally hit by a bus, G-Man? If you answer, I'll give you money in the hand. That's a stupid question. You need Jesus Christ. That's my answer. You need to give saving for your torment to day and night in the lake of fire. Next up, thanks for your super chat. Stupid horror energy says, G-Man, how does good prove he is good? I think that maybe- How does good prove that he is good? Stupid horror energy, call me. I'm going to take you to McDonald's and I'm going to teach you how to spell that. Thank you. Want to know how God proves that he's good? I think that's what you mean, but you're going to have to actually send another super chat and actually say that before I actually answer the question. Keep paying that G-Man. Thanks for your super chat. G-Man says, Dog whistles on this channel are not cool. Couldn't agree more. If you're doing dog whistles from the mic and strike debate, please, we would like for you to get along and accept every people group. And so, dog whistles will be deleted if they are perceived as hate speech. So, let's see. Stupid horror energy, some people, what? Dog whistle, some people, I don't know what the dog whistles are, but I defer to Tioga because she knows more about stuff than I do. Basically, it's a long story. Stupid horror energy, thanks for your super chat. Sorry, I meant how does God prove that he is good? By allowing you to breathe, by allowing rain to fall on the ground, by providing you with food and clothes on your back and allowing you to strive and to have a job and take care of yourself, by allowing you to have babies and allowing you to be able to talk and not have any handicaps or anything like that. You understand what I'm saying? That's how he proves that he's good. And he keeps his word as well. Gotcha. Thanks for your super chat from our dearest friend, The Rage. Says, G-Man, where can I buy Jesus hats? Thanks for your super chat, Rage. Well, actually, I got this one on the internet. You know, I paid like 15 bucks for this because I got tired of wearing the Jesus's Lord hat. And yeah, you can go on eBay and actually get one of these. You can get different colors and different varieties. Or if you got a local Christian bookstore next to you, they got these there too. Yeah. Marty Camillo, thanks for your super chat. Said, G-Man, I can assure you no one is threatened by you. I don't believe you. But if you're right, I do believe you. But if you're wrong, I don't believe you. Last question. Gotcha. P-Bathulu. Thanks for your super chat. Glad to have you here, friend. They said, first time chatting here. Hope everything is going well, swell for you and yours. Cheers, all. Thank you. I appreciate that. That was a nice happy. It's good to hear some kind words. You know, it's nice when people who are good people say kind word about people instead of just attacking them. You'd figure that's the trait of a good person, right? Someone who speaks kindly of people who doesn't just attack them. But, you know, G-Man's Field is free to feel whatever he finds is moral. Brian Stevens, thanks for your super chat said. Patreon question. Thanks for that Patreon support, Brian. Said, are you equally as bad as Stalin, or are there gradients on good and bad in your worldview? Move that for me or him. Thank for you. Can you read the question again? They said, are you equally as bad as Stalin, or are there gradients on good and bad in your worldview? I'm not a good person in the sense that if I was a good person, I would constantly be doing good. I don't constantly do good. I do things on purpose to get on people's nerves sometimes. Sometimes I'll do things that I'm not supposed to do. I'll say things that I'm not supposed to say. And I'm a man, and I'm man enough to admit that. And because of that, I know that's why I need Jesus. And I'm trying to get the rest of these people that are watching this. We have to be exact, exact, exact same problem to realize that they need a savior in order to go into heaven. What you purposely said is what you do. You purposely do those things to be mean to people. Nice question from Brian Stevens. Thanks for your other Patreon question set. Man, believe he is as equally as... Oh, we got that question. Sorry about that. Okay. Thank you very much, folks. I do want to say we really appreciate you hanging out here. It has been so fun to just be hanging out here. Hanging out, just enjoying your company, friends. So I want to say a huge thanks to G-Man and Skyler for being good sports. Both because Skyler was harassed by G-Man and G-Man was harassed by the chat. So we appreciate all of you people want to just say thanks for being here, folks. And we really do enjoy you. I honestly, you have no idea how good it feels to be back a few days away, and I was just missing it big time. We had one more Super Chat just flew in. Stupid horror energy. Thanks for your Super Chat. Said, stupid horror energy. You said, G-Man, why don't you give in to your gay thoughts and live your best life in the village? That's because I'm looking forward to that date of stupid horror energy. Give me a call, because once you go G-Man, you'll never go back. Okay. Oh, thanks for your Super Chat. Said, G-Man is B-17 able to cure. Cure. Cute pylonephritis and ureth... urethri... Oh, gosh, you guys, why do you do this to me? And or urethritis? B-17. Oh, don't worry about it, James. I'm gonna have some fun with this. B-17 is definitely the cure for atheism. If you take it in very large quantities, and I mean large quantities, like 100 billion bottles, it is the cure, because it will end you. It will end you. There was a cure for atheism. Next up, MyRaven26. Thanks for your Super Chat who said, so your whole argument is based on an assumption with absolutely no evidence, and you can, quote, have, unquote, God and not be good, and also not have God and not be good? It seems your position is irrelevant. Okay. So, is this some selective hearing going on there? I didn't provide any evidence. I challenge you to go look at my opening statement and then show me how I didn't give you any evidence, or maybe you're guilty of what the rest of the atheist community does and you don't really understand what evidence is. You know, if you don't know what evidence is, I'll give you a pass, but watch the opening statement on here. I'm pretty sure I gave some evidence for what I was saying. Unless you got that selective hearing, you hear what you want to hear. Thanks. Thanks for your Super Chat. Anthony Zaredich, let me know if I mispronounce it, friend, said, Skyler, you're amazing. G-Man, define premise. Premise? This is what I'm going to do with that. When you guys go to Dryton's YouTube channel, he's going to make it feel a little better. He's going to put a bandaid on it, and he's going to go, don't worry, guys. G-Man's a jerk. He's going to do that for about five hours, and then, oh, you're going to go to bed and feel better about yourself, so don't worry about it. You're not going to define premise? You're not going to answer the question? No, because I just felt like I just, you know, these questions. I'm sorry, Wilson. I would understand. Thanks for your Super Chat from I'm Sorry Wilson, who says G-Man's ex-wife would disagree with that statement. I didn't know you had an ex-wife. Well, here's the thing. And a kid. I didn't know that either. So your wife should stop calling me and asking me to give her some of that G-love. That's what you mean. Your wife needs to stop calling me. This is the Christian, folks. This is the Christian. The one who talks about having sex with other people's wives. This is the guy who said it. Well, technically, he only said she wanted the sex. But he would give it to her. He was, well, they give it to her. This is the moral person there that he claims to be. G-Man, were you going to have sex with that man's wife? No, no, no. They gave me a troll question. I gave them a troll. I mean, I thought these college educated. I've got to stick up for G-Man a little bit just because it's true. I will concede. G-Man has been coming after you, Skylar. But at the same time, I feel bad for some of these Super Chats I've read. You guys, we normally would not read these mean of Super Chats. Well, I'll get the literal one. I've been so hard on G-Man tonight, you guys. Tioga, thanks for your Super Chat. James, don't worry about it, James. Because on Wednesday, they know what's coming their way. So don't worry about it. They got the pre-trial coming. Because they're going to claim their good ones. And I'm going to say, look at this video. No, you're not. So good. Tioga pre-trial that nobody will watch. Tioga, please. That ain't what the last two weeks has been, Skylar. Tioga, OK. Let's take a look. Tioga, thanks for your Super Chat. Tioga, thanks for your Super Chat. G-Man, stop flirting with stupid horror energy. She's out of your league. Oh, no, about this. That name. Can you imagine stupid horror energy G-Man? Like the power couple we would make. Like if I could be with stupid horror energy, if I could just get her to change one word on that. I mean, that would be great. G-Man, stupid horror energy team. You know, we'll make one heck of a couple. Can you imagine the children? Can you imagine the kids? Stupid G-Man energy. Thanks for your Super Chat, Mike Billers. He says G-Man only needs 40 seconds. No, actually, I need 39. Next up, let's see. We had another one. One of the funnier things they saw in the chat tonight was someone said, I don't know if this is the worst debate ever or the best debate ever. Pasadena. Are they giving money to say all of this stuff? Have you made like $1,000? That sounds like you're making a lot of money tonight. That was a normal chat that I had to give it street cred for. But Pasadena Police Department, thanks for your Super Chat, says G-Man won. He bought us pizza. We got you, boo boo. So can I say real quick, just to give you an idea. A month ago, G-Man made a video about me. It has 243 views on his channel. So this, I don't know what you think. Like you're going to do something on your channel and all these people are going to watch. Like you kind of inflate your ego like super high when you have a channel. Nobody watches anymore besides atheists, the people making fun of you. I like to comment on that one, James. I like to comment on that. I don't have any atheists watching my main channel because I've been extremely successful with getting you guys to stop watching my channel. My new audience, however, can't stand atheists and don't want to hear nothing about you people. However, go to G-TV. Talk about the console. Go to G-TV. And when you go to G-TV, go look at my pre-trials, okay? And then go look up atheists-owned Skyler, okay? And then go find your best video. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. Your video had 300, less than 300 views. Next up, we have to keep moving, James. We have to keep moving. Caleb, thanks for your super chat said. Caleb said, T-O got trying to get that date with G-Man. Thanks for your super chat. M-O who said, I was a cushion last year and now I'm not because of G-Man. Next, you can respond if you want. Red Cosmo. Oh yeah, I responded to that. I responded to that. The only way you can stop being a Christian is because- Gotta let Skyler go pretty quick here. Yeah, because- It has been an unusually long amount of time. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You're saying that I'm the reason why you don't believe then you were never a Christian to begin with. Gotcha. Okay, thank you. And then we do have to go. So last one. Red Cosmo's devil thinks you're a super chat said. G-Man, no offense, but are you a Flat Earther as well? Last one I can read for the night. Please don't send any more questions. Okay, G-Man is not a Flat Earther. However, he does deny the moon landing. We're going to have him on for that one next week. So thanks so much everybody. Thank you. It's been a lot of fun. Want to say thanks to Skyler and G-Man. Their links are in the description. We appreciate you all being here, folks. We hope you have a great night and keep sifting out the reasonable from the unreasonable.