 of a fuzzy logic waveform detector. We select an input waveform. It's actually an envelope of the time series waveform. It could be GECG or anything else. The fuzzy logic is doing classification based on different parameters, essentially looking at the membership of the symmetry and the sharpness of the signal. So if it's a triangle, it will be sharp, but then square. Based on symmetry, you could detect the difference between, say, square and the left triangle, because the square will be symmetric. Left triangle would not. So left to right triangle will be kind of similar to an envelope of a spike during a seizure or a QRS complex during EECG. Let's see what's this. Here we have an input wave selector, noise amplitude control, output wave selector, it's square. Yeah, so that in that example is the false detection, because the noise is too large. The input is a hexagon, but it's detecting a square, and this percent detection error is very high. So essentially what we're doing now is converting this tool into Python. We have both GitHub Copilot and GPT-4 trying to help us with the task. So currently this is what we have running, it's giving us unknown. So the noise works okay, get an unexpected token, the JSON file is not valid. Right, get an error in the back end as well, length of X and fuzzy membership function must be identical. Right, so the post, we only have one post request at the moment. It's called the analyze. It's giving us this error. So we know why the detection error is wrong now. It's always showing a square and there are no errors. So that means the output is always below one third. So essentially the current configuration, the output that is looking at the symmetry. Yeah, the output is super low, the symmetry you would have expected for a left triangle, just do a sinusoid. Essentially only square works. Input waveform only works when we choose square as an input. For all other inputs, it goes to the default option, which is the sinusoid. Yes, else the default option is the sinusoid. Yeah, we have to make sure the signal there matches fx ago and else return signal. That should not be case sensitive anymore. Square now doesn't work. There's no match the same. Input wave, left triangle, whatever that is, definitely not a sinusoid. That's for sure. On this square to check the sums of cases, sensitive issue, verifier, stream matching, there's something wrong with that order there. So I have square, left, drop side and this is the default. The signal length is 100 points. Okay, we really have to fix that. Plotly loading forever. There you are, right triangle. It's making sense. That's what the hexagon should look like. Like this, I don't know, something like this. Exactly like this. No, it's not defaulting anymore. That's okay. Yeah, don't think it interrupted this image correctly. In the image, there is a red hexagon. Can you provide a function that will generate a similar envelope of the signal as output wave now picked up the 200 from the image on the x-axis and 100 should be fine. Fixed 100 signal length should be okay. We also don't need a separate function for it. Just the piecewise should be signal hexagon wave. If no strings matches, it does the sinusoid, but I should not see the sinusoid anymore. Rising edge, first vertex, top flat line, dividing the thing into six, the hexagon again, and so it's dividing the thing into one, two, three, four, five, six. Okay, I know what the problem is. It's meant to be two waveforms instead of one. Again, let's solve it. This is what I get for the hexagon. It's still dividing into six regions. The first region, two minus here, rise to the first horizontal top, down to the middle, back to the start. Go from here, should be better than what we currently have. How many errors? Oh, those errors should be okay. Square. Yeah, that's true. You can get it right. This is still incorrect. A candidate would check, do we need to separate waveforms for the top and the bottom parts of the envelope? I want to get to the fuzzy logic bit. Do we essentially need two waveforms for the top and the bottom shape of the envelope? Okay, keep repeating the same thing, but it doesn't work. This doesn't look like an envelope of a hexagonal shape. Do we need to split it into two waveforms? First, it looks the same. Let's just change this slope. It's playing dumb. The square is a square, even though that's a sign or something. I know it's not a sign, but it's a sign. It's clipping it. What is that left? It's making sense. So we're having trouble, and it's close, keep up. Gopal doesn't give us anything useful, and it's doing each piece wise. It doesn't go right. We have the hexagonal shape, a print screen, pick up the generate input wave hexagon that looks like this. Here, the code should be basic geometry. Okay. Why does it look like a hexagon as in the original image provided? Does the hexagon that you generated looks like the image I provided, where the hexagon is built out of two waveforms for separate, for the top and bottom? It's interesting how its logic works. Let's say, yes, sometimes it's an advanced developer. In this case, it's playing a bit silly. So the both should start from zero, one five by five. That's a separate top and bottom envelopes. I don't know if they're not correct. Let's do the top part. Let me just do one envelope, one envelope, just the top part. One, two, three, four, five should have, let's divide into six parts. No, five parts. The output doesn't look like a hexagon. It's obviously a contradiction between Python and the waveforms being generated by JavaScript or Python. The waveforms are being generated in Python. How do we update this JavaScript?