 Ναι, σέντε το πριστορικό. Είναι η θέα. Οι μαθαιτολογίες, που γίνονται σε ένας σχέδιου πριστορικές πέσεις, αφού ειδικά είναι στο σημαίνειάμενοι από την συμβουλή, οι κοινότητες κοινωνικές και το κοινότητα, αφαλήθηκαν, πρώτα, το υποχωρικό καρκεολόγιο, από την αυτασκή λίγο, αλλά πρυσικά από τις αξεκτικές εξεκτικές και τις αυσιακές αυσιακές Πραγματικά, τελευταία εαυτήραστασης των αντιμετωπίων εξοδογικών πολιτικών και για να εξανασταθούν τα εξοδογία των εξοδογικών πολιτικών στις εξοδογικές δεξιότητες, μόνος της παραδοσίας και στις στις εξοδογικές συστητείες και για να εξηγούν να συμβείται τα εξοδογικά μας χρόνια της εξοδογικών πολιτικών επίσης του Ήνταστον, Μασσεντών, Τραίας, Ειθιλίσ και Θεσλί Στην παρακολουθήτηση της Δεακλονίκας εξοπέροντης, είναι λόγοντας για την εξοπέροντη συμμετέρα της εξοπέροντης, και η κα μεταξύ των δεακλονών σε πόλη της δημότησης, στους εξοπέροντες και νερός της πόλης των εξοπέροντες, για να υπάρξει μια σκέφτηση μετά στο βασικό εξόπέροντας, στους εξοπέροντες που μιλούνταν μόνο για την φορή, αλλά όχι όταν είχε συμμετοστασία, were central to the historic everyday life. The pioneering work of Tsundas and Wesson Thompson during the early 20th century has made Thessaly the focal point of Neolithic research in Greece. Long before any systematic framework was established for other parts of Greece, research in Thessaly possessed an elaborate chronological system suitable for describing the cultural history of the area. To some extent Thessaly still holds this privileged position today and some of the central issues of Greek prehistory revolve around research in this region. Lately research in Thessaly has moved into a phase of synthesis with less emphasis on excavation and more on the analysis of excavated data. At the same time new issues have been put forward and new methods and approaches adopted. The most intensively excavated area of Thessaly is its coastal region. Research which started here at the turn of the century and continues to date has produced a fairly complete excavation record covering extensive parts of settlements from the early Neolithic to the late Bronze Age. No major excavation has been contacted in the eastern Larissa Plains in its intensive activity of the mid-1960s. During the last 30 years however there is also this early excavation has gradually appeared in an impressive number of volumes presenting in detail the evidence on which the preliminary synthesis by Milotius had been based. The western Plains of Thessaly displays a lower concentration of settlement in the prehistoric period with the exception of the hilly area near Farsala. This spareness of habitation is usually attributed to unwelcoming photographical characteristics and also to the low intensity of archaeological work. Walk at Ahelion and Platiama Goulazaku are the major prehistoric projects that have taken place during the last 30 years. Last scale public works in Thessaly during the last years have prompted a campaign of extensive rescue excavations, fast surfacing in size and intensity any earlier archaeological project carried out in Thessaly. The Larissa area is specially benefited from this opportunity and archaeological work in that region is in progress. The immense quantity of material produced is only slowly entering the study phase and there are few concrete results to report as yet, although one can venture the prediction that the picture of New League and Bronze Age Thessaly will change substantially when the new evidence becomes available in its totality. At present, preliminary reports permit a quick launch at this emerging picture. Main excavations, Gulf of Olos, Sesclo, Pyrgos, Dimini, Pefkakia, Petromagoula, Mandra. Eastern Plains, Otsiaki, Agia Sophia, Galini, Σουφλή, Μαγούλα, Βελεστίνο and finally Western Plains, Achilles, Πλατιά Μαγούλα, Ζάρκου, Ραχμάνι and theopatra cave. Already in the early 20th century, Macedonia came to occupy a peculiar place in the consciousness of pre-Historians. It was considered the keep province for the study of European prehistory but also a backward area in itself with a native tendency to isolation. Macedonia was construed as a passage or a highway between lands of obvious importance. Europe and all Greece, or Anatolia, and archaeologists from the way to Rodin would invoke that condition as its justification for excavating there. Fairly argued that the land west of the stream on belongs primarily to the Aegean at a time when few could pay attention. Other researchers, including Carson, would make it clear that Macedonians were European, not Mediterranean by nature. They suddenly found the province's northern character, not in its latitude, but in its very environment and climate, example given in the discharge pattern of its rivers. Thus Macedonia proved to be different from the Aegean in general both with regard to its natural environment and the character of its prehistoric culture. It was considered the other of the Aegean. Questions of cultural origins had been prevalent in Hadley's book for Historic Macedonia and archaeological reconnaissance of Greek Macedonia in the Neolithic bronze and early Iron Ages. Innovations as well as local developments were invoked as explanations of change in wares and figuring types. But the work offered much more than this and it was justifiably called a scientific record of elastic value. A ceramic cultural sequence was established even in absolute chronology. Time was measured in thickness of deposits. Moreover, as the excavations were dispersed over a very wide area, regional differences were emerging. The departure of Hadley's team from Macedonia in 1931 was followed by a 30-year period during which a minimum of field work was carried out at the historic sites. When the joint Cambridge Harbour, Cambridge Harbour excavations at Nenny Comedia began in 1961, much field work had in the meantime been conducted from Anatolia to Hungary and Thessaly. Diffusion and ethnogenesis were no longer the leading concerns of mainstream European prehistory. Nenny Comedia yielded an early reactor ideal carbon date 6,220 plus minus 150 BC associated with domesticates and shine. It was then the site of the oldest dated Neolithic community yet found in Europe, making Macedonian an important link in the long chain of evolution of a European society. Although the excitement was short-lived for many reasons, still the project at Nenny Comedia marked the beginning of the modern phase of prehistoric research in Macedonian beyond. It was followed by excavations at several sites, including the important one at Citari and other projects. Main projects Western Macedonia, Middle Aliacmon Valley, River in Zone Terces and Ani, Ravenna and the Upper Aliacmon catchment, Kytrin-Lymi area, Droschiaa, Genicaa area, Mándalo, Arhontiko, Nenny Comedia, Makrygenos. Central Macedonia, Langadas Basin, Two Late Neolithic sites, Area of Thessaloniki, Stavroukoli Με συμμεριανή Τουμπα, Τωρονι. Ιστανα-Σαντώνια, Decilitas, Citagri, Προμαχώνα στο κόλλιντσα, Τουμπα, δρά μας, Αρκαδικός, Δήμητα και Παράτιστος. Greek Thase is generally absent from reviews of ancient prehistory. It is surprising, since one would think that both Roudofi plain to the south as well as the ever valley to this would attract researchers interested in prehistoric interaction among Anatolia, the Aegean and the Balkans. Nevertheless, it was only a few decades ago that the prehistoric excavation of some scale was undertaken by the archaeological service which has also conducted smaller scale excavations of early sites in the area. No secure stratified sequence has been sufficiently published for any period of Western Thase. Recent excavations at the site of Makri promised to rectify the situation for the Neolithic period by providing a more secure stratigraphy for the 5th and 4th millennium BC, quantities provided by Paradimi and may offer evidence for even earlier Neolithic occupation. Previously known sites with Neolithic and occasional early Bronze Age occupation are primarily mounts along the edges of the plain and near the coast and caves with sparse traces of intermittent occupation from late Neolithic to historical times. Only recently have less conspicuous sites some in elevated areas been discovered indicating at least for some periods more varied patterns of habitation than were suspected in the past. Main projects Paradimi, Roskinites, Makri. Itherus is mountainous, difficult to explore and because of ubiquitous deep graves its landscape is subject to intense erosion deposition. The rock has been erratic. In view of these conditions it is not surprising that few Neolithic sites are known in the province. It may in fact be more surprising that as many as 10 to 15 Neolithic sites are known. A few are caves that is relatively stable protected micro-environments. Others must by recently deposited sediments were discovered by chance during construction of rocky fields or dangerous ditches. They would have been undetectable such facts underline the rarity of stable areas in the Ipirotic landscape where Neolithic settlements might be easy to come upon. Noteworthy however is the absence of Neolithic mount sites. That may suggest that settlements were relatively ephemeral, buildings were dispersed limited use was made of earthen materials for construction and total population density was never very high. For Ipirus the problem seems to be far more basic and disconforting. A scarcity of field data. The underdevelopment of prehistoric research a chronic condition has stunted progress. The archaeological imagination has always been resourceful in Ipirus it is time however for intensive field book. Taking for instance the prehistoric settlement of Makri on the coast of Aegean thrace. All the provisional evidence indicate that the prehistoric settlement of Makri belongs mainly to the late Neolithic Balkans archaeology of the 5th millennium BC. The excavation of the prehistoric mount of Makri 10 km west of the town of Aleksandropoli has produced an excellent record of Neolithic occupation and revealed prehistoric deposits that were very recent architectural remains and portable finds. Excavation there began in 1980s and has continued almost every year since then. The dig covered the top of the mount which seems to be the center of the settlement and is represented by the excavation section B. The section which is located largely on the summit of the mount extends a short way down the sides. A central area whose architectural forms are indicative of intense floating activities has come to light together with a living area with traces of residence and food production such as houses on piles with file places and successive floors on which there were pots, milk stones, stone and bone tools and loom weights. It seems likely that at some time the settlement had a stone wall around it. No properly organized graveyard has been found though beneath the floors of the houses were occasional barriers in simple pits. The settlement yielded a rich collection of various items made in range of materials. On the basis of the typology of these items the Makri settlement forms part of the cultural space of the southeast Balkans and belongs chronologically as mentioned above to the 5th millennium BC. In order to negotiate in an attempt to incorporate all this mixed data we have to deconstruct the available archaeological material through a procedure of intense critique and recompose it on the basis of meaningful units of the social activities taking place in the landscape so that we finally derive the meaning from its elements separately appreciate the archaeological information in reference with what it actually represented and classify the sites according to human activities. Our contemporary knowledge of space that includes not only maps but also our ability to exactly locate any site inferred by the archaeological record has led to tentative reconstructions combining information from maps and the material record of the same period and context. The shape and form of space announces a whole cultural territory meaning a cultural landscape as well as a corresponding perception and interpretation of the environment that hosted human action. Regarding Neolithic North and Greece both tales and flat extended sites central as well as peripheral estimated in the natural and human main landscape context offer us a vital research perspective in what concerns the perception of free historic space in its entirety. Thank you.