 Hello everyone! I want to tell you something and tonight I want to introduce to you three interesting languages that I use in Esperanto. But before I introduce them, I just want to ask you, do you like my new shirt? Because I certainly found it a bit different. Because my new shirt, which I often wear, almost died last time. So good luck, all these new shirts came and I can wear them. I like the color of it, because it looks good on my shirts. But now, I want to introduce to you my book. So the first interesting language that I use is the sister-accusative. Probably you have never heard about this new mystery-accusative case, have you? Well, in fact, it is not new and it is simply prescribed for certain misuse of the accusative case. So before I introduce the history of the accusative case, sister-accusative, I just want to tell you what it is. So in a good just phrase, you put the accusative on the object of the transitive verb. But in a phrase that always uses certain misuse, which we call the sister-accusative, you put the accusative on the subject of the phrase. And the sister-accusative is not simply prescribed in such bad cases, where you put the accusative unfairly on the subject. It prescribes the misuse, where you put the accusative on the subject of the phrase. So probably you think, why are we doing that? Well, the reason is not certain. Probably it is caused by misunderstanding of the accusative case, but now I want to read that which said the full analysis of this accusative misuse. So it says, and for those who do not know, the full analysis of this is simply a new grammar book about Esperanto. So it says that the new sister-accusative was written by Raymond Schwartz, who chose it because the concerning misuse was put on the pages of the Esperanto newspaper given to the sister-accusative in the south-west of France. As you can easily observe in this newspaper, the error in this phrase is not the lack of the accusative case, which often characterizes the language of the beginners, but the too much use of this case, the substantive which is the subject of the phrase and follows the verb has the accusative ending. So it says that it follows the verb, but you can often see that it should not follow the verb. It is simply a misuse of the accusative case and you put it on the subject. So the second interesting language to use is the phrase that is already there. Probably you did not see this phrase because if you were an Esperantist for a long time, I only saw it maybe three or four times while my Esperanto word I suppose, and it came from Esperanto because it is not just a language used in Esperanto, but it is very well known among long-time Esperantists. While time is, in fact it means in Esperanto, while time is, or while time is. So for Esperanto, it is not a whole language, it is simply a few notes about Esperanto before it became Esperanto. You must remember that Zamanhof often worked on his own language project until 1887 when he published the first book of Esperanto. So the notes that came before the first book of Esperanto were known as the first book of Esperanto. And one of those notes included a phrase that was already there. And strangely, and one after the other, people still wanted to use that phrase. It has a certain meaning and, for example, if you are in a conversation with another Esperantist and you want to say that we must do it now, it is serious, you can say that it is already there. And now, the third interesting language is actually a topic about the misappearance in Esperanto. Well, probably you saw very new words in Esperanto at the same time. For example, genio and chaos. But one after the other, they changed during the history of Esperanto. And, for example, genio changed to genio and chaos changed to chaos. And maybe you wondered how that happened, how the chaos changed to chaos. And many Esperantists simply said that this happened because the chaos was an easy to pronounce. And that, partly, is correct. But there is something more of a history compared to the misappearance of chaos in Esperanto. So, in fact, it came from two sources. Firstly, someone wrote to Samenhof and asked him about the chaos himself. And he responded literally to that person. And he said, about the literal chaos, you are absolutely right. If I believe in the language now, before that of Esperanto practice, I, certainly, will reject this letter. So, many people saw that and almost read it. It is basically an official recommendation of Samenhof. And you must remember that Samenhof said that after the foundation of the Esperanto foundation, he no longer was an official fund for Esperanto. But many people even read their responses because they were official recommendations. But there is another fund that probably killed the chaos in Esperanto. So, that happened between a discussion between a few years of the language committee and a legand of the official Esperanto newspaper. And it happened about 1920. So, there was one, I suppose, and he asked the language committee and you must remember that the language committee was the first institution for the Esperanto academy. He asked directly to the committee but for a few years of the committee and he said, did we lose the sound because it was very difficult to pronounce. And a few years of the committee said to him that yes, you can do that because those words are not often and so there are many other things that he said. But that letter was given in the official Esperanto newspaper and at that time he said that it was very difficult and at that time that newspaper was the fund for the language discussions and many people missed the letter and in fact, they missed it because it was an official recommendation of the language committee and we had to remove the sound by sound and even today, many people still show the official recommendation of the language committee but in fact, it didn't exist it was just a mislego of the new letter so that really isn't why the sound was missed in Esperanto so that's all if you like this film like it share it subscribe to my channel if you haven't subscribed and I'll see you in that in the next film and if you're not there we'll miss you and as always I want to thank my donors for Patreon but before I do that I just want to say that every dollar that you can donate to this channel really helps it's legal in the description if you want to donate something so my donors are Andrew Timpon Kota Komensanto Chris Perdue Craig Robinson Gibi Ante James Harlem Jason Knuckles Ludisto Magritte Kilpac Robin Nilsson Robert Portser Shane Power