 David Newman's asked were there tools so a party could aggregate all of the petitions to all candidates so that they could draft responses rather than each candidate being burdened? Yes it's a good question. So basically I mean the reason why we decided to design the tools so that it was each candidate is because the political party system in Argentina is going through significant changes. It's a very weak party system so candidates pretty much run their digital campaigns, their social media, you know with their specific teams. So even though political parties have you know some sort of a like nationwide strategy they pretty much run their campaigns by themselves with community managers you know managing their own communication. So instead of focusing on on political parties where we may have you know one shot you know to engage with them and they might say yes or no you know as a political party we decided you know to go with important candidates very strategic districts. So with that we have the capacity to escalate a lot you know the the profiles and also to make sure that the critical candidates in the critical districts were able to create a profile. Okay I'm kind of linked into that. What was the value of doing that kind of proactive engagement with with campaigns and candidates versus them doing it themselves? Are more candidates coming to you? Yes the effect is very it's very interesting because it was the first time we were reaching out to candidates. I mean as Leandro said in 2019 we have a total of 140 responses that means that we have also responses from the private sector and also from people that are not candidates okay like like mayors or politicians that were not candidates. So we use this strategy of reaching out during the campaign so that now I mean we are positioned as a platform that they can engage you know with a large amount of people I mean it's a imagine you know that that for for a politician engaging directly with 150,000 you know people that sign a petition that it's target to that specific you know candidate or politician is a magnificent you know communication tool. So no one you know is giving them you know some sort of an audience you know that where they can tailor a message that it's catered you know to that specific you know people that are asking for specific you know changing policy or something like that. So now what we are seeing is and we're changing a little bit the strategy based on the learnings from last year what we are seeing is that on Twitter whenever I mean we they see that they're mentioned on a petition they reach out to us you know to say how can I respond and then that's a way that we have you know to sell them the profile on Change.org. Okay over to you Lucia. How difficult is it I mean the pledge tracker obviously it covers it covers quite a lot. How difficult is it to link and you know to encourage standardization of data on you know all of these kinds of things like open contracting, beneficial ownership etc. I mean is that is that kind of standardization standardization sorry something that you're very interested in or is it literally just it's almost it almost doesn't matter as long as they're putting it out in some way. So I guess the fact that that they are actually publishing something it's already important in a way but I guess that as we see from this project there are many very complex topics that need to be addressed and supported by civil society organizations working on specific spaces. So let's say so the open contracting partnership or open ownership on beneficial ownership so the more that we can link civil society organizations and other entities that are supporting this implementation with the government and the more that high level commitments can be trickled down into agencies and the specific departments can see what is feasible and what is not. I think that's the way forward. I mean pledge tracking is just a very general process but then when we get to each specific type of area so let's say beneficial ownership it becomes so much more complex because it's not only about creating public registers it's also about starting with the legislation if there's a definition of official ownership if there is you know a standard way in which this is published if there's way of verifying the data afterwards so obviously these are very complex topics and I cannot talk about all of them but the more we can link them to the relevant organizations working in the field and the more that they can the governments can learn from these experts I guess that's that's the way forward I would say. I'm just linking into that I mean has transparency international actually any activities in place to increase the kind of civic engagement and and monitoring of anti-corruption commitments made by their governments. Yes so yeah of course so I mentioned a few examples but many of the chapters are currently working with with citizens to actually increase engagement on this so I mentioned Ti Sri Lanka for example they they do a lot with citizens they have recently then you know put out a storytelling let's say call for proposals where actually amateurs can do videos on how corruption affects them and and how to for example engage and so let's say youth engagement on corruption issues or also they are working with investigative journalists so there's many initiatives out there going on in South Africa as well they try to engage youth participation on the development of the national anti- corruption strategy so yeah there are plenty of ways in which they are engaging on specific commitments and linking citizens with the with the process. Great thank you very much again as ever more questions than we have time for and very sorry but thank you so much to Lucia to Leandro and to guest on for those incredible presentations once again as we say we'll get all the information out once we are back in work tomorrow.