 आवलिकेशन आपुल्ट्स प्रे किलगाम ढ़ापच्तरी, और अगो ळनाप'ts रीसेच रीशेच की लगा को ब्रिष्करना होता है, वो जन्नलस जाहापे हमने अपने रीशेच लग्प्रत्रे इसाजागा को फुभलचाए आई, अंगो कैसे ये जाना जाए की वो रीज़च वानियुस जुहें वो कोई उतन्टिक रीज़च वानियुस हैं. नोलगिज़ शीर्ट और अद्वास्ट तो शकोलर ली पोख्स और जरनल्द, और इंक्रीजिंग प्रिक्वेंसी एलेक्ट्रानिकरी. और लिए वो किताबे ये जरनल्ट जो पहले हम लिए ब्रेडीज में जाकर भेड के सच करते ते दूंते थे. नोलगिज़़़ वो कोई लिए लिए ब्रेडी एन एजरनल्ट और आई पर इप विलिए गर नड़र्च्टाए. अजका जो ताईम है, इस में एक पूल्ट्लेज तीसिस की जो शेर्फ लाईप है, जिस को हम P.H.D. का तीसिस केते है, that is only 3 years. और अगर हम एक मास्ट्रस तीसिस की बात करते है, that need to be published in maximum less than 2 years time. और अगर हम एक मास्ट्रस तीसिस की बात करते है, that need to be published in maximum less than 2 years time. और अजके इस पास्टर ताईम के अन्द, जो भी रीशर्च पेपर यह रीशर्च वोर्ग कमप्लीट होता है, उसको आज सुन आज पबलीश होना जरूरी है, क्योंके इतनी जाड़ा रेपिट चेंजे जोरी है, with the time, कि हम उन उन रीशर्च रीशर्च को जब वो पुराने हो जाते है, उनको पबलीशिभल खंसिटर नहीं करते है, क्योंके इतनी जाड़ चेंजे समारे इडगिट के सराूंटिंगs में होरी होती है, क्योंके उस रीशर्च का इंपाक उस ताईम दूरेशन के लिए तो करेक्त होता है, लेकिन शाएड वो बाद में आने और सालों के लिए थीख नहीं होता. ये बिल्कुल यह जैसे हम बाद करते है, different psychological tests की, कि विदे पीरीड़ अप ताईम वी नीट तो चेंज ते वो बाटम्स, वी नीट तो चेंज देर नागवीज, वी नीट तो चेंज देर, कोन्सेप्स जैसे इंटलगेंस तेस चो हैं, वेज की अगर में एकजामपल दूं, के एज की ब्रेक्किच जो है, वो विदे पीरीड़ अप ताईम रीवाईज होती जारी है, कुंके आज एक तो साल का बच्चा भी उस नोलिज को एकषेस कर सकता है, तो आज से दस साल पहले सेरे वे एक नोस साल का बच्चा जो स्पूल जाता दा, वो उस को एकषेस करताता. तो सिमेले लिए the research need to be published as soon as it is completed. Despite one might assume it to be sophisticated and collaborative process, scientific writings and study publications are full of potential of intense conflict and dispute. When there are the multiple people working together in one research project and there comes the publication issue, at times we find that this process can become very disputable. No matter how collaborative it is, one need to be fixed that who should be the author at what number. Like we say that the corresponding author, first author, whose contribution it will be, then further we will talk about it. Although publications in scholarly outlets alone carry no direct monetary gains, if you have published your paper in one research journal, then at times you need to pay by your own self for the processing charges or you need to pay your reviewers. So at such a monetary benefit, why people are interested in having publications? Because there are many different factors that motivate researchers for the publication. The main reason for the most of the researchers is the desire to progress in their professions. How will you publish them? There could be many things. First of all, we need publication credits because they are used in our promotion. The more your number of publications, the more you will benefit in promotion. For instance, those who work in academia, they have that contribution that if you have 10 research articles and after that you will have a certain degree, then you will be able to work as an assistant professor. Similarly, you would be work as an associate professor. Similarly, if you have 15 research publications, you would be able to apply for professor if you have a certain service land. So these research papers are contingent upon with your promotion. That is why people want to publish research work. Apart from that, the more research papers published, they establish that you are a good researcher in that area and when you apply for different funded projects, then your track record or background record determines the basis of your published research papers. Publications also evaluate researcher's status among their peer and may even confer more widespread frame. How do you get that fame? If a researcher publishes research in a specific area, then he becomes an authority of that area. We can easily distinguish between which field and which area of interest he has developed in Pakistan. Then competition to get published can interject unhealthy features into the scientific enterprise which we are getting these days. Focus on quantity rather than quality. This is one of the big issues which has been seen during this time. We see that instead of deepening a study, people prefer to publish a study in such a way that the study will be published as soon as possible. So basically, this is not a good practice that we focus on the quantity where you have published 200 pages rather than any of the 200 pages which people cite internationally and which people recognise as remarkable work. Other criticisms include the tendency for authors to inflate the importance of their work and failing to provide sufficient discussion of study limitations. Researchers in their research highlight the importance of their study but the real-time challenges and limitations they face do not interfere with their discussion which also feels that this is a flawless study. So one study could not be a flawless until and unless we need to write the limitations because if you are a good researcher then you will know the limitations of your research and the confounding variables and where you need to address them into the conclusion sections. Another major issue regarding publication outlet is increasing number of predatory journals. Now, this is one of a very important thing to elaborate on because predatory journals are so many which do not know the difference between a journal which is HEC recognised which is being indexed in scoopers which is being indexed in clarivate analytics and which are the journals and which are the colonial journals which basically have no impact factor or recognition. They are fake journals or they are also established in the process and they are unknowingly published in the journals. To avoid this situation skeptically examining the publishers content practice and website and contact the publisher if necessary. Basically the easiest solution which is for students at the time is that HEC has devised an HEC journal recognition system you open it and name it if it shows that journal in any of the category it means that this is a journal which is recognised and you can publish your work in that journal otherwise that is a predatory journal and you should not waste your scholarly contribution by putting your work into any of that predatory or colonial journals and you should not waste your research material because if you publish it at a good place only then your work would be cited and other people are going to recognise your efforts. .