 There are many type of researches which generally get publication. At times they are the research study which are based on cases and those cases are different kind of research and it need to be published into a different manner. So here we are talking about publishing case studies and narratives. Many mental health professionals welcome learning from the correlative analysis of stories, interviews, field studies, case notes, journal narratives and other sources of life experiences. For example, the cases we have, when detailed case studies are taken, their narratives are taken, so at times there are other researches which are qualitative in nature on which we can do detailed analysis. Some work explores symptoms, suggests treatment based on successful outcomes or illustrate and in living theories. These verbatims, these notes, these narratives, they build that we can see different types of clients, their symptomatology, their demographic, their life experience and their lived experience basis. We can develop different theoretical frameworks. Publishing material based on interaction with clients and others is not intrinsically unethical. Of course it is not unethical that we ask their detailed stories, their symptoms, their life experiences but the problem is not in asking but how we can keep that record is an issue. Issues regarding informed consent, confidentiality and privacy invasion pertain that should be tackled very carefully because in many of the cases, if all the documentation is not properly handled, then all the records and tags are not tackled, all the codes are tackled, all the identity is not tackled, instead there are alphabets or numerics. So those cases can easily be identified as to the individuals and clients of the live stories. More recently we have seen a movie in which we saw that a writer meets people and asks about their live stories and tells them the story of their life and then they publish the book in the form of a book without hiding their names, without hiding their identity and in return of that, the persons who are being exposed to the stories, the stories become the best bookseller but the individuals commit suicide because they are being identified by many of the people and their live stories will be exposed in front of people which they wanted to captain confidence. So there are similarly many issues that these case studies, if they are not kept in a confidential way, their record keeping is not properly done, then such issues can be created. Although carefully disguising stories by removing all identified information often provides a satisfactory solution, therapists who publish detailed articles about their clients must remember that when writing about a single person or one family, the risk of outing the information remains ever present. Perhaps in many cases, they can easily get to know about this case about which individual is responsible for their life and how they are being exposed to the stories of the victims. Furthermore, if extremely detailed descriptions such as essentially a verbatim transcript of the therapy notes, such as the individual has been through some severe depression and suicide, the details of the verbatims are published with the case that can easily be identified. So even if you have presented the case by disguising it in your own way, but if the individual discovers that it was a verbatim and that it was published without his consent, of course no one gives consent to publish this kind of material. So while publishing all that kind of scholarly work, especially the case studies, it is very much important to remain in the ethical boundaries to safeguard yourself from different issues such as facing the court.