 The line is close. Nobody's online. Nobody's online except for city CTV. Well, fair enough. I saw participants three, so. You know, we have a pretty comprehensive staff report. And with some right, but. I can't call that. Anyway, there. So there were a few items that were noted. The staff report has not able to get positive findings. And I'm wondering if we could start with those. Because I think the application is relatively clear. And it will be. I know we're working on questions of course, but. The staff noted that there were a few items that. The missing. Wanted to see if you guys could fill that in for us. Absolutely. Again, Dave Marshall from civil engineering associates for the record. In this particular case, there are a number of places where you can find positive findings. You can do a fine job of summarizing the application materials. And with that, there are towards the first portion of the staff report, the number of places where positive findings with. Conditions are recommended. However, as you move deeper into the report, you will find a number of places in which staff cannot find positive findings because the information is missing. So I think that they are the character that they feel comfortable working with the applicant in order to basically fill in those points, however we can convince you that that is appropriate. So that being the background, the first one is actually related to the screening for the partner level. This is my fault. I don't know if you're familiar with Rock Point and its location with regards to the rest of the city, but it is in a remote location. It is a remote location. And I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but I think that the first point came to the community screening of parking and the other statement that I missed the vote. As far as again, how to protect the pavement from. Heat gain and the like. So we do need to provide supplemental trees to. Enable the appropriate screening percentage. The care of the day. Staff didn't indicate that as we look at this particular plan, They have you submitted this to the city already. Yes, only about an hour and 15 minutes, but nonetheless it isn't correct. But we felt this, this doesn't show any different than what the application materials indicate, but it brings it all together and kind of an easier way to see things. So this first particular rendering, prepared by Lincoln Brown is an aerial view of the site. And when you approach the site, you come in from the top right of this drawing. And then you head to the bottom left. And that's that's the one way entry into this particular site, all surrounded by trees for the most part. And there are two buildings that occupy the primary area of interest in this application. The conference center, which is right in the middle, and then the Van Dyke building, which is on the top left of that building set. This application actually has two proposed additions. It's the infill addition that connects the Van Dyke building and the conference center. And then the classroom conference center addition to the south, the south addition. I already talked about that in more detail as far as the components, but getting back to the open items that are missing. And what we need to do is provide that particular shading calculation. You can see some large trees that have been retained at the southwest or the bottom left of the parking lot. What we've done here is actually work with the fire marshal to improve the emergency access along the facade of the building and essentially reorganize the parking in a way that doesn't isn't front and center to the activities of the school area itself. And with that, there are a number of large trees that are being retained that will be useful in the screening calculation. But it looks like we're going to need to add a couple more trees before the compliance as far as the number of trees per parking space, at least in the immediate vicinity that is useful for the screening. And that's something that, again, they feel very comfortable with as far as working with landscape architect on coming up with those computations and would like to ask me to be more to enable us to work with staff. So what is the standard. So, what are the working spaces I'm going to be 3030 will say. I'm just going to say that we started into a preliminary design of how to satisfy that particular standard comfortable and doing that and not add some adversely impacting the operations of the school. And with that, we're very comfortable with a that we do need fill in the blanks and to that we can do that. There was also one particular component towards the end of that particular parking and circulation section where there was a question in regards to fences or retaining malls and at this point I'm not aware of a proposal just to allow the record to be clear on that. And there's also some missing information about any other parking to do the numbers on that this long term by parking. I didn't mean to miss out, but one thing we do have exterior parking staff indicates that it appeared to be adequate for the requirement meeting requirements, however, we do not show any interior long term protected vice. And now I'll let Randy actually speak to into your courses. I think for the long term of bicycle parking thing. They would like to try to solve that with that needs to be inside structure of maybe a biking structure. And we certainly design something that is complimentary of a character style. So it feels like it belongs, you know, not something to just do you have places in mind on the site. I think that's something that we look with days on what makes sense. We do have for regular bike parking that isn't required to be in the long term. There's some pretty, pretty good size overhangs and in a couple of areas on the building that might help provide protection. So we might target those for that for that piece for the kids who are coming and going on a on a more routine basis. But I think there's plenty of areas in sort of the islands. The south part of the island there on the loop, you know, the loop is obviously designed as a one way. It's driving out there or even parents dropping off students there. They're trying to limit how much academic planning to have the school bus do an arrangement where they pick up the students at the high school, and then you can order them in on one of the smaller buses. So, so the traffic load that's coming in and out is controlled. That's all part of the lease arrangement between the diocese school districts, working on those details. That would be sensitive for that. So I think, similarly, I think the chance for the bikes bicycles could be carefully located in the island area. Someone purpose was closing the long term. One of the other questions related to this was it's on staff comment on our equity. 2930 spaces provided would serve to represent. Yeah, 14 additional 15 additional spaces over and above what's there currently, which would serve to new additional classrooms and I think staff was looking for confirmation that that's correct. That right Scott. Both sort of information is lacking to figure out whether you're under the parking maximum. I want to say the maximum is set for class. So it has to get more complicated so we need to figure out how many classrooms you have. And you're still above it then we need to look at the total area of the school to see what that math comes out versus the parking maximum. There's nine, nine total classrooms, seven, seven within nine total with the addition to two in the new seven within the existing. You can give me something safer and the application portal that reflects that. So yeah, it's nine total then you're into the next. So that would be fine. Yeah. Okay, we're originally looking at an objective of four process as I was really to have 10, but in our budget balancing, trying to make the numbers work economically. We've settled in on what the two plus official stability nine total classrooms, right, which then meets the bank, which satisfies that. I think we ran through the missing information. Other questions from the board about the project. Yes, and I know the sites. I wanted to make sure we covered that. Is it reconfiguring the driveway parking is it going to be all gravel or is there pavement in there? So the existing conditions are deteriorating and the idea or the intent is to go to all gravel and basically try to get it back and be able to natural feel in that particular area. But then I noted that it was all gravel. And I have a desire to keep it as natural feelings. This might be a scar. This is a reference to some of the Bronx you're like a one point a zero point one. That was in your submittal. So we have a number of elevations. Yeah, right. Do you think we can try to find those and it's hard at least what's in the package. So are the rendering there? Well, those are the renderings that those will be helpful to give you a more of a three dimension. I was actually asking for the actual submittal information that was hard to make sure that you've got everything there. That's why I'm just curious. Things are submittal that weren't in the packet or something like that. Could we go one elevation drawing? Right. And then these renderings were intended to be. Okay. Elevation for our heads of clothing. There was a roof plan. Elevations, but no. I think there's actually, I think I stole one of Randy's plans to just depict what the roof character. And then. We have elevations and we also have an existing condition plan. Because the intent of the design is to mimic the original. So all the materials basically of the new building back to the system. That's basically. Sort of cut to the chase. But it wasn't in your code letter. Sort of says it, but it doesn't say on the other side. Double check that. So this represents a two dimensional view of the proposed elevations. And the darker portions represent the additions. And with that, there is a colorized. Heat that our photos of the existing mutations that will help you give at least a little bit more depth. As far as the character of the existing structure. I don't know if you have that in there. Scott. I thought everything you submitted was uploaded to the super clerk. But right now I'm in the current system right now. Okay. You have a file name. And I just see this one label this proposed elevations, which is what I just had. I don't see anything that says anything about photos. It was a sheet prepared by Randy's office that specifically provide call outs of all of the existing characteristics. And, you know, that we talked with existing elevation photos and materials. Let's go with that. Yeah, that's the big packet. Okay. Yeah, that's a lot. I haven't totally lost it. So you may need to zoom in a little bit just to get a better flavor of this. Okay, that's those are. And I'm letting, I'll let our next week. So yeah, so the intent there was to kind of call out the material types for. See your shingle kind of shape. Standing seem a roof. All which all new materials are intended to work and blend in with those existing materials seamlessly. And what's in the middle is actually the original design plans, the original programs. Sorry. For the project dating to 1988. Pre computer. Yes. Yeah. So as far as like general circulation go for, for the building. We're not changing the patterns. How do things operated or the main points are still going to be the focal point of the main. Entries and the entrances are still largely going to be there. The infill. There's no function in the infill connection other than circulation. So that's designed to be open and glassy so you can kind of see through. That's where the elevator will be located. So we can have any access to both upper levels and both building structures. So that's all an open. Interior piece in that language. And then obviously two classrooms on the south elevation. We'll have a, an egress as a component of its core. But it won't be a primary entrance. You want to add as far as these particular renderings. So, so this would be. If you parked in the new reconfigured lot, this would be the, the formal. Entry just to the right here. And this is the image that. Like it helped us put together here to give an idea of the two classrooms. So those two windows would give an easterly view of those classrooms. And then there's the quarters. I'm far far side, the west side. So there's, there's windows. Barled light, if you will. In the quarter where you can see out to the west and get the lake views. So the opening and the south elevation here. Sort of the triangle opening there. That's the exit. Kind of opening. So it's designed to be a, sort of a negative reveal area. To protect the vestibule entrance there. So if they are navigating. Back and forth to the current building, which is the chapel. That's on site, which we don't know. New proposed work for. That would be the primary circulation path between two buildings. So there is a, another ring of the opposite side of that side petition. On the west side. Thank you. So two classrooms. West side as Dave, Dave mentioned, you can kind of obviously see the. Entendent circulation pattern. All of that is existing. We will be modifying the piece that currently is south. Of the conference center to wrap around the new classroom addition. Here. And on the, on the far end, you can see. The conference center dining hall. So that's where we're going to be. And on the, on the far end, you can see the conference center dining hall as that spills out. And the nicer periods of the year that they'll eat outside a lot. I'll say in the summer. And as the diocese will run, they'll still have a lot of outdoor activity. And it's sort of with the linkage of the elevator now that that's closed off. It kind of creates sort of a protected. Courtyard feeling the enclosure. Which I think for the, for the school's purposes, when they're using their. Periods of the year helps contain an outdoor classroom feel. Of an area that's. There is one more rendering. Probably the last one. That represents the infill. This is the infill, which. Although it's the same sort of easterly elevation. We are intending to kind of keep as much of the dense tree growth. Between there. So it feels. You know, on the approach. You won't see this unless you go down. The drive path. To that entrance. And that's where we're proposing to have the. The waste container recycling and utility is to us. This is a little bit more of the. The back of the house support. Area. Although we've provided a few. Handicap accessible spots there for convenience. As this obviously where the elevator is. And someone may want to enter at that point. For better convenience, depending on the program. Maybe no fairness. You can't receive building committee work. Right. Right. Right. Or. Any other questions from the board. Is there anybody online who wants to speak on this application? We're joined after Scott said no one was online. No. Nobody online. All right. Well, Thank you for that. We have, I think we have everything. Yes. They go to this way. I've made a motion. It would have been sent. I think if we had everything else. I believe we could have a lot of fun. The number is EP. Four 94 rock point. Several that we approve the application. Subjects and staff's recommendations and conclusions. With the inclusion of the representations made. At the DRB here. That the six shade trees will be provided. parking spaces will be provided in an enclosure or shelter on site and final site plans provided to staff at the time. Okay, second is that discussion and depends on stuff. No fencing is going. Yes, that's correct. All those in favor? Okay. Recording stopped. Thank you for your time. Thank you. I'm sorry. Yes.