 This is one of the key issues of artificial intelligence. When we think about what makes us human or what makes a machine a machine, and in Silicon Valley and China and many places where technology is king, the argument is that we are essentially technology, that we don't have any magic sauce, that we are infinitely complex but we are the same than the tools that we make. So then the argument is that we can transcend humanity, which means our body limitations to become superhuman. And I really believe that the concept of transcending humanity, that technological means actually results in us becoming like machines. And I think that that's where it gets really dangerous for us because to me that's a downgrade, not an upgrade, because the things that make us human are not technology. You know, they're not data, they're not algorithms, they're feelings, emotions, creativity, imagination, mysteries, you know, they're all these things that are essentially not algorithms. And in my book I argue that algorithms are great to use, but the andro-rhythms, you know, what makes us human are our future. It's good for us to use computers and machines and technology to take care of the heavy lifting, but to look at them as being the same as us in terms of the capacity of existence, I think that's probably a very bad idea.