 or the clarity of the paper, is it done by someone in the editorial team or do the peer reviewers point it out? It's usually pointed out by the peer reviewers, but it will have been noted at some point in time by the editors. Our process is that an editor looks at it first, an associate editor, and then they will determine how they want to move forward with reviews, who they want to review the submission, and at that point we'll get reviewer comments back, and in those, that's usually where they'll note if there is a particular problem with some of the language, you'll usually see it in the peer reviews. Okay, the reason I asked was because if the authors sooner can know about a reason which is not related to science as a part of the projection, then it could be one of the phringing processes and they could immediately know, okay, it's the language why the papers come back and then go for peer review. And I mean, and that would be a comment if there was a problem with the language, that would be a comment that they would receive when the papers return to them, whether or not they recommend a revision, those would be part of the comments that they would receive.