 The Defensive Marriage Act has some powerful enemies with strongly worded opposition coming this week from some familiar names. A flawed study on LGBT parenting is also under attack, with its author now under investigation. All that and some good news coming out of Maine. At the American Foundation for Equal Rights, I'm Matt Baume, and welcome to Marriage News Watch for July 16, 2012. Last week, we reported that multiple challenges to the Federal Defensive Marriage Act are headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. This week, a wide range of companies, politicians, medical organizations, and cities have filed amicus briefs in support of those challenges. Those companies include Microsoft, Google, Viacom, eBay, and Xerox, among others, and the city's range from San Francisco to New York to Boston. Their brief states that, quote, statements of principle are our agenda for success. Our principles reflect, in the truest sense, our business judgment. By force of law, DOMA would rescind that judgment, and direct that we renounce those principles. Or worse yet, betray them. Members of Congress filing a brief against DOMA include Gerald Nadler of New York, Nancy Pelosi of California, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, John Conyers of Michigan, and James Clyburn of North Carolina, 130 representatives in total. And numerous medical organizations filed a brief of their own, which states, quote, the claim that legal recognition of marriage for same-sex couples undermines the institution of marriage and harms their children is inconsistent with the scientific evidence, unquote. The brief was submitted by the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, among others. Filing a brief in defense of DOMA was the American College of Pediatricians. Now, they're not to be confused with the American Academy of Pediatrics, a 60,000-member respected medical organization that opposes DOMA and has been around for nearly a century. The American College of Pediatricians is about 10 years old, is estimated to have just a couple dozen members, and primarily exists to oppose protections for LGBT people and their families. Their pro DOMA brief cites a deeply flawed study that we reported on a few weeks ago. That study purported to show that the kids of LGBT parents suffer when compared to the children of straight parents. But that contradicts a large body of evidence, and now the study's author, Mark Regnerus, is under investigation by his employer for scientific misconduct. The University of Texas will issue a decision on his study within 60 days. In the meantime, the real medical organizations explained in their brief that the ACP, quote, seriously mischaracterizes, unquote, the research. They also pointed out that, quote, the Regnerus study sheds no light on the parenting of stable, committed, same-sex couples, unquote. Turning now to states, there are positive poll numbers in Maine. Voters there will decide in November whether LGBT couples can marry. Currently, the measure is ahead, with 57% support to just 35% opposed. You can visit AFER.org for more on the federal fight to overturn Prop 8 and win full federal marriage equality. At the American Foundation for Equal Rights, I'm Matt Baume. We'll see you next week.