 Good evening, everyone. I am Dr. Siddharth Chakraborty from BGIMS Lodha and I shall be presenting Radiological Evaluation of Stomach in a pictorial review. The stomach is involved in a period of pathology, ranging from the 9th to 11th, ranging from Pectic ulcers, portal dashes of the hypochloric sclerosis, and hyacinthaticians like parcelloma, lepromas, and the common symptoms of stomach particularly are localised or diffuse, epidural pain, swelling or distension of abdomen, loss of appetite, weight loss, and polyphoenus, after me. Stomach can be done through ultrasound where we see the molybdenum, stratified architecture, distention, focal growth, production of stomach, on radiography we can see the various pre-gas gasification calculated and the various mucosal controls and chemical growths that we see through use of various salts to various concentrations and taking the image at various times and positions in which stomach was extracted from the blood transfusion. This is kind of the preferred emitting modality for assessing gastric departmental pregnancy, both the luminal and actual luminal spread of disease, we can see the partial necrostomy. Magnetic resonance imaging is also a good modality for, because of its better soft tissue resolution as compared to CT. Pet imaging is still under debate but it can be used to detect metastatic deposits that are connected to the various blood transfusions of stomach. In our study, we shall be evaluating various forms of stomach with me and comparing it to tetanus to be an orthodontic findings. The study was taken done on 25 patients and the patients were confident of their respective gastroenterology and the patient having gastric surgery or gastrochritis or design concern were not included. All the patients were subjected to orthodontography and then the CT scan radiography was done as an adaptable and the final limiting was compared to both the findings and the study can follow. Now coming to the cases, the first case is of a 28k-volt heat wave, which is ending with abnormal distension and again on ultrasound we got again pylorus with 4.2 atom of diameter and the pyloric canal was of 16 mm. The patient was taken up for high difficulty with pyloroblastin and the diagnosis was of congenital apocritic This is a very classic case. The second case is of a 6.5 mm patient with 10 abnormal distension and non-pyloroblastin. The pyloroblastin and gastric abdomen and the patient was of pyloric acetia. A 35 mm patient with dyspecya and orthodontic and the pylorosound fraud multiple polipoidal holes of the throat with increased words pyloros. The patient suddenly increased in popularity and patient was taken for gastric abdomen and such any pylorosound was taken and not checked and the biopsy was removed from the pylorosound. For the year-old main patient with oral orthodontic also had same, very good matemasis and on ultrasound we had small pyloroblastin on the body. On ultrasound for the small head of the patient and biopsy shot mucosal cells and mucosal cells and the diagnosis was of a live arm of the stomach ball. Six year old main patient with endipestous apocritic distension and non-pyloroblastin the pylori can have was narrowed on ultrasound and however the one thing that is normal next patient will start to cut off the pyloros and once the patient with apocritic acquired non-hypocritic pyloroblastin was removed. Now coming to the next case, 45 year old main patient with concave distension with non-saccharinous ultrasound pylori apocritic and apocritic distension with non-hypocritic pyloroblastin and on contrast pyloroblastin was removed from the pyloroblastin and on ultrasound with endipestous apocritic distension with non-hypocritic pyloroblastin and on ultrasound there was a sedentic stomach with pyloros and on surgery we put a pylorosound from pyloroblastin and the diagnosis was of pylorosins pictured on pylorosin. Coming to the next case, a 46 year old main patient presented with concave distension and also an appetite ultrasound product taken by going to the wall with loss of normal adipotexia, sedentic surafocal aneurysm, enhancements of the chip and it was to be shown from stomach walls and the diagnosis was quality differentiated and apocritic pyloroblastin was removed from the chip. Coming to the next case, a 47 year old man presented with concave distension with loss of apocritic and showed a ticket wall with loss of normal adipotexia and high quality patients had seen the liver which is in the right zone, he is trying to take an answer to a non-distance of stomach and the diagnosis was shown from stomach walls, they discussed the pyloroblastin and the quality of the growth of the diet was just because of quality of the adipotexia, like the planet is classed to the diet. A 55 year old male patient, a previous patient, presented with significant weight loss and distended abdomen, ultrasound shot, distended stomach, they can pyloric walls are very as to be shown with loss of pathway to the same and he is controlled enhancing muscle in the pyloresis pysomartin and it was to be shown, it was to be directed by the showed a moderate pyloroblastoma and this patient. Coming to the next case, a 72 year old male patient, presented with lung sensation with upper abdomen, an ultrasound shot with loss of apocritic and some of what was seen with some diastolic TMS and with loss of fat mass liver, it is controlled with loss of apocritic and some of what with loss of fat mass liver and pancreas and it was to be shown became at us because of holes and the diastolic on the Pocchial lymphoma. A 69 year old male patient presented with an ultrasound shot with Pocchial lymphoma and it was to be shown that the beginning of stomach wall, it is controlled with Pocchial lymphoma and it was to be shown that the diluted mass is to the surface of the stomach lobes and the diastolic to the Pocchial lymphoma. The study was of 25 patients with the maximum age group of 50 to 60 years that approximated 100% percent. The main symptom was of pain at the moment or by vomiting or a big loss. The most common critical findings were of lump at the moment with the most common lump being seen in the left upper quadrant. The body with the most common site of vision and it was mostly of malignant scintillitis. The cutout taken for the study for malignant scintillitis was 7-11 and all the patients with thickness more than 7-11 was malignant except for one case of the corousal structure of stomach after ascending which was also 7-11 and so coming to the conclusion that some of the things that we need to focus on are readily available for patients because they are making quality, having great potential and diagnosis of stomach illnesses for proper assessment of body to texture, stratified architecture, focal tones, reduction of testosterone, retrography can be also used in the first time in the investigation. However, we can see only the universal distortion. Extra liminal or metacinth is not commented upon. It is the absolute location of the vision, luminal and X-luminal improvement for better assessment of lymph node stations and with the help of negative overall contrast and IV contrast multiple reconstruction can be done. This being said, we should always keep in mind the measurement history and use the age appropriate and a sufficient image modality for suggesting that diagnosis is something your better patient can do. Thank you so much.