 Hello, I'm Charles Brookson, I was the Chairman of the GSM Association's Security Group and back in 1986 I actually wrote the GSM Security and I moderated the panel on the Internet of Things, A Force for Good or Evil and of course with that title we had quite a bit of discussion amongst the panel about the normal paranoia one would have with such devices of the Internet of Things we did avoid trying to define the Internet of Things and it was pointed out that the Internet of Things went back a long time to very early ages when we had connected devices but now it's only coming on people's consciousness and of course we had all sorts of discussions about the trust of the equipment, how it communicated to each other and for example how one of the examples was that somebody could create a false temperature on a device that would then bring up air conditioning or change heating and of course the Internet of Things it was talked about that it might well be 50 million devices interconnected and we have to have the appropriate security for that and there was a great deal of discussion about what was an appropriate level of security and the fact that many people were creating devices without any kind of security or thought of security. There was also a great deal of discussion about the legal issues because there's things like privacy so do you really want people to know which television channels you're watching or whether you're at home taking a shower which of course your smart meter will respond to you and there was of course the usual discussion I would say about cars and the smart cars and whether you could hack into those. In the end we had a balanced view about the Internet of Things I think it would be fair to say that clearly there were threats and issues clearly there were legal things which varied amongst countries and people had different views about what privacy might mean whether it was in one country or another and some people also had different views on how quickly laws could catch up and whether devices were being developed quicker than the legal frameworks to ensure people's privacy and to make sure that what happened. Of course there's many devices we discussed about devices that allowed you to that you had to sacrifice your data in order for example to play games and many people just tick boxes on their devices just because they want to play a game involving candy or birds or something like that and very few people actually read through the privacy terms of that. I think in the end we ended up with a balanced view about the whole discussion about the Internet of Things a lot of people were positive but clearly there are many issues that we need to address over the next few months and years as to how we can ensure an appropriate level of privacy and how we can make people aware as to what they're sacrificing and giving up in order to make sure that we have a safer and better world. Thank you.