 Spinoza would say, and he was a great analyst of the feelings. I mean, he really was a great philosophical psychologist. But what he would say is that unless you recover reason, which I guess is why your movie was called that, unless we begin again to believe in the possibility of objectivity, not perfect objectivity, there is no perfect objectivity. There is no God's eye view. But because there is no perfect objectivity, we don't have to concede that there is no objectivity at all. And it's always a struggle of correcting one's subjective biases with reason, so as to attain to a greater measure of objectivity. And if you think about it, what objectivity is a form of transcendence, because it means detaching yourself from yourself, which is what transcendence is. It means exceeding yourself and not remaining with your prior upbringing or public identity traits and so on and so forth. So he would paint a very attractive portrait of reason, which is something I've always been excited by him and other philosophers for. You know, reason has a very bad reputation. It's dry, it's arid, it's bureaucratic, it's instrumental, it's technocratic. In fact, reason is a constant adventure. It's a romance because it's a constant struggle. I mean, reason is never, ever on top, ever. And so I think Spinoza would have said, get past yourself, use your minds, which is, as we know in his tradition and in the Christian tradition, when it says in the Bible that God created man in his image, most commentators take those words in his image, Kiedmuto, to refer to the mind, that that is divine. It's not use your mind to get past your limitations so that you can imagine the sufferings of others and thereby arrive at genuine compassion. And on the basis of that, if genuine compassion is achieved, then we may have a ground for hope. That's what I think he would say.