 So, in terms of how education is changing in this globalizing environment, I think that first of all, it's making the need for specialization even more important, just in general. The same time, I think you need to be more worldly, and being more worldly means that you need to have a kind of breadth of learning across not just cultures such as history and things like this, but also in terms of language learning. So you want to both be educated globally, but also being more specialized. Let me just talk about language learning and how, you know, it needs to change from the way it's been and how I think in general, and what generalities I can draw from that. So traditionally, we all know language learning took place in the classroom, and the teacher stood in front of the class with about 20 students, and the teacher explains the language. And essentially by explaining the language, the students will then understand it and then be able to apply it. The assumption there is that language is a very adult skill, and through analysis and logical reasoning, you can figure out any language. And that came out of a tradition that came from the Middle Ages and so on, when they were trying to revive Greek, ancient Greek, and Latin. And they essentially applied the same pedagogy for teaching living languages as they did for dead ones. So that really, as we know, has not been a successful strategy. And why? It's because the student doesn't engage enough, and you don't learn some things through understanding a logical explanation. You need to experience it, you need to live it, and you need to work things out by trial and error. I think that's where Rosetta Stone, for example, is very different to traditional language learning. The student right from the start is reacting to different stimuli and trying to figure out the language by themselves. And that kind of learning, I think in general for anything, is very helpful. Because by solving a problem, even making mistakes, you learn things in a natural way. It's really the same way babies learn their very most basic skills. And so I would say that how things need to change is that we need to recognize that there are new technologies that enable new ways of approaching learning and we need to leverage them. However, that's not to say that you should just throw technology at the problem. So great teachers are incredibly valuable. Everyone who's had a great teacher knows that. And all of us have, at some point, had great experiences like that. So it's more a case of finding out what can these new technologies do, using them in the learning process, and then thinking about what is it that teachers or human beings are uniquely able to do. So for example, in language learning, teachers aren't necessarily the most efficient conduit for getting you to learn a new language, getting you to learn a new word, etc. That's probably easier done with the technology environment like the one we provide. However, teachers are unique and vastly superior to machines in the sense that they can socialize learning. So if you think about learning a language, you've got a need not just to learn it, but to practice it. And if you think about the goals that we have as language learners, which is to be able to have conversations with people, there's great efficiencies that can be created by having essentially machine-based or computer-based or software-based learning upfront whether a student acquires new language and then having a teacher essentially take that student and get them to practice the language that they've learned. And that can create great efficiencies and lots of enjoyment, by the way. I think one of the things that technology can really change is the level of enthusiasm students have for certain subjects. They can, things that were, that involved a lot of sitting back and listening to essentially someone talking kind of like I am right now, you know, it just isn't that engaging after a while and students will lose concentration. And so it's much better to then mix things up a bit and have more diversity and more interactivity and more engagement.