 I'm Roger Branch, a native of Trinidad and Tobago. I'm also a doctoral candidate in the field of international psychology. I am the director of forensic psychological services and a service partner for Converse. My company has been instrumental in designing law enforcement screening protocols for several of the Caribbean islands and we have been in business for approximately 20 years. You know what I read about ID Tech and I wanted to find out a bit more about it so I got in contact with the manufacturers of Converse and they said they were having a small meeting in Houston. I said okay I'm gonna fly out there and I want to see this product. I mean it sounds interesting, the technology sounds strong but I want to see it in operation. So I got there with an open mind and there were several other polygraph examiners there and I saw the number test, the demo with the numbers and the moment I saw the results I called my wife immediately. I left the room and I said honey we have to get on board with this. This is it. This is what we need to do. We need to get this to the Caribbean fast. It works. It really was surprising. In a few minutes it got every person's number in that room and I was sold at that point. I think the professionals in the field are somewhat afraid of change. It happens to all of us. First of all I think many of them would be surprised to know that the same team of scientists that worked on developing the computerized polygraph are the same people who have developed the eye-detect technology. So what is the resistance? When you couple the accuracy of the polygraph and the eye-detect as a credibility assessment expert by applying both of them and getting a say a person who passes the exam you are given the assurance using this multiple-hills approach that you are actually finding the best suited individual and in final analysis you're really looking to find the best suited person for whatever job they're being selected for. So the more tools or the more techniques or that you can utilize in your profession the more significant or credible your work becomes. This can create a new profession for them and not polygraphers but credibility assessment experts and until they start seeing themselves as that they are missing out on what the future and holds for the profession itself. If you look at a history of polygraph testing it is important for polygraphers to be adaptable. We started off in the early days using an analog system and when we changed over to the computerized polygraph there was resistance and with time we're all now using the computerized polygraph. No one that I know of uses an analog system. Now that in itself tells you you know what you should be ready for change. You change from the analog you're now changing from the computerized system of the analog and now you're adding to that using eye-detect. You as a polygrapher or anyone as a polygrapher should be cognizant that accepting advances in your technology is part of the profession. Change is inevitable so it's not necessary to resist but to embrace.