 The study compared the accuracy of cephalometric analyses made with fully automated tracings using Cephex, computerized tracing using dolphin imaging, and app-aided tracing using CephNinja. It found that Cephex had greater variability than the other methods, but was comparable to manual tracings for most parameters except INA, Degree, INB, Degree, and INB, MM. The study also found that Cephex analysis with manual correction is promising for use in clinical practice because it is comparable to CephNinja and Dolphin, and the analyzing time is significantly shorter. This article was authored by Pamir Marek and Julia Namova.