 And I feel as if she's being forced upon our culture, like it's this Taylor Swift colonizing effort. I'm not a Taylor Swift fan. She's a narcissist. I don't think that she's very talented. She's nasty. She's ugly. Nobody likes her. Does Taylor Swift have any boys? She looks like a teenage boy. Like, dudes don't like her. Like, if you put her in front of like, she's ugly. That's true. Yeah. Does Taylor Swift have any eggs left? Very normal. He just asked. Does Taylor Swift have any eggs left? Bro, what is wrong with you? Who thinks about these kind of things? And I'm sorry, she's ugly. She looks like a teenage boy. What is wrong with these conservatives? Holy shit. I don't even know how to process this. Just demented. Genuinely demented. So that was a clip from an October episode of Charlie Kirk and Jack Passobiak's Thought Crime podcast that was shared by the Midas Touch Network. And that bizarre Taylor Swift rant went on for a very long time. In fact, the Midas Touch estimates that it lasted for nearly 25 fucking minutes. Now, if Taylor Swift is in your cup of tea, that's fine. She's not above criticism. I personally like Taylor Swift. But the way that they're criticizing her is not reasonable. It's creepy. It's downright explicitly misogynistic. And I don't even know how to process what we just watched. But there's more of it. So we're going to watch about three minutes of it. And as you're going to see, it's going to become clear why they hate her so much. Her body count will have a museum and Galleria dedicated to it at the end of her career. I would take free Britney, crazy free Britney, over Liar Taylor Swift, who sets up her whole life where she's not like a real person and she's leading an army of women over a cliff against all of us. See, I totally understand her. She understands me. I love Taylor Swift. She does it. She makes money off of you. She does make it. She probably hates you. She doesn't dress well at all. I mean, she dresses like super revealing. What is virtuous about her for young women to glean? Like date as many men as possible, complain all the time, ruin men's lives. She's she has started a family. She's like kids. Like it's a terrible model three up. If young women start dressing sluttier because of Taylor Swift, which makes their life miserable. Like when women dress like this, I don't I don't know if a hundred percent. I'm telling you, it's like, I don't under, like, why are you dressing like that Taylor? I think it's worse. You dress like a stripper. That's not the issue. The issue with Taylor Swift is that she makes women hate every everyone like literally everything and everyone like all of her like the the empowerment thing against the audience. You go to one of her concerts. It's not like a family friendly. It's a it's a strictly female cult cult. Yeah, it's a cult. That's what it is. There's no men that really enjoy Taylor Swift. They just don't men fake enjoying Taylor Swift. Impressed women. That's correct. Taylor Swift is a major reason why so many women are angry in America. There's more women that enjoy the Chicago Bears game than there's no redemption. She's a bad role model. She's not a good person. She's a bad icon. Let's also remind you her politics are cancerous. Her politics are poison. She doesn't do the stuff that a political troublemaker did something. She is four million girls registered in like 24 years. You see that? But it broke the website. That's the thing. It's so easy for her to do that. There you have the biggest... Hey, I would respect her. But so she's not leading people to God. She's leaving them the woke-ism, complaining on boyfriends, man-hating. And she used to be a Christian. Aziz says, I don't think Taylor is a Christian anymore. She grew up on a Christmas tree farm. Yeah, I rest my case. Someone who like turns away from the faith and like pursues money, fame, and approval of the world. Good luck in eternity, Taylor. Over-under. How long until Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey are no more? Over-under. Blake. Like until they're dead? I could see their suicide pact taking effect with it. No, not that one. Not when the mRNA gene-altering shot makes Travis Kelsey drop in the middle of practice. That one's way more fun. I'm talking about when will they no longer be together? I don't think they're together now. I think this is all a Psy-Op. What's the goal of the Psy-Op? We're all done. Totally agree, Blake. You agree, Jake, Jack, that just to make money? I think she's very alien-esque. I mean, just look at how she functions. I apologize for the amount of brain cells you lost by enduring that idiocy. Like, I'm speechless, honestly. As a political commentator myself, I'm speechless. I don't know what to say. I mean, they talked about her being bitter. That's a little bit of projection. Her body count. How about you just mind your own business and shut the fuck up? How about that? Why do you feel entitled to know her body count? Mind your own business. Now, two of them think that her relationship with Travis Kelsey is a Psy-Op. And even Charlie Kirk, perhaps the dumbest one there, didn't even seem convinced because it begs the question, what is the point of the Psy-Op in this instance? What agenda does that serve? Why would they pretend to date each other for some reason? These people are so stupid. Holy shit, goddamn. Like, they look like a bunch of angry, sexually frustrated incels. And this is why people hate conservatism. I still can't get over the first part. Does Taylor Swift even have any eggs? Bro, you are a fucking freak show. Now, Charlie Kirk in that clip explained his real beef with Taylor Swift. So he says that she got four million girls registered to vote in 24 hours. She's going to destroy our country. There it is, right there. It always comes back to politics. It's not just that she's culturally influential, which scares them, but that cultural influence comes with political influence and her wielding it is what really scares them because if she actually chose to get more directly involved in politics, she could actually make a significant difference, especially in swing states, for example. Now, that clip was from October, but conservatives' creepy obsession with Taylor Swift hasn't stopped since then. And as the New Republic reports, conservatives are once again being very weird about Taylor Swift, and this comes after she was named Person of the Year by Time magazine. And they point to numerous examples of this. Jack Basobiak, who was part of that podcast, again bashing Taylor Swift saying, the Taylor Swift girl boss, Syop, has been fully activated from her hand-selected vaccine-shill boyfriend to her dink lifestyle, which for those who don't know, stands for dual income no kids, I had to look that up, to her upcoming 2024 voter operation for Democrats on abortion rights, it's all coming. He adds, here is Taylor Swift, a northeasterner from Pennsylvania, pretending to cry and attacking Republicans, claiming they don't stand for Tennessee Christian values. The day the op was born. Now, white supremacist Stephen Miller also chimed in, saying what's happening with Taylor Swift is not organic. Notice how literally everything has to be a conspiracy theory to conservatives. It can't just be that they don't like her and they leave it at that. There has to be some additional layer there where she's actually an op for some specific political reason, and this is all nefarious. Her being popular is some nefarious plot by Democrats. It all amounts to them coping and seething about the fact that conservative celebrities just don't have the cultural cloud or relevance that liberal and progressive celebrities do. And they hate this because it makes them feel not only left out, but it also is a missed opportunity because they probably would love to weaponize the cloud of someone like Taylor Swift or Beyonce, but they can't because no celebrity is even close to that level of cultural influence. I mean, who do they have? The guy who played Superman and Lois and Clark and Hercules, I forgot his name. The Dilbert creator, like that's their celebrities. Now, Trump's attorney, Jeffrey Clark, basically admitted this. This is what happens when we seed culture to the left. Brainless youth raising themselves on Taylor Swift's Sakharine Bland music and that washing over into the serious world of politics. If we reach the point where Dwayne The Rock Johnson and Taylor Swift run for office together, we will truly have reached full-on idiocracy where Mike Judge imagined President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. My brother in Christ, you support Donald Trump. Idiocracy was about you. Mike Judge literally said that Trump makes idiocracy look optimistic and also argued that Trump actually makes President Camacho look pleasant in comparison. So they are thirsty for cultural relevance, but they have none because they are hateful and bitter and that toxicity isn't going to make them likable, right? It's why we all dread thanksgivings because our conservative uncles say the same shit that they were saying in that clip. Who wants to be around that, right? Nobody wants to deal with that. It's why we don't like you. It's why you don't have this influence culturally and socially. But this conservative animosity towards Taylor Swift represents a broader issue with conservative men in general that I think in part contributes to this loneliness phenomenon that they in particular are experiencing. And rather than instilling good values into their listeners, Charlie Kirk and his ilk are instead cultivating misogynistic attitudes towards women among his younger male audience. And that sexism is a huge turn off to most women, which then makes them less datable and subsequently compounds the issue of loneliness. And this isn't conjecture. Data actually shows that young conservative men in particular are struggling on the dating scene because liberal women don't want to date them. And this Washington Post editorial suggests that this political mismatch will actually threaten the institution of marriage itself if women don't drop this standard. But as the Salon response to that op-ed points out, it is wrong to suggest that women are the ones in the wrong here. They're not wrong for having higher standards. Conservatives are wrong for being toxic and sexist. Amanda Marcotte argues the op-ed presents as if this entry to date across party lines as if it's generalized advice being offered to both men and women and both Republicans and Democrats. But of course, it's aimed primarily, if not exclusively, at Democratic voting women. The polling data shows that most Republicans are already willing to date Democrats, which makes sense since Democrats make more attractive partners. It's mostly Democrats and mostly women who declined to date those from the other party. In trying to sell women on this marry men who repulse you plan, the editorial board unconvincingly argues that simply being married makes people happier than being single. But while it may be true that married people, even those in politically mixed marriages, report higher levels of happiness than single people, it doesn't follow that the wedding ring is the reason. Most Americans marry for love after all. Being married to someone you want to marry is very different than what is being suggested here. Lowering your standards just to get married. But of course, women's happiness is not actually the concern of the Washington Post editorial board. The more serious argument comes from their insistence that cross political marriages will help save the nation from the Trump era divisions and social ills stemming from man's misogyny. Basically, it's a gussied up version of the classic beauty and the beast fantasy where a woman's love can turn the brute into a prince. It's cruel on its face to expect women to give up their own happiness and hopes they can turn a red hat into a better man through patience and love. But it's also a false hope. It's hard enough to get anyone to change their minds about politics. Trying to get men who already think women are inferior to listen to their liberal wives is a joke. And that's exactly right. Nobody wants to date somebody who thinks they're superior or thinks that you're inferior or who's overly superficial and hyper-fixated on body counts or some dumb bullshit like that. It's weird and it's understandable that women would be turned off by that. So what's the solution then? Well, the solution isn't to shame women into dating conservatives. The solution is to teach young conservative men that they need to respect women and view them as equals and actually value them. And conservative men, conservative influencers like Charlie Kirk in particular, should in theory be instilling these values in them. But instead, they are teaching young men the opposite. They are teaching them to be toxic and hate women and treat them like shit and speculate about their body counts and stuff like that. And to the extent that conservatives do have an impact on culture, that impact is toxic, as we've seen. But I mean, at the end of the day, regardless if their hatred of Taylor Swift stems from her political or cultural influence or downright horniness, it's just really fucking stupid and weird. And if conservatives are wondering why they're struggling to maintain any cultural relevance, that's why it's because you say things like that that make you look like fucking freaks.