 So look at the interface between nutrition and resilience. So we know that we are facing the triple burden of malnutrition. First burden is hunger nourishment. We still have 800 million people who are suffering from lack of calories. So simply not enough to eat to their stomach is empty. The second burden is hidden hunger. Hidden hunger means lack of micronutrients, vitamins in their diet. And hidden hunger is equally damaging as visible hunger. So every year we lose 2%, 3% of global GDP because of hidden hunger. The third burden is emerging that is over nutrition and obesity. This is particularly true in many of the emerging economies including my own country, China. So we were hungry, we were unmarried but today we did too much. Obesity overweight has emerged as a heavy burden to the whole society. Not only in terms of the social cost but also in terms of sustainability. Simply eating too much if everybody follows Chinese diet pattern which follows the U.S. diet pattern simply this world is not sustainable. The triple burden. So all this contributes heavy, heavy loss of our economic opportunities. Not only GDP every year we lose about and latest figure actually is 5% or 7% of total GDP lost from the triple burden. But also more important is our future generation, our children. So they are either unmarried or over unmarried. And that affects their mental health, that affects their physical health. So the damage is permanent, we call it a life sentence. So nutrition and resilience are intermittent. So nutrition is both an input to an outcome of strengthening resilience. And reducing malnutrition is crucial for strengthening resilience. So I'll come back to that later. So well nourished households can better withstand shocks. So when people are strong, well nourished, when a crisis can and they are very resilient either to cope with it or to recover even prosper after a crisis. Strengthening resilience is key for reducing malnutrition. So households most affected by shocks face higher risks of malnutrition. We know that from our studies in South Asia. We have enough opportunities to strengthen that. Yes, we know all the challenges. So if people are malnourished, they are not resilient. If the people are not resilient or the system is now resilient and it will cause malnutrition. So opportunities to strengthen that means one is to accelerate investment in nutrition specific and nutrition sensitive intervention. I will come back, I will come back to that issue the next night. I adopted value chain approaches for improving nutrition. So integrating nutrition into the whole value chain. So it's not just a consumption. We must start from the very beginning. From the production side, what seeds we select to what farming practices we choose to harvesting, transportation, processing and a final consumption. And produce more nutrition with more efficient use of all inputs on a durable basis. So here I will call it sustainable intensification which means produce more with less, more means more nutrition. Less water, less man, less energy and definitely less carbon emissions. By the way, CGI is using this as a strategic cross-cutting thing to guide its research. But I should also acknowledge Shane Shevers here. He was very much involved in CGI reform. I think you take the credit, we take the blame. He helped us to hire both of the CEOs who also achieved the executive of the new CGI system. So good or bad, you take the credit. So the CGI is using that as a strategic thing to guide its research. And promote multi-sector, multi-discipline, multi-factor approaches. So working in sign language is not acceptable anymore. This has been preached for so many years. One of the questions is how can we really integrate it into our day-to-day work? We just had a big conference in New Delhi to look at an inter-sector approach, cross-sector approach to tackle monetization issues for children. Not only Ministry of Health, not only Ministry of Agriculture, not only Ministry of Development and Women's Development. Everybody must work together. So it's not just the preach or rhetoric. We must integrate that into our day-to-day work. And I finally improved the status of rural women. The women are so critical for achieving nutrition outcome. So they are involved in producing food. You might be surprised. A big share of the food is actually produced by women, particularly in Africa, in South Asia. And they also cook the food for the family. So if they are empowered with monitoring information about nutrition and most likely they will feed their children much better, nutritionally, healthily. So this diagram shows how we can really invest in nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions. So nutrition is the final outcome. Nutrition-specific interventions means micro-nutritional supplement. So you can fortify your rice, your wheat, by adding iron, zinc, iron into your food, into your salt. And breastfeeding and complementary feeding. We have the knowledge to show that the first 1,000 days is so critical. I really appreciate the concerns working in this area to work together to push 1,000 days initiative. Focus on nutrition of the children under 1,000 days. So between conception and 2 years birthday. So critical there. So once damage is done, the damage will be permanent. So you will not be able to fix it at all. Then dietary diversification. So not just rice, wheat, corn, maize, you have enough to eat. But more importantly, it's quality of the diet. And nutrition-sensitive approaches. How can we really reshape agriculture for achieving nutrition and health outcomes? Make sure that ministers of agriculture are accountable for nutrition outcomes. Then social safety. Yes, many poor and angry people need to have access to food. In short-run, we need to bring food to them. But the good question is how can we also bring them out of poverty-hunger in non-term. I think during the non-term debate, how can we make sure that the trade market is working for the poor. So they are utterly graduated from the poverty trap. The women's empowerment, I have already mentioned, health, water, and sanitation services. Food only accounts for probably 30% to 40% of the problem challenges of our nation. Sanitation is another 30%. Women's status is another 30%. So one-third, one-third, one-third. From women's empowerment to food and sanitation. Now, just to give you one example. It's called nutrition-sensitive intervention by authentication. So how can we integrate or add nutrition into food crops like sweet potato, rice, beans, wheat, salt and mint. So we can add nutrition into this crop through breeding. You don't need to go through GMO. GMO could be more efficient, faster. But even traditional breeding can add nutrition there. We know that many poor, hungry people will continually eat rice, wheat, and beans, particularly in South Asia. How can we help them to improve nutrition, even though there's continually the rice, wheat, and the mace? This is actually an interesting range. So we're aligning agriculture for improved nutrition. I have to say the NGOs, the World Concern, the Hand-Calling International, have been in the frontier to link agriculture to nutrition and health, have been frontier to look at the reasoning before anybody. CGIR, if we need to learn from them. And we have a job to do, to synthesize best practices, good work you have done, and to scale them up, to influence policy. So not just the NGO doing the work here and there, but more importantly, integrate that into day-to-day policymaking. So here, focus, addressing multi-sector causes of nutrition, water, women's status, agriculture, all this matter. And learning how to effectively address challenges of multi-sector collaboration. So actually, it's quite interesting that gender not only involves women, but also involves men. So until men realize how important women are, so the impact will be very small. And finally, this one is quite interesting, district coordination of nutrition committee. India is learning from that. India in some states, they set up this called Nutrition Commission in Mahastra. Three years ago, they set up that commission, bringing different sectors together. And we have seen some impact there already. A system is so important, a reasoning system. So, you know, we used to work in silence, but today the system is a must. Even one node in the system fails, the whole system fails, just like an aircraft. That's a triple or a seventh aircraft, right? What they do is to reduce redundancy in the system. Three or four is a default system. One fails, another one kicks in. But there is also efficiency involved. So too much redundancy in news efficiency. So the balance between efficiency and the reasoning is very critical. Now the question is, how can we really target the weakest nodes to make sure that the whole system is not going to collapse because of that weak node? And to optimize our resource allocation, not maximization, maximization is too costly. Optimization, optimize the resource allocation to make sure that the weakest node will not cause the collapse of the whole system. And capacity building obviously here is very critical already mentioned. Capacity building of the community of individuals, particularly individuals. We have a concern if individuals are nourished, we are nourished and they are very resilient. Otherwise, the resilient system should also focus on the nutrition of the individuals. In conclusion, the eliminating hunger and the monetization really needs higher priority post-2015 agenda we have already mentioned. Make sure that this is a key. People focus, we focus on people. Make sure that people can move out of the monetization and hunger. And the resilience is critical in doing that. So resilience must integrate into the 17 goals right now, 169 targets. We can debate about these 17 goals to manage some of the instruments, some of the truly goals. And 169 targets, they have to be measurable. They have to be achievable. But also ambitious at the same time. And it's all worked together. The post-2015 agenda mainstream resilience into all this until the system is stable, until the people move out of poverty hunger permanently. Then our system will always be very vulnerable to shocks. Then ICM-2. ICM-2 we have very high hope. I really hope that the different stakeholders, the governments all work together. Let's commit to certain principles, to certain goals. And we can always work together at the country level. To develop country, contact roadways, road map to achieve certain goals, we commit to that this week. From my final point, this is my final point. Knowledge, data, and accountability are key for supporting country-level strategies. So how can we really learn from each other? Connect the data, make sure that the governments are accountable to certain indicators. We have all agreed, we are all committed. So Ypres is waiting to work with Irish aid, with the concern with many other stakeholders here to push for that idea. How can we set up a knowledge hub to support the follow-ups of the ICM-2? Thank you very much.