Loading...

Massachusetts v. EPA: Implications of the Supreme Court Verdict (Part 1 of 2)

2,547 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Apr 11, 2011

Massachusetts v. EPA: Implications of the Supreme Court Verdict (Part 1 of 2) - Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming - 2007-06-08 - (Part 2 not Currently Available). On Friday the heads of two government agencies responsible for our nation's global warming and oil dependence challenges will appear before Chairman Edward Markey (D-MA) and the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. The committee will examine the response by the Bush administration and the Congress on global warming and fuel economy following the landmark Supreme Court decision of Massachusetts v. EPA. In a second panel, the committee will host the Attorneys General from Massachusetts and California to discuss their concerns over the federal government's response to their states' attempts to cut global warming pollution. Witnesses: Panel I: * The Honorable Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); * The Honorable Nicole Nason, Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Panel II: * The Honorable Jerry Brown, Attorney General, State of California; * The Honorable Martha Coakley, Attorney General, State of Massachusetts. Video provided by the U.S. House of Representatives.

Loading...

When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...