 So, in this topic, social-political behavior, it is very important and critical regarding the human nature, regarding the human behavior. Because in every aspect, human behavior is the basic focus of political sociology. So, we can say that social-political behavior is basically the study of psychological perspectives of masses about the political process and systems around them. Yani, hum sab jo kuch apne siyasi nizam ke baare mein sochthe hai basically that reflects through the behavior of individuals. So, in other words, the thinking of mass, public, about politics, development of political values and participation in political processes, social-political behavior. Because such social and political change have majorly supplemented by a third wave of democratization. Political sociology so apne aagas se hi yeh samajhti rahi and it has also explained that insaanon ka raveya, chahe mohsharti raveya ho, chahe siyasi raveya ho, it is very important because humans are important. Lekin ilmi medan mein, jab process of democratization ka start hua, debate was started regarding this concept, then actually it further strengthened that the human behavior, the social and political behavior of human beings, that is the actual key towards the process of democratization. Because the study also stresses on the capacity of public masses about the gathering of information and acquiring more knowledge of their political systems. Waqe sasaad, logon ko yeh mehsoos hua, logon ko bhi yeh ndaza hua, ki wo sirf ek din nizam ka hissa nahi hai, baal ke unhe apne siyasi nizam ke baare mein, zyada se zyada maalumaat rakhne ka hak hai. Chahe yeh maalumaat, political system ki working ke baare mein ho, siyasi nizam ki kamyabio na kamyon ke baare mein ho, iss sabki information logon ke paas hoona zeroori hai. Because the human behavior, that is dependent on the quality political debates, yeh boh saare political philosophers ka perspective hai, ki if the human beings may be familiar with the political debates, jo jho bhi siyasi lehaas se, jo debate moshre mein ho rahi hai, uska logon tak pahonchna asal mein unki siyasi tarbiyat ka hai, yani koi bhi siyasi tarbiyat munkin nahi hai, agar logon ke paas maalumaat na ho, logon ke paas yeh ilm na ho ki unka nizam ki marahil se guza raha hai, nizam ko kya mushkilat peish a rahi hai, nizam ki kamyabi kaise munkin hai, yaun masail ka hul kaise munkin hai, yeh sab social-political behavior ka issa consider hoti hai. So, such behavior or attitude of mass have been evolving since long with varying levels of political interest and cognitive mobilization. Everyone has some political interest, as well as everyone has a cognitive map which actually bounds individuals to move to some certain direction. And we all are bound to behave into some certain directions which are clearly determined by our cognitive map. So in contemporary democratic regimes, elections and voting are considered as ultimate credentials for democracies, but some other people attach things like quality of elections along with values attached to it. Halake, ek vakt aisa tha, sirf election mein vote lending ko ehm samjaya jata tha, lakin ab jub baat hu rahi hai, hu yeh hai ki quality of elections, yani elections, kitne free and fair hai us te hi, insano ke moshre ke andar, tavdeeli aur behtri aane ke chansis jo hai, unko moka milta hai.