 I'd like to say a few words about the role of external actors, generally speaking, in the Council of Europe in particular. So, as was mentioned, I'm the head of the Council of Europe's office in Bosnia-Herzegovina. And so to start with external actors, everyone knows that external actors have been a driving force in Bosnia's history for quite a long time. Just to focus on the recent past and the horrific war that took place from 1992 to 1995, which was itself a result of external aggression, a lack of external intervention, left the civilian population victimized for nearly four years, and in the end the peace finally was negotiated externally. And a new political system for Bosnia was drafted and adopted by external actors in Dayton. I see no benefit in any of us ignoring the fact that this externally imposed constitution, which was never adopted or endorsed by the population and citizens of Bosnia, leaves the domestic political actors to navigate basically stormy seas in rickety and unmaneuverable skiff with the international community today, satisfying itself mostly to stand on the shore shouting advice. So the ship, which was given to Bosnia-Herzegovina and Dayton, we already know is basically unseaworthy if you want to sail to Brussels to use this metaphor all the way to the end. European integration, particularly EU integration, has a large share of technical aspects. Adoption of the key establishment of agencies, harmonization of laws and things like this. But all of the European institutions, and first of all the Council of Europe already in 1949 in its statute, specifically acknowledged that Europe is first and foremost a community of values. Democracy, human rights and the rule of law, these are common values that undergird all of the additional structures that have been built since then, economic and monetary policies, military and security cooperation and the like. These are the basic construction material for seaworthy ship. However, in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the constitution which was imposed upon it contains an initial faulty compromise with these fundamental building blocks, inherent leak if you like. The Bosnian constitution at the outset recognizes one privileged class of citizens, constituent peoples. And rather than building the sovereignty of the state on the value of citizenship and the benefits of human rights for the individual as a bearer of the rights and of the citizenship, it confers a preponderant share of power in public affairs to members of the privileged class of constituent peoples, Serbs, Bosniaks and Croats. In 2009, the Satish and Finzi ruling of the European Court of Human Rights demonstrated clearly the incompatibility of this aspect of the constitution with the European Convention for Human Rights. The discrimination and disadvantage of citizens who are not members of the constituent peoples. That judgment was specifically confined to the presidency in the House of Peoples because that was the complaint that was brought before it. However, it should be clear, although not necessarily the case, should be clear that at the heart of the issue is the inequality of citizenship. The irony today lies in the fact that the Bosnian State Parliament and the political party leaders are charged with amending the constitution to implement this judgment. They are members of constituent peoples all. And I couldn't help but thinking of the beginning of the last century where the old male legislatures in so many countries were charged with deciding whether or not women should have suffrage. It's a little bit similar situation today with the constituent peoples charged with determining what place and what scope of equality should be made available to those who are not members of the constituent and the others. Now, specifically talking about the Council of Europe, I'd like to just emphasize three main intentions I guess that the Council of Europe has with Bosnia Herzegovina as its member state and with its office in Bosnia Herzegovina. First of all, just to remind you, Bosnia became a member state of Council of Europe in 2002 and when it did so, it was after signing on to a substantive list of commitments and obligations. And those commitments and obligations basically were the promises made to the Council of Europe that being allowed to join this pan-European intergovernmental organization, they would fulfill. And 10 years later, I have to say we're not there yet. So the first intention of the Council of Europe as an external actor vis-à-vis to Bosnia Herzegovina is that it should fulfill its accession commitments and obligations. And the second intention is that Bosnia Herzegovina should be a full participating and active member of our organization. It should demonstrate its capacity to be a good member state and especially in the context where it is striving to become a member state of other important organizations. It should start by showing that it can be a good member state where it already is. And by that, it would mean first of all actually participating, being present in all of the different intergovernmental committees and expert groups that the Council of Europe has. And in order to do that, they would of course need to appoint people who are the most appropriate person to participate in those bodies and not again be blocked by the question of the ethnic balance between the constituent people. So I'll come back to that again. And then third is that Bosnia Herzegovina should make the best possible use of the Council of Europe and the resources made available to it by being a member state of the Council of Europe. In order to move further with its European and Euro-Atlantic integration. And that means making use of all of the standards, the conventions, the treaties, the monitoring mechanism, the peer review mechanisms, the different bodies which provide advice on legislation and so on that is available basically for all aspects of the Copenhagen criteria within the Council of Europe. And by doing this, Bosnia would have a chance at least to build finally a sea-worthy ship that could have a chance to make it and be reliable enough to make it to EU integration. That being said, I come back to the original point, which is that the external actors of which Council of Europe is partly one. Because I would also emphasize that Council of Europe is also, maybe not the internal actor, but at least also a partner in the sense that Bosnia Herzegovina by being a member state of Council of Europe is also part of the governance of Council of Europe. So this is also a partnership type of relationship. And I think there it's really critical that as an internal, external actor, the Council of Europe is not just standing on the shore shouting advice for the crew of a ship which has no chance to make it, but actually jumps on board and lends a hand with the oars. So I'll finish with that silly metaphor there. Thank you very much.