 You briefly mentioned just now that growth, well, growth was more or less coming from a capitalist roots, but we saw it and in your book you also mentioned how in the communism regime in the USSR, they also had these mega plans of growth. So today probably most, if not all political families, even the green, in many cases they are pro-growth and we fell in the trap of growth, even if we want to save the planet somehow. But later in the book you mentioned redistribution, redistribution of resources, of time, of work hours, you know, commenting and all of that. So would that be a new form of communism? I write one that doesn't care about the growth or what is the political family then de-growth could be adhered to or attached to or thrive within? Or is it a new one or have you thought about this? Yeah, but I think it's different and I think between each of the four co-authors who might have a different answer to that. I think Giacomo for example would say yes, a new type of Euro-communism, Italian type of, I'm a little bit more agnostic to that. And I think people in the de-growth community also have different ideas that you would say come from anarchist, communalist, socialist, eco-socialist. Eco-socialism is also a very big stream within de-growth. I think we should remain also open to people with conservative ideals that might speak to some of that, of course keeping our differences. You know, that there are also people with conservative political ideas that understand that the current system and the obsession with growth is problematic and catastrophic. I'm not a conservative myself and I would never go in this direction, but I say I personally tend to think of a bigger umbrella that brings different people together in new ideas and in ways that perhaps are not the same as before. Comments for me is a core word, but I think it's good because it's not communism that has a particular historical legacy that it's difficult to disassociate from the way the project developed. Comments, I think, keeps, I think, what is good from these ideas, but also gives it a different direction, which is like both of something of creating, something new right now which is being created, but also the commons that have always existed. Mutual aid, solidarity, sharing has always been part of human condition and of human societies and I think has been at the root of civilization and at the root of whatever progress we might have had. So I think I would emphasize these aspects around the idea of the commons with a very strong green dimension to it, of course.