 I feel now, even when it was founded, it had a different challenge. At that time, whatever it was, as Dr Chandler has put it, it was a challenge in applied science. Applied science and solved the problem and particularly applied science. But now as 30, 40 years have gone and we are coming to the 50th in the fifth decade, the national programs have become stronger. The challenges of the rice cultivation, the rice farmers, rice consumers, the whole rice community in the world have also become more and more complicated and complex. So under these circumstances, certainly our challenge is to use this real science or the, you can say, basic or strategic research. But the challenge is that we should not be going deep in strategic research and ignoring the fact that we have to solve a practical problem. Whatever strategic or basic research is needed, according to Institute's capability or resources, should be done either here or in collaboration with advanced countries. But our focus is to put ourselves in a situation that we solve the practical problems using those. Now how this requires a balance and how to put ourselves at that particular place where we can really perform the best. Because if we start working on the strategic or the basic research side, we can go. But whether we have a comparative advantage there to compete with the advanced countries, advanced labs, private sector for many of the technologies, we can't compete with them because we don't have the resources. So I think our strength would be if we put ourselves in a very strategic place in that whole continuum from the basic research, strategic research to applied and to the downstream work, so that where we can perform and still not do sight of the fact that farmers' problems should be addressed. And that's the biggest challenge I've been seeing. And then performing that job with the financial constraints that we are facing, that's another thing that we have to solve. So basically in general the challenge is that we have to solve the practical problems by using the advanced science, strategic collaborations both with national programs. And now also another factor that was not there before is strong private sectors. And we have to know how to work with them. I still feel that CG Center as a whole and even at Erie, we are not yet very clear how to work with them in a way that we also get something in return from them. Of course in hybrid rise we have been working in a way that whatever is available we are sharing with both public and private sector. But that's just giving every time. We are not getting anything back in return from them. And the reason we can't get it because we don't have a mechanism at this stage. So that's another challenge that we have to address. And if we, based on my experience in hybrid rise, if we can develop models of collaboration with the private sector, I think this collaboration models, if found successful would be also useful for many other seed-based technologies that we are coming forward which are in the pipeline right now and where we can impact 5-10 years from now. So this is another area that Erie has to look in terms of future.