 And I definitely personally hope centralized exchanges burn in hell as much as possible The thing with developers is right that we're fairly fungible people you know we can kind of One developer goes down someone else can keep on developing if someone puts a gun to my head and tells me to write a hard-fork patch I will definitely write a hard-fork patch. He'll write the GitHub issue. I will write up the code I will publish it. I will do everything they say if I if I am a Do this and I publish a hard-fork patch to delete Fire a bunch of accounts. How many people here would be willing to download and install the update and switch to that chain? I See relatively few raised hands This is called decentralization Do you personally own any cryptic I think like two people gave me a couple of crypto kiddies And I haven't really looked at them since but they're around tokenizing real-world assets, whether they're securities or gold or bonds or like fiat or like I don't know like pixels of some Banksy photo or whatever. I think it's like all Interesting it doesn't seem psychologically that easy for people to make the leap from paying $40 million for a Mona Lisa painting to paying $40 million for a digital private key thing a jig that claims that it has some arbitrary attachment to a Mona Lisa painting and That's like okay fine. I understand that I don't really understand the art world in general anyway when you can just like photo Copy that looks almost identical Yeah Even if centralized exchanges end up having a lot of volume like the better decentralized exchanges are at the base As a baseline kind of the more happy I am because that way we can really like take away this Stupid king-making power that these centralized exchanges have for like where they have this ability to just decide which tokens become big by just deciding to list them and in charging these crazy 10 to 15 million dollar listing fees and Like the more we can get away from that world and into something which actually you know Satisfies the watch in values of openness and transparency the better. I definitely am less optimistic about private and consortium watchings than it was two or three years ago basically because like There's there's there's this bubble and there were a lot of promises and like oh my god IBM makes 200 million dollar savings by putting something on a blockchain and I have No idea what they actually did they probably just like digitize something that was paper before and like great Which other blockages interested by which we could measure of the which are the blockchains Do you actually have private keys for? Experimental reasons or which I do Well, a lot of this is like kind of historical reasons, but Bitcoin Bitcoin cash Bitcoin gold Bitcoin Uranium it's quite bad. It's Bitcoin carbon dioxide No, let's see. I got some doge. I think I think I got some z-cash In all sorts of Ethereum based tokens