 After the welcome session, we begin the program with an audience poll using Slido. This polling session is aimed at assessing participants' opinions, expectations, and points of view on various aspects of pitland restorations. This polling session will be moderated by Professor Daniel Murdi Erso. Pa Daniel, the time and screen is yours. Thank you, Iska. Ladies and gentlemen, colleagues, friends. I'm sure you're already familiar with Slido. If you can go to the browser, please upload to slido.com and use hashtag swamp. Or you can go to the chatroom. In the chat box, there is a link. Vito, can you put up the link? No, I didn't see it. It's not there. Just click that Slido link. And then you have the Slido application with you to join this exercise. So with the help of the interpreter, I will explain or run this session in Bahasa Indonesia so that I can talk with my Indonesian colleagues. So the interpreter will translate it for colleagues who are speaking. Jadi ini adalah sebuah cajak pendapat. So this is a poll, ladies and gentlemen. This is not a test or a quiz. There's no right or wrong answer. This is just us sharing our opinion. And you are also going to do it anonymously. So that way we can capture your honest opinion. There are four aspects that we want to ask you. The first aspect is the biophysical aspect and then the social, economic and governance aspects. For each aspect, we have prepared four questions. So in total, we have 16 questions to answer. Now, from the results of the poll, we can capture general view and overview of your expectations about pitland restoration in Indonesia and seeing those views from those four aspects. Let's start now. Oke, saya kira pertanyaan pertama terkait tengah. So the first question is regarding the biophysical aspect. So we have two languages, English, followed by Indonesian, after Slast. Oke, jadi yang, sorry, pitel, baik. Jadi dari pertanyaan pertama. All right, from the first question. The participants are hoping that there will be more pitland reweighted. Oke, the second question. Kalau kita ingin kesuksesan diukur dengan kondisi hidrologiknya, kalau kita ingin mengenai kondisi hidrologik, apa yang Anda pikirkan tentang kondisi hidrologik? Sebagian atau belum, atau belum punya kesempatan mengamatkan? All have been reweighted or partially reweighted or you haven't got the opportunity to observe? Oke, jadi sekitar... So from the responses that we've got, 40% of the respondents mentioned that only few have achieved the target. Berikutnya, pertanyaan ke-3. Question number three concerning biophysical aspect. So if we would like to see more pitlands, semua sudah sebagian, in your opinion, what is your view? Or in your understanding of restoration related to the re-vegetation, do you think pitland restoration? Oke, sangat pinomis sekali pertanyaan ini. Baik, seperti kondisi hidrologi, jika kita melihat kondisi hidrologik, yang paling banyak, menjelaskan bahwa hanya beberapa yang telah mengalami re-vegetation. Jadi, 44% dari respondents menjelaskan. Pertanyaan ke-3. Jika ke-3. So, di dalam bagian yang berkaitan dengan perakat, yang terlalu besar di ke-3. Menurut saya, orang-orang yang mengharapkan perakat, orang-orang yang berkaitan, orang-orang yang berkaitan, orang yang berkaitan, orang-orang yang berkaitan, orang-orang yang berkaitan. jadi seperti hidrologi dan faketasi. Masih belum tuntas, masyibat. Kita perlu memperbaiki manajemen kebakaran. 46% pertunjutan menjelaskan hanya jika Anda memiliki target. Terima kasih banyak untuk pertunjutan kebakaran. Pertanyaan pertama, Fito. Kalau kita mengamati aspek sosial sebaiknya. Apakah perubahan perilangnya? Apakah perubahan perilangnya? Apa yang perlu dikembangkan dengan pelanggan sosial mengawal? Apakah perubahan perilangnya? social structure of the community is it identifying potential conflicts or identifying groups that are for and against beat restoration efforts. Thank you. So while we wait for Padanyal to join again, let's continue with this slide of all. We have just started the social aspect and we are now on first cover the, I think we covered the first question. Now can we move on the second one in this? This is about when behavioral changes are observed, what aspect of people in restoration are affected. There are four options. Kindly take your time to go through them and provide your opinion on this. I'll wait for a few more seconds because there are people still polling. The main thing that's emerging is different use of different type of vegetation to support livelihoods. So that's one of the behavioral change that is observed as per our group polling here. So we have about 100 parties, more than 100 participants and 60 have voted. So we'll give maybe 10, 15 seconds more because there were long options to read through. Once we cross about 80 people or participants mark, then we'll move to the next slide. What is interesting is in this poll is that the least voted option is keep using existing peatland, but aware of peat wetness by keeping soil moist. So I think this is very clear that this kind of positive behavioral change is observed. So I think the polling is stopped at 65. We can move to next slide, Vito. I don't see it changing. So on the next one, we are talking about considering the different community conditions in each hydrological unit, or should the social impacts be measured? So there are various options. What would be the best way to assess? We have a few quick responses. Make sure you are reading all options. I'd also like to again mention this is not really a quiz. It's just there are no right or wrong answers. We're trying to assess through your perceptions, through your experience, through your knowledge of peatland restoration. What is your opinion? What are your perspectives? So share your own opinion. And here the highest poll is received by option, which is creating a baseline to compare the impacts across community groups. So that would be a good way to measure social impacts in each peat hydrological unit. And the next one in this one is comparing within a certain group over a period. So this is also important. So between two time periods before and after, and see how this has changed. Which is another way to assess the social impacts. Okay, we can move to the next one. I think this is the fourth and last option in social aspect. This is regarding gender equity and participation of women. When women participate in peatland restoration, we understand then what progress is observed. I understand in some cases you might think that there should have been an option to choose more than one. You can edit also. Yes. Put a new answer. Pa Daniel, good to have you back. I was filling in your shoes, but I was limited by my language skills. So I was doing it in English. Good thing we had it. So if you want to take on from now. Your comment on the last questions on the social? Well, I was just saying that on this one, this is about women participation. The most prominent one is in the active decision-making process. When they are women are involved and decision-making is more inclusive and active. Why am I saying inclusive also? Because that comes the second next. So those two first and second are the highest vote to get, if I can say that. Thank you, Rubash. Can we move to the economic aspect? Sorry, ladies and gentlemen, friends, I was kicked out. And thanks, Rubash, for replacing and filling the gaps. First questions on the economic. I think these are very exciting questions that we have. We are expecting options which economic data are more important to measure in the impact of restoration. Data apa yang diperlukan untuk restorasi? Data ekonomi apa? Which economic data are more important to measure the impact of restoration? Is it fresh data that are taken directly from respondents? Is it calculated data on value? So in general, most of the respondents have chosen fresh data that are taken directly from respondents. So the least option chosen here is the secondary data. Investasi, kapital bergeser kelepahin bawah. Tetapi secara umum, 70% hampir. So umum 70% of the participants chosen or are off the opinion that fresh data that are taken directly from respondents are more important to measure the impact of restoration. The next question, Vito. Dengan mempertimbangkan kensi yang ada on going intervention, at what level can the economic impact of restoration activities be measured? Is it household income? Is it business activities? Is it workforce absorption? Or is it contribution to gross domestic product? Sementara household income atau pendapatan rumah tangga menditu. For the time being, household income is the highest chosen option or answer. Almost 70%. Of the respondents choose household income followed by the workforce absorption. Oh, it's still ongoing. Okay, I'll give you more seconds. Tapi tetap pendapatan rumah tangga menditu. But again, household income is the top or most chosen answer. The third question in relation to economic aspect. If the impact measurement is carried out at the household level, which respondent is most relevant to measuring the economic impact of pit restoration? Is it household directly involved in restoration activities or household not directly involved in restoration activity but their properties are affected by those activities? Absente land managers or owners? Tidak bisa ditanya, mungkin yang terakhir absente land manager. Or the last option is the absente land managers or owners can be Jakarta or in other big cities. Most respondents or participants have chosen the option of A can be but not C. It means that household directly involved and household not absente land managers and owners. Ini sudah mempunyai apa yang terjadi dalam perjalanan. Terima kasih banyak untuk itu. Sekarang kita akan bergerak pada pertanyaan ke ekonomi. Bagaimana keputusan ekonomi yang harus diperkenalkan? Data awal. Bagaimana data inisial? Melayu sebelum pemerintah. Sebelum dan sudah intervensi. Saya kira sangat lucu dan menjadi pilihan sebagian besar-beserta sehingga kita bisa membandingkan apa dari restorasi dan ekonomi dari restorasi. Saya kira ini sangat kuat. 63 pesan. Saya pikir ini sebuah masalah. 63 persen dari respon yang telah memilih pilihan itu. Bagaimana kita memiliki pilihan yang lebih banyak? Pilihan yang terakhir adalah keputusan. Pada pertanyaan pertama pada keputusan. Ada tiga perkara yang dipercayai pada periksaan Anda. Apa yang paling penting untuk memastikan program restorasi pitlandan? Bagaimana pilihan restorasi pitlandan? Bagaimana pilihan restorasi pitlandan? Bagaimana pilihan restorasi? Pilihan itu menulis pilihan restorasi pitlandan. Pilihan itu dipercayai dalam program restorasi pitlandan. Saya cُelirkan sekarang pilihan restorasi pitlandan. Saya memikirin pilihan restorasi pilihan yang terakhir. Saya bertanya untuk mempunyai kepercayaan atau kepercayaan kepercayaan tersebut untuk semua pembelajaran yang berikutnya di depan FITO. Jadi jika kita mempunyai kepercayaan, jadi di periksaan Anda tentang kepercayaan yang berikutnya, kepercayaan pada Restorasi Pitland. Apakah itu sangat berharga? Sebenarnya cukup sukses, sedikit sukses atau tidak dapat p ahora? Sebenarnya seperti tema biophysikal, mana-mana yang paling terkejut diberikan adalah keskontekan keinginan. Terima kasih banyak buat itu, for that. Thank you for your responses. Apakah, Neri Dampak? Sorry, ini pertanyaan kedua ya. So is this the second question? Okay, pertanyaan ketiga. Alright, now let's move on to the third question. So in your view on sustainability related to organization, do you think the government has sufficient organization on pitland restoration? Is it quite a decade, somewhat sufficient, hardly sufficient, or you do not have opportunity to observe? Mirip dengan jawaban pertanyaan kedua, masih sedikit soal organization. Similar to the answer. Orasi dari segi apa? Organisasinya apa? The defense mentioned that the organization is somewhat sufficient. So we need to look at the lower level field or the national level field. Here. Alright, the last question regarding budget. In your opinion on sustainability related to budget, do you think government has sufficient funding on pitland restoration? Do you think there's adequate funding, somewhat sufficient, hardly sufficient, or you haven't got the opportunity to observe? Ini menarik. So this is interesting. Aspects terlumnya different from the previous two aspects. Yaya ternyata peserta dinilai in relation to the organization and regulations, in relation to the budget. 45% di antara tiga pertanyaan jawabannya. So 45% of the participants have chosen this option. That the budget is hardly sufficient. Thank you so much all of the participants for your kind participation in the survey. So we can also check the chat box. On your responses. So thank you so much for your kind participation. So your responses will set the tone on our discussion today regarding the progress of pitland restoration in terms of the biophysics, social, economic, and also governance aspects. Thank you so much. And now I'll give the floor back to Iska. Terima kasih.