 Namaste bitches. That's what the cup says. Go back to our stupid directory, it's up Corbin. I'm Zabon Zabon, Zabon Zabon Jipp. Go on Instagram. Go on Twitter. Twitter. Zabon. Jizz content. Ho! Today we are watching a new trailer. We are. That no one yelled at us for. Oh. OK. Did you get yelled at it? Nope. No? What are you doing? Just looking at different things here. Oh, I don't mean to interrupt you. Yeah. You're scrolling. No, I was looking for somebody on Instagram. It's related to you having the cup that says Namaste bitches. Anyways. Anyway. A new trailer dropped just a few days ago. I think it was two days ago. But it's the Kashmiri files. I'm sure people have messaged you about it. Not one person. Not one person. I've heard nothing about this. Not one message. Anyways. But yeah, it's been bombarded with requests. But the reason we hadn't got to it was because it wasn't subbed when it first dropped. Yeah. I don't know why. I don't know. I think I found it. What is it? I hope it's worth it. No. It's not. No, I wanted to. Her. Yeah? Her. What about her? She says Namaste. OK. That was not worth it. Anyways, this is a new trailer, a handy trailer. It's called the Kashmiri Files. Right. Is it? I've been trying to avoid any information other than the fact that I can't help but read because I've gotten so many messages that this is about it. This is true? Yeah. OK. It's about the true event that happened. The Kashmiri Files is an upcoming Indian Hindi-language film written and directed by Vivek Aghahotri, starring Darshan Kumar, Mithun Chakraborty, and Anupam Khur. Oh, cool. Khur. The film tells the story of the exodus of Kashmiri Hindus in the early 1990s due to Kashmir insurgency. The director won the national award for his previous movie, The Tashkent Files. I remember that. Yes. You've seen Darshan in NH10, the main villain. All the other actors are legendary, obviously. And I'm sure. It is different. OK. That's a different one. But yeah. So it was subbed by our subbers. Thank you so much, subbers. Thank you, subbers. For actually getting this to us because that's why we hadn't gotten to it yet. Obviously, we don't know a ton about the Kashmiri Files. And we know. We know some know about the Kashmir event, but it's not like we're experts, sir. By any stretch of the imagination. Nope. So here we go. And I'm imagining in advance. I can't imagine anyone's going to have strong opinions about this. Nope. None at all. Here we go. 1829 PS 21 boys 23. You are accused of killing many of the Kashmiri students. Yes. How many people were killed? 20, 25. If they tell you to kill your brother, then kill them. And if they tell you to kill your mother, then kill them. Kill them? We won't talk about our past in front of them. I mean, no mention of exodus. No. Exodus, not genus. Subbers. Look who's here. Krishna. Yeah, yeah. We definitely know him. I'll definitely make sure to go. Who? Our people are dying, sir. Kashmir has never been an integral part of India, and this is a historical fact. Well, right? Shit. Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. I was scared of death too. But I was scared, not you. I didn't get it like this, right? And the government gave you permission to do so. Azadi is a song of terror. It's an anthem of feet, Kashmir. It's a sacred song of terror. If Maasul calls me, I'll be in trouble. I'll be charged with rape. I'll be punished for this. Kashmiri Pandit is never a bad man. Why? And we'll never allow Kashmir to be an integral part of this country. Even if you don't have to apply for it, this is the time for justice, Krishna. But will Kashmir Pandits get the chance to go back to Kashmir? Is this justice? The events that happened looks like it's going to be an extremely intense not pulling punches, kind of watch. It feels Schindler's list heavy. Yes, I mean, and once again, if there's any information that is not true in this, do not blame us. We are just reacting to it. I know you guys have... Kashmir is obviously a very touchy subject. I'm just talking about the trailer itself and it looks really, really good and it looks really, really intense. All the acting looks like it's going to be incredible work. I agree. At least in my opinion. I agree. It looks... It looks important. It looks powerful. I would encourage everybody to not judge a book by its cover. I remember many times films that have been released here in the United States that had controversial subject matter and the way that the story was told and from whose perspective it was told. Yeah. And a lot of people... The first one that comes to mind that was really a big one and I've mentioned this before is when people took exception and people, particularly the Catholic Church and Catholics in America around the world took exception to Martin Scorsese's film The Last Temptation of Christ which had Willem Dafoe as Jesus and what they took exception to was some liberties that Scorsese took artistically where he's saying some things about Jesus' life that are not portrayed either in the 66 Protestant books or the apocryphal books that are in the Catholic Bible or in any archeological evidences. There's a lot of artistic license that he took. Yeah. But they were saying they didn't like it before they saw it. Yeah. Same thing happened with Da Vinci Code. Same thing happened with The Passion of the Christ. And I know that this is a... I mean when you talk about this part of the world and when you talk about the tensions between Hindus and Muslims it's never going to be a peaceful conversation unfortunately. But if this is about that event once again, it's very similar to how awful the event atrocity was of the one in Sardoudam. I don't know if it's similar to that event but I'm assuming it was and I think it's one of the most tight events, right? It is. And so it looks like an important story and it looks like it's a well done... Anupamkur looks amazing. It looks incredible. Yeah, Darshan Kumar. Darshan Kumar who we've seen in a couple of things. Everybody about this from an artistic standpoint looks incredible. And my admonition for folks would be it's one thing to appreciate the power of storytelling and film to be an educational source for things in history that are important for us to know about and to remember. Another thing to give too much power to cinema and unfortunately it happens where people don't do their own research and they just accept a two hour film as the carte blanche tell-all of what took place. I would definitely never do that with a film and I feel like it's a shame that stories that are this incredibly important for a lot of reasons, geopolitically and of all humanitarily that the real message that needs to be conveyed in the artistry about those things could be lost with the other surrounding. It's... I just don't have a good feeling about this film and the way people will respond to it. But I mean, just by the look of it it looks like a really well made film with this director Vivek. It looks really well made. I remember people saying, we never got to see it yet but the Tarshkent files I remember people praising that film saying it was a really, really well done film. I can tell you from this trailer I want to see this. Yeah, absolutely. And so hopefully it's as good as it looks. Do you see what it released? March 11. Yeah, like there's times where I say I'm in and it's like, okay, I'm in. I put my foot in the water or I'm like in a shallow end. On the trailer alone for that I'm fully diving into the deep end wanting to see this. For the, what I know about at least his reputation with the Tarshkent files and a lot of the actors involved I would be in just based off that but the fact that it looks like an important story and the fact that it looks like it's going to be intense and done in a way that is going to make you uncomfortable. Which telling in a certain event should. If you're going to do justice to an authentic event. Obviously a Holocaust film should make you feel very uncomfortable because of how awful it was. And it's interesting because I know that there will be people who for whatever reason and I have no idea about the context of the film and who would be upset with it or not upset with it. But do you remember when Clint Eastwood did the two films about World War II? He did Flags of Our Fathers and the Iwo Jima film. And it was the exact same historical event and he told it from the perspective of the Americans and then he told it from the perspective of the Japanese. I love that. But there had to have been some people off that he took the perspective of the Japanese. He was Clint Eastwood. And he did them both one after the other back to back and they kind of they go together. You need to watch Flags of Our Fathers and then the Tale of Iwo Jima or Flags of Iwo Jima. I never saw either of those. No really. Oh they're incredibly well done. The thing I would struggle with those is if it was Eastwood directing both I'd want to know who his team was. To put together the Japanese side of things. I can tell you. The Japanese side is 100% from you would think he had a team of people that were telling the Japanese perspective. I would help you. If I was doing a film like that I would want a team of historians from the Japanese side. It's a great thing to watch because what it does, especially from an American standpoint it lets you see the story if you're willing to look at it from the eyes of the Japanese. Which as actors we've talked about that consistently one of the things that we do as actors it's a trait you need to have as a human being is to be willing to look at things without judgment from the other perspective. If I'm going to portray a serial rapist I promise you I'm not ever going to agree with what they did. But at the very least I'm going to try to understand what it is that makes that person do what they do so that you can be aware of those things and stop those things from happening again and portray it realistically and not judgmentally. My hope is that when this all goes through that the artistry is celebrated for the artistry and that the truth of the historical events are communicated and I guess time will tell. It did kind of reminded me a little bit of not the film as a whole but I guess the subject man the way he did it, the header and Vishal, what he did with it. Obviously I know he was kind of in a way portraying a certain of the men's themes. Well he was. And I know he was. Obviously in that speech that he was doing that I learned but if you haven't seen that please go watch it. The Azadeh is engrained in my brain that word specifically but I'm talking to like how he portrayed it and the violence that kind of happened there even though I know the film's not really about that and just the way it was shot reminded me a little bit. Well it is because he did take because if you know the story of Hamlet you understand the underlying story of what's going on with the tensions of war between two countries and how he put that within the Kashmiri experience and the difference being someone would have to come in with an extremely high level of understanding of Hamlet and both and Kashmir to comprehend what it was he was conveying this is much more face value. Oh yeah. Yeah obviously. Yeah well let us know once again don't shoot the messenger please let us know what you thought about the trailer what you think about the upcoming film and what you thought about it and all this kind of stuff in Tarkin files is that one that we should be watching? I remember hearing so much about that and just ready to use about it but let us know down below.