 21 Studios and the 21 convention and co-founder of the red man group today on the show with me I have DDJ from Miss Andrew today also a frequent and new panelist on the red man group every week on Saturday It's 11 a.m. To 1 p.m. Eastern DDJ welcome to this show today's interview Hey, man. It's good to be here. Thanks for having me on. I really appreciate you taking the time to chat with me today always a man fuck yeah, and so you know I bring it I'm bringing DDJ on today guys because he has filed a major lawsuit against Google and YouTube relevance with relevance to Tech tyranny and censorship on YouTube and social media platforms DDJ can you kind of go through an outline of what's going on the lawsuit that just got filed the other day? Yeah, so I filed a lawsuit on the 22nd, which is yesterday and just kind of a you know Kind of like the brief elevator speech version of the lawsuit Basically, I'm suing under 10 separate causes, but the main five are under free speech under 42 USC 1983 and I'm also suing for discrimination Based on 42 USC 2000 a which is a public accommodation law and then I am challenging Section 230 of the communications decency act is unconstitutional and I'm also suing Google and YouTube for fraud and I'm trying to get the courts to enter a declaratory judgment Finding that Google and YouTube's contracts are unconscionable, which means that basically they're unfair and Unconcerned to rule them unenforcible You mentioned Section 230 is that the thing that I've seen Ted Cruz and other senators talk about in the Senate with like You know protecting protecting the platforms from any kind of blowback and lawsuits and stuff. That's correct. Okay. Yeah, cool Yeah, and this is so why is this you know? We're gonna go through it in a minute but why is this lawsuit unique because obviously others have tried to sue in California and stuff against Google and YouTube for De-platforming James DeMoor comes to mind and a few others I think some of those are ongoing too, but it's like what happened to them and where are they going? So why is it different? Well, let's let's talk about James D'Amour for a second because he actually happens to be the exception to the rule So the thing about James D'Amour was that he sued for wrongful termination, which is a little bit different But what makes his lawsuit compelling is the way his attorney pleaded that lawsuit But also the fact that he had to to work with arbitration clauses. See he had him dead to rights He collected all kinds of data and information So of the particular lawsuits that were there, he had more insider information than almost anybody up to that point Pardon me now with with that said The thing about James D'Amour is that they went through arbitration with his case And he ended up settling and the reason he ended up settling is because his was the strongest case against Google for discrimination on the whole employment discrimination side now his case also Even though he's no longer a part of it the other plaintiffs in that case They're pursuing forward and of the cases that are active right now his has been the most successful now let's go ahead and Compare that to say some of the other cases like the Lauren Loomer case or Laura Loomer case I should say the Prager case and some of the other cases where they mentioned free speech So under 1983 One of the main ways that you hold somebody accountable for free speech type violations is you have to demonstrate some kind of government interference That's been the main failing point of most of these lawsuits Prager got blown out of the water with a Motion to dismiss Laura Loomer just lost a motion to dismiss now She's in the court of appeals and she almost lost her ability to appeal the other day But the judge said no we're gonna go ahead and let you appeal Even though we don't think your case has a lot of merit the difference between my case and their cases when it comes to the First Amendment claims Is that I'm actually claiming that Google is a government actor? So they never did they never even alleged it But if you look at my complaint the base complaint itself is 67 pages But with my all my exhibits and my evidence that I attached to it it goes up to over 500 pages now The reason that that's important is because I'm saying that Google is a state actor for the government of China European Union and they are a state actor for the Christchurch call signatory governments Which there's 17 other governments now the thing that these governments have in common they've outlawed hate speech and so what I'm saying is that Google in their individual capacity is enforcing foreign government's hate speech laws on American citizens on American soil Hmm and that's a violation of our First Amendment constitutional rights and in my case It's not only a right. It violates my rights a freedom of speech It violates my right to choose what religion I want to choose without any kind of retaliation And it also impacts my right to associate so a lot of people talk about political discrimination and in California in the state of California and in Washington DC there are political discrimination Discrimination causes of action when it comes to those types of things But but nowhere else in the country so with that said What I'm saying is is that we can talk about political discrimination under First Amendment with regard to freedom to associate You should not get political pushback or First Amendment You know civil rights pushback For who you associate with yeah, you know you want to be a conservative you be a conservative You want to be a religious fundamentalist you be a religious fundamentalist, but you can't be discriminated against those those or on those grounds now the reason that this is important to the Manusphere is because people who associate with the Manusphere They're getting their speech silenced. Yeah, you know the whole Red Pill community the whole Manusphere community doesn't matter what tribe You're part of you're getting your speech silenced and that's a serious problem Specifically the Red Pill community on red It was quarantined about a year ago maybe a little more and I was about 300,000 subscribers ahead of time It's all quarantined so fucked up now, and it's been falling apart since then because of that Right so so with that said let me kind of you know talk about the lawsuit a little bit like I said It was filed yesterday. I'm gonna go ahead and share a screen so you can kind of see the lawsuit a little bit I'm gonna I'm gonna jump around a bit because there's a lot of facts Okay, also for those of you viewing there is a link in the top link in the description to this video You'll see the link to the full lawsuit everything has on site. I miss Andrew today calm So top link in the description to view this yourself Yeah, and anybody who wants to look at the lawsuit definitely look download it Yeah, share it give it to your elected officials if you live in a state where the Attorney General is getting ready to Investigate Google and YouTube and big tech. This is something that's there now. Here's the other piece right off the bat Why did you file this in Colorado rather than somewhere else like California? We're gonna get there in just a second, okay First and foremost, and this is a big one for me. I've doxed myself in order to file this lawsuit Damn now the reason that this is important for me is because when my book first came out I got targeted by feminists feminists were trying to dox me So I doxed myself cuz fuck you that's why I had white supremacists try to dox me. They couldn't do it Feminists tried to dox me People within the migtau community tried to dox me. They couldn't do it I've always believed the idea of hiding in plain sight So I just been telling everybody that my name is something different than what it is And of course everybody was thinking that and they just believed it. So, you know first rule of war You have a nice day. Yeah, so with that said The reason I filed it in Colorado is because that's where I'm that's where I live so so Now the other reason why it's fun to file in Colorado is because I'm told the 10th circuit is one of the most conservative circuits in the country So I have home field advantage Now with that said as you can see the case number is right there on the top now I'm gonna jump down now. There's 47 pages of facts, but we're just gonna go through them real quick Okay, so the introduction now here's a mistake most people make and the one of the mistakes is under jurisdiction So YouTube always fights for jurisdiction you to Google fights for jurisdiction but the issue is this in Colorado if you look at Statement 10 here's I scroll through you'll see that they have a significant presence here That's one of the ways you establish personal jurisdiction. They have a hundred and thirty million dollar 200,000 plus square foot facility that employs over 800 workers in Boulder, Colorado That's enough to establish personal jurisdiction The other reason that they have jurisdiction is because obviously I'm a resident here as well as you can see if you can see the Highlight there in a second And then of course venue is proper for the same reasons now as far as the parties are concerned I talked about that a little bit scrolling through now. Here's the facts now This is number one Google is a Chinese state actor now part of the reason for that is is dragonfly their censored search engine but the other reason is because of the 2017 national intelligence law entered by China which states that any organization in China that operates in China Falls under the jurisdiction of their intelligence and they actually have to Work with the government they're required by law to it imposes a duty on them now Google maintains four offices in China and they they employ hundreds of people and in addition to that They're working on AI so they have to work with the Chinese government by law They're duty bound to do so and I believe that they're pervasively intertwined, which is what we are alleging I remember reading it reading about this and even there's some Google employees a while ago who were really pissed about this I think few years on it was really super fucked up Yeah, and that's and that's the point it's extremely fucked up So so this is the way I think that that we talk about China China as a state actor The other problem that I see though is they're also operating as a European Union State actor You see they talk about their trusted flagger program, which I'm gonna kind of get into here And this is the thing that really a lot of people miss So when you look at the trusted flagger program the British government is a YouTube trusted flagger, okay? Wow, you want to talk about pervasively intertwined you have foreign governments responsible for enforcing Hate speech policies on YouTube. So you have foreign interference with US free speech rights right here and Google admits it This is an article from the Verge from 2014 now in addition to that They say less than 10 of these slots in as of 2014 were filled by government agencies But that also means that more than just the British government is involved So there may be other governments involved now The other issue is this they created what's called a code of conduct between the European Union and Google and part of that code of conduct is that they're supposed to share information with other tech companies who were part of the Signatory group as well as the governments. This could implicate antitrust issues This could implicate monopoly issues But it could also implicate a variety of other issues as well because you see even with the Chinese government issue By law Google is supposed to be listed as a foreign agent and And and they haven't they haven't registered and the same thing with the European Union This is a joint enterprise agreement and what's important about this is is that? Google and YouTube were involved in the creation of the code of conduct now the code of conduct was created specifically to enforce hate speech online These countries have laws against hate speech where you can go to prison for hate speech And they are enforcing these laws these foreign laws on United States soil Let's go by real quick for the average viewer hate speech in the United States has been ruled by the Supreme Court to be completely unlawful and Unconstitutional or any kind of discrimination against hate speech since there's thing in America We're gonna get we're gonna get to that in a second Let me jump down to that now Let me see if I can find a good quote for that because there's there's some pretty good quotes here Give me a second. Got it That was a long ago that was a side that was declared right by the Supreme Court Yeah, so it is so in I want to say this was in 2016 This was Mattel versus Tam and the United States Supreme Court Justice Alito stated in pertinent part speech may not be banned on the grounds that it expresses ideas that offend Speech that demeans on the basis of race ethnicity gender religion age disability or any other similar ground is hateful But the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express the thought we hate So again, it free speech is constantly being Attacked in the courts and the courts are constantly telling the people who attack our free speech rights To go fuck themselves because hate speech is not a thing. Yeah Now the reason I bring this up we're gonna gonna jump away But so so there's a lot of facts here, but I think the big facts are this, you know, the Chinese government issue is a fact I'm gonna jump around a little bit Google operates as an EU state actor. They're pervasively intertwined the Christchurch call which happened after the New Zealand shooting Let me see if I can get down. There's a lot of facts as you see I'm scrolling through Yeah, the Christchurch call which is section 4.3 of second page 17 of the complaint Let's back up a second year too for the average viewer who's just totally uneducated on what this means This document we're looking at is the first public complaint the first official document that got filed for this lawsuit, correct? Yeah, this is actually the amended complaint, but I had to change one sentence But it is like 99.99% is accurate as a first complaint This is the first amended complaint, but it says the same things got it So this is the first official motion to get this to get the ball rolling as a vet is correct This is a complaint. We'll be filing a summons as well as our cover sheet a few days. We'll be serving YouTube and Google next week So we wanted to get out and talk to people about it. I'll be setting up a go fund me account for this to help fund The lawsuit to help fund the attorney. I'm not doing this pro say I do have an attorney on board I did do a lot of the work myself on this a lot of the legal research and everything else Got the attorney to kind of over you know provide oversight and not this thing going But I mean that this is a huge there's a huge suit and those who don't know you you spent years as a paralegal Working with turnies, right? Yeah close to 15 years and all I did was litigation and appellate work in addition to civil rights work as well so Pardon me. I had to get a drink there now As far as the multi-state actor after the New Zealand shooting the I think she was the New Zealand prime minister She put together the thing called the Chris Church call Now this was organized. Her name is Jacinda Arden and she also organized it with the child abuse victim and French president Emmanuel Macron Oh, yeah You banging his teacher when he was a kid. Oh, yeah, that's his wife now. Yeah Yeah, yeah, he was banging his teacher who became his wife. And so now she's like the creep keeper Yeah, it's dark world man dark world. Oh dude, dude. The cuck is real. I'm telling you man the thirst. Oh man So anyway, we fast forward and 17 governments Have alleged that to be signatories here But also google microsoft twitter youtube daily motion and facebook as well as quant and amazon Signed this agreement as well The united states was asked to sign and they told everybody to go fuck themselves because according to the guardian They state the u.s. Has reportedly refused to sign up because of concerns about freedom of speech Huh golly gee Oh Yeah, it's a scooby-doo mystery. So so we're talking about that So i'm going to jump around a little bit more the reason why this is important and the reason why this is so damning Is because the chris church call Basically tells the the tech companies are are getting together And what they're doing is they are sharing information. They're creating common databases They're not only sharing it with the other governments the 17 signatory governments They are sharing it with other tech companies That's classic definition of potential antitrust. You look at like remember when alex jones was taken down by everybody Yeah, and payment processors wouldn't work with him How much you want to bet some of those payment processors where chris church calls signatory agreements? Okay, how much you want to bet? I mean that's that's classic antitrust And the thing is is that nobody's actually ever said it as much nobody is challenged google or youtube In any kind of meaningful way on the chris church call or the european union code of conduct now Here's the other thing Many of these lawsuits to come out. They don't use these news articles that we find In the lawsuit. That's what makes 4.4 the lawsuit so important Because 4.4 google enforces foreign hate speech laws and opposes hate free speech in the united states This whole section is based on the good sensor that was released to breitbart Okay, and I can go through and add this And uh chris church or christ church. Sorry dollhouse Whatever i'm looking at the chats So anyway, if we go down here, we talk about the good sensor and we're going through here This is what google advertises they advertise freedom of expression freedom of information freedom of opportunity freedom to belong But they don't do any of those things And they they admit to the legitimacy of the document to the verge So I talk about that as well. So there are over in this in this lawsuit There are probably 60 or 70 Um probably closer to 60 to be fair Um exhibits attached to the lawsuit because there's so much evidence here right out of the gate And part of this is is that I don't want anybody to assume that I'm making Conclusory statements. I'm actually only sharing facts and in many cases. I'm quoting them one after another So now we go through and I'm going to try to jump around a little bit And again, this is the good sensor now. The other thing is google's contracts are unconscionable now. Again, that means they're unfair One of the reasons that they're unfair is because of unfair bargaining power now What that means is that google and will youtube specifically Is used by over 73 of all us adults It is the second largest social media platform in the world right after facebook And it is the second most popular website on the internet According to alexa So they have unfair bargaining power But more importantly their contract is a take it or leave it type of contract. You can't negotiate with them So what that means is is it's a contract of adhesion? Now in addition to that their contract of adhesion says they can change the terms at any time without any notice To you at all Now the reason Oh, uh, bengoshi. Biyusha. Yeah, I understand that but I do know for a fact that I got hammered for the new zealand stuff Prior to the chris church agreement as well. Just kind of an fyi Um, I think they were in part of negotiation because that's the other thing to jump back up the eu agreement the coda conduct as well as the, um The chris church call Google and youtube admit to helping create that they probably were working on it for months behind the scenes Before anything came out in public and they probably used the alex jones d platforming as like a beta test to see what would happen That's that's my assumption here. I have no facts right now of that But you know what it might be something that we look at in discovery. So with that in mind, let's move forward So, you know as they come through here All these terms of service Their competitors use the same terms that allow them to change the terms at any time without notice When you allow this to happen What ends up happening is is that you have an unconscionable contract with no control and it constitutes what's called unfair surprise This is important in law because it's one of the ways you determine a contract unconscionable First is is unequal bargaining power, which we've already talked about Second is going to be unfair surprise and then the third is that There is no meaningful choice YouTube is the largest video platform in the world if you want to do business on video And you are an independent video producer like me like you like many other people You have to work with youtube because they all have the same clause They all have that terms of service that says they can change it at any time So that was an important to make sure that was included and then finally this is a big one There's a lot of people out there that have been talking a lot of shit About how 230 is the greatest thing since sliced bread And I don't think so. I think it's just the opposite you look at youtube You look at google you look at facebook and twitter how they silence free speech left and right and they're able to do it Because section 230 of usc 47 Gives them immunity it gives them civil immunity from civil liability For violating somebody's constitutional rights It's even written in the law that even if the material is constitutionally protected They're immune from civil liability So we have to attack it because they can just file a motion to dismiss based on this and we have nothing And this is what's called constitutionally overbroad Constitutional challenges as far as how you do them They're well settled case law all throughout the country. And so that's what we did We researched this to make sure we were all on the same page And we wanted to make sure that we attacked this because it was overbroad because it was vague And then yeah, it's almost like surprise anal Bengoshi exactly um And then in addition to that You know, we we talk about how it's internally inconsistent You see the the reason that they created the 230 exception Under the communications decency act was to promote free speech. It wasn't to silence it But yet that's exactly What youtube google and big tech are doing is they are using this as a hammer to silence free speech now Let's move on change for that immunity. They were supposed to not act like a publisher They're supposed to let people post and publish anything that were on the platform for the most correct But that's been totally perverted and destroyed at this point Well, and let's and let's talk about that because if you go back to the good sensor And you can see this on the good sensor document and I include this and I talk about it in a lawsuit Even youtube and google admit That they're now publishers and they're not facilitators See it used to be that they they were called quote-unquote platforms and they would facilitate other people's speech But now what they're doing is they're publishing their own speech and they're competing with the people Who are pushing their own speech on there and so in a way to kind of Unfairly compete with them. They're censoring people They don't like and then they're and then they're boosting people That they do and we're going to get into that later on But I think that it's important to kind of talk about that as well because you're absolutely correct there now Here's a new one. No one has ever done this yet, and I'm the only one online who's talked about it in this way YouTube is a place of public accommodation Under 42 usc 2008 which is another civil rights law. They're basically I'm saying that they are a theater And they are a place of public exhibition now in order for you to qualify under this law You have to be a place of commerce So google sells movies. They rent movies. They sell tv shows. They rent tv shows You could subscribe via youtube red. They're absolutely a place of commerce and what's interesting is Is that under the americans with disabilities act? Multiple courts have ruled websites are places of public accommodation And the department of justice is actually admitted They are places of public accommodation in a letter Tooth in 2018 to congress From the department of justice office of the assistant attorney general and I have a couple quotes here You can look at the lawsuit. This is about page 32 at this point Um and it kind of goes into that point what we're asking the courts to do is to say That youtube and google are places of public accommodation for civil rights purposes as well because I believe that as a patriotic american Who follows the christian faith? I believe they've discriminated against me based on my religion and national origin See a lot of people don't talk about Discrimination in the context of national origin discrimination. I think i'm the only one who's actually ever brought it up In in in those terms anyway So that's there are protections against national origin discrimination And if you're an american and you wear a hat that says make america great again Or you wear, you know, you have you fly a flag proudly in your yard an american flag You shouldn't be discriminated against for that. Yeah, that's unfair Now we're gonna move on. Um, I have some facts related to what they've done to me And then i'm gonna scroll down here to another gem because this was uh Brought out by project veritas recently and I used it in my lawsuit Give me a second here scrolling down. This is the scrolling scene of the video Maybe here we go So the interesting thing about project veritas and here is something that no one else has talked about Okay, so everybody's talked about this thing called twiddler Now what twiddler is it is a program that allows google and youtube to boost content They like like say they like a video and they want it to go viral They can boost it and force it to go viral and have everybody see it They can put it at the top of the search engines. They can do all these things They have a thing called real-time boost that helps with that as well And they also probably be something very bland and mainstream like a steven colbert video or some mainstream music video, right? It would be that or it would be something that promotes socialism Or something that promotes, you know, the muslim religion feminism and shit feminism stuff that hates trump Anything that that promotes civil rights gets dropped because you see twiddler not only can boost material It can also demote it so no one ever sees it Okay, so let's say somebody doesn't like my video on will sundar pachai get arrested because he lied to congress Which I put out so that video gets 2 000 views when it should probably have 100 000 Now again, it's one of those scenarios. I was one of the first people to talk about it But that that video got buried and I believe twiddler and some of these other tools were part of that But here's the thing that nobody talks about and this is something that I do and this is the most important takeaway I think of this particular lawsuit that no one's going to discuss and they're not going to know how to discuss it Let's say you have an ad sense account. Let's say you're the for the ford motor company, okay? and I'm going to put my ford car ads On a video or a website and I have an ad sense account and if you guys for those who don't know When you get monetized by youtube you have to get monetized through an ad sense account, okay? Now, let's say YouTube has some viral video of trans grooming of children, right? So they're doing pedophile grooming of trans kids or kids to be trans to make them more vulnerable to trans indoctrination They artificially inflate it and they make that video go viral now that video gets three or four or five or 10 million views What they're doing is is they're charging ford motor company extra money for those views because they've artificially inflated how popular that video is now that video is viral ford motor company May end up paying 10 times as much for marketing on youtube or through google than they would otherwise This is the same as true for websites. You have ads on websites and their websites that youtube likes They boost them up and since it's pay-per-click or pay-per-view or pay-for-whatever Now all of a sudden these these advertising companies They're paying 10 15 20 times more than what they would normally pay because youtube is artificially inflated the traffic And they're and they're getting no return on this on their advertising There's been studies done where social media marketing is not translated into additional revenue. So artificially boosting content It robs advertisers Of revenue or i'm not of revenue. I'm sorry, but of ad costs by artificially inflating their ad costs That's not fair to advertisers now. Let's take it on the other direction If you artificially drop or demote Videos or websites and you conceal them let's say on page 20 of google Or you conceal them to where when you try to search for them on youtube. You can't find them Now you're robbing youtubers of ad revenue Because you're concealing their video and you're doing it in such a way that people never even see it And the twiddler tool through the most recent project veritas leak proves it That's huge antitrust. That's huge fraud on a federal level Now and this happened to me too. The reason I bring it up is because i'm personally damaged by this I can show where people are getting unsubscribed from my channel They're not being notified of my videos and you can see the the videos the number counts are drastically dropping And it's not because nobody's watching them and then on top of that youtube and google are turning around and they're going back through And they're stealing views from from youtubers Well, when you're stealing views from youtubers, you're also stealing ad revenue from them So that's something important to think about but the other thing that's important to think about And this is something that a lot of people didn't realize. Let me see if I can find it here Give me just a second here Um, here we go I did a video in december 2018 called the splc funds terrorists Now google has donated 250,000 dollars to the southern poverty law center, but in addition to that The southern poverty law center is a youtube trusted flagger And on top of all that google pays its employees six months wages To work with ad partners. I mean to work with ngo partners The southern poverty law center Is one of these non-profit ngo partners NGO means a non-governmental organization something like that. Correct. Correct So 501c3's so google is not only giving money to the southern poverty law center Who in turn is giving it directly to antifa, which I point out in my december 2018 video But they're actually assigning Google employees to work full-time for the southern poverty law center for six months at a time Antifa is about to be declared a uh, terrorist organization too. It looks like and if they are then that means that any Organization that funds them is aiding and abetting terrorism. So once This is why I bring this up This is important because google is using the southern poverty law center And they're using 501c3's as pass through information pass through agencies to fund antifa terrorism. That's a problem So and again, I mean, it's you know, this is this these are major national interest issues And these are things that people are not talking about to my knowledge I'm the only one who's ever accused the splc of funding antifa and I can prove it So that's the other issue that's there. So those are those things are important So let's talk about the causes of action. Obviously we talk about the first amendment under 1983 Um, we go down here some more We talk about the second cause of action about national origin discrimination Under a subsection 2000 a and then again, we go back up here We talk about how 230 is unconstitutional and again, you guys can read all these on your own definitely um, you know, definitely Share this with everybody. You know other youtubers that are dealing with this You know, uh people in the media that are dealing with this all alt media I mean the reality is it is it, you know, it doesn't matter how big the youtube beef is We all need to be Fighting for our free speech rights as american citizens Let's let's put our differences aside and let's work together Protect our rights and then, you know, we can go back to whatever beefs are still left. All right Go ahead question. Does the constitution of the state of colorado have any relevance to the case or any influence? I don't know I don't think it'll have any influence per se other than being a positive impact But I'm I'm this is a federal case. It's filed in federal court. I got a state court. Okay. Got it Yeah, um, the fourth position here is fraud And where I'm basically saying is google is committed fraud google and youtube commit fraud They say they're a free speech platform. They advertise it. I pled it They're not and then on top of that they conceal the fact that their trusted flaggers Are foreign governments and agents of foreign governments enforcing foreign hate speech laws on u.s citizens. That's fraud They don't tell you they don't tell anybody about that and when they change the terms of service They never notify anybody. That's unfair surprise. You know, it's like what's his name said earlier surprise butt sex So then the other side of it is is at any time you enter a contract Um, you have an implied governor. I'm sorry an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing They've breached that and so I go on and I talk about that And then you go on a little farther and we have google's contracts are unconscionable Now part of the reason I'm doing that is so that I can avoid forced arbitration in california But the other reason is because they are in fact unconscionable and it's unfair So we can continue on the land ham act now. This is a competition act Basically, I say that because google and youtube make videos on their own they compete with me Now the other side of this is that no, uh, hi lord inquisitor. I got 40 watching right now and again, this was an un There was no notice given on this. This is a this isn't on the fly screen stream. That's not bad for that All right, we're gonna move forward and the eighth cause of action google does not meet the good faith requirements of 230 Now here's the thing if section 230 of the communications decency act is held to be constitutional There is still a good faith requirement under 230 to get immunity and i'm saying that even if it is held constitutional There is no good faith on the part of google and youtube and so they shouldn't get that immunity I'm one of the few people that's actually alleged this as a as a cause of action by itself And then finally tortuous interference with economic advantage because google and youtube have attacked my channel They've demonetized my channel. They demonetized a lot of my videos prior to demonetizing the whole channel They've concealed videos. They've removed videos. They've interfered with my ability to earn the money I would have normally earned Yeah, none of that happened and and a lot of people are complained about this I'm just one of the few that's suing over it. I mean at 21 studios We've had hundreds of videos about demonetized same with the red mag group. They get demonetized almost every time Yeah, i'm not surprised. Yeah And then my 10th cause of action is is motion for declaratory relief Now basically i'll talk about that in the prayer of relief section because I think it's important to read so number one Google youtube are a joint interest or visibly intertwined state actors and agents of foreign governments And in their individual capacity Violate and continue to violate Louis's first amendment rise to free speech and freedom of affiliation under color of foreign law two Google's websites youtube.com google.com are places of public accommodation their online theaters and or places of public Exhibition within the meaning of usc subsection 2000 a and they've discriminated against me based on my religion And my national origin as a patriotic christian and american citizen Three google's hate speech policies are used to censor american citizens on their face are unamerican And they serve to chill my free speech rights and they constitute an unconscionable contract clause as a matter of constitutional law public policy and national public interest four google youtube's contractual clause allowing them to alter the terms of their contracts at will without notification And forcing me to pre stipulate to any and all of their contractual alternatives Constitutes an unconscionable contract clause and is unenforceable as a matter of law and public policy interest And then of course subsection 230 of the communication Decency act is both facially and as applied Unconstitutional due to being overbroad vague and internally inconsistent And then in the alternative Google youtube doesn't meet the good faith requirement for any kind of immunity from civil liability under section 230 of the communications decency act And then in addition to that google is committed fraud by misrepresenting me and the american people That they don't maintain I'm sorry misrepresenting to me and the american people that they don't maintain black lists or artificially promote demote content of users And then of course any other judgments the court wants now I'm also asking for google the courts the federal courts To enter an injunction, which is like a restraining order To prevent youtube from restricting demonetizing or otherwise censoring videos From me or any american citizens on youtube.com or any other website That that is awesome. That's fucking great Okay, and then the other part of the injunction is to cease and desist enforcement of hate speech policies against me or any other american citizen And then on top of that to require them to publicly disclose which foreign governments and agencies work with them as trusted flaggers Or in any other capacity and finally to cease and desist artificially promoting and demoting any other content on its platforms And then of course i'm asking for damages to be determined at trial However, I am looking for no less than five billion dollars in pure This is fucking great the fucking balls to put this together and file this is It's fantastic. That's really making my friday And that's the thing is like like when you look at this whole thing, right? And you look at this whole scenario This is the kind of lawsuit in my view that other people should have already filed already because all the information is publicly available But the point is this is that the lawsuit is of national public interest and big tech as a group as a cartel Has been attacking Free speech left and right So dollhouse asks the question your perspective is to come back after it is dismissed No, my perspective is if the trial court dismisses it, we're going to take it to the to the court of appeals and to the supreme court This is not a fight that ends at the trial court You see the biggest mistake that people make and i've been saying this for years online Is that you need to prepare for your your appeal on day one? And this is what we've done. We have prepared to take this to the court of appeals We have prepared to take this to the united states supreme court on day one I don't really give a shit what the trial court does because i'll tell you what's going to happen If we went at the trial court level Google and youtube are going to appeal If we lose at the trial court level, we are going to appeal. That's just that's just the reality This is going to be a case that's going to get to the supreme court regardless Because this is a type of case that has massive public interest and the other thing that i didn't tell anybody about So it turns out that there's a little known law that when you challenge a a federal law as unconstitutional You have to notify the attorney general of the united states and give them an opportunity to either intercede in the lawsuit either to help you determine as unconstitutional or To fight you on it What this means is is that this entire complaint including the stuff about antifa and the fraud and everything else Is going to cross the united states attorney general bar It's going to cross his desk So he's going to read it which means trump's going to know about it Which means everybody's going to know about it because we're challenging the laws unconstitutional And a lot of people have realized that the law is flawed where it is and there has to be some changes Now i'm not saying that this is the perfect lawsuit I'm not even saying that we're going to win but what i am saying is is that it's not a frivolous lawsuit It's a lawsuit that's basically taking Well-settled case law and applying them to websites and applying them to the cyber age Because that's what we need to be doing We can't be using old antiquated ideas without trying to evolve to an internet age And I think that's the biggest mistake that a lot of Prior lawsuits have made is they haven't pled this stuff out because the rules of Pleading these complaints have changed and the way things are done has changed So, you know, there's a lot of new things that we're bringing into this lawsuit It's a very novel concept when it comes to a lot of this stuff But we understand that it's going to be an uphill battle and more importantly though We also need to understand this if you do the same old thing over and over and over again And it fails every time To continue to try it is insanity So we are trying to absolutely win and like I said in the next few days We're going to be putting up a go fund me so people can donate to the legal fees And we can you know, basically help fund the lawsuit as we're fighting it because this isn't just for me And this isn't just you know to dox myself and to make a bunch of money and right off into the sunset This is about free speech. We have a way where we can Give the power of civil rights online back to american citizens And I think that's the most important piece because you know, american citizens have been silenced too much And a lot of people feel like they're on the verge of giving up and and you see it everywhere And I think that you know, one of the reasons I filed I've been publishing, you know content videos and conferences for 13 years now and as an entrepreneur and a publisher I do feel like I'm walking on eggshells at the time like an abusive relationship or something like that Yeah, I can't always say what I want and publish what I want Not because of some law but because of these fucking companies being like, you know Covert little scumbags and you don't know what's going to happen. You might get demonetized You might get a copyright make it a not a copyright community strike or you might just a girl fucking channel deleted alex jones style It sucks. It's horrible. It needs to stop Exactly and I and I agree completely and so that's one of the things that that you know I wanted to bring up because you know what we are a nation of laws and and unlike every other country in the world We have a constitution that protects our right to bear arms It protects our freedom of speech It protects our right to affiliate with whoever we want whether you're a christian or an atheist Whether you're a misogynist or you know an emasculated cuck you have a right to associate with other cucks if you're a cuck You know, that's all i'm saying, you know If you want to associate with some with some cuckoo misinforms everybody not that i'm pointing fingers at anybody specific That's your right to do, you know hashtag cuck lives matter But what i'm saying is is that on the other hand You know If you want if you want to hang out with people and you want to to fight for your constitutional right To hang out with masculine men like say, I don't know the 21 convention Well, you should have a right to do that too You know, so the point is is at the end of the day You have to be able to exercise your rights free from discrimination and that means that foreign governments Who enforce hate speech laws as crimes and criminalize people who speak hate speech? We can't allow that shit here Well, let's just be clear hate speech is free speech Yes This is like, you know the most simplistic, you know way to put it speaking your mind and defending people I mean, that's the most important hate speech is the most important speech to protect Yes Defensive and radical and controversial to the extent you're not advocating for like open violence You know no one is we just want to fucking have an idea and talk about it Well, hate speech policies by definition are un-american. That's right. I agree So that's really this is my lawsuit. This is what's going on Um, like I said if anybody who's watching this video Yeah, go to my website Download the lawsuit itself Download all the exhibits there and in a zip file. It's a big it's it's together when you put it together. It's real big Okay, so but download it Get copies of it. Feel free to upload and mirror them Send them to your attorney generals The attorney generals are getting ready to investigate big tech. Send them to them Send them to your politician send them to Ted Cruz tweet it to donald trump Tweet it to everybody because this is something that if we all get together and do this This is a way we make change because you know the thing I've noticed online And I was talking to to my attorney about this the other day I said, you know, there's a lot of people out there that are like, well, I just agree with that So I'm just going to get angry and I'm going to make a video about it Or you know, I'm going to get angry and I'm going to show somebody else and I'm just going to I'm going to start a twitter war over some bullshit and it's like none of that shit matters That's that's masturbation without a payoff at the end, right? Yeah, you might get popular about it and you might you know, you convert you signal But the thing is the reality is at the end of the day You have to do something offline too. Okay You know, I listen, you know, I I had to wipe the Cheeto dust off my shoulders And I had to create a complaint To to make this happen and and frankly, you know, and you know this anthony because because I've been to your house I take my identity very seriously You know, I take I take who I am my identity very seriously And when it comes to this sort of thing, you know, everybody knew that that we've met before in real life Which I don't I don't think these guys know that but we have yeah Yeah, we've met and and and that's the thing is that you know, Anthony's been in my corner this entire time And even though we don't agree on everything we don't have to but the thing is that You know when when something of national importance comes up Sometimes you have to make some sacrifices In order to make it right. That's what our troops do You know, when you sign up for the military and you become a soldier and and you know, our military veterans They sacrifice their lives their families and everything else to defend our country So this is one way I can do the same thing in order to defend our country for what I perceive as Enemies of our constitution both foreign and domestic. Yeah, you're putting your balls on the line I mean mad respected real life stuff is the way to go always offline And you just we know spirit online It's a fuck yeah, man I'm glad I can promote it and support it and as soon as the GoFundMe is ready to He'll make sure put that on the community tabs on twitter and stuff like that Yeah, I'm not familiar with the g e news because my head has been down doing this complaint and getting it ready to roll Got it But yeah, the other thing you guys can do too is if you don't download the law So you definitely share the website link Which will be in the description of this video, you know, share it with everybody tweet it out Send it to facebook every group you can shoot it to people like alex jones Alt media we'll be talking a little bit about it tomorrow with staphon mullinou Probably for you know a quick five minutes well in the beginning of the the stream So, you know, just know that there are options here for you guys to do it This is an option. This is this is a place where all of us can come together Regardless of what tribe of the man is here you are whether you like ddj whether you hate dj Whether you think it's great. I've doxed myself or you think it's horrible that I've doxed myself Listen put all that shit aside. That's childhood shit Let's protect our country. Let's protect our freedom of speech and let's come together and make this should happen Because I'll tell you what the more support that this lawsuit gets whether you whether you you help fund it with the go fund me Whether you help promote it by putting it on social media platforms and by sharing it with your politicians Or you download it and host it on your own web pages All that helps every little bit helps at this point because this is the way We protect our free speech rights. This is the way we hold big tech accountable and foreign government accountable For interfering with the american way of life because I'll tell you what there has been foreign interference in our elections And it's through companies like facebook and twitter and youtube and google through enforcing hate speech policies on american citizens on american politicians And on american public officials and frankly it's time it stops Hey man to that man. Fuck yeah Well, does that then also let's wrap up today's interview. I really appreciate your time man coming on today And everyone else again a short notice like this. Fuck. Yeah Yeah, thanks guys. Take care. Cool. DJ. We'll see you tomorrow, man. Everyone else. See you soon. Peace out