 The third question that strikes me as extremely important, which has already been raised here, how the cities are absorbing the migrant population. I think I would agree with Rakesh that remarkably good job is done in India also. I looked at the 61st round national sample survey data, which calculates poverty percentage for the class one cities, which has gone down significantly. The percentage of people in the class one cities is somewhere between 10% to 12% for Mumbai. I would like to mention to Professor Sassan that it would not be more than 7% to 8%. If you take the unit level data from the national sample survey for 2004-2005, but this poverty level is half of what we have noted in small and medium towns. If you look at the disparity in terms of access to other basic amenities, drinking water, sanitation, and electricity, you find the gaps between small and large cities is two and a half times to three times. The point that I consider to be extremely important is that with globalization, there are very many positive manifestations that we see that larger cities are in a position to tap the global market. Nationally also, they have been able to mobilize resources by floating bonds or other financial instruments by taking the help of credit rating agencies. Many of the cities have not been able to really reform their property tax system, but they have been larger cities taking advantage of the more liberal environment with globalization coming up. 74th constitutional amendment for empowerment of the local bodies have been able to increase their other sources of revenue, but nonetheless the gap between large and small towns have certainly gone up. Even if you look at the expenditure in the public, by public agency state and the central government, you do find that the disparities are high and larger cities are in a position to get higher per capita allocation. I'm not only talking about Jawaharlal Nehruan National Urban Renewal Mission, which is focusing on 63 basically large cities, but there's a parallel program for the small and medium towns. I did a calculation to really see that the per capita allocation under the parallel program for the small and medium towns once again is about one-tenth of what we have noted. More importantly, much of the investment which has come up is linked with the economic infrastructure, is also linked with the basically real estate development and the global capital market, and not much is going to the social sectors which is creating some sort of crisis in the social dimensions in the urban system. I would like to mention that infant mortality rate in India was going down significantly in the 80s, but the rate of decline has gone down. The rate of decline has declined. In the 90s, maternal mortality rate is another area of concern where there is virtually no decline. I would like to just mention that India is certainly going to reach the MDG target of reducing poverty to half the level by 2015. By all our calculations, everybody in the Planning Commission is convinced and everywhere else that poverty certainly would go down, but as far as the social, other social agenda is concerned, MDG in terms of access to sustainable drinking water, slum population improvement in their conditions, bringing down infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, access to education, equality, gender equality, I think our major failures would be certainly manifest in these social sectors and urban segment also would report very alarming failures in terms of these social dimensions. I would like to touch upon the urban economy, which is not a very important component in the context of this seminar, but I must say that it is a low-cost support system which we have been able to create in many of the large cities. And I think Professor Saskia talked about new kind of informal economy. I have described them as formally informal workers who are working in the organized sector, but don't have a share in the benefits, they are working, you know, shoulder to shoulder within the organized sector, but don't have the social protection. There are these informal sector workers producing cheap commodities and services which are being used by the formal sector to be reflected in the global competitiveness and their efficiency, and also the households that are engaged with the globalizing sectors are getting a cheap support system in terms of domestic assistance. Again, the analysis of the latest data for 2004-5 does show that there is a significant growth of male in-migration who are semi-skilled, primary education, secondary level of education, which means that agricultural laborers being thrown out of rural economy, coming and finding job in the urban areas have become extremely difficult. But some amount of market-friendly skills, streets, street smartness, would be required in order to be absorbed in this, you know, formally informal sector.