 I feel like, let the audience ask a question in a few minutes, but first of all, I have a different conversation here. Let me begin by asking a question like that. This may be that I'm not a need, I'm not a need to target any truth that your other managers ever talk. You said that you weren't producing, they're not just breaking news, but more in-depth and analytical news. I've always thought of a winning strategy for media companies, newspaper magazines, which would be to put the who, what, why, when on the web. I'm not the one, who, what, where, when on the web, and the why on the paper, because it takes a lot more time. I frankly, maybe to my eyes, I can't sit in front of a screen and read a 3,000 word analysis, but I can't read... Your readers are, they all know the length of the analysis, so we call it that analysis. The Arab world is suffering, and the Arab world is suffering, and the Arab world is suffering, and we are suffering from the Arab world, and there is no such thing as a problem. Now we have a topic about, You're using, I'll break the news, what not, Allah, yes, yes. You're using sent out as a bulletin, or as an alert, according to the editor of each chef to be used as worthy of being be used. Do you put long analysis? Of course there are on the site long analysis, but not that great views obviously. I mean, break the news is sent out as SMS, text, or as flashes on our user screens, explaining what's at this long link to a story which is developing. So as a story develops, the link obviously gives you more detail. I was interested, you said that the critical use of the internet in this region is for e-mail. I should tell you that my students think e-mail is like yesterday, and in text mail they don't read e-mail. You said you don't send them to my text, they don't get it. Well, it depends, text messaging is quite popular actually, especially in Europe and outside North America. But in an e-mail, when people are using Facebook or other social network sites, they might not use specific e-mail address of their work or their personal address, but actually Facebook itself becomes their e-mail email. And I have a comment on user-generated content. I think it's one of the most hyped, over-hyped catchphrases, if you will, because user-generated content I think is most appealing, as never said, when it comes to the person. When people want to be in touch with their friends, family, social circles, this is where user-generated content is most appealing. But user-generated content for entertainment, I would not want to spend three hours on YouTube trying to find something nice. I'll just go to some brand name which I know produces good quality entertainment. I'll go House or Seinfeld or what have you. These are brands, that's important brands. So user-generated content to replace entertainment, to replace professional newspaper, or professional media brands that you know you can trust their objectivity, their analysis. And you know their biases too. It's always important when you watch a channel or when you watch a certain medium to know their biases, to filter it out. So it's user-generated content, good in the person's space. It will not kill professional media organizations. It might pressure them a bit more, it might help them, might be cleaning into their analysis. For entertainment, it's agonizing, I think, to watch YouTube with all those wannabe comedians, in fact. What can we search, imagine search when it wants to be developed, helps people price and do, does the research indicate that people look first for the brand? Do they get a search list? Frankly, I can't, I can't even conclude the exclusive answer on this. But I think if brands were not important people would not, organizations would not be so interested in making sure their brands stand up. So even in user-generated content, it's usually the brands that catch people's attention, unless masses of people have filtered it out and basically became recommended into the users. In YouTube, for example, the number of times a certain video has been viewed, that's usually an indication of that might be something worth looking at. So that's where they have the most to watch, and so on. But it's the long-tail phenomena, where basically there's five or six percent of the content is what most people watch, and then you have huge long-tail where videos are watched 100 or 150 times or 300 times throughout their lifetime. So it's not a threat to the producers of good blockbuster movies or good drama series or good music or whatever. Another question for you. I don't know. I've said this in a quote, meaning freedom is a lot less in this region, and you guys set out to challenge that. Your signal is blocked in Saudi Arabia. You can't get in. Are you getting out of Saudi Arabia? Are there young people that are sending this form, or are they not going to exist? We have two young people from Saudi Arabia, and two from Tunisia. Some of them are not able to go abroad. So we have to make sure that they don't have the right to go abroad. If they don't have the right to go abroad, then we have to cut the shit out of them. I think we should try to increase the level of the situation in Saudi Arabia to a higher level. Of course, any new choice or any new place should be made at the beginning of time. And we're going to do that at the beginning of time. I think that the issue of the moment's production is that we have to make a new kind of announcement. I'm going to go out of the government's office. I'm going to talk about the situation in Saudi Arabia. Let's start with you. I think that the lack of democracy in the Arab world is the fault of the leaderships of the political systems themselves. And therefore the notion that you remove the dictatorship and suddenly you have flourishing democracy. When the fact of the matter is it's actually the social and political realities in that country that has made dictatorship possible. So basically dictatorship is a manifestation of the ills of the society rather than the only ills of the society.