 Good to see everyone so welcome everyone we will now call the February 7, 2022 meeting of the town of Arlington redevelopment board to order. This open meeting of the redevelopment board is being conducted remotely for the governor's extension of the remote meeting provisions of his executive order of March 12, 2020, due to the state of emergency in the Commonwealth through the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus. The meeting the ARB is convening via zoom, as posted on the town's website identifying how the public may join. Please note that this meeting is being recorded and that some attendees are participating via video conference. Accordingly, please be aware that other people may be able to see you and take care not to screen share your computer. Anything that you broadcast may be captured by the recording. So now I will confirm that all members are present and can hear me. I am the chair Rachel Zenberry. Next we have Ken Wow. President. Next we have Jean Benson. Present. Melissa Tentacolas. Present. Steve Revillac. Good evening Madam Chair. And from the Department of Planning and Community Development, we have Jennifer H. Present. And Kelly Linema. Present. Great. Thank you all for joining us this evening. We'll move right ahead to our first meeting agenda item, which is the zoning warrant article public hearing schedule for the 2022 annual town meeting and I'll turn it over to Jenny to take us through the schedule that she and Kelly put together. Thank you Rachel and Kelly feel free to unmute at any point to jump in. What we wanted to share tonight is just basically the, this is the draft legal notice, which is what we put into the local paper and we publish on our town website, we post it at town hall at the library. This is simply the notice that says we are planning to have public hearings as part of our warrant article hearings, and they are happening every Monday in March. And with a conclusion with the deliberations and a vote occurring on Monday, April 4 to set us up for delivering a report to town meeting, which then begins on Monday, April 25. So the point of this was just to share with you the schedule and confirm that we're okay with the schedule and see if there's any other. Any feedback it is a little bit different because this, this year we have two petitioners who are two people who are part of a petition one of them we've we've taken on as our articles but I think you know Christian Klein has is related to a number of the articles and then James Fleming is also a petitioner on many articles and so we had to kind of rearrange things a little bit differently where in prior years, we might have had a little less happening in one particular evening. It's a great job trying to move around things and accommodate a variety of availability and schedules, and it's also, you know there's, there's other factors in here that make it that can make it challenging if people are also associated with warrant articles that might be getting heard by the select board so many other variables that had to be considered. So, with that on beginning on March 7, which is the first night, we would have hearings on. I'm just going to share them on the screen I'm not going to read them all. The first article is the citizen petition, and then it would be followed by three of our articles, our first three primary, you know, substantive articles. The first evening in on the 14th, the hearing schedule would be to knock out those administrative amendments warrant article. And then have James Fleming's articles, which constitutes 12345 articles. The third evening on the 21st, the hearing would be, we have two citizen petitions, first, and then followed by the articles that we discussed with Christian Klein that were filed by the board, some of them three of them. And then on the last evening, we would conclude all of those articles. There's three more to then be able to wrap up on the fourth with deliberations and votes. So the purpose of this was simply just to share it with you and make sure you knew what the schedule is going to be about and what to expect. We, as you may know from prior years and of town meeting, we publish basically a guide that will be able that you'll be able to click through so that you can see the warrant article see the main proposed motion. And that would eventually become our report to town meeting where there will then be some discussion of what we discussed as a board, and what led to the vote, and what was the vote that was recommended by the board. So that document will be part of the legal notice which gets posted beginning on February 17 is when it becomes available. And so this notice will be up with as much documentation basically as we have at that point in time. Prior to the hearings. For some of these we do have some draft motion language and the motion of course is what is the actual amendment to the zoning by law. And that'll be the beginning of the discussions of course. So, I'll pause there to see if there are any questions Rachel. I will just ask before I turn it over to see if anyone else has any questions, whether we would like whether tonight would be a good time to talk about whether there are any articles with which we'd like to get feedback from the select board should, should that be something that they'd be interested in providing feedback on and conversely request. And whether there are any articles that will fall in front of them that we'd like to provide some feedback on I believe that last year the way that we approached this was I collected feedback from our board and then we had a joint meeting with the chair of the select board and redevelopment board and you and Adam. So I just wanted to open that up for discussion and see if any of the members of this board had any feedback on how they thought that went last year and whether that was something you wanted to pursue again this year and Jenny would welcome your thoughts on that as well. Great. And so we'll start with, can any, any thoughts on the schedule or the, the feedback exchange of feedback between the select board and redevelopment board. And quite frankly sorry I'd like to throw in there to the zoning board of appeal since several of these, I believe also really affect the types of hearings that they participated. Okay. The first part the schedule is fine with me, I think that's very reasonable and great job Kelly and Jennifer on doing that. And then as far as feedback, I think, I think we had asked for a little bit more last year I'm not quite sure we're actually asking not only feedback but for support, which ones today fully support which ones they have any questions on. I'd rather change it from feedback to support so that we're all on the same page. And I would like to, you know, say yes they have we we have their support and if he's following, or if you know, so that you know, you know we're not left to holding a bag here all the time with this, and then same with the zoning if they if they have. You know, questions are fine but if they have, but also if we were like, you know, their comments and their support of some of these articles. And then we can just go ahead and make our recommendations to, and then we'll have all three when we presented to the town. That was the second part and the third part is, when we see these are we going to get more information and what's there or we'll have a couple days to digest it or how's that how's that working. As far as schedule, Jenny. Yeah, that's some that's to come. And typically, you know we, we start asking and have already started to ask the petitioners, the citizen petitioners in particular for any material that they have about the actual the substance of the zoning amendment that they're proposing. Some of them we've seen in some draft format and others but nothing, nothing, and others you know sort of more in passing we're aware of them but we don't have actual material provided. So Kelly is in the process of collecting that we're trying to gather as much as we possibly can to put into the document that will be posted on the 17th. And to the town's website is part of as part of this notice but what what also might happen is that we'll receive. We have a schedule and Kelly, I don't have that readily available but we do have a schedule where we we communicate. I think that one week, at least prior to each one of these public hearing evenings, requesting that that's the actual deadline, we must receive all materials by that time so we. So in other words, for the meeting on March 7, you'll, you would have everything a whole week prior. You know, if it's not already in a part of that packet that I mentioned that gets published on the 17. And there will be enough time. Usually when we hear these things out. The final draft. You know we might not be in total agreement with that whole article, and we have, we said if you made a few modifications to it, we would find acceptable. How will we going to be able to look at that revised version, before we send us send it off with our support or non support to the town. Can we hear a time we have that. I think that's a good point that can is making can we look at the last date before the date that we vote because I think that that was a fairly light group that evening and so I'm wondering can if we could ask people to come back again if there is language that we've asked them to consider adjusting to come back with that for the, I believe it's a 28. There is a lighter number of warrant articles that we're reviewing that evening and so perhaps we could incorporate that request. We can make that clear to people who were meeting in some of the earlier evenings. And that's that's exactly what we've done in prior years. Yeah, we wait till that last meeting that last hearing night. Depending upon time and other potential agenda items that have nothing to do with the warrant articles. We make sure that we have the final language, which then of course relates to your deliberations and your final vote on the fourth. The one the one little just one other quick thing. The one other, you know, thing I don't know. We don't know if there might be a special permit hearing or something also that needs to happen simultaneous with us that did that has happened of course in past years. At the moment I'm not sure there might be two potential special permit hearings to some point during this time. I just don't know. And then the ones that are being presented on 28. If we have any word changes there that that will leave us enough time to make those changes to. I think that for these, I think for these articles we will have all the language. I'm less concerned about these ones. Okay, we tried to organize this in a way that kept the, you know, was in keeping as many of the similar themes together as possible. Nope, I see now. Yep. That's good. Thank you. I'm all set. Thanks, and just to clarify as well. As you would ask about the content of the package I know Steve has since his first time through this with with our board, Jenny and and Kelly and the team of the Department of Planning Community together a really wonderful summary of their, their review of each of the warrant articles and give us some background information as well. Okay. Next we'll go to Jean. Thank you. The schedule looks fine. I think what Kin said, I would just agree with, you know, as soon as we can get the main motions, the better in terms of giving us as much time as possible to look at them and sort of think about whether we like them or we'd like them with amendments, etc. But it's always worth asking every year anyhow because that often becomes a sticking point along the way. I wasn't clear Rachel whether this board is going to meet with the select board or just you and Jenny, meeting with the chair of the select board. Which one. Jenny go go ahead I think that you have probably better handle on schedule. The process actually that we agreed upon last year, we thought we would do it again and I have spoken with Adam chapter lane the town manager about it in, you know, to figure out the best timing of when we will do this but it would be the two of us plus Rachel as the chair of the select board and Steve D'Corsi as the chair of the select board with Doug Heim. And we would have a conversation about what we think are the right articles to weigh in on. And we had and weigh in actually it's probably not the right phrase it was more like, you know, any comments or feedback or support, you know, is something different we didn't talk about that last time but we would bring that up per Kin's request. And then we basically get that information back to either respective boards via a memo, which I think was supposed to be delivered by me. As I recall, last year. Last year was the first time we did it. Right. Do you want us now to suggest articles to having that discussion or do you want us to send, you know, Jenny and Rachel and email to you afterwards with our suggestions, how would you like us to do that. I don't think you have any thoughts now it would, you know, we can certainly start to collect that and then I would say Jenny I'm not sure if you and Adam and Doug have started to look at timing for when we would have that have that meeting whether you wanted to try and do that. You know this month. So that we could have that in mind before we start the hearings which would be helpful. But yeah, and I think the sooner we can start to collect that list, the better and maybe Jean you can start that off and then if others have thoughts, you can send them via the email we can collect the full list. And do you want these to just be the articles that we're putting in but also the citizen articles. Both. Okay, I mean it seems to me that the article that I'm going to pull the screen back up by the way. I keep losing it on my screen. Yes, I'll do that. Yeah, thank you. Thanks, Jenny. You're welcome. So on the first page. I think an article that's going to be very controversial is the two family. So I think I would be interested in what the select board's thoughts are about that, whether they would support it whether they would support it in any particular sort of way to do it. The enhanced business districts to if you go down a little more. Kenny. I don't know if that's about their energy systems. Not yet keep on going. The one that I don't understand, which is the enforcement one, I don't know what that's about. So if it turns out appeals. It's possible to figure out what that is and whether it's something the select board needs to be aware of. And the other one is the is the increasing the FAR. So those would be my suggestions. Sorry, Jean, I got four of those. Did you want the solar included in that as well. So that's increasing the FAR. Yeah, one that I don't understand that says appeals. I don't know when. Yeah. And then enhance business districts and two family. One family and RZR in our one. Okay. Great. And did you have any particular thoughts related to the zoning board of appeals and those that you would want them to weigh in on. No, it seems to me they're all just like, let's fix things that have been unclear or need clarification or so. All of the Christian client articles. Yeah, I think, you know, unless I know you might want to just touch base those Christian to see if any of them. He thinks raises major issues. Do that. But I don't see them being big shot issues. Okay. So far. That's it. Thank you so much. Great. Thank you, Jean. Go to Melissa next. Well, thanks for making the schedule that's super helpful. And I think with regard to the input from the different boards and selecting which ones we need to hear from I guess I'm just curious. Is that a typical practice, Jenny, or, you know, through Rachel, is that normal. Something we chime in on it, right. Yeah, we've done this in a couple of different ways in the in the past and we've just identified how interconnected. So many of the articles that are both related to amendments to zoning bylaw or town bylaws really, really can be. And so have reached out with the identification of a few articles where we really think it's important to take the temperature of both boards and understand our perspectives related to the experience and the expertise that we each have. And so they similarly last year came to us with a handful of articles that they requested that we discuss. And I think that that's something too that we should identify at which meeting we'd like to add that into our agenda because again we need to do that with enough time to get that back to them before, before their voting occurs as well so that you know there's any type of dialogue or back and forth between the boards if there is enough time. Okay. Yeah, I know that seems reasonable and I think I'm in agreement with kind of the direction we're going with on this. Thanks so much. Steve. Yes. In terms of the schedule, I think this, I think that it looks like it looks like we'll have a busy March but it looks completely reasonable to me. In terms of articles that I thought, you know, or I think input from the Select Board could be helpful are, you know, two of them are ones that Mr. Benson mentioned. The Allowing Two Family by Right because I, you know, I think there will be quite a bit of debate about that. And also the Appeals article, the first one on the schedule for March 21st, and I'm mainly interested in that because it seems to have both the human resources and a cost component. So it's, I'd actually be, you know, in addition to the Select Board's opinion, I think our town manager might be another person to weigh in. The second one is the second article scheduled for March 14th. This was the citizen petition to expand the business districts. You know, and I know the, or I at least have the impression the, you know, commercial vitality is something the Select Board has an interest in. And so I think, you know, they, you know, getting them to weigh in on a, on a change that would expand the footprint of one of our business districts would be worthwhile. Of course, I'd also be interested in hearing any, what I, what I think is interesting might not be what they think is interesting. So I don't want to my remarks to seem as limiting in any way. Thank you. And just to clarify, that is one thing that when the chairs and Jenny and Adam and Doug meet together, we offer both boards the opportunity to identify any, any articles that we may not have preselected that they would like to be able to get some feedback on. So I think at our next meeting, you know, once we have seen, or actually it'll have to be after actually the whole warrant is out. So I think that we can certainly take a look, maybe perhaps at our next meeting at preselecting some of the articles that we'd like to weigh in on, so that if those aren't identified by them, we, I can go, go to them and let them know that we'd like to offer our opinion or potentially support. Great. Any other thoughts on this schedule or the process before we move on to the next agenda item? I'm going to just really quickly, can you or Jenny remind me, I think the, the idea was the select board would not actually vote yes or no. Correct. These articles they would just Right. Their opinions and input, and whether they would support them or not. The other thing, and this might be sort of a little, I'm not sure what the right word is you'll figure it out. But last year, they submitted to zoning law articles. And I think we need to remind them that it would be better if they send people through us because then we have more time to work with the folks than last year when it just appeared at the last moment it hasn't happened this time. But I think it's worth your mentioning it to the chair of the select board. I think that we can certainly make sure to do that. Yeah. Notes. Thank you. Yeah. Anything else. Okay, great. I need a motion for this too. Oh, you know what, we, we, I'm assuming Jenny, we need a motion to approve the schedule. No. He want to. I know it never hurts to have a motion and a. Thank you. Thank you. Is there a motion to approve the public hearing schedule for 2022 annual time meeting as submitted. Second. Second. All right, take a roll call vote gene. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. And I guess as well. So we'll move forward with the hearing schedule as submitted. Right. That closes agenda item number one. And we now move to agenda item number two. Which is committee updates. And I thought we could just run through. And then we can move forward with the. The board of committees that we have. Members of this board. As representatives on and for those that we don't. Jenny, perhaps you or Kelly would be able to provide it a quick. Quick summary. I have a list here. And if there any then. Missing. We certainly can hit those highlights. If you have an order you'd like to go and I thought I could just run down the list. I was going to say you can run down the list or you could just go around because everybody. Is associated with their, with committee. Sure, we can start there. And if there's any missing, we'll come back to those again. So maybe we'll start. You. See if you had any updates for your committees. I'm on a CPA. Committee preservation. Yeah. Yes. And we have listened to all 13 projects that have been submitted. As of last Wednesday. And. We have close to the amount of funds that that's being requested, but we're a little short. So we're going to meet next month. And decide are we going to. Spread that shortness out to all the projects or postpone one or two projects. So unless next physically. Fiscal year. So that's where I right now. They're all worthy good projects. I'll just mention there are three phases, community housing. Open space and recordization and historic preservation. All the projects that have been following those two categories are well worth while then. I think they're very good projects for the town. Thanks. Any questions for Kim. All right. Moving on to Jean. Zoning bylaw working group. Kelly and Jenny were both there. So I'm going to go ahead and talk a little bit about what we're going to discuss. I think I can correct all my omissions and commissions. About this. We met on February 2nd. Just last week. And we sort of got a presentation on what the articles were going to be. For zoning didn't really discuss them. Most of the discussion. Was a paper put together. Input from other people on zoning for resilience. That is what should the town be doing as there's more flooding. Due to. Climate disruption. And looking at some other communities. Where they've done zoning, for example, allowing the. Buildings to be built above the flood level, but therefore allowing the height. To be higher. So it was that sort of discussion. And I think maybe within a year, there'll be something to propose on that. If needs, I think, I mean, it was a lot of good work. There's some more work to be done. One step is trying to map out. Where the flood zones are in the town and maybe take a look at the city. And then we can always. Mesh up. Well, as another step toward figuring out whether. We can just use the two existing. Flood zoning. Districts in town. And just add on to them or modify them or need some sort of other overlay districts. So that's in process. I expect it will be in process. And I think that was it unless Kelly or Jenny. Any questions for Jean. All right. We'll move on to Melissa. I should have said Steve, he was there too. Sorry. I was not able to make my committee meetings. Unfortunately. So. I let Rachel know. And I don't know. Jenny, if you were able to touch base with Rachel. If you were able to touch base with me, I think that would be great. I think that would be great. And the implementation. The master plan implementation plan update. Reason I could not. Unclick. We, the, that the master plan implementation committee meeting is on the 17th. Yeah. The new, yeah. The next one for February. In February. Yes. So that that committee actually hasn't met since. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know if there's anything else. I don't know if there's anything else. I looked online. And I'm wondering. I'm not sure if they had everything posted. So that's great then. Okay. Yeah, they, they did not end up meeting there. For a number of reasons. And so at this point, they are now finally getting to meet again. On the 17th. So. Will you be able, will you be there? Or, or will you not be able to attend? I don't know. Sorry. Kelly. We'll be in touch. Okay. I mean, I think it's open. So. It's, it's on. It's. It's on zoom, of course. So we'll send you all the materials in advance. You have this to meeting. All right. Thanks Jenny and Lisa. Let's see. Steve. Yes. So I have two working groups I can report on. One is the zoning by law working group. Mr. Benson covered most of it. I just wanted to mention the, you know, the challenges, the sort of challenge in figuring out what area we're working with. So for example, I think the other option is taking modeling of flood and precipitation data. Sort of laying it on a map and saying that these, this should be our floodplain overlay district. Another option that some communities have done is instead of basing it on the 1% risk area, the quote unquote, hundred year storm area. They'd actually use the 0.2% risk area, which is, you know, that sort of like the five, the 500 year area surrounding it. And the other option was, you know, I just wanted to say, you know, I just wanted to say, you know, Ms. Heidel's memo was it was a good, it was, I thought it was a really great summary of, you know, what other communities have do have done and, you know, by extension what we could consider doing. So I'm looking forward to working more on this. My second committee is the housing plan implementation committee. We voted to adopt the housing production plan by a vote of two. I think that was, I believe that's, I think that was primarily what we covered at our last, at our last meeting. Great. Thank you, Steve. And so I'll cover the, the three committees that I've been a part of, one of which has not been quite as active as a committee. Lately, which is the economic recovery. Task force, although it's not that the committee hasn't, hasn't been as active, but Ali and Jenny and the rest. The rest of the staff members of the town certainly have. And one of the things that I think is most relevant to this board from that is something that actually came up at one of our previous meetings, which is how to streamline some of the applications, processes and procedures for new businesses and current businesses who are looking to change parts of their, their operations or their physical, their physical structures, you know, to make sure that there's a clearer pathway to establishing a new business in town or altering your current business plan. So Jenny, I don't know if you have anything else to add to that, but to me, that's been one of the things that I think would be most impactful to this board. Yes, definitely. I mean, this board, I know, cares about that issue. But I think that it does take a lot of time and should care about it, especially in relationship to how we work with other boards. It came up during maybe some of you remember before we were doing recodification. We talked a lot with other boards. We actually had an all board meeting where this particular issue came up pretty high on the list of things we wanted to get done. But it, it does take a lot of money to do what we want to do as well as staffing project management. And so we've had, we've had, we've had, we've had, we've had had either of those until at least now we have half of those this year. We have the capital money to get it done. And we have some grant support, but we unfortunately don't have the staff. So we're in the process of hiring through the IT department, project management staff that will get the ball rolling and start the whole process, which will take time to develop. And this board will definitely have a role in providing input and the work that we've been doing is very important, but it's also very important to be aware that the development of the board has inevitably hired to do the work to bring us into a more, you know, dynamic online platform for permitting. Great. Thank you, Jenny. Appreciate the additional background and next steps there. Let's see for the Arlington Heights neighborhood action plan implementation committee. I think the longest committee name in Arlington. So I think it's a wonderful walk through the district in the fall and identify two areas that the committee is really focused on right now, which is a signage and bringing the standards of the current signage bylaws, contacting a lot of the businesses and helping them understand what is actually required and how they need to adapt in order to meet the current requirements. And then a second focus is on bike parking and the way that the bike parking and the pathways to the bike path are identified. I also know that the department has been working on items like the challenges with the sidewalks there and ensuring that they are in better repair than they have been specifically the brick sidewalks for accessibility reasons, which I really appreciate. Those have been the two main focuses of that committee. And then for the last committee that I'll report on which has been the most active is the remote participation study group, which was created as part of town meeting last year which is exploring how the town will be approaching hybrid meetings for all boards and public boards and committees going going forward. And there is a actually tonight the the draft report to town meeting is being presented to the select board, which identifies basically a pilot program for some of the most active boards in town, such as ours. Who meet with a large cross section of the public and deal with a number of different challenges with regards to trying to, trying to be able to host a hybrid meeting so the, the recommendation will be that there be a pilot program period of time for believe it's seven different boards or committees in town including the select board the ZBA the redevelopment board and several school board, the disability commission and several others. And, and we are right now working with a small group to identify what the parameters of the that hybrid period with me what is the feedback loop look like you know how are we going to test. You know the models for what will work with what won't what are the what is the equipment that's needed what rooms are going to be prepared. And so that's part of a larger effort. But again, there will be recommendations that to town meeting that this be piloted and then the pilot would then start following any discussion at town meeting, but I'd be happy to answer any questions on any of those three committees that you might have. And any concerns you might have or questions about that pilot program can. I know a board that thought you're going to cover it, which was the marijuana group board. No, I was not, I thought you were covering. Yeah, I thought you were going to mention but I'm so sorry yes if you could cover that one that would be great. We met and that probably the last time we met. We've approved the last site pretty much right Jenny. And so that boards just being disbanded now until I guess more sites come available. Right the marijuana study group just activates when there is some application to review or input that is required for the select board, usually as part of their host community agreement decision making process so we need the group met and provided the board and the HCA was granted to Calix peak, which is planning to open at 251 Summer Street, but they still have to go through a regulatory and licensing process. They are having a community meeting I understand I don't have the specifics, and eventually, at some point, probably my best guess again. So many qualifiers thumb. They will likely come to this board in like June or July, so it'll be a while. So nothing, nothing yet from from that applicant and there are no other licenses except for the transportation delivery, but we have yet to fully roll that out. Thank you Jenny and thank you can for participating in that. In that board I appreciate it. Any other questions. Madam chair just a comment through you. I'm actually really, I'm really thrilled to hear that there is a effort to streamline the permitting process. This is I remember the all hands meeting at the beginning of zoning recodification because the, the permitting process we had in place at the time with the big flow chart chart in the zoning bylaw that was more or less impossible to read. You know was one of the reasons I got involved. So, I'm, it's happy to see that's moving forward. I agree as well I know that's a big project and I appreciate. I appreciate that's being taken on. Jenny, the two that I know we have appointees who represent who were who were reviewed and approved by the redevelopment board or for the open space committee and envision Arlington. So I don't know if that's something that we could coordinate just a quick update from them at one of our future meetings, it would be great. Again to have the folks who, who represent the board, come in and we'd love to interact with them and hear what they're working on as well. Yes, absolutely. I, yeah, I had not thought of that for this evening but we could invite. Actually, the open space committee one would be very appropriate because eventually you will be reviewing the open space recreation plan draft and we'll need to provide your support comments and support on that. Kelly, do you have like a rough sense of that timing. So the next public meeting, which will be the final public meeting on that planning process will be somewhere late in March, and then it looks like the plan will be complete. They're aiming for May. Plan completion date. Lisa, some time in March or April. We'll probably have to say April. Perfect timing. And then similarly, the Envision Arlington conversation. We'll figure out the best time for Jagged to come. Okay, great. Thank you. Jean. Just a quick question. Who's the staff contact on the open space and recreation plan. It's David Morgan. He's our environmental planner and conservation agent. Okay, thanks. You're welcome. Great. Any other questions or comments on committee updates. All right, we'll close agenda item number two and move to agenda item number three, which are the meeting minutes from January 3 2022. And I know that Jean and Steve, thank you very much for providing your comments ahead of time. Thank you, Jenny. Jenny, I don't know if you wanted to pull those up. Yeah, I made a lot of edits that were provided so I'll just, if you want, I can just roll, roll through here. I'm going to have an apologize I wasn't able to send it to you earlier today. I believe that the 645 massive application, which was the bank application if I remembering correctly the address that would would have been a four to zero continuation instead of five to zero since Steve had to abstain. Yes. That is right. Great. That's the only correction I had in addition to what Steven Jean already sent through. But I'll go through and see if anyone has any comments. I know Jean you already provided some but wanted to roll back through and see if there's anything else. You're good. Okay, Steve. Nothing further. Great. On page nine of somewhere in the middle. Can you tell me like roughly what page you're on because it are like what paragraph you're talking about because I don't have page nine. Oh, sorry. No, sorry, it's page one of four. Nine is the whole thing. Sorry. And it's in the middle. It says, I lost it now. There was, I think, either Jean or Steve caught an edit here in a sentence that you something that you were saying. Yeah, this is a missile I was said he was concerned that the ground floor with blinds and graphics will look like that space. I'm not sure where the walkoff space come from I just scratched all that all that off and say from the street. That's what that's what I meant. That's it. Great. Thank you. Melissa, any edits. Yep. Thank you. All right. Thank you all. Is there a motion to, we can scroll through the other edits. I just integrated all the edits that I received. Thank you so much for sending them. Thank you. Is there a motion to. I'm sorry. I said thanks to. Oh, great. Is there a motion to approve the January 3 2022 meeting minutes as amended. I so move. Second. Great. I'll take a vote starting with Ken. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. And I guess as well, so the meeting minutes from January 3 2022 have been approved as amended. And closes agenda item number three. So we'll move to agenda item number four, which is open forum for this evening. So at this time, I see that we have a few people who have joined us. If you would like to speak and address the board, please use the raise hand function. So I'll remind you that you have up to three minutes. Please introduce yourself by your first last name and address. And please go ahead. Don Seltzer. Thank you, Madam chair. Don Seltzer, Irving street. As we begin discussing these warrant articles. It helps to be working with a common understanding of the basic facts regarding the diversity in our housing. First fact is that Arlington has 20,461 housing units. Just 39% are single family and 61% are two family or more. It makes no difference whether you reference our local assessors, database or the American community survey data. As long as you count up the numbers correctly, you'll get the same results. After the last meeting, when these numbers were disputed, I was sent an explanation of just how Barrett consulting had arrived at their published numbers. And I also had some correspondence with Steve Revillac. It is clear exactly how Barrett consulting aired in processing the data from the American community survey. They miscounted more than 1000 townhouses and duplexes. They were also classified as single family homes. The next fact is that single family homes in our zero and R1. Comprised just 1240 acres, which is only 38% of Arlington's land area. A significant portion of our zero and R1 is used for other purposes, including our schools, playgrounds, municipal buildings, churches and cemeteries. Additionally, there are more than 600 multifamily homes in these districts. The final fact is that Arlington has another 645 single family homes located in the R2 districts. They can already be rebuilt as two families by right. This is important because it gives us insight into exactly what would be built if we rezone our single family districts. This board has been provided with the recent sales data for those homes that have come in the market, been torn down and replaced with condo duplexes. You can judge for yourselves what income group is being served by this development and whether any affordable housing is being built as a result. And I'd be glad to go into this in detail with any board members who are interested, you know, after this meeting. Thank you. Thank you. Are there any other members of the public who wish to speak this evening? Okay. Seeing none, we will close open forum for this evening. So any other items before we move to adjourn? All right. I will now see if there's a motion to adjourn. So move to adjourn. Second. Let's take a roll call vote. Jean. Yes. Ken. Yes. Melissa. Yes. Steve. Yes. My yes as well. Thank you all so much. And we will see you in a few weeks. Have a great evening. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you everyone.