 Australia agrees to build U.S. missiles, U.S. dismisses Australian concerns about Assange. Two different news stories about U.S.-Australian relations have broken at around the same time, and together they sum up the story of U.S.-Australian relations as a whole. In one we learn that Australia has agreed to manufacture missiles for the United States, and in the other we learn that Washington has told Australia to go suck eggs about its concerns regarding U.S. persecution of Australian journalist Julian Assange. The relationship between Australia and the United States is all the more clearly illustrated by the way they are being reported by Australia's embarrassingly sycophantic mainstream press. In a Sydney Morning Herald article published Friday titled, hugely significant, Australia to manufacture and export missiles to U.S., the U.S. educated war propagandist Matthew Knot exuberantly reports on the latest developments on Australia's total absorption into the American war machine. Australia is set to begin manufacturing its own missiles within two years under an ambitious plan that will allow the country to supply guided weapons to the United States and possibly export them to other nations, Knot reports, adding that the joint missile manufacturing effort is being driven by the war in Ukraine, which has highlighted a troubling lack of ammunition stocks in western nations, including the U.S. Knot, perhaps best known for being publicly told to hang your head in shame and drum yourself out of Australian journalism by former Prime Minister Paul Keating over his virulent war propaganda on China, gushes enthusiastically about the wonderful opportunities this southward expansion of the military-industrial complex will offer Australians. As well as creating local jobs, a domestic missile manufacturing industry will make Australia less reliant on imports and provide a trusted additional source of munitions for the U.S., not rights, ecstatically, and what has somehow been presented by the Sydney Morning Herald as a hard news story and not an opinion piece. An article published the next day, also in the Sydney Morning Herald and also by Matthew Knot, is titled, Assange Endangered Lives. Top official urges Australia to understand U.S. concerns. It's not unusual to see this type of propagandistic headline designed to convey a specific message above Knot's reporting on this subject. In 2019, he authored a piece which was given the bogus title, A Monster Not a Journalist. Mueller report shows Assange lied about Russian hacking. The United States' top foreign policy official has urged Australians to understand American concerns about Julian Assange's publishing of leaked classified information, saying the WikiLeaks founder is alleged to have endangered lives and put U.S. national security at risk, Knot writes. In the sharpest and most detailed remarks from a Biden administration official about the matter, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Assange had been involved in one of the largest breaches of classified information in American history and had been charged with serious criminal conduct in the U.S. Now, Blinken's remarks came during a press conference for the Australia-U.S. Ministerial Consultations Forum on Saturday in response to a question asked by Knot himself. Here are Blinken's comments in full, quote, Look, as a general policy matter, we don't really comment on extradition matters, and so I really would refer you to our Department of Justice for any questions about the status of the criminal case, whether it's with regard to Mr. Assange or the other person in question. And I really do understand and can certainly confirm what Penny said about the fact that this matter was raised with us and it has been in the past. And I understand the sensitivities. I understand the concerns and views of Australians. I think it's very important that our friends here understand our concerns about this matter. And what our Department of Justice has already said repeatedly publicly is this, Mr. Assange was charged with very serious criminal conduct in the United States in connection with his alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country. The actions that he has alleged to have committed risked very serious harm to our national security, to the benefit of our adversaries and put named human sources at grave risk, grave risk of physical harm, grave risk of detention. So I say that only because just as we understand sensitivities here, it's important that our friends understand sensitivities in the United States. The reason Blinken keeps repeating the word risk here is because the Pentagon already publicly acknowledged in 2013 that nobody was actually harmed by the 2010 Manning leaks that Assange is being charged with publishing. So all U.S. officials can do is make the unfalsifiable assertion that they could possibly have been harmed had things happened completely differently in some hypothetical alternate timeline. In reality, Assange is being persecuted by the United States for no other reason than the crime of good journalism. His reporting exposed U.S. war crimes and the U.S. wishes to set a legal precedent that allows for anyone who reveals such criminality to be imprisoned in the United States. Not just the whistleblowers who bring forth that information but publishers who circulate it. This is why even mainstream press outlets and human rights organizations unequivocally oppose his extradition because it would be a devastating blow to worldwide press freedoms on what is arguably the single most important issue that journalists can possibly report on. So here is Australia, signing up to become the Pentagon's weapons supplier to the South on top of already functioning as a total U.S. military intelligence asset which is preparing to back Washington in a war with China and on top of being so fully prostrated before the empire that we're not even allowed to know if American nuclear weapons are in our own country being publicly hand-waved away by Washington's top diplomat for expressing concern about a historic legal case in which an Australian citizen is being prosecuted by the world's most powerful government for being a good journalist. You cannot ask for a clearer illustration of the so-called alliance between Australia and the United States. It's easy to see that this is not an equal partnership between two sovereign nations but a relationship of total domination and subservience. I was only half-joking when I wrote the other day that our national symbol should be the star-spangled kangaroo. Australia is not a real country. It's a U.S. military base with marsupials.