 Hello and welcome to People's Dispatch. Today, June 22, Brazil has surpassed 1,080,000 confirmed cases of coronavirus and 50,500 deaths. Here with us to discuss the impact of the administration of Jair Bolsonaro in the managing of the coronavirus pandemic, we are joined by Jesse Dayane, a militant of Leuante Popular da Juventude, ex-president of the National Union of Students and a member of People's Brazilian. 47,000 deaths already here in Brazil, because in the first place, the president of the country, who is the largest political authority, reacted negatively to the disease. In other words, from the point of view of anti-science, anti-reason, he denies the gravity of this epidemic, of a pandemic that is committing the whole world, right? All state leaders are taking measures to counter the contamination and to seek cure, to seek with which a minimum of people in their countries are contaminated and killed because of this coronavirus. So, all countries made several measures and adjustments, from the point of view of health, to deal with the sanitary crisis. And here in Brazil, in the first place, the president denies the disease, right? So, he called it a flu, said that it was not all that, right? That it was a flu and anything, and denied the serious impact on the health of our country. So, this is a first element, because in addition to not taking measures because he reacts negatively, he also sends a message to the population, because the good part of the population sees that the president is an authority that knows what he's saying. So, when the president says, go to the streets, work, keep your lives normal, part of the population believes and part of the population actually minus the gravity of the disease. So, this is a first element. The second is that, as a consequence of this negative position, he also did not take the necessary measures so that we could count the contamination. So, the president denies all the measures that the MS is giving to everyone, right? So, the social isolation measures as the only way, until today, provenly, that he can count the coronavirus advance, right? He hasn't developed the vaccine yet, the medicine, so the only way that the doctors say that it is possible to count the deaths is with social isolation, and he denies the social isolation and, consequently, all the necessary measures, right? Because what would be necessary in Brazil? First, develop more beds to be able to accommodate the people who are being contaminated in our only health system. Second, the state would need to take the beds of private hospitals, which, besides today, in Brazil, did not happen. This happened in several parts of the world, so that we don't have to choose between who will die and who will live because of their financial social condition, right? Third element, also, the tests, the number of tests in Brazil is very low, and the fact that we don't have many tests makes us not have a forecast of when this thing will be damaged, of when the peak came, of how many people are contaminated, and, consequently, without this forecast, you can't have a strategy of containing the disease, right? And we lack everything, right? We lack the EPI material for the health system that works in hospitals, so it is a situation of extreme calamity and deep sanitary crisis in the negative position and also the lack of necessary measures to guarantee social isolation. So, here in Brazil, the opposition to the government in the National Congress, since the beginning of the pandemic, made several fights to be able to approve measures that guarantee social isolation, one of them was the emergency income. The opposition proposed a minimum wage, the government was offering R$ 200, which is not possible for anything here in Brazil, and then this dispute ended up conquering R$ 600, 600,000 and R$ 200, which was approved, but until today, millions of Brazilians can't access this resource due to the bureaucracy of the government, right? So, all this makes people continue the streets to work because they need to survive, right? So, the government also played with this argument that if we guarantee social isolation, if you stay at home, you won't be without food, you won't be without a job, the economy will stop, so it put the population between hunger and coronavirus, but if you stay at home and don't work, that is, don't put yourself at the risk of the coronavirus, you become hungry. So, it put the population between death and disease, or death due to the lack of living conditions, right?