 It's not the first initiative to bring certification to subtitling. There has been figures initiatives such as most famously Netflix's Hermes project. What lessons can we draw from those previous attempts in your opinion or from certification in other fields? You mentioned various certificates available for translators in general, which are usually at the national level and therefore between countries. If we start with the Netflix Hermes test, I believe it was a wonderful attempt to create a kind of system able to single out the best professionals. That was the idea, I guess. It probably didn't go as expected because Netflix later decided to rely on DTT, the Netflix Direct Timed Text Program, using partners, media localization partners to employ translators. It was a good idea, but I think that the fundamental difference between the Hermes test and the AVT Pro is, first of all, the Hermes test was created by a company or the company. It was a certification while the AVT Pro is a joint effort of academic professionals and members of the industry. It's actually supported by the English string, but it's not for a company. That's the main difference. So it's neutral. It's expendable by professionals. No strings attached to a specific company. And that's what I like about it. I think it's more like, as you said, other translation certifications out there. They're our model, of course. It's how we would like to see the AVT Pro like the standard for subtitling in the industry. That's our main dream, let's say. In a way, perhaps, Netflix's decision to stop that project shows that they have decided it's not a part of their core business to assess subtitles. And this assessment is best left to other institutions who are more experienced in this and who are better placed to provide such a botch and such as integration.