 Good day, fellow investors. Who is the best investor? Warren Buffett, Ray Dalio or Peter Lynch? Or better to say, what investment styles among those three better fits your investing style? Those are all great investors among probably the top three in the world. So we have to see which of their investment styles better fits your investment strategy, style, risk-reward, appetite, etc. So in this video, I'll give you an overview of each of those investment styles. And at the end, I want to hear in the comments which one best fits you and you will find a way to better position yourself, your portfolio and what best works for you. We'll discuss Ray Dalio's investing style, all-weather portfolio, Warren Buffett's investing style, buying great businesses, Peter Lynch's investing style, buying earnings, trading and always 100% invested. So let's start with Ray Dalio. He's famous for his all-weather portfolio where owning various asset classes allows him to earn the yield on those that those produce and be very well diversified at all times, no matter what happens in the economy. Additionally, by selling part of those assets that increase in value and buying more of those that decline, thus by balancing one's portfolio exposure, the investment return increases. The goal is to be diversified across various asset classes so that you can do relatively well, no matter what happens in the economy. If gold goes up, you sell a little bit, you buy more of what went down or has seen the portfolio exposure decline. Seems easy and it actually is easy, but there is one thing many get wrong. Ray Dalio delivered an average return of 10% for his Bridgewater funds over the last 30 years and people expect that they can do the same with their all-weather portfolios. Well, forget about it. Ray Dalio did really well, but he's invested in over 150 countries, 20 asset classes, derivatives, options, whatever you can imagine, leveraged, hedged all of it, so he has 1,500 people working and researching for him, so no individual can copy that. All you can do, you can have a simple all-weather portfolio and then expect, okay, bonds will give me 3%, 4%, 5% with the rebalancing, so a return over the long term from stocks, dividend is 2%, a little bit of earnings, between 5% and 7% from an all-weather portfolio and yes, you will lose money when there is a crash, but you will lose much less. For example, if you have 40% in stocks, when the stock market crashes, 50%, you will lose just 15%, not 50% or 60% like someone who is 100% in stocks, but you will miss out on the upside too. So, we can conclude that the all-weather portfolio is someone who likes slow and steady, who doesn't like volatility, which is not risk, it's just you don't like to see your value, the value of your portfolio go up and down, because you don't like that, you sacrifice, you buy bonds, you buy gold that is not producing anything, you buy commodities and you rebalance your portfolio every quarter of twice a year and put it there, enjoy it, whatever happens, you don't have to worry about anything and the returns smaller will compound over time. So, that's Ray Dalio and that is what people have to understand from him. Now, let's go on to Buffett. Warren and Buffett's investing strategy, we can summarize it in three points, don't lose money, does always buy value no matter what, try to get value at a fair price or even cheaper price, let your investment returns compound in the form of dividends and high returns on invested capital. There is a complete playlist going through Buffett's investing mindset and letters to shareholders on my youtube channel, so if you enjoy his investment style you can find much much more great content there. A key point is that Buffett likes to wait with cash for a big opportunity, in good economic times Buffett likes to accumulate cash that he consequently deploys when there is blood on the streets, like he did in 1999, 2005 to 2007 and he has been accumulating cash since 2013 waiting for opportunities. So, we have Dalio that's really focused on the macroeconomics, what's going on in the world asset classes, then we have Buffett who looks at recession cycles, who waits for blood on the street to make his big purchases, to use his elephant gun as he likes to call it and then that's a big difference. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway stock fell more than 50% four times top tick to bottom tick over the last 50 years, so extremely volatile, something certainly not like the all-weather portfolio, but his returns, his investments have compounded 19-20% over year over the last 50 years, which is a remarkable investment return. He's now much much bigger, he cannot compound at 20%, he's happy with compounding in the future at 10%, which is something again remarkable and perhaps even better than a normal all-weather portfolio, as I think that he will do probably better than Ray Dalio in the long-term picture of things with his all-weather portfolio, but you have to accept more volatility. Now, let's discuss Peter Lynch, who is the guru of all, the boss of all, the highest return. Peter Lynch was Fidelity Magellan's fund manager from 1977 to 1990. He delivered 28% per year over the 13-14 years, so if you invested 1,000 when he started managing the fund, you would have, after 13 years, 30 or 28 or 31 thousand dollars. That is an amazing returns, one of the best track records in the history of investing, especially for a long-only investment fund. What he did, he simply focused on earnings and you can read a lot about that in one up on Wall Street, which is a book I strongly, I practically urge you to read, read in detail and note everything down. When I will have the time, I will make a chapter by chapter summary of the book with the most important points, which will be something very, very important for most of you, but when I get to it and when I have the time. The core with Peter Lynch is that he was focused on earnings, so he would look, okay, where can these earnings go and then he would buy the stock comparing the earnings and then when the market would value those earnings properly, he will sell or when the market would have those earnings overvalued or he would have another opportunity. His portfolio consisted of 100-200 core positions, he had more than 1500 stocks, but those were little positions, but also very important. I'll come to that and he would trade that he would roll over his portfolio one, two, three times a year depending on what's going on. So a trader, but still focused on the most important thing, the business. He wouldn't spend one minute looking at the Fed, the interest rates, the economy, etc. He would just focus on where the earnings could go and what's going on with the business. Secondly, something very important with Lynch, he was not afraid of losing money. He says that if you buy 10 stocks, let's say you lose 9, 9 stocks go bankrupt, but that one that you bought becomes 100 beggar over the next 10 years, so increases in value 100 times, which means that, okay, that one stock I had 10% of my portfolio time 100, it means that that one stock increases my portfolio from, let's say 100 to 1000, despite the fact that I lost money on 9 other stocks. And that's something that Buffett doesn't, Buffett is focused on not losing money, but Lynch takes much more, we can call it risk, but he spreads it on various bets and therefore he is happy to lose money, but also he lets his winners run. So I think Lynch and Buffett are really on this side on investing in businesses. Lynch accepts also losing a little bit more, we can call it betting, but really educated business-focused investing betting. Buffett looks at the margin of safety, he's a real value investor, and then we have Deilio with economics. Let me know in the comments which style is best for you, why, what do you think about it, and whether you might find something interested in other styles, Peter Lynch, Warren Buffett or Ray Deilio, that you can apply to your portfolio to increase the value of it. Thank you for watching, subscribe to the channel and I'll see you in the next video.