 Okay, thank you very much. I would have a lot of things to say about the last conversation, but it doesn't matter so The I want to to say something about what we call new mobility services and shared mobility in City like like Paris as you know, Paris has been a pioneered for new mobility services bike sharing since 2007 electric car sharing you can see it Since 2011 we also worked with the taxi companies to provide a better and smarter service for example here with an application for a link a taxi or also providing Hydrogen for hype a taxi company totally using Hydrogen and the arrival of shared mobility is fueling a public debate To change our perception of how mobility is organized I'm sorry so We have new challenges with digital mobility platforms The the private hiring vehicles platforms as Uber or more recently bicycle delivery platforms Have been very successful in cities like Paris, but very quickly the rates major issues about their impact on workers competition with a taxi driver first then the working condition of Uber drivers and also of delivery drivers but another important debate that is emerging for cities like Paris or New York or London is the use of public space Vehicle like Uber are concentrated in the dense city center waiting for passengers Like zombies and of course and you can see this on the on the pictures the Eruption of bicycle and scooters in free-floating services since last year As generated other problems in the use of public space discomfort for pedestrians and wheelchairs Vandalism and broken bikes These issues highlight the necessary regulation of this mobility service in the out of the of the dense city This regulation is also necessary to meet other challenges Guaranteeing user safety ensuing digital inclusion or having sustainable machines in a circular economic approach So I gave you the example of the Regulation of the TNC Like uber in in France a national law entered in force a year ago The main objective of this law is to define a national framework In the future law on mobility The logic of regulation of the TNC's remain national in Paris in in France And we want to deport the debate by creating digital infrastructures at a local level And we want to share API's to make them Interoperable and define shared rules that allow them to be registered We think we can give a very large place to on demand transports to widen accessibility But local regulation can ensure that the service is clean and shared that it avoids Door-to-door traffic at peak times the local regulation can also limit Competition with active modes and mass transport the national level can help us to encourage Operators to follow our policy So the challenge is of mobility as a service The we are no convinced that the regulation of mobility service on demand car sharing or free-floating Will we create mass technologies the promise of the mass is to move from a Proprietary vehicle that meets all travel needs to a mobility package That meets the diversity of possible needs to move This is a promise shared by many players from startups such as the Finnish WIM to many other Digital company, but also public transport operator car manufacturer and car rental companies And of course also mobility platforms such as uber So Private car even in a metropolis like Paris where public transport is highly developed We present the vast majority of the cost of the transport system and you can see it on these figures And it's it's it's very important because the cost doesn't fit with the sharing part of the mobility Taken by the personal vehicle Three quarters of total transport costs on the scale of Paris region for example But the private car is also a huge waste of resources it remain parked 95% of the time only one minute more if it's possible only 95% of the time and The purchase of the proprietary electric vehicle remains too slow to meet our greenhouse gas Reduction target So the question is how can the market evolves and I want to say that the role of a local government Is to organize an open market for mobility as a service We refuse to have a winner take it all model In some cities for example medium-sized cities in France a public transport company can organize mass services But we do not think that it's work in large metropolises like Paris We believe that we have a role to play in organizing the digital infrastructures that we enable The regulation of several mass platform in the cities This role must be conceived within the framework of a public private people partnership 4p 4p We need to share open standard But also happy is open happy Shares the ambition of an open regulated market to achieve the shared mobility principle Shared this ambition with public transport operators But also with manufacturers by providing guarantees for the development of their activity. Thank you. I'm sorry for the time