 Good afternoon, everyone. So thank you very much for the invitation from behind me. It's a very great pleasure to be here and discuss such an interesting topic. And also, I've heard there is a very important rugby game going on just now. So I also want to thank each of you for being here, especially coming from the country from Brazil where sports is so important for us in our case, soccer games. So I can understand the feeling now. And even if you're also watching this game at the same time, for me, it's fine. I'm very happy that you are all here. As Claire mentioned, now we get to the details of the appointments and challenges of our creators. And which are the factors that lead to one thing or the other one? And especially consider the confidentiality surrounding our creations. Not only which are the factors which are important when taking these decisions, but how do we find the information relating to each of those aspects? So I'll focus on appointment. And somehow the company will focus more on the challenges and issues. I believe it's time to explain the importance of the project. Thinking about each of you or of your experience, even for the ones of you who haven't participated in the natural procedure, I understand that most of you have participated in multi-treations. So even multi-treations, you can see the difference between an arbitrator who gets to the ground and only asks questions which two years show that they don't know the details of the case. And they don't, a very simple example, but which you can compare that when you think about a New Yorker in important nutrition that you are handling, the difference of having pairs with different characteristics. And how do you get to that? An important difference between moot, quarter-treations, and moot-treations, you have the voice to choose your food. So this is one of the most important facts that's going on in our country for nutrition, and we have to find the necessary information not to be able to present the most hints of a trader for New York case. So in view of that, which are the topics that we are going to discuss now? First, how are traders selected? Which are the factors that we have to take into account in this testimony? And second, how to find information about the potential of traders? And some of these issues have already been covered in previous panels, but not considering the details that we are going to present here. So the first issue, how are traders selected? And here I will just quickly pass through some of the most important issues that we have to take into consideration. So the first thing, we have tangible facts. Training, school, legal system, and nationality of the trader. These are issues that are really easy to see, and we really find that you can see that in the CV of the trader. You can see that on LinkedIn, on the website of the trader. So these are really easy things to find that are really important to the case. The second one, experience. Experience in arbitration as a lawyer and as an actuator. And we have had some ethios here discussing the role of the two hats and the importance of that. The rules applicable to the arbitration. The law of barring the substantive dispute. Sometime, depending on the characteristics of the actuator, there are some technical aspects that are very important. Do this person that you're thinking about wanting as an arbitrator knows how to experience over those matters. And particularly in some case, the sector in which the dispute field trip is very important too. So does this arbitrator have disputes in their specific sector? This information, the rules on experience are not that easy to find because maybe in the website of the trader, you say, okay, I have experience in this field, we did this, but it's different reading that in the website and another thing is having participated in arbitration with this person and knowing how experts and seeing how it works really dominates such issues. So the information that you have from practice is really, really important. Third thing, which is really important is the position of the arbitrator considering the issues that are discussed in this specific arbitration that you are having. So this arbitrator provided, published articles or legal opinions regarding the favor of a certain position related to the spectrum of the spectrum of arbitration or has this person represent a party who was in a similar position or from the same sector or against it? So all these things, also, you want to find that you can look for this information, but it's not information that is as easy to read. Then we go to the intended aspect, which are also very important. So the first plan is the way of the image and it would say, of course, we support you, of course, but it's important you need an arbitrator and it's time to work on a case. The thing is, many circumstances, the person who does think, okay, I already have fifth term arbitrator, just give the information on the number, I'm fine with that. I don't think I have too many. So it's the control of that is something very complicated. And ICC knows that. So the first thing that ICC knew regarding this issue was, ICC decided to ask the arbitrators, the appointed arbitrators, to inform in how many cases they were involved when they were appointed. So the defiers would take this information into consideration in order to decide to challenge him or not. This was the first thing in ICC part and maybe this is enough to solve this problem by closing it because you can't control the information that the arbitrator writes in this form. So the second more recent thing that ICC did was ICC is now publishing the composition of the arbitrator users that participated in ICC's education. Of course, it's not all about tuition, it's not all about ICC, but it's a very important chamber. So having this information available to the market is a very important thing. And it happened with all the ICC initiatives. Many other chambers are doing the same. Even in Brazil, the most of our confirmers are already starting to do that too. So you can also research the websites of these chambers to find out on how many cases this potential arbitrator is already involved. And so you have a lot more information about the expert's availability. Now, also related to availability, you have the practical experience of knowing, okay, I think that I'm handling the arbitrator. How long does that period take to react to each submission of the party? So some of the submissions are already very clear as to whether it's established in a procedural order. And so we really know what's the next step. But one of the things that happens in the case is that it is not so clear it's established. How long does this arbitrator take to decide how to show up in screens? And we were just discussing with Annala outside about another case and then he was like, you know, it is updated to 13 months to do the last next step in an arbitrator. So sometimes it's really complicated and you have to have this information not to decide to come to a point. Same thing regarding the award. Sometimes an arbitrator takes too long. So if you want to work addiction in a way which shouldn't take that long, just because the person takes over the product. So this is really a very, very important step. One of the factors for simple cartridges in developing between case in Brazil, you should take it on a case to a court, it will take a case that will take 20 years or more. So he wanted a case in a situation to go fast and this question on time is very important. Then we have the question of the behavior of the perpetrator. So how does the user be able to prevent an arbitrator behaves in the arbitrator union, in the hearings, which kind of questions this person presents in the hearing hearings? How does he behave when he has me as a chairman and as a part of trade? All this information is very important. And what about the relationship with other traitors already appointed in this group or even if you are appointed at the same time? If you think of the characteristics of this group, who are the pieces of the person who might be appointed for this case? And if you consider this many times people, what's the relationship between them? So how this are also very important at first began the solution for the perpetration that we have been discussing. They have to say it's what counts in a thousand times. Interrelate to government with production. What are the behavior of the perpetrator regarding these issues? Especially for example, how far it's come from which individual traditions do you love from love? What's the usual behavior of the perpetrator? How focus on careful about the things of the case we deserve further in terms of each positions because there is also a behavior of the perpetrator who has been so long working on these cases and things like this is not a general issue but it happens that some are faced all the time you do everything about this and you see that the person cannot take all the focus on the perpetrator of the case and as it was necessary. And finally the reasoning of the wars because in the end what the war is possible war. So the reasoning and the details of the war also have to be very well determined. Then once you have all of this information you have to think on how to balance these factors and this is really depends on the details of the case. How what's more important depending on the cases of the case that they're handling. And some cases they're so specific. For example we have had a few cases with ill talking about transports again. We have had a few cases involved us on social teams and in this case, besides all this information we have to think maybe this is a case of cheers for this team. So I don't want him in the family. I don't want any of this fashion involved in my decision. So we have to go into the framework of the case to make a very big decision. So once you have all the information once you have all the things that you should think into account you may or not think. Okay, I'm starting this day with international education and I have here the idea of which kind of profile for an individual at home of the correctness that I need. And so how do you look for the information to answer all of these questions? It depends on the source that you have. And then here we really go to the question of the source and not the work of organization. The first resource is the law firm. So in our case for example, we are the law firm with the biggest team in nutrition. The biggest team is known here handling now 70 administrator organizations. So we have hundreds of awards to do that in our pathways. And for example, if I'm starting the case and the profile that I want, I don't know any person who would be fit for the position whether you do expert partners or experts in our team. And some of the law firm, we already have so many information that we can use in order to take this decision. And apart from the work in as counselors we also have the position of the people in our team as administrators, which is even better because we know not only how these persons work when we grant them a sponsor and the person in the administrator, but you have someone in the firm who has already sat with this person in our administration and knows how this person behaves within the actual community. So of course if you're working in a big firm who has access to all of these information it makes it much more easy for you to have access to all these questions. But what if it's not the case? What if you're working in a case in a firm which does not have or you are in the same team, person who has to start working for the position and you don't have the information in the firm? And again, you go to the actual network. And of course it also happens in class because thanks brother, there is diversity, we're looking for it, we want to have more people working with the presentation, we don't want to have one of these in the same place as we have always. And sometimes even in the law firm we don't have the information about the people who is the possible arbitrator of the case. So what do you do? You type it up and you call friends. You call peers, you call people who know, might be involved in administration with this person and you say, have you had this opportunity in your face? Or have you had this person sit in your chair for a minute and then you go through all of the phase of the phase and you look for the answers to the questions that you were looking for. But in the end, do you get accurate information about that? That also depends on the social relationship that you have used in your current work. So depending on whether the person knows you, whether they trust you, or whether you are also open to provide information when the person needs, you have more accurate information about the potential of your work. So the social aspects of the administration of work is really important in this. Once you have all the important information, you can also use the source of interviewing of the arbitrator, which is more common in some countries in all kind of all these results is not very common practice, but it also happens. And in the end, what happens with the persons who do not have information in the law firms and haven't used network to obtain information? In other words, as you said, and look to have more transparency regarding information and phrases, some of the issues that we've been dealing with, I don't know which of you has heard or has information about our trade intelligence, does everyone have? Some of you, yeah, many of you have heard of it. So for the ones who doesn't know it, what is it? So you should be afraid by Professor Catherine Rogers and the idea is all of these questions that we have been discussing that everybody has this answer to. And how would that happen? They created a questionnaire that people would answer after the finished interpretation procedure. And in this questionnaire, all these questions that I have asked you now, they have these questions about each one here. So what did they have? How did they create the sign? How did they deal with the left-hand documents? How fast was he? How long did he say to ensure the ward? How did he behave in order to prevent further questions from the appearance? And so it's a very, say, questionnaire in order to find the access to the information. And so people would be encouraged to answer this questionnaire and after our free intelligence got all the necessary information regarding one thing, they would start to provide to people. It's not to you, it's not to define how it would happen. Probably people would have to buy the questionnaires or the forms. And then you would have, for example, these counts, if you are providing information to you, they give you six out of three. I'm not too forced to use all the questionnaires. But the idea is to promote the transparency and the financing and diversity in international education. The big question that comes with that is, will the arbitral community provide this information? Will everyone feel encouraged to answer these questionnaires? If that happens, for sure, this will change a very important aspect of the social and natural education. This will increase a lot of transparency in education. So this is a question that I leave to you for our discussion today and for us to think a lot, okay? Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.