 Good morning. The NRC is pleased to announce that an international team of senior regulatory experts has found that our operating reactor oversight continues to be top notch. In particular, we greatly appreciate the team's findings that the NRC's post Fukushima actions are appropriately addressing lessons we've learned. I'm pleased to see not only that our 2011 near term task force report is internationally respected, but that our inspection activities are also highlighted as being exemplary. We're also very proud that the team has emphasized the NRC staff's professionalism, dedication, and technical expertise. This international recognition is well deserved, I believe. Just as we've continued to benefit from the insights and findings of the 2010 IRRS mission report, the report from this mission will be a valuable resource for us. We'll consider the team's suggestion on improving how reactors transition to decommissioning, the NRC highly values international cooperation which gives us an opportunity to share our best practices and consider ways to strengthen our program. We continue to encourage other regulators around the world to take advantage of this beneficial service. The United States strongly supported the IRRS program since its inception and we look forward to participating in future review missions. In keeping with the NRC's commitment to openness and transparency, we'll be posting the preliminary mission report on our website as soon as possible and we'll make the final report public as soon as it's available. Thank you very much. Good morning everybody. My name's Colin Patschett from the United Kingdom. I work in the Office for Nuclear Regulation. I was a team leader for the IRRS mission. This IRRS mission was a follow-up to the one that was conducted in 2010 which focused on the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States and the comparison against international standards. The mission concluded that the recommendations and suggestions made by the 2010 IRRS mission have been taken into account systematically under the NRC's action plans which were put in place and that significant areas of improvement have already been made. Out of the 20 suggestions that were made last time, 19 have been cleared and out of the two recommendations, one has been cleared. We also looked at the U.S. NRC's response to Fukushima. We consider that NRC had acted promptly and effectively after the Fukushima Daiichi accident in the interests of public health and safety and that the report of its near-term task force represents a sound and ample basis for taking into account the lessons learned from the accident. I'd just like to make a few general observations that U.S. NRC has taken the challenges that we put last time particularly in the area of primary responsibility for safety very seriously and put in place measures to encourage operators to make sure that they do treat that responsibility very seriously. We also made a comment about regulations and guides last time and the need to ensure that there was a systematic review and we can say that U.S. NRC has carried out that effectively and efficiently in comparing their guides and standards against international practice. We did identify a good practice, what was related to U.S. NRC's approach for collecting operational experience feedback information from other industries together with those from the nuclear industry and the way in which it is disseminated within the organisation we consider that is an exemplary process and that we commend that for others to use. And then lastly as Alison commented we did have a finding relating to making sure that requirements and guidance were clarified and streamlined for the transition from operation to decommissioning of nuclear power plants. Thank you.