 Hello. So I was asked to give this talk on behalf of the three anonymous creators of this game. So for those of you who may have played a game called Cards Against Humanity, but in this game it's a fill-in-the-blank game. So there's one card with a phrase on it and a blank, and everyone tries to submit what they think is the funniest completion of the game. But this isn't Cards Against Humanity. This is Cards Against Tecography. So for example, a black card might say, oh no, I just saw Koblitz and Menazes taking another look at, and you might try to fill in the blank for something you think is funny, like a hand-wavy argument. Or maybe you saw them taking another look at a proof that appears in the full version. They were taking another look at post-quantum RSA, or perhaps the North Korean cryptographic standards. They could have been looking at the secret flash drive hidden in my underwear, or the very mature I bought. And as another example, a crypto conference is never complete without 17 slides for a three-minute rump session talk. I'm doing good. We've got the awkward question the chair asks when nobody understood the talk. The walking zombie corpse of Claude Shannon quickly trying to peek at someone's badge as I shake their hand, but unfortunately it slipped backwards, especially suitable for UCSB if you're staying in the dorms, taking a group shower with your recent co-authors, or a career-limiting card game. So as Martyn has said, there are two decks for the funniest rump session talks and another one for winning the puzzle. If you don't win a game, there are cards that you can print at home at this GitHub address or the creators tell me you can submit your own cards. Thanks very much.