 Prydedig hwn, allan fel ysgolwd. Ac maen nhw daar iwn wedi ot 라고 Gan ybydd ddannig angen El 19 dd Lyludd yn Hip Unoelectronic Roedd y lalom cymdeithasol ei poddwyddingsgol ac yn cael'l cynte soml yn ymateb am tell cerdiynau ac yn rhai성u ar hyn i� Beatles Wedyn mae phobl yn rai Онаeth yn Llywodraeth ac mae hynny'n gŵr ei rhan o'r ffordd iawn i'w ddechrau a gweithio gweithio'r Llywodraeth. Ond rwy'n gweithio'r cyffredig o'r cyffredig o'r cyfeithio ymgyrchu'r cyffredig. Mae'n oed yn rhan o'r bwrdd yng nghymru a fyddwch yn cael y bai'r blaen. Mae'r gweithio'r maen i'r rhan o'r pwg rydw i'r blaen o'r bai'r blaen o'r gweithio'r blaen o'r pwg rydw i'r blaen o'r blaen o'r blaen o'r blaen o'r polg am y ffymol. ac mae'n fwyfyrd i gael o fywch. Yn ystod o'r gwaith o'r ngysylltu, mae'r ddweud o'r blaenau a'r rhaid o'r ddweud i gael o'r ddweud o'r ddweud. Mae'n ddweud o'r ddweud i gael o'r ddweud. A yn y context scolwch, mae'n gweithio'r gweithio. Mae'n ddweud i gael o'r gweithio a gweithio i'n gweithio i'r gweithio i gael o'r ddweud a'r ddweud o'r gweithio. Mae'n ddweud i'r gweithio, ychwanegwyd – ac eich bod yn gychwyn i'r Fygaidd Cymru yn Llywodraeth – a считio'r Gŵr! Fygar o'r grannant yn Gŵr! Fylgar o'r Fygar o'r Llywodraeth yn Llywodraeth i'r Fygar! Mae'n Fygar o'r Fygar o'r Gŵr! Mae'n gwybodaeth yn bach yng nghyrch yn yr unig o bobl, o'r gwahanol a'r èu yn uninas, o'r gwahanol o'r cymdeilig a'r gwrs honno i'n gweithio'r pari. We've already had conversations about the hassle this morning. It's the same idea that these run across frameworks that would be regional or national or international. So, turning to the Scottish situation, several years ago SCARF was launched as a national framework, a Scottish Alcoholics Research Framework. Currently, there's much more development of regional research frameworks. This is just a very schematic diagram that I've put together. May have missed some. I've made some ideas of some of the research that's going on. The ones on the right-hand side of the screen, as you look at it, are the ones that are funded or organised through the SCARF programme. So, we've got the completed national framework. There's a completed regional framework for our GAL, RAP, RAPA. And there's ongoing work that's happening in Scotland, which is a year old now, a year and a half old probably. And then new frameworks starting up in Highland, which we heard this morning, was being driven by community groups that are leading that group. The three islands research frameworks that we're here by later is universities, and Parthen Kinrosses through their council, well, through a heritage trust. And there may be more coming along. There's more interest in the west of Scotland, things possibly in the future. But there are also SCARF frameworks. The red ones on the left, as you look at it, the car, stones, marina, maratham and such. These are much more thematic frameworks. But they also cross back. The science informs the regional frameworks and the national framework. We've heard it by DNA and beakers this morning. Well, that's the science, and they cross-cut. So we shouldn't be thinking of them in the boxes that I've got to organise here. We also have a World Heritage Site hard work made research framework, which is organised outside of the SCARF environment. So, back in August, the three islands research framework was launched. Twitter, announcement on Twitter, Twitch, one of the responses. This one is just that. I mentioned the Argyll frameworks. This is about how does Argyll and Butte feed into the three islands framework. So already, as soon as the regional framework was announced, somebody was thinking, how does it relate to other existing frameworks? I just want to try and talk about this afternoon. So, taking that viewpoint as a researcher, I want to find out our current thinking about, questions about, say, newly, the burial practices in northern Scotland. Their research area is not the same as the research areas that we necessarily have organised regional frameworks into. So they need to look at Argyll, possibly, Highland and the three islands groups. And they need to look at research questions related to burial practices. They may also want to see how it changed over time. So what happens, how does burial practice change through time? So one of the things that I've been looking at with Kerry was how do we define time? We all know the Nail, the Bronze Age there. But we haven't really defined them in an online, referenceable situation. So the scaffold project, Scotland's ages, uploadable periods and ages project, so this is a set-up, a reference that can be made for producing machine-readable formats on internet. And again, we also want to look at how the regional questions relate to the National Framework to the SCAR framework. And finally, we want to look at outside Scotland. So looking at the west coast of Scotland, there's a common sea between Northern Ireland and Argyll. So the seaways of communications routes, there's a lot of potential similarities there. We also talked about slightly Scotland and North East England. We've got an artificial border on the Chirriot Hills. How do the frameworks tie across? So we're thinking about making sure that we're all trying to define the terminology we use. So that we're all talking about the same thing. I think we're talking about the same thing. So why use control of the categories is to improve consistency in what we call things, to improve cross-searching online between the regional frameworks and within the National Framework, and across other frameworks, whether it's the National Boundaries or the thematic frameworks. They're specialist frameworks that are developed as a set of carved stones. There's a lot of research on carved stones that will relate to an early medieval framework. We also need to move to a more sustainable model for maintaining and updating the research frameworks. There's a lot of effort and emphasis goes on to creating the framework, but once that framework, once that activity has happened, how is the information intended? How do we measure what we're meeting with the questions that they've been asked? So that's where we're going to use the terminology and the technology to help feed the information back into the research frameworks. As I said, I work in the National Rapid Historic Environment. We use control vocabularies to manage some of the searches in our systems, as does the story of England and the Welsh Road Commission. Seven years ago, we worked with the hypermedia research university of the South Wales to create a link data semantic web version of our monument to sore eyes and objects in maritime craft. Scotland was lacking a periodist that we could refer to. Over the last winter, we compiled and analysed how people were using periods and created a link data form. This screen shows the heritage data site, heritagedata.org. It's in a machine-readable format, so it can be taken, used, built into widgets, and all the people search. The key thing is it defines a term. It allows us to express the term in English and in Gaelic. And so, whether it's a narrow term for the term, it's the most precise meaning of the term. Or in this case, there's alternative labels, how people might affect the monument type. So as long as we can map the terms to an index, we can improve searchability. And key to this is they all have a scope that describes what term it is. They've been restricted to everything for characters, which is quite limiting, we've discovered, for the period terms. So a period budget would span that period limit. Looking at the work Kerry did, he'd be doing a lot of other research on the use of chronology and periodisation and how people describe, the vocabulary people use to describe periods. So he's got the three age system that we use, the bronze age, the iron age type system. Cultural terms, Roman, Pictish, Viking, Saxon. The regular periods, the King's, Queen's of England, Scotland. And the ordinary centuries, just the centuries, as well as things like the First World War. And then we've got various monument types in Scotland. We've got a lot of monuments that we don't really know of the terms. So we've got quite a broad terms of it. We might say it's an unknown, the date's unknown, or somebody hasn't considered the dates, we say it's unassigned. And then there are other terms we use, industrial, improvement, croft. These are all terms that people vaguely use to describe a period. And many people have different ways of expressing that period. Bronze age can be expressed by Portugal Antiquities Scheme, by historical and heritage data, and on the arena, Portugal as it was. And regionally, date range has changed. This is the graph on the bottom, shows how people at the time ranges, people in different parts of Scotland have defined bronze age. And somebody can recognise a calcolithic, which is much more an artifact-based term rather than used monuments. So some people won't recognise the calcolithic others will. We're not trying to say everybody must say that the bronze age starts and ends at such and such a date. We recognise this fluidity, and we recognise that there's a leap of read in the archive. On a carry slide showing that there's no hard, trying to convince, convey that there's no hard start and end for these types of fuzzy. And it's not a new problem. It's a chart from 1769, which shows the issue going back as far as then. So people recognise that there are different overlaps. We haven't published the date ranges for the regionally term yet. We're waiting for a project. We've put out a call on Twitter and on the Starf website for people to help refine the scope notes that we use to define the period. Once that's done, hopefully we'll get some feedback on how very yet. About a month there. We'll then update the heritage data site, get the scope notes translated into Gaelic, and then publish it on our website, or period.o. Again, it's just another graph showing how we compare the regional period dates. The idea is that we'll publish these on the heritage data website. So work to get there. We need to update the scope notes, add Gaelic terms, translate the scope notes into Gaelic, combine the scope data with period.o. The data website, and then update the heritage data website as well. As he says, he wants to update submit a patch from the region on to the period site. So it becomes economic reference data set. We also want to share information. We want to work with colleagues and make sure that we're all talking about the same thing. That's new, I think.