Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Uploaded on Sep 2, 2009
The main argument "it was in!'ers use, is that since you can see white surrounding the puck in a blurry screenshot, that must mean it was in. I set out to prove this theory wrong by attempting to recreate the angle of the screenshot. Then to see if it was possible to see white surrounding a puck but in reality the puck is still on the line. The only way it makes sense that "because you can see white surround the puck = decisively in" is if we lived in a 2D world. Was it in? That is up to you but this shows it is not so clear cut.