Loading...

Did Flight 77 really hit the Pentagon on 911 (Part 1)?

93,443 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Dec 11, 2006

You decide?

Comments • 2,520

Fred Carter
As much as I hate to admit it there was no plane here. If it were a 757 most of the pentagon wouldve been decimated and would have burned for a VERY long time there was ABSOLUTELY NO debris of any plane and all of that fuel anywhere. No HUGE engines, body of the plane, black box, luggage spread around bodies. Low speed impact would leave MOST everything intact that didnt burn and there was relatively no aftermath just a boom like a cruise missile bomb. Folks, a plane crash is a HUGE terrible sight this was a neat small focused powerful explosion that was immediate and short lived. If there was a 757( if a cessna trained pilot could even get it there) believe me you would know it! No evidence whatsoever just as with flight 93 in the field sorry but.....absolutely no evidence. Do your own investigation! The only group that could plan an attack such as this on us is (I hate to say this being the scale it is plus fooled for 14 years) us! And look now where we are~ government intrusion over our privacy wow how convenient for the globalists that undermine everything for power.
View all 4 replies
Hide replies
Cole Miller
then were are the passengers who died on the planes.
jumping jehoshaphat
yes the cia fbi bush cheney rumsfeld and gang are this evil. awesome isnt it? 
muzicmaker2001
Here's a better story. An 80-100 ton plane crashes into a tiny hole in a building and there's no significant wreckage in or around the impact hole. No wings, tail section, engines, bodies, luggage, chairs, etc. But wait..there's more. A Pentagon employee then walks directly through the hole supposedly caused by this plane and sees no wreckage, bodies, jet fuel, etc. Can I have some milk n' cookies with this story please? Open your eyes and use your brain. 
Dankus Memus
Not an inside job, they shot a missile at us
siouxperb5570
Did you by chance mean to say, 'AWACS'? No, it was not an AWACS, or Airborne Early Warning And Control aircraft. It was a Minnesota ANG C-130. H model, to be exact. The 133rd is an airlift wing, and does not have any AWACS aircraft assigned to it. So it could not control a drone, nor was there any drone to control.
mjs1231
A-WAX FILMED RIGHT ABOVE THE PENTAGON RIGHT AFTER THE INCIDENT. A-WAX WAS USED TO GUIDE THE DRONE. REMEMBER WHAT GIBBS SAID, THEY TOLD HIM NOT TO SAY ANYTHING TO THE PUBLIC, THEY HAVE HAD DRONES SINCE THE 90'S
mjs1231
IT WAS A DRONE.
siouxperb5570
Good question. Will send you pm shortly.
muzicmaker2001
How many of those 600,000+ active airmen have taking a stand on this either way? When you compare the airmen who support the conspiracy (none that I know of), pilots for 911 truth stand clear. 
When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...