 Well on the Toffie TV I am joined by Andy at El Povote FTV, I mean it literally says it there. I'm just going to do a little bit of a tactics video. Just to better how everything line up. How everything have changed and how everything will hope to change with Marko Silver and Marcel Brands, obviously driving the recruitment. Andy will be doing a weekly stat show when I get back to me all of you on Payton so make sure you check that out as well. So Andy, it's the 4-3-3 which Marco favours or wants versus the 4-3-3-1 which he currently plays or is favoured because of Guilfee Sigarton essentially. Just a personal preference here for you before we get into it which is your favourite? For me, I'm more of a fan of the 4-3-3. I think this system is now, it's not been worked out completely because you can still have success with depending on the personal you've got on it. But the 4-3-3 is a bit more flexible, you can do different things with it. You see Manchester City play a version of it, they play a 4-1-4-1 sometimes as well. Liverpool play a lot of top teams in Europe now favour this system because it gives you midfield superiority which is important now on the game. So Marco Silva took over, it's 14 months now or something that he's been in the job. Obviously last pre-season he had to come in and quickly assess what he had. You'll often see this with managers who want to play a certain way coming in and they have to try to shoo on players into positions and then he made a quick assessment, got half a dozen players in by the end of last summer transfer window. Started the season in a certain way and then we had that bit of an evolution, a bit of an evolvement after the winter spell, really the terrible spell in the middle. Covent Strideham with the final 10 games and Mity Everton were excellent and he seemed a lot happier with what he was trying to achieve in those final 10 games. Was that more a case of him working out what was best for the players or was it the players' understanding? I think it's a combination of both because obviously it takes time to understand the new philosophy and the new system. We've come off a season, we've played half the season under Sam Allard by, so it was fairly, usually it's safe, didn't commit a lot of bodies forward, played quite deep defensively, tried to cut, basically play our palace played in some ways. Basically take less risk and with Marco Silva obviously like to take more risk, likes to get people up the field, he loves the counter attack. So I think he was trying to blend those stars and I think what happened to us when we got back up here in the 10 games, I think you've realised it was probably best instead of playing it through the midfield because he didn't like, not that he didn't like going and going. I think that he saw that getting the ball early to the dorm could give us more space in the areas instead of building up slowly through the midfield and I think that's what helped us, you know, a couple of graphics but we'll show in a minute. But in terms of like against Man United National getting that ball up quickly because they don't play as deep, enables us to get space wider and beyond which then creates opportunities. It doesn't always work the same though against teams like Palace, you know, and Bailey's types because they do sit deeper. So I think that's part of the next evolution for us is changing the way we play against them teams, whereas we still may play more direct against your Arsenal, Man United's, Man City's and Liverpool's. We definitely did see that last season, we saw counter attack. You know, this is something he did a Wofford when he'd gone to Wofford. Fantastic on the counter attack. Obviously he would have the challenge and draw people in. He did it with Olympiacus, he did it with Esterel. Spring the counter attack. Draw you in and a quick break with obviously fast players. And he has had to try to mould Everton to some extent because we weren't blessed with the type of players you could play on the counter attack. You know, Ronald Cooman. Let's be honest, the recruitment hasn't been great since Moise left. Let's be brutally honest. David Moise left in May 2013. So we had Roberto Martin as he didn't have a lot of money. He had a good window and that was his face window. Then his recruitment wasn't great. We then, and we didn't give him enough money really to help him as well because we didn't have it. But you know, things happened and he went and then we got Ronald Cooman in and Steve Walsham. Again, the recruitment wasn't great. What we tried to do then was just buy players they thought were good. It was a quick fix, wasn't it? That's what he wanted, Cooman. He wanted to try and get the quality up to the sides around 6, 7th in the league. He could then say I got everything to your up. Then he would have went off to Barcelona wherever he thought he was going to go. But what the ethos is and what it is now is, we're buying players for the club. We're not just buying players for Marco Silva because I think Brand sees more of a long term vision is that Everton will have a playing style. The managers, they bring in will fit that style. The players, they bring in will fit that style. Not just every manager needs to change the 11 all the time. It can't work if you build the football club on. Let's buy loads of good players because you're always trying to buy good players and then you want to play the pressing game and you get sacked. We're not doing well and we bring another manager in and he wants to play counter attack on football or slow possession type game and all of a sudden you've got these players that can't play that and then he gets sacked having spent money. You're always left with what Marco Silva was left with last summer, which was a Frankenstein squad. Bits of Moises squads, the late Cumin, Martinis, Allardice. So trying to get it to a situation where basically this is how Everton football will play. This is the style of play. It means that you're only having to change one person instead of changing. Wafford have done it in a much smaller scale. They replaced the manager and they had Kiki Sanchez-Farros did well, he's sacked them. Then they got Marco Silva and they got Gracia. They have Masini. Masaria. He was cut in the history but it wasn't so good there. So they basically just filled the manager and I don't think they see the manager as the head coach really and the system and the Poso scouting system covers the rest of it. I'm not saying that Marco Silva hasn't got an important input, but it has. It's just that Marco Silva doesn't want, Brassel Brand doesn't want to say, ooh, do you want me to sign? They sign them and then we get to another manager who's not like Marco Silva and he goes, I need another 11 new players because there's no continuity in that. And also if you can't do it financially, you can't do it. You can't because the world is looking at now where we're trying to get rid of this deadwood all the time. That is the issue. So going forward, I think that's part of the ethos of the club, is to try and find players who fit what's tactically what will be going forward. And I think you look at Saturday and we're obviously going to get on to now. The low block is a different type of where you've got to set up for it. And obviously I haven't played well against the top teams because we do that direct way. It doesn't necessarily work against the low block. This was the thing wasn't it? We finished the season on a high. We had a great run at home. We beat a lot of the top sides at home. We can see the goal since February and all of those things that look great. I think we all recognise we need to be a little bit better away from home. The performance at West Ham, I guess, would be if you wanted to put a blueprint in of how to go and win away from home. We dominated the game, scored goals, could have had that hell of a lot more. You know, won the game comfortably. Lesser of Newcastle and Fulham last season. But when you're playing against teams who is self-preservation first, which are your palaces and your Bernese and teams like that, which is fine. Everyone works with the tools they've got. We had it with all of that in certain games. It's actually smart in certain games because against Man City you can't play open. They'll destroy you. So getting a draw off Man City for some teams is a point gain that they never thought they'd get. So I understand it. There's nothing wrong with that and being tactically flexible. Obviously I'm not a fan of people who just do it at 80 games a season, but that's your bread and butter. I mean, me and Pett, we were on the Premier League show, so you're saying Lesser and Lesser those managers nowadays. I think we had it down to about three now left in the Premier League. I think like Haltson, Dyche and someone else would come back to me there. Another manager, it's about self-preservation for first and foremost. But anyway, back onto Marco, the 4-3-3 versus the 4-2-3-1. We're playing the 4-3-3-1, but I do believe he does definitely want to move towards that 4-3-3-1. I'm not saying that Gilly's is an issue because that's the whole reason. But obviously, as one of the best players of the club, you have to fit your best player, and you can't just come into a club and go, I don't want to use you. One of the highest-paid, big-money player who scores goals. Because that would be stupid. You'd be cutting your nose off to spet your face with him. So you've got to find a way to fit him in, and then you evolve slowly. I'm not saying that, and Guilffy hopefully will evolve with the style change. On Satya Palace, Palace played two narrow fullbacks. So what is the low block? The low block essentially is to basically negate the space in the middle of the pitch and not give away space. So you play two narrow fullbacks to cover the half space, which is the goal, the distance between the edge of the penalty area and the post. And you're basically having two defenders just having to clear the mop up essentially. And you're forcing teams to cross it. Now, and basically you've got two lines of four, one narrow, the other one is spaced out. So basically you're covering the middle of the pitch, so there's not enough space and you're forcing teams. Because like Burnley did it well when Michael Keane, Ben Me, James Tarkowski, they want you to cross it because they're ready. They're ready to be over it, yeah. Whereas, you know, Man City's, you know, when they're trying to cross it, they want Man City to cross it because of where it was 5, 4, 7, 8. So they want teams like that to try to nullify their biggest threat, which is passing it around the box in their pace. So to combat this, teams generally trying to space teams out. Now on Satya, against the low block, the issue was we couldn't space them out enough and we were having to cross a lot. And I know a lot of our attack and play is based on crossing, but we need to vary it because otherwise we're going to find ourselves knocking a lot of chances on goal, not creating quality chances. Now we created a couple of OK chances on Satya, but there was nothing, apart from maybe the gil, you know, the other ones were sort of good chances created, but there was really an open goal, Charles had one effort. Well, maybe Colman's as well, actually. It was more of a Ricky Shea, but we need to create better chances and more consistent. The more chances we create, the more likely we are to score, even on Satya we created, I think it was 10 shots. We had 10 shots only for the onside. We need more than that, really. You need to get like 5, 6, 7 on target. So, you know, that's the key. But yeah, so the way I would, you know, the way we do it, we want to have a look at the way we played on Satya. And also compare it to the way you played against... Yeah, that one, isn't it? You played against... Sorry, that is the right one, yeah. So you look at down the left as on Satya, you had obviously two centre backs higher because obviously against the low block, they're sitting deeper. So you'd have these centre backs naturally higher. You'd have your full backs fairly high as well because what you're doing is trying to space the ventes out. And then you have obviously your wingers trying to... They should be a bit more in it, but with Charleston's fine. But Bernard should be a bit closer in towards the goal. So you should pick up a space there. It should basically create one-on-one. So you want team A, one-on-one with their winger. You want with Charleston, one-on-one with their full back. Because then obviously you rely on players and one-on-one situations. And if they're able to beat them then, the blue block collapses. And you're asking there why play is to track back with the full backs and why players can't... You're creating mismatches. You're basically trying to get Dean or Coleman in behind into space. But the problem is, for evidently, is this middle bit here. So what you've got is... Do you want to call the Lewins dropping in to receive the ball? No-one's really following up from the field and Guilty Sigitson's actually beyond them. Which is the issue because Guilty Sigitson really should be feeding off Calvert Lewins somewhere here. And then Calvert Lewins should be spinning behind and that's where Guilty should be looking to explode the space. But we're not. So essentially we're shorting the pitch for ourselves. What you want to do with the blue block is you want to try and lengthen the pitch so there's more space in that gap which your tend should fill or another midfielder. This area is congested anyway? That's what I'm saying, so you need to space it out. So by lengthening the pitch, this up Barstow and City is where you have Guero and Suarez, for example, of Barstow and it. Sometimes you're offside positions, but teams still got to sit back a bit further to counteract that they're going to jump at you. And then basically you're creating those pockets of space that Bernard and Rich Arleson, you know, your box-to-box midfielder should be bigger up or an arcade-skill-physicism. So in being so tied there basically means there's a lot of space whereas then the midfielder can sit deeper against you. You've got two very deep sitting blocks and it basically will not create any space to create shots. Bernard is too close to Dean. So essentially you'll have two players wide, covering two players. We're not creating enough space. We're not spreading them out enough. I mean on Saturday I thought early on. We did do very well. Bernard was taking people inside and there was a big bit of this area. He was fine for Lluker and we had a couple of opportunities. But you're right after that, it got shut down a bit. It basically pulled us out of what we were doing. Basically when the ball comes in the box you're probably going to have three people in the box when really Gomez... This is the key. The two key players to making this 4-2-3-1 work are Andre Gomez covering the space between the strikers and the number 10 and Guilffy Siggins in popping up in the right areas. Guilffy Siggins is fine as a second striker and getting in the box, but I'd also like, because he's a great shooter of the ball. If he's dropping off Calvert Llu and then it creates space for him to get his shot off. And it gives Don the opportunity to spread them behind. Yeah, that's exactly what we need to move to. We need to spread teams out more now. People say, oh well why didn't we get rid of Guilffy and Dominic Calvert Llu? We played exactly the same way against Arsenal last season. But the difference is Arsenal play a higher line. So it creates more space. And Arsenal are coming on to you. They're coming on to the full backs. Instead of where's the palace full backs, the level with the two centre backs. They're higher up the pitch. So it creates space down the sides as well. So it will work against your top teams, but against your lower teams who just need a bit more cues, a bit more, a couple of tweaks, essentially. So essentially we need basically to spread them out more and for Guilffy and Andre Gomez to exploit the spaces that the spacing is creating. And that's the key. Now, coming on to, if you look at the Manchester United game, when Guilffy scored that wonderful goal from outside the box, he is playing more often here. And he had a great game, I think. Yeah, we can do it. Obviously the full backs aren't pushed as further on, but, again, many likes to play a higher line. They're going to attack us more, so we do sit generally a tiny bit deeper. But again, that's more your gameplay further up than it's now. And there's actually a tangible distance between them continuously all through the game, which is what we want. Andre Gomez can control the centre of their field. But he also needs to link the forward play as well. And he's dribbling. It's essential. That is strength, though. The strength, what he did great for Valencia was he travelled with the ball. So he'd be in the middle, picked the ball up. It's cos he's strong and he can bounce off people. He'd carry the ball often into their penalty area. Too many times. Not too many times, but a lot for us, it's great that he'll get it and he'll turn, he'll recycle the ball and he'll get it and ping it here and ping it there. I want him to carry the ball. He's got that ability. Go long or short. Get it out your feet. Drop a diagonal. Next time. Drive forward with it. And he has to do that. One of the keys to breaking the lower block is people being good dribbling, because if you beat a man, them defenders are going to leave their positions, the disciplined positions, to cover the space that's being left by the beating man and that's when it opens up spaces with what bar stone within the ester did well, what Manchester City do with De Bruyne and Silver when they beat a man still and whoever, it creates space. We need more of that, which comes on to why we signed the players in the summer. Just very quickly, cos I've got the run-on. This is the positions from the weekend. This is Everton's average position during the game and we lined up and obviously we've got Pickford. These are fine, Keane and Meener are fine, where they are. Look at Deane, basically like a left winger, high up the pitch, which is fine. Sheaimus isn't as high up, but that's fine as well. But yeah, look at these. This area for me was really interesting, which was Sigarton ahead of Dom. Now Dom and the Calvert Llewman is a centre forward and he's a centre forward. He'll take it on the chest, link the play. He needs to be here for me. Is your link into that? That's the problem. He's come and taken it down. And Andre Gomes and Morgan Snadlan are 15 yards away from him, 20 at back. So he's done, isn't the most technical player. He's not been able to turn and spin and run up people. But Guilfee, he should be here so we can pick the play. He's ready, he's got the idea. This to me, I'd say, is even more of probably an issue than Guilfee and Dom here. Is that, Snadlan and Gomes are almost holding hands. And for Andre, when ever, with Christian Bentech, they were never going to force us back with pace because his pace is because he needs it. His pace is gone. So he should have been playing here for me, 10 yards up the pitch, which then would have given Pallas a bit more of an issue, which then probably would have freed up Guilfee Sigurd in a little bit more, which then would have enabled Dom to push on a bit more, which would have got us higher up the pitch. This can't carry on. No. This is one I've talked about in the past with Andre Gomes. He plays with in himself sometimes. He's got the ability to change games. He's got that much ability and sitting deep in it, I had this conversation with someone on Twitter and he was saying, oh, he controlled him a field. He did, but for tactical purposes, he needs to cover that space. He needs to fill in this area because otherwise, you're just going to have two blocks of force sitting on top of each other and they're not going to worry because you just have four attackers and basically two more fielders. Well, let me ask you that if that, if this, is John Felipe Cabaman. Then he would then. Would that work better? Because Andre Gomes, in my eyes, just or in my head, is the type of player who you get on the ball and he will control them if you're in terms of great possession, strong, can't push him off the ball, he'll pick passes here and there without maybe, I want the next bit of his game is just to drive forward. But if he's going to sit and almost be like the quarter, quarterback, position when he's got the ball, if he's got bammons in there, bammons in there for the tackling as well as doing that, but he does like to break forward. Do you think would he have offered more with these kind of blums? Cos Morgan Snadlam blums, Morgan Snadlam almost becomes the third centre back. It was a weird period on Saturday when Morgan Snadlam was getting up the pitch and I thought that is not... Yeah, but then what he'd do is he turned around and go back. Oh, he passed the ball from him back. Doesn't like, doesn't like his game. He doesn't want to go back. When his rink of bammon came out, I know, he'd give the ball away a couple of times. He was in the final third, he was getting close to Dean. He was in these eight, which is important because then again it gives an extra man for the defenders to think about. So they have to spread out, they have to cover each position. Whereas when you've got two midfielders sitting deep, it's eight men marking four essentially and then the full backs, which makes it much easier for them to vent and we're having to cross it. We're basically crossing it to two or three in the box rather than four or five, which is important. But yeah, the midfield, the composition of the field is important and what you're going to find is as well as go bammon will attack the space with the ballers' feet and that is going to be essential and a woby when he gets it in. It'll move people just what I just thought that was an interesting graphic because of where we spent the game. It was one of them. So you've just hinted at it there. That's currently what we're at. We've talked about the four, three, three, just mentioned Alex a woby. So you were saying to me off camera before you were looking at the players in greater detail who we've brought in and now you've got to clear and understand what's going on. So when you look at what I'm trying to work out of it in transfers, I'm always thinking of why we're trying to sign it. Obviously it's future reference for my own fingers out as my own brands operate, out of the silver operate. And I was trying to figure out why. You know, you could say that Gabbaman's got a bit of discipline, but what you look at with every single player we've bought almost is that all better ball carriers dribblers than the players before. So even to players who we didn't sign is a hard to call right. To players you love to go past them on, carry the ball, progress the ball via run, a woby, sedibi, best and Coleman, Gabbaman, best and gay carry in the ball. These are all, this is what I think we want is because the key now in football is and this is an issue the German national team are facing as they haven't got enough people who are good in one-on-one situations. And that's why they've struggled in the sort of the slice of cycle of internationals. We have now brought in players who will be able to create mismatches by beating a man, carrying the ball further up the field. It will also then break those lower blocks. I think that's what the plan is. I think the plan is to get better one-on-one players, players who can carry the ball, players who can do it quite well in the front three. They're so fast, and Man City's well with De Bruyness, Silver, Stale and Sane. Then type of players can create things by taking on a man. And we really haven't got that one. Gilffy Sigurdson, for all his great technique, great shots, isn't really that dynamic. No. But he's actually a decent dribble to be fair. Coleman, direct runner. Direct. Yeah, he's not really a cute player as he was just done some past people. No. Andy Gomez, he is, he can do that. We need to see it more. He's a good dribble. I think you're absolutely like the composition of the midfield at times. I mean, how do you just say this when it'd be Guy and Snideland together? Now, Marko Silver did develop Guy's game, particularly from Christmas, in terms of him carrying the ball up the pitch, which he was able to do because he had a good turn of pace. Okay, it went apart when he got towards the edge of the box. But that gave everyone a different dynamic because when they played together in the past, they both tended to want to sit and get in each other's way. That's how I felt Gomez and Snideland there at the weekend. So if we can change that kind of play and I've been looking at Alex a while, we've looked at a lot of the stuff he's done. He's fantastic at carrying the ball. Strong, can see a pass as well, but things vital can go past players. And I suppose when you look at it, every player that we've bought brought in since last summer, obviously, yet he being on the ball on the ball by what I mean is if you take them off because they defend us, you could do fantastic at carrying the ball, like balls in. By Nad, you just mentioned, by Nad, great on the ball, great at pulling people out of areas with selfish movement. Selfish movement which some people miss. Yeah, it's important, especially when you're playing teams like Palace because then W runs basically open up to the wide space. It's been a while, but that's why Benjel, so many assists, because B and R have run inside. So when you go through and go home as like we've said, and we've gone with Charleston, great at carrying the ball. This year, we've, you know, Govaman like you've said, we've got Alex Obalby, great traveller with the ball, Siddi B, who's good in possession, he likes to get forward, he can transition with the ball really well. Moise Keane as well. Moise Keane is another different type of striker. He's going to turn and face you, hold the ball up, play it off, you know, spin. Moise Keane wants to ball his feet, wants to run a player's, wants to travel with the ball, and I think that's another thing that's going to open up. And wants to play in the shoulder. He does, yeah. He wants to get in behind. And I think that's where the midfield again opens up because obviously, if Guilfe's sitting a tiny bit deep, he doesn't need to be as high with Keane, sitting a bit deep, but then he's got someone like he did with Walcott last season, unfortunately Walcott didn't take the chances someone running behind and offering him that pass, and the manager tells him to get the high, but it's limiting the space he's being able to operate and it's making him ineffective. Now he's in pocket to the game, he creates chances and stuff. He needs to be more involved in build up and bringing teams down. Last season, I'd done a lot of the tactic stuff in the first part of the season, he started off playing as a proper number 10. And then obviously out of possession, he's become a striker, so we go 4-4-2, which made us quite solid, which is great. He's got to get back to finding the pockets and he did do it. Certainly, games like Manchester United when he dropped into that pocket and they didn't know where to stick or bust. If they push someone out, if they specifically say to someone like the manager Mattage, go on and sit on Guilfee Sigurds, he's fed, I think, on last year, then Guilfee pulls them out of position anyway. So even if he's not, again, it's a little bit like Bernard, so even if he's not doing what you want him to do, he's taking the fella, he's taking a man away, which creates an open space. United didn't do it, but they didn't last year. Hence, he's racked one in front 30 yards and there was other shots he had in that game and he was able to, because he's a clever pass of Guilfee. You can see a pass. Sometimes you get bogged down like Saturday and I think, you're right, I think it's more to do with what he's doing, rather than Crystal Palace doing anything different. They've set up in a low block, like you said, to contest that area of the pitch, to not give up any space. And if he allows himself to be marked, then he's not doing this job. He's not going to get in the game. Exactly. The defence in the field, there, it would be higher. And Gander Gomes is another person who can help this as well because if he's coming in, the other midfield has to engage. And then Charleston would have come off their man and then go in the space. But the problem is with them two being so far apart and there's no one filling that middle gap. Essentially we're playing two up top with nothing in the middle and we have two sitting midfielders. It's just a big gap. Well, we may as well bang it long, if we're going to do that and not for flick. And that's the problem. Because you only see his Gomes left, right, left, right. There's nothing coming dropping in, players playing off and going, but we didn't really create any chances from the middle. I think what we'll see as well with the transition of the team, and this isn't having a go with Dominic Alvalu, and this is just when I think when Moise Keane is playing, we'll see him come short and then he's spinning, he'll be away and Andre Gomes then and he's thinking fire them balls through. Another player I think will really help Fabian Delth. Fabian Delth does transition well with the ball. He likes a switch. He does like the left foot switch there, Fab. But he gets up and gets in and around a penalty area. Even when he's sitting, even when he's all, even when he's supposed to be, you know, the six or shitting and protecting, he'll pop up on the edge of the box cos he will allow himself to go. Whether that's him, you know, going sit, I'm going, cover me, whether it's that token or whatever, he will get that far ahead. I think Gomes has got to drag that bit back into his game. I just wonder if it's time of Barcelona when it started to turn, he became safe. So because of the crowd, so it was in, I just keep an opacity to you and I just get it back and I pass it there and then no one can have a go with me. Where it's Valentier, he was freer, shoulders put. You weren't even that good of a team, Valentier. No, no, but he's played his game. And he wasn't being criticised. There was a Barcelona, obviously you play a third-position based system. You've got to cycle the ball all the time. That's key. And I think with Andy Gomes, I always say the same what my take of Valentier, she was at Chelsea now, in Madrid. Both of them went to big clubs. They've never been the same since they moved in because they were under so much scrutiny. And they felt that they were going to be out of the team. They made a mistake. So they came. And they need both of them to be where the money that's been paid for and to become the players that they should have been. They're going to have to take those stabilisers off essentially and become, as I said before, Andy Gomes, for the times he criticised and complained with himself, he's got matchwind about it. We've seen it. Are we sure that last year? We've got to take control of the game. Are we sure? And if he was that good as he was against Liverpool on Saturday, we would have been passed to him. Oh, of course, yeah. Because he would have broke down the lines. He put some great performances in last season. Amffield. It was brilliant at Amffield. They were loved. They loved him. We were coming in after that game and they were like, I like Gomes. Because he did walk through them in the field. He was good against them at home. He was great Wolves. That goal at Wolves demonstrated his ability. Westam away was one of the most. One of the best midfield performance I've seen by and I haven't played for years in terms of dictating the game from the first minute at the last minute Westam fans. You know, these are city of being here in Liverpool and that was the best midfield display we've seen for 20 years and not at that grand, obviously, you know, because you haven't been here that long. All of that. So for all of them, though, there was the other side to it. So if we can stretch that and get them the confidence to just go, actually I'm going to play Westam, I'm not over-criticising for Satie. I thought he had a good game. He played 44 minutes and he got injured a little bit. It may have resulted in running. Exactly, but he's a key player for us. So we need him on that, but you're right if we can. And that might be more of a midfield changing role. On the 4-3-3, when you have, so you have Gabamon probably sitting in the 4-3-3, then you have Gomez, when it's Guilfee, or Delth. Delth, Davis, whoever. They will go in beyond and then you're just creating a 4-1-4-1 then essentially so you have more people attacking and you'll be filling those gaps and stretching teams out. And I suppose him and Gabamon can swap. If you've got a good relationship with the person you're playing next to, I'm going, you stay. And they go. It's probably more beneficial that Gabamon gets higher if you're not going to attack as much because then Gomez can then take the passing and they're going to get the movement. And he can go and engage with the tackles and users as physicality shop. So what we bought is versatility and I suppose as fans we're just going to have to be the type of patient because it's going to be fitting the pieces in, changing the style. We'll still have similar style from last season and I think Guilfee will be tweaked. I think Gomez will be tweaked and we'll see what happens this weekend at Watford. I don't know, we'll be the same. I think we'll be slightly different. But it's good that we've signed these players. I can see now what we're trying to do more and more. And I think by the time then And you like what you're saying. Yes, because I think it's smart. I think the thinking, I like the fact that there's a strategy there. Like you said about the motion we're buying a team for 2004 to try and beat Chelsea's team. It was very physical, slow. What we want really is you want on the modern side you can stretch teams, you can play different ways to beat teams. We can play the way we played against Manchester last season. We can win games like that. And then we'll be able to play a different way when we're facing sides. We're going to sit back and that's what we need. And again, that'll literally come when he's got everyone fit as well. And everyone's up to speed then he'll be able to move things around. And he's a good coach. Whether you like him or you don't you can't deny it. Not a good coach. Everyone says he's a good coach. And I know people go to Australia. It's Keath Stavis. Do you know a good manager? Who an awkward manager? Let's be honest with you. Well, I thought if it was Seamus. Seamus doesn't suffer fools. He's always a bit of a tomato. He's had a lot of dice. He's always a thing. He's always a thing. Cumin. He's always graces. Holler manager. So, there you go. It's exciting. Don't get too darned. And what we're showing here is that at the weekend to beat those kinds of teams we're going to have to tinker. And listen, we're looking at it and going, we need to do this. Don't worry. He will be looking at it. It's just that it's not quite you that they would personally and the style evolution will come. It will definitely an exciting time, I think, to being out of town with things that are going on on the ground and the players. And teams do, you know? Paul Mason's going to be panicking in those Sky Studios that he might have to rotate on soon in some respect. It's on some aim. Just to win one game again. Oh, do it. Lauren's some long time. No. I mean, I feel I'm lost. Four years on the ocean since he started. So fair play to him. He'll have a good chat. Let us know what you think in the comments section below. You're starting to understand the path that we're on with Marco Silver and Marcel Brans. You're happy about that. You're happy that it seems as though for the first time in a long time Everton have got a plan that they seem to be following. Or are you one of those people that are like, listen, enough of this. We need to start winning games and he's not good enough and he's not. That's fine. If you're impatient, no one's going to say what to do, but you are going to have to be a bit patient if you want it to be rewarded because it won't and it can't happen overnight the way financial fair players. So you do have to build and build and build and build but we certainly think it's on the right track. Make sure you subscribe. Subscribe. It takes a sec. If you want more videos, make sure you come and join us on Patreon as well. Give the video a big thumbs up and give Andy a follow on Twitter at El Pavoti FTBL for all statistical analysis and scouting reports. Incredible scenes. See you later.