 I Hazardous gunplay Absolutely not and then right before they reveal whatever plot points it cuts to commercial You're just describing a show you're not you're not making describing every show in the 80s. Yeah All right Well, you guys ready to go. Yes. Yes. We can go early Nicole. You ready? Yeah, sorry No problem. She was thinking of my She was imagining how amazing a detective telecinematic Canella verse would be can you imagine these portals open and they all show up just That would be weird to be funny. All right before we start YouTubers don't forget June 3rd We are switching the live broadcast twitch twitch.tv slash. Good day internet be there June 3rd for the live broadcast all right Here we go in three two Dawn banks has supported independent tech news directly for five years be like dawn become a dts member right now at patreon.com dts This is the daily tech news for thursday may 30th 2019 in los angeles. I'm tom merit And i'm the show's producer roger chain Sarah lane has the day off but with us today. Nicole lee senior editor at engadget. Welcome back to the show, Nicole Happy to be here. It's good to have you. We've got Promises of 5g We've got possible merger conditions for t-mobile and at&t. We have some augmented reality glasses But let's start with a few tech things you should know Go go announced its 5g service will start with business aircraft commercial regional jets and smaller mainline jets in the us and canada In 2021 so it's not going to be on your big flights and it's not going to be till 2021 Go go will upgrade its existing 250 tower network Which will continue to fall back to 4g and 3g if necessary And go go believes that 5g will deliver lower cost along with lower latency Meaning that it can keep its service prices lower Within 48 hours of the magnitude 8.0 earthquake in peru on sunday alphabet company lune Had its internet balloons providing lte coverage now lune also provided emergency connectivity in portorico after the hurricane maria in 2017 That deployment took a month though the difference this time Is that lune was already in the process of installing infrastructure and conducting tests with peruvian partner telephonica So lune's trying to say hey, if we're on the ground preventatively we can help in these emergencies much faster And the first youtube channel to reach more than 100 million subscribers is india's tea series channel tea series If you don't know began back in the 80s as super cassettes industries private limited Selling copies of bollywood songs before transitioning into producing new music and the company is now known for original bollywood music soundtracks and pop music and is india's largest music label followed by sony music india and z Music and now the owner of the largest youtube channel ever All right, let's talk a little bit more About google and its ad blocking policies remember back in january We did a main topic about google announcing a change to the chrome browser that would stop Ad blocking extensions from using the web request api to block ads. I don't know if you remember that but api web request lets extensions modify a request So request comes in to do something and the extension can go. Yeah, well, yeah, okay, you can load that image But no you can't load that cookie So this is what a lot of ad blockers use you block uses it for instance to block cookies or javascript This would however also allow a malicious extension to steal cookies It's kind of an all or nothing thing and that's one of google's problems with it google wants to replace web request with declarative net request Which lists the kind of responses and requests to be blocked? So the extension would say block cookie request block these kinds of requests Or redirect these kind of requests and then the browser does it that way it speeds things up And it would also stop malicious extensions from being able to take things declarative net request however does not allow for more complex patterns And google has said it would limit extensions to having 30 000 items On its declarative net request list you block already ships with 90 000 filters So it says that won't work with us. We can work with up to half a million safari does this already Uh, it started doing this in 2015 and safari allows 50 000 net requests not that many more but more google has said it might increase the amount and the reason this is in the news today Is that a while back google had walked back the idea saying hold on we're not we're not done with this version yet But in a message this week google's simian vincent wrote chrome is deprecating the blocking capabilities of the web request api and manifest v3 Not the entire web request api Although no one was worried about that. It's only the web request blocking. But anyway, uh blocking will still be available to enterprise deployments So the headline is that you'll see everywhere that chrome is deprecating web request ad blocking For everyone except enterprise the enterprise can do it because maybe there's some internal extensions. They want to use He also wrote that they are planning to modify the install flow Which gave some people the hope that maybe during the install flow blocking might be allowed and they just want to narrow it Uh so that extensions can't get away with stuff But nicole, how do you feel about this google saying we want to make things faster Which you block has said it doesn't make things that much faster and we want to make it more secure Um, I think the there there's a balance to be struck between the desire for things to be speedy and fast And also for things to be secure, but I also think um the idea that There has to be some balance there and I think I do think the the concession to enterprise users make sense. I do wonder though If uh, then if they're working on another solution for consumers as well because I think consumers really You know, they have they have a legitimate reason of wanting to be to block ads and Not so much for enterprises. I'm thinking I'm I'm sure enterprise has their own, you know Internal use cases they want to block web requests for different reasons the right there's different reasons But I think for the consumer that's I feel like there's another there's a completely different And I feel very legitimate reason for blocking ads too so um Yeah, I don't know It just seems like one of those things where like You think google would have the enough Manpower resources to come up with a solution to this and hopefully they are, you know Yeah, I mean uh, you block is already a point in a fire fox saying just do what they do They've got a three-part system. You can just use that But of course google has the pressure To limit ad blocking because it makes its money off ads And and even though a lot of these companies like ghostry are focused on privacy Uh protecting your privacy often ends up blocking ads I use privacy badger and and that runs up against ad blocking filters a lot because it says oh, you're blocking ads I'm like no, I'm actually just blocking you tracking me with that permission But it ends up being the same thing a lot of times Firefox is out ahead here in many many ways like the privacy aspects of it the non tracking aspects of it. So Maybe take a look at that in the meantime Yeah And and don't forget that even if you don't want to block cookies and ads There's also blocking scripts where you're like, I don't want to authorize scripts, right? There's that's why no script exists and no script has said this wouldn't make it easy for them to work on chrome either. So A lot of things to consider and I hope chromes Developers consider them Android police noted that google updated its terms of service in the google play store Requiring game publishers to clearly disclose the odds of receiving items for loot boxes As well as other in-game lotteries in advance of purchase. So before you buy a loot box It's going to tell you your odds of getting that cool sword or whatever that you're wanting are one in five million or whatever The odds are apple introduced a similar requirement back in the app store in late 2017 So if you're familiar with that, that's kind of what's going to be going on Google also expanded rules against sexual content to include a ban on nudity or any clothing That's not acceptable in an appropriate public context Mm-hmm Didn't they also didn't they also um ban like weed ordering apps? Uh, I think that's part of the family stuff. Uh, I saw I saw headlines about that I did not see that in any of the respectable stories that I read Okay Now you're making me look it up though That's a great headline But I did not see it in either the nine to five google or the Android police story about yeah, I I wonder if it's part of this thing about like, you know Making the play store a little bit more of a legitimate family friendly plays In general and I'm sure this loot box things. It's a little different thing But it goes to the whole like nudity ban and oh wait. No, it's in the android police. You're right It's in the android police story Uh, it will ban apps that facilitate the sale of marijuana. That's right And google says it is working with developers to make their apps compliant with new rules rather than banning them from the play store altogether So no not not banning them But working with them just to make sure that they're not allowed to offer an in-app shopping cart feature Sure, so in other words, you could still have your app and you could still tell people where to get it Um, you can't like buy it. You can't make it too easy Not too easy, right? So, um, I think the loot box thing is is good I mean the loot boxes have been kind of an issue in the gaming community for a while, you know, like, you know It's kind of like it's kind of gambling, right? Like that's basically what it is sort of and I'm kind of okay with them like making it very clear like what your chances are for doing it I don't see anything really Yeah, I like the odds thing for sure, uh, the nudity thing And and the marijuana thing are both slippery slopes where it's like, okay You get to do that because you run the google play store But at what point are you going to allow something that a lot of people don't want you to allow and they're like Well, you allow the you block these other things. Why don't you block this thing that I know the browser block chrome Because that was a bunch of stuff that you shouldn't see right right and get all kinds of things through the web. It's horrible Yeah, I never use it Microsoft announced it's going to bring it's all you can play xbox game pass to the pc with more than 100 pc games Microsoft's own games will be available on game pass for pc on day one Members will get a 20 off discount in the windows store on games and 10 off downloadable content and add-ons Microsoft did not mention how much of this new service will cost when it will launch Or whether it will be able to be combined with the xbox version of game pass or be sold separately Microsoft also confirmed that more xbox game studio titles will come to steam Microsoft is also opening up support for native win 32 apps in the windows store Which previously was limited limited to universal windows platform apps and that will apply to games as well Do you uh, do you game on the pc at all nicole? I'm kind of a console person. I mean, I have I like all I play on is the switch These days because the switch is everything For me, but this sounds great If you if you an xbox microsoft person the all you can play game pass. I mean more more than 100 games That's great. I mean it would be interested to be able to combine them If you're an xbox person and also want to play on the pc, but they're not saying whether that's possible or not Roger. I know you were real excited about hi. I mean You know, it's it's essentially just kind of a net flake service for games That is, you know, gonna be introduced on the pc, which I think is great One of one of the big bug bears of playing games You know when you on the pc is that there really isn't a subscription service You buy you play and you get bored with it. You're kind of just stuck with Shelling out the 50 bucks or 60 bucks that you paid for it um This will definitely allow people to get more Uh A wider a broader range of games that they can try out without necessarily having to spend more Which I think is what's so compelling about it And if they combine it, I mean again, no one knows yet, but they really come out with the xbox Game pass That would be super dope because there you are essentially just paying for one service and you can play On two different platforms, whether it's in front of the tv on your couch in living room or you're holed up in your, you know, your work office space with your pc And you know, it's kind of something that microsoft has been working on They had play anywhere that allowed you to buy with the one game that you could play either on xbox or Or pc. I think there's maybe four or five titles. I actually did it Um But I mean it's it does kind of push the the the narrative that you know, microsoft wants these games to be kind of Platform eventually at some point maybe platform agnostic Where you know regardless of what what you're playing on you can play these games Do you would it matter to you if uh, you had to pay extra to get your xbox game pass and your your game pass for pc It depends on how much extra if it's like, you know, if it's basically the cost of both them together Maybe not But if it's just like maybe you know 15 20 percent more to include both I think there would be a lot of people that would totally Dive into that especially if they're portable accounts that you can say hey, you know I don't have a gaming pc But my dad does when I you know when when I go home from college I can go play in my family's computer. I just log in with my account You know and then I can you know play there and do whatever kind of like what you do with steam and microsoft studio titles coming to steam I always applaud more cross-platform ability So that's good. I I think they should do that not just make them available in the windows store 47 companies including apple google and whatsapp signed an open letter to the uk's gchq The uk's security agency urging the agency to abandon plans for a ghost protocol Ghost protocol sounds cool. Uh, it'd be a good name for an xbox game But it was in this case a proposal made in november by two uk government security experts describing a technique To send copies of messages to a third party like a law enforcement party Besides the intended one. So I want to send a message to nicole. I'm under suspicion or under a warrant My messages would also be diverted to a law enforcement officer Not just nicole without my knowledge The idea would be to surveil a target without breaking encryption So they're saying you don't have to put a back door in just divert the messages our way now the companies in this letter Object on two grounds one It would require the injection of a new public key into a conversation without telling people and two It would require companies to suppress notifications that appear when a new person joins a chat because in essence these Surveiled chats would become group chats. It's just only one person knows it's a group chat and the other two Think it's just between the two of them the companies say this would quote Undermine the authentication process that enables users to verify. They are communicating with the right people Introduce potential unintentional vulnerabilities and increase risks the communication systems could be abused or misused the national cyber security centers ian levy is one of the two authors of the proposal and said That the hypothetical proposal was always intended as a starting point for discussion and Quote we will continue to engage with interested parties and look forward to having an open discussion to reach The best solution possible. So nicole on the one hand, it doesn't seem like this really solves a lot of these companies concerns But on the other hand at least isn't a backdoor, right? yeah, um, i'm all i mean like i think i'm of A couple of minds about this i do i do agree that it's at least not at least not a backdoor So that's good on the other hand like i can totally see how this could be misused I can totally see how a bad actor could like be the you know, like the hidden A chat member in a chat and like You know being used for scams or spams or that kind of thing um, so yeah, I think that needs to be definitely more discussion about The authentication process making it maybe a little bit more transparent. Um making it A little bit clear of what exactly The government the government would have access to and what they wouldn't have access to This is a better example than backdoors. Backdoors are bad because backdoors can be used by anybody Uh, it's it's not hard to reverse engineer them once they're there I mean, it's hard, but it's not impossible and you want it to be impossible This says okay, don't put a backdoor. Just let us in on particular conversations Right, that's less of an issue because if everybody's doing it, right? Then theoretically only people with a warrant who are investigating people who deserve to be investigated would be let in Uh, but like you say it's still open for abuse And there is the potential as they say for unintentional vulnerability So maybe the ability to insert a secret public key It's not really public if it's secret But you know what I mean like insert a public key into conversation without the other two people knowing about it Could be hijacked That's a little more theoretical than backdoors, but it's still possible So the question becomes like the most secure system is a mechanical system where the company could say I don't touch anything It's encrypted end to end There's an authentication process that runs the same for everybody else And what this ghost protocol suggests is but every once in a while you should insert yourself and as soon as the company inserts itself It's not as secure as if it is just as if they are fully separated from it And so I guess my question is can you ever have a situation that allows responsible legitimate? law enforcement surveillance That is the big question and I don't think this answers it Yeah, so I don't think so either Bloomberg reports its sources say the u.s. Department of Justice wants sprint and t-mobile to help a fourth wireless carrier With its own network get started as a condition for approving the merger of t-mobile and sprint if you're like, huh In other words, they're saying okay sprint and t-mobile. You are the number of three and four carriers You can merge as long as you make sure there's a new fourth carrier Um new street research has blare 11 told bloomberg a fourth competitor could come from the cable industry Comcast and spectrum And dish have all got spectrum and they're all in engaged in a certain level of providing a wireless service Uh, so one of those providers Could reach a virtual network agreement An mvno agreement to fill in the gaps while it continues to build out its own infrastructure Meanwhile Reuters reports its sources say the t-mobile and sprint are considering divesting wireless spectrum in order to get approval for this deal So it sounds like they're at least thinking about it But the idea I guess would be to say to I don't know let's say dish You've got spectrum We'll give you a little more spectrum and we'll give you a deal to use our network as an mvno until you get your network up and running in exchange for approval of this merger I guess it's just weird because spectrum And comcast and all of those they're also giant companies in their own right I mean they have their own cable and that's a big giant company too. That's why I think I wonder what the doj really wants is a Fourth wire like a really a pure wireless carrier like a t-mobile or a sprint or something and not something that has a giant Other company. I I think what they I think what they want is a lack of consolidation. They're like we want to make sure There's a at least a fourth player here So I don't think it matters to them whether it's a big company or not I mean at&t and Verizon are large companies as well So so to me it's less about the size of the company in fact the size of the company may be appealing to the doj here Because they may say well you that that company then has a better chance of surviving a viable competitor I will say that the idea of mvno is in general. I think it's it's not really talked about a lot I in it seems like anyway, but they're actually a really great option I think google phiaism is actually really good. And I think they're you know, I think walmart has it has its own Uh a carrier and I know I know they're not like real wireless carriers but they're Actually really good viable affordable options that people should look into anyway The thing is they're dependent on these other carriers and so I know that's why they're saying the mvno could be a stopgak To help them get their infrastructure. But the goal would be to not have them be an mvno To in fact be a separate have separate infrastructure of their own That's fair Um, so yeah, I mean stoic squirrel says sprint could split off boost mobile T-mobile could split off metro pcs, but that wouldn't help You need what department of justice wants is somebody to build out their own fourth network Yeah That's gonna be hard I don't see t-mobile and sprint being real excited about helping somebody else Yeah, yeah, that's gonna be hard. So Uh, finally china's n real that's n r e a l Announced a consumer version of its light ar glasses to arrive later this year for four hundred ninety nine dollars Uh, if you if that rings a bell we talked about them at ces The glasses in this case though use a phone rather than a pc Like the ones showed off by real at ces remember they had a little attachment little computer Uh that you stuck in your pocket. That's what we saw at ces you saw those at ces too, right? Yeah Light ar looks like a pair of sunglasses except for the wire coming down the side of your face Uh that in this case plugs in by usbc to a smartphone running on qualcomm snapdragon 855 processor they include n real partners black shark two gaming phone the oppo remo 5g and the lg think q But theoretically any Phone with a usbc connection and a snapdragon 855 could use this Developer version that comes with that computing pack and a handheld controller that we saw at ces is also going to sell That one will be 1200 dollars though. So quite a bit more expensive It is a developer version Yeah, it's it's so they're shipping that one in september because they want developers to create apps That can use the light ar glasses when they have 499 dollar ships to the consumers later in the year Yeah, generally speaking, the available versions are more expensive because they usually bought by companies trying to test things out So I think you know it is $200, but that's not for consumers. Anyway, so I you know Think about that $500 version is the one that just yeah attached to a phone. Yeah, that's the one and It looks like sunglasses except for the wire coming off your head Better than a lot of these other augmented reality glasses that we've seen because it looks a little more normal But it still has a wire coming down, right? It's not wire less That's how it's able to look like sunglasses because it doesn't have to have a lot of stuff in it Uh, just a display, right? Yeah, I think honestly at this point I think that's not a bad way to go because I've seen the all-in-one Head stats and they're they're really kind of bulky and they're big and they don't look good on everybody because they're like those sort of the squarish frames and They're not that great Based on just my personal experience But I think you know something like I think right now from where we're at in terms of technology I think offloading the the battery and the processing from the rendering power onto a phone really makes a lot of sense It's cheaper too. It's $500 and phones are really good at rendering like that's what they do and I think it's Totally okay for these classes to use the phone for rendering Yeah, the stepdragon 855 is built to handle some augmented reality stuff. Yeah, literally So it's taking advantage of that. Who is this for though? Like I I I totally agree with you that this is better This is a better approach. It's a more consumer friendly approach to somebody who might want to start doing this It's similar to google cardboard and and those kinds of situations where they're like, hey, you just stick your phone And then you got some vr But who will do this who will pay 500 dollars to have this because The the major as you were saying you were down at santa clarita at the augmented reality conference the major Use case for these things is in business is in enterprise right now This is definitely not a business case this 499 dollar fancy glass you put on your face is really meant for consumers Yeah, and that's that's the question I think they what they really need to do is to sell the use case before they sell the hardware in some cases Like they have to say oh, this is what you're going to use it for You're going to use it for like watching movies or like cool apps or cool games or you can put your you know, email on the corner as you're Working on your document. They can multitask. I mean something like that. I think would maybe make the case a little bit better Uh, but right now the hardware is cool. The hardware is ready The software the applications are kind of the the x factor here Did you spend any time? Uh, did you see the unreal when you're at the conference? Yeah, I mean it's good quality like the display is sharp and the hardware looks cool I think it's really good good value for the price. It's just you know, the question of use case Yeah, make a use case for us and real come on. Let's do it Hey, folks, if you want to get all the tech headlines each day in about five minutes Be sure to subscribe to daily tech headlines dot com and thanks to everybody who participates in our subreddit You can submit stories and vote on them And it affects what we put in the show for sure as well as just being a great resource to keep up on Other things going on in the tech world outside of the bubble You can find that at daily tech news show dot reddit.com and uh conversations always going on in our facebook group facebook.com slash groups Slash daily tech news show. Let's check out the mailbag. Andrew wanted to comment on our laptop form factor discussion on yesterday's show We were talking about hp and dell and intel Building second screens into laptops foldable laptops and all that Andrew says hey guys long time listener recent patreon the honeycomb glacier laptops That's the intel one you talked about caught my attention Because as an all day laptop user, I love the idea of more screen real estate However, no one who has multiple monitors stacks them on top of each other They need to be side to side The concept from razor project valory back in early 2017 seems much more exciting and practical That's the one where the screens slide out from the side. It turns out it hasn't been practical because they haven't brought it to market Um, anyway, Andrew says two bonus full-size monitors folding out from the main display Perfection in a world of foldable and rollable screens. I'm surprised. No one has made this simple concept work I uh before we could move on because gary has his own take on On the the laptop form factors I want to point out that I actually used to put my monitor above my laptop monitor like I totally stacked them But that doesn't prove Andrew wrong. I'm crazy. Most people don't do that. Anyway, gary said I could think of all kinds of things I would do with a dual screen laptop Currently, I don't have a desktop windows pc I have a surface pro 4 that I plug a giant widescreen monitor into and I need more screen real estate However, it would be really nice to have a laptop where I could for instance Read a podcast script from the main screen while running audacity on the auxiliary screen Or have a google hangout on the auxiliary screen and a web version of cards against humanity on the main screen So players can talk together while playing the game for tasks like these jamming everything onto a laptop size screen is problematic A pop-up auxiliary screen on a laptop would allow folks to do these types of tasks without being tethered to an external monitor So it's not saying Andrew. It's not actually a counterpoint to Andrew But gary's just saying yeah, it's some kind of secondary screen does seem like a really cool idea Yeah, I think um, I think the only question I guess is that you would still have to have a You know an external keyboard, but that's I guess you're going to have it anyway Right if you're using this kind of dual screen devices. Well, did you see the honeycomb glacier one? It's got it's a laptop. So it's got the laptop keyboard Then it's got the secondary screen and then you got the main screen. So you don't need to In that situation, that's true. So, you know one of them I mean, I really like wing windows because one of the issues when I was looking at more of the the intel and the dell and the The Lenovo designs is that I already have neck issues like neck shoulder issues from sitting on a computer all day Just kind of even having had to even tilting my head down just, you know Half a degree just to look down. I can see being kind of an rsi Issue whereas if they were side by side You know, it I don't think it would be at least for me in my current Condition would be a little less problematic You know one of the reviewers I read though had exactly the same approach But liked honeycomb glacier because he said it moved the monitor farther up And so he felt like he was looking straight on at the laptop monitor And then he would tilt down when he needed to see the auxiliary monitor But he felt like it actually helped him have a better ergonomic stance I I love that they raised that and I think the easy way to do that is to build a built-in laptop stand that would raise your laptop Uh to get at eye level, but just just I don't know. I just the wing windows There's some about the wing screens that really appeal to me. They just haven't been able to make them practical I don't think or they would be out because I think everybody likes that idea But you got to make it so they don't bend and break and and get floppy and It's not that the screens themselves would break but the the connections Yeah, you know from sliding in and out is something you have to you have to be able to do Whereas this hinge that honeycomb glacier has seems really solid Yeah, the durability is definitely a question when it comes to these like extra screens By the way, nick with the c takes issue with the idea that no one wants stacked monitors and stoic squirrel uses stacked screens Because he uses the laptop and a monitor above it just like me. So we're not crazy There are a few of us Uh and finally yesterday we mentioned that intel doesn't do products We were talking about the intel reference design in relation to the honeycomb glacier, uh, but ion computers notes that they do get real close Arguably they do a product with the intel nuke the next unit of computing Which comes as both bare bones where you supply your own storage or fully loaded pc with windows 10 pre-installed for around five Or six hundred bucks kind of like a mac mini And the idea here is that intel's like we make all these parts We're just putting them in a form factor and selling them But it is essentially a pc. It just doesn't sell with a keyboard or monitor, but that's no different than a mac mini I adds I've had a lot of success with their systems in schools medical offices engineering firms and recently vr workstations using htc Vives with their recent hades canyon models with surprising collaboration with amd Which still blows my mind since i've been following pc hardware since the mid 90s So it's not even always intel's parts in there I digress if intel wanted to release more intel pc's in different form factors I would definitely check them out because of their previous six years continuing their design and improvements on their portable pc nuke systems So, uh, thank you ion computers for that. It's a good point. Those nucks are pretty much products out there for intel And thank you nicole for joining us Thank you for having me if you want to find more nicole. Where should people go? Well, you can check out what i'm talking about on a regular basis on twitter.com slash nicole For my working can just go to engage at dot com It i know you're working on some things you're not ready to talk about yet Are there any hints you can drop or just check back next week Be sure don't miss it. Be be looking at twitter.com slash nicole That's right Folks our goal each month is to get one more patron than last month and we are almost to the end of the month So be the person that makes sure we're over the top become a dts member and get an ad-free rss feed I've got an explainer of arm if you've been a little confused like is arm a chip maker why it's not a chip maker But then they are they not a patent troll I've got a special episode of editors desk coming to everybody at the five dollar a month level and up on saturday You get that you get the rss with the ad-free episodes You get special episodes looking back at tech news in the past at certain levels and more sign up In fact, you'll get roger's take on the ryzen chips coming out later today in a column at patreon.com dtns Our email addresses feedback at daily tech news show.com. We're live monday through friday at 4 30 p.m Eastern 20 30 utc you can find out more at daily tech news show.com slash live Tomorrow chris mancini from comedy film nerds is going to give us his impressions of the new star wars galaxy edge tech Disney amusement park and len peralta will be with us too talk to you then This show is part of the frog pants network Get more at frogpants.com Club hopes you have enjoyed this program Yeah, i'm kind of jealous that chris got in to see that already Have you seen the videos yet? Yeah all the trailers they look crazy and there's apparently some really cool Usages of smartphones Yeah You can kind of use it as like your past is like it's they star warsy buy it. They star warsy Your phone There are already people that have like built like little I don't know cases for their phones or that it looks more like an actual make it like not. Yeah Yeah Although they must sell them too. I guess. I don't know Oh Titles are being submitted in the irc and you can see them at showbot.chat realm.net 5g's a go go Blocking ad blocking who blocks the ad blockers. I feel like we've used that before maybe it's Gchq, please stop That's pretty funny. That's pretty funny these glasses are in real Let's see google is pitting chrome and stack them if you got them Regarding the monitors Oh, sounds like these glasses are in real. Yes. I like that Done. I want to make sure I spell in real correctly in real. Yeah, okay in real These glasses are in real so I talked to The in real people there and I didn't really talk too much for the on the show, but uh Basically, I was talking to them about use case and like people don't really use it so on so forth And she and she was saying again, I don't have no in other insides other than this, but she was saying Um, augmented reality is really like hot in china Or something like it's a really like up-and-coming thing. It's a really hot category. And of course, I have no way no way to Yeah To I have no way to objectively verify that. How do I verify that? I don't know Right, like there are there are definitely trends in china that are different than in north america. So I wouldn't necessarily Not believe it because it's not hot here But when a chinese company that's making an augmented reality glass tells me it's real hot in their home country I'm like, okay Maybe maybe I don't Have a bias to want to see it as being hot. I mean, I will say that a lot that a lot of Um, a our companies these are coming out of china No, and real rocket several others they're coming out. So that's a thing But I don't know how pot really is I want to hear it from somebody who's not employed That's right. I think it's not true. I just Yeah, yeah, I don't know. I really don't know because that is the kind of thing I look at I feel like The the fact that apps like we chat and now grab And others are becoming platforms we chat with But we chat kind of set the road for these messages to become platforms in southeast asian india That's a that's a boat that europe and and especially north america is missing big time And it's not like facebook didn't try to make messenger into more of a platform. They just couldn't do it right Oh, yeah, I mean the the chinese companies have such a foothold and we chat and um, it's another one that can't remember Take a tick tock. It's a chinese company. Yeah, so like those companies are massive So I look I always find these trends for that But I like for them like I didn't look I didn't find that out from we chat telling me how hot they were Yeah, like you just sort of naturally see it happening Um, the uh, good day internet title could be the temple of wellness done We are one mind it's either that one or you don't have a rice cooker does your mother know I've raised you poorly I do have a walk. Is that okay? I have a walk and it goes unused I do have a walk whoever uses a walk It's the thing is you need to be cooking a lot to use a walk because Because in with walk cooking all the prep all the work is in the prep, right? It's the dicing slicing it's like I got a microwave. Let me just unwrap the package It's For three minutes Yeah, I didn't take my cup noodles and empty it into the walk last night That's the thing about like Trying to be like all good about cooking sounds like me. It takes time. You got two kids jumping on you It's like It's the part's really good All right, um, I have a lot of work to do. All right. Yes, thanks. Oh, but thank you so much for having me. Thank you for being on Nicole Good risk And uh, youtube folks, uh, don't forget june 3rd moving to twitch.tv slash good day internet for the live version for the live version Uh, and uh video folks. Thanks for watching audio folks stick around. There's more to come