 The best way to join our organization is to get your free annual subscription to Newsletter censored with your gift to support this work. The newsletter of hard-hitting truth and news fighting censorship and conservative propaganda since 1977. There is nothing out there like the newsletter censored in the mainstream media or the press. This newsletter is the very best way to join and be a part of our organization. We're living the end times, so you need newsletter censored. Go to www.newslettercensored.com For the real hard-hitting truth, you need newsletter censored. And now, back to the show, by the way. Okay, we are back. Thank you very much. William Hamilton, moral of the third, for your words of wisdom and doing promo. And hopefully, you paused and read the Bible verses 4, How to Defeat a Conservative. How to Defeat a Conservative. All right, we will now get back to the readings. I used to love the Claymore Magazine. Oh, not anymore. And yes, it was mainly for the articles. Yes, sure. Well, you didn't really see much. But I wasn't exactly repulsed by the pictures. They only showed airbrushed pussies. Airbrushed pussies, you know, you didn't really see the labia or the labia, whatever you want to call it, Volvo, Pujo, Sa, Bernal, whatever. You didn't really see the parts, the prime parts. You just saw breasts, primarily. And of course, gorgeous young women. All right, go ahead. You may find that an odd admission for an avowed feminist, but I've always felt the argument over the sexual objectification of women tends to miss an important point. Yeah, but it's voluntary. Nobody's holding a shotgun to these women's heads. Namely, that sexuality is a part of life. Indeed, one of the best parts. So what's wrong in not representing, not presenting women as objects of a lure? What's wrong is behaving as if women can only be objects of a lure, as if they have no place or value beyond that expressed by face and form. Well, you know what? The sex act only lasts so long. Eventually, you have to start communicating with each other. Oh, God forbid! And if you're not compatible, if you don't have mental chemistry, you're not clicking properly, then it's not going to work out. You could have a misuniverse or a sports illustrated model, but if you have nothing in common and you're bored and you can't, you're not really conversing and you're not laughing together and you know, if nothing's happening after the sex act, I mean, what can you do? It's not going to really go long term. All that, there was a post up there on Facebook last night, I think it's called demisexualist or something, a person who requires emotions in his sexuality. Well, women tend to be like that. And then it was a survey. So they wanted people to, you know, do you agree or disagree? Based on reality for men and women, there should be a mental chemistry. I mean, I mean, otherwise it's just like glorified masturbation or hiring a prostitute. All that said, I've been trying to figure out how I feel about the recent news that Playboy, which pioneered the so-called sophisticated man's magazine, will soon stop publishing nude photos of women. Say bye-bye to Playboy, may it rest in peace. Beginning in March, its models will be scantily clad. You might as well just get sports illustrated or what's that man's magazine? The tip of my tongue, it's a man's magazine. Yeah, the swimsuit model. No, this is another one, Maxim. Oh, that's like Playboy, yeah. Yeah, but there's no news in a man's just scantily clad women and they talk about guy stuff in there. Yeah, yeah. It feels not unlike hearing that Disney World has fired Mickey Mouse or McDonald's has stopped selling big bags. I bet this is all the doing of Hugh Hefner's daughter. This sounds like a woman's touch, you know, but they might as well be scantily clad because if all you're seeing is nipples, I mean, well, you are seeing ass, but if they got a tongue bikini, you're seeing ass also. You know, it's like big deal. A famous brand, Jet-A-Zing, the very thing for which it is most famous, the thing by which it is defined. It's been 20 years or more since I was even a semi-regular reader of Hugh Hefner's magazine. That is true. I mean, yeah, that's very true. Apparently, I'm not the only one to fall away. In the 70s, when I first picked up Playboy, it claimed a circulation more than 5.5 million. The number has reportedly withered to about 800,000. Wow, shit. Oh, well, that's the way to crab cake crumbles. At one level, then, this is just a new iteration of an old story. Yeah. The decline of print. Jet magazine disappeared from newsstands last year. I see where you're going with this, and I agree. Newsweek's print edition died. Then was resurrected. Many once robust newspapers are now resemble pamphlets. Yeah, because with the popularity of smartphones, people are online constantly. They're online. At another level, however, Playboy's woes and its response to them present an interesting snapshot of a culture that, sexually speaking, pushed the envelope until it tore. At its founding in 1953, after all, Playboy was revolutionary. A frank celebration of carnal pleasures in the Eisenhower era. Well, when Lucy and Ricky were forced to sleep in separate beds. Yeah, and wearing their pajamas, having a button all the way to the top. And they're on their Adam's apple, I mean, on their necks. And they couldn't say pregnant on TV. Would they say with child or something? Or the stork came in visiting? The stork came in visiting? Years before Elvis. Scandalized America. Knocked up as worse as it is. My wiggling his hips. Yeah, that was a scandal back then. There was Hefner presenting screen goddess, Marilyn Monroe. Yeah, that was a very, it was a conservative nude. Very, yeah, yeah. Hosing starters and coquettish. On red velvet. Monroe and then late after that came Jane Mansfield. I had that picture of Marilyn Monroe somewhere in my morgue. But I don't know where to hell in it. Ann Margaret. You know, then women, they all started coming out of the woodwork. Blondes. Peroxide blondes. Was that actress Tuesday Welleson? But yes. Ursula Andrus of Bridecourt, yeah. It also carried titillation. No pun intended. And 62 years later Playboy has been swallowed by its own revolution. Swapped by its own tsunami. They did a sort of a satire. A satire of Playboy. And penthouse on the odd couple episode with John Aston played the president or CEO of this girly magazine. Yeah, I remember that. As CEO Scott Flanders told The New York Times, you're now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free. You're damn right. On the internet. So why read magazines? Pictures in a magazine. That's very true. Free porn is abound. It's many websites offer free porn. In other words. All kinds, too. If Playboy was born in an era of repression, it has reached its arpiers in a sexual wild west of free and easy pornography that airbrushed perfection of breasts and back sides feel quaint. You know, an anachronistic. I was told airbrushing is like the before and after of a woman, you know, without makeup, without cosmetics and with cosmetics. Professionally done. They look very different. Like airbrushed photographs in a magazine. The women do not have flawless skin like that. Flawless. And same thing with makeup. I saw photos of before and after celebrities, female, and they look like different women. More to the point. It is an era where in the commodification of the feminine form is ubiquitous. The double entendre has become for some one entendre too many to bother with. And sex is everywhere, all the time, often tiresomely so. Yeah, it's anybody who has access to being online. No matter how old they are or who they are, they can get free porn. They can watch free porn. It's like, I mean, is anything left to the imagination anymore? I don't think so. One doesn't feel liberated from sexual repression. That battle is over. One doesn't even feel titillated. One simply feels numb. And then you have the religious right-winged nuts that are anti-sex completely. Except when they do it. Except when they're involved. That's correct. They get caught. Mr. Swaggart. Mr. Swaggart. I'm talking about conservative politicians. Ditter. On and on and on. Now, who was that Republican that got this I don't know, escort pregnant and insisted on an abortion? And he was very anti-abortion. He was pro-life. He's great. He's great. He's great. He's great. Come on. You know, one of those Republicans that want to do away with Planned Parenthood and abortion completely. Who want to control your life? I'm not there. But when he knocks somebody up. Oh, you got to get an abortion. I guess, you know, my political career cannot be tarnished. Okay, I get it. Insert tabae into slot B and it feels pretty good. But then what? Here's to enter. What does it get? The peg in the hole? Tab A into slot B. Tab A into slot B. Seven bells. The unanswered what is the whole world outside of sex? There is one, you know. I'm gonna, I'm gonna. Though sometimes watching television for all its undeniable success enforcing a more honest appraisal of and appreciation for human sexuality. Hefner's magazine also seems the living embodiment of the axiom about being careful what you wish for. 62 years later we are living in a world playboy made. And if anyone is having trouble doing that, take heart. Apparently playboy's having trouble with it too. Oh well. Nothing lasts forever. Hey, 62 years is a freaking good run, no? For any company. Yeah. I mean, especially since in this case it's a magazine and reading unfortunately you know, reading the old fashion way is becoming less popular with high technology taking the backseat to high technology. It ain't cutting it, man. Well, the problem I have with online reading are two things. Quite often the font is too small for me to read. And it's very annoying to have to manually you know, enlarging enlarging the font every time I go to a page. Alright, number one, that's that. Number two it's just the glare of trying to read text, large amounts of text online. It's so, so glaring. Yes, it's a strain on the eyes. Unless I, there's a way to preset the font on every single freaking page I go to or preset what is it, the brightness and the contrast of the monitor but no, well I could probably do that to the monitor, the big flat screen but then there's the font. Hey, a lot of those health articles that people post on Holistic Health Talk the font is tiny. I mean really small and sometimes I'm like not only that, the color of the font light blue letters with a white background I can't read this you know, anyway. Lawton, Oklahoma Oh boy, I can imagine what this is. City officials are making changes to public library policies after a man who describes himself as a Satanist reserved space for a book signing. At the public library? At the public you would think he would be at a Barnes & Noble or something. Adam Daniels, 36 founder of the Oklahoma City based church of Araman booked space in accordance with library policy so that his client could read from the sign copies of Aramani Enlightenment. I bring that to a public building, Goethe Barnes & Noble for God's sakes. It's I imagine you could buy it there. A book that explains the basics of the church's non-traditional form of Satanism. Oh, he tweets Satanism. He's a Satanist. In other words it's a little different than the well, don't we have freedom of religion in this country? Yeah, if you want to worship butterflies and you want to start a butterfly cult you can't nobody could really stop you. And get a socialist tax right on? There's the problem. Tax exemption. Tax exemption. Okay. You'll get followers. Believe me today. When locals learned of it they began registering complaints with city officials. Jim Russell assistant city manager said that Daniels was protected under federal law. And next Tuesday's book signing will go forward. But he said the library's advisory committee has drawn up a draft of new policies concerning book signings and public readings. Among the recommendations is attendee age restrictions based on the content. Oh yeah, definitely. Definitely this is not for minors. Paris will be furious. Kids should make their own decisions when it comes to religion. You know, none of it can be proven. That's the funny part of the whole thing. The scientists have found fossil like hints that some kind of life existed on earth 4.1 billion years ago when the planet was a mere volcanic coddler. You'd be surprised what living creatures can survive even extreme temperatures. It's amazing. Well, there are some that live in the volcano itself. Living organisms? Yes. Now, that is incredible. That is 300 million years earlier than it was previously thought life had emerged. Not only does that change scientists' concept of earth soon after it formed about 4.5 billion years ago but it gives them reason to theorize that life itself is more plentiful throughout the universe because it seemed to start up so quickly. They're finding they're finding planets that have an atmosphere and similar temperatures and water and you know, I mean, hey. The study was published on Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Now, they're okay there is a possibility that there is life other forms of life in the universe but God if you're serious about your Christianity God chose the earth the earthlings to be the chosen people. You know what I mean? But there is a possibility that there are other different forms of life. Wait, the Bible says there's only one the Bible says there's no other forms of living horseshit horseshit. That's human arrogance. No, no, no, no, no the Bible doesn't say that there is no possibility the Bible says there is no other forms of life you hear what I'm saying? I'm not saying humanoid. There is no other forms of life anywhere in the universe that's human arrogance. It's arrogance, I'm sorry between you and the universe is in decay because of Lucifer and his time spent on the earth you probably think that all the sightings are there are demons in disguise we don't know where they are sightings is galore the Bible also says that the earth was created at the same time as the universe that's something like 13.5 billion years ago, not 4.5 million I could dig that I could accept that, sure the Bible says a lot but to say that is not agreed to by man I do not think but that's you think the interpretation that there is no other forms of life anywhere in the universe I don't think the Bible is saying that what is it saying then? it strictly talks about the creation of the universe it mentions the heavens and it mentions the earth but it does not say there is no other life anywhere in the universe except earth yes it does oh really? deductive reasoning really deductive reasoning here we go his perception versus other people's perception well show me the verse not now but I mean there are many of them you can't show me the verse you just don't you like the concept of knowing the universe how do you know the Bible says that because that's what it does well that's how you interpreted it no that's what it says when you actually read it you see how the fights start well then I want to read it well then read it show me not now do your homework prove all things whole fast that which is good prove it Bill Eisenman doesn't do that for James Madonna James Madonna does it for himself hey buddy boy you misinterpreted that verse lazy baby you misinterpreted that verse there are not one verse there are many verses that as plain as they show you that there is no life except on the planet earth after the resurrection after the other resurrection after the other resurrection and some of those spirit beings move to the other planet then life will be on the other planet but not now so all these the universe is in travail like a pregnant woman about to deliver humans toho and boom humans historically have been shown to be the most arrogant the most naughty pompous self centered creatures on the planet alone on the planet your perception is your interpretation that there is no other life anywhere in the universe that's it I feel like I'm arguing with with Kim with Kim Davis that's it no say you don't accept it read the bible I gotta read the whole book to find the whole book stop being lazy you know you can create bill morrow you're all older men as part of male menopause they have to they have to be right all the time holy shit it's the bible your interpretation might be wrong does it say plain as day bible you're being a baby bible you're being the baby does it say plain as day there's no other life in the universe except earth absolutely read it it's not one scripture the bible has to have all the scriptures put together one's referring to the same thing here a little and there a little what can I search in the concordance what words do you recommend no concordance you have to read the whole sure I'm gonna read that whole big humongous book oh sure end of argument